Motion and image artifacts of various intracranial aneurysm clips in a magnetic field

MRI in patients with a cerebral aneurysm clip; review of the literature and incident databases and recommendations for the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

In the past ferromagnetic cerebral aneurysm clips that are contraindicated for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have been implanted. However, the specific clip model is often unknown for older clips, which poses a problem for individual patient management in clinical care.

METHODS

Literature and incident databases were searched, and a survey was performed in the Netherlands that identified time periods at which ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic clip models were implanted. Considering this information in combination with a national expert opinion, we describe an approach for risk assessment prior to MRI examinations in patients with aneurysm clips. The manuscript is limited to MRI at 1.5 T or 3 T whole body MRI systems with a horizontal closed bore superconducting magnet, covering the majority of clinical Magnetic Resonance (MR) systems.

RESULTS

From the literature a list of ferromagnetic clip models was obtained. The risk of movement or rotation of the clip due to the main magnetic field in case of a ferromagnetic clip is the main concern. In the incident databases records of four serious incidents due to aneurysm clips in MRI were found. The survey in the Netherlands showed that from 2000 onwards, no ferromagnetic clips were implanted in Dutch hospitals.

DISCUSSION

Recommendations are provided to help the MR safety expert assessing the risks when a patient with a cerebral aneurysm clip is referred for MRI, both for known and unknown clip models. This work was part of the development of a guideline by the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists.

Artifact quantification and tractography from 3T MRI after placement of aneurysm clips in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients

Background

The application of advanced 3T MRI imaging techniques to study recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is complicated by the presence of image artifacts produced by implanted aneurysm clips. To characterize the effect of these artifacts on image quality, we sought to: 1) quantify extent of image artifact in SAH patients with implanted aneurysm clips across a range of MR sequences typically used in studies of volumetry, blood oxygen level dependent signal change (BOLD-fMRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DW-MRI) and 2) to explore the ability to reconstruct white matter pathways in these patients.

Methods

T1- and T2-weighted structural, BOLD-fMRI, and DW-MRI scans were acquired at 3T in two patients with titanium alloy clips in ACOM and left ACA respectively. Intensity-based planimetric contouring was performed on aligned image volumes to define each artifact. Artifact volumes were quantified by artifact/clip length and artifact/brain volume ratios and analyzed by two-way (scan-by-rater) ANOVAs. Tractography pathways were reconstructed from DW-MRI at varying distances from the artifacts using deterministic methods.

Results

Artifact volume varied by MR sequence for length (p = 0.007) and volume (p < 0.001) ratios: it was smallest for structural images, larger for DW-MRI acquisitions, and largest on fMRI images. Inter-rater reliability was high (r = 0.9626, p < 0.0001), and reconstruction of white matter connectivity characteristics increased with distance from the artifact border. In both patients, reconstructed white matter pathways of the uncinate fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus were clearly visible within 2 mm of the artifact border.

Conclusions

Advanced 3T MR can successfully image brain tissue around implanted titanium aneurysm clips at different spatial ranges depending on sequence type. White matter pathways near clip artifacts can be reconstructed and visualized. These findings provide a reference for designing functional and structural neuroimaging studies of recovery in aSAH patients after clip placement.

Cerebral aneurysm clips in the 3-tesla magnetic field

Object

The aim of this study was to evaluate cerebral aneurysm clips, and to know in more detail the characteristics of currently available clips in the 3-T magnetic field.

Methods

According to the protocol recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), the authors conducted quantitative evaluation for displacement force and qualitative evaluation for torque in 52 aneurysm clips and 48 samples of raw materials in the 3-T environment.

Results

The largest displacement force occurred near the bore opening, and the force was directed to the isocenter. Deflection angles of all objects in this study were within 45°. The translational force in the peripheral position in the bore was larger than that in the center, and the translational force in the magnetic field was proportional to the weight of the objects. The proportion coefficients varied depending on the metallic materials. In the titanium alloy, the deflection angle was also detected to be approximately 2°, although no response was observed in titanium in a previous report. This behavior was similar to that of the Elgiloy and Phynox materials in the 1.5-T environment. No difference was observed among the groups of shapes (straight, bent, and fenestrated). The amount of torque that occurred was dependent on the clip's or material's loop and bent shape. The torque on the titanium was perpendicular to the torque on the other materials (which was perpendicular to the magnetic field).

Conclusions

Care must be taken with patients near the bore opening while moving them to the center of the magnet's bore on the MR imaging table. Although all the clips examined in this study met the ASTM requirements, the titanium alloy clips are preferable in the 3-T environment for safety's sake. Suitably sized clips should be selected for the aneurysm size, because the translational force increases proportionally to the object's weight.

Artifacts of vena cava filters ex vivo on MR angiography

We evaluated magnetic susceptibility artifacts of nine types of vena cava filters in MR angiography (MRA) at 1.0T ex vivo in order to assess the filters' compatibility with MRA. Each filter (tulip filter, tulip MReye filter, stainless Greenfield filter, titanium Greenfield filter, TrapEase filter, Simon filter, LGM Vena-Tech filter, Antheor temporary filter, and Bird's nest filter) was inserted into an acrylic tube (20 or 25 mm in diameter, 15 or 30 cm in length). Gd-DTPA was poured into each tube at a concentration of 1/500 and each was placed in a water-filled container for imaging. We evaluated artifacts of the filters according to the following criteria: signal void beyond the tube, 3+; signal void within the tube but at more than one-half the diameter of the tube, 2+; and signal void within the tube but at less than one-half the diameter of the tube, 1+. We evaluated artifacts originating at the tip, intermediate portion, and distal end of the filters. We judged the artifacts as follows: tulip (3+, 3+, 3+); tulip MReye (2+, 1+, 1+); stainless Greenfield (2+, 1+, 2+); titanium Greenfield (1+, 1+, 1+); TrapEase (1+, 2+, 1+); Simon (2+, 2+, 1+); LGM (2+, 2+, 1+); Antheor (2+, 2+, 2+); and Bird's nest (3+, 3+, 3+). The numbers in parentheses refer to the degree of signal void at the tip, intermediate portion, and distal end of the filter, respectively. The tulip filter and Bird's nest filter made of 304 stainless steel caused extensive signal voids beyond the areas defined by the filters. The signal voids in the remaining seven filters were limited to within the tube. We concluded that seven of the nine filters were compatible with MRA ex vivo.

A national survey of attitudes towards the use of MRI in patients known to have intracranial aneurysm clips

The objective of this study was to determine the attitudes and practice of neuroradiology centres across the UK regarding the use of MRI in patients known to have intracranial aneurysm clips. A postal survey comprising three questions and a comments section was sent to 35 neuroradiology centres across the UK. There were 32 (91%) respondents to the single questionnaire. 16 (50%) respondents said that they would not consider performing MRI on a patient with an intracranial aneurysm clip. Of the remaining 50%, all said that identification of the clip type and assurance of its safety would be needed prior to scanning the patient. The magnetic strength of the system did not appear to affect the decision regarding whether or not to perform MRI on such patients. There was a variation in attitude towards the use of MRI in such patients between different regions. Neuroradiology centres are equally divided in their attitude and practice about whether it is safe to use MR to image a patient known to have an intracranial aneurysm clip. This is most probably due to the conflicting literature, as well as uncertainty about the identification and ferromagnetic properties of individual clips.

Aneurysm clips: effects of long-term and multiple exposures to a 1.5-T MR system

The authors evaluated the ferromagnetic properties of multiple nonferromagnetic aneurysm clips before and after long-term and multiple exposures to a 1.5-T magnetic resonance system. No alterations in the magnetic properties of these clips was observed. These findings suggest that repeated or chronic exposure of patients with implanted nonferromagnetic aneurysm clips to strong static magnetic fields is unlikely to result in any clinically significant alteration in the magnetic properties of these clips.