Improvement of coronary morphology and blood flow after stenting. Assessment by intravascular ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler

Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: Its use and abuse

Clinical decision making in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis is still debated. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination and/or functional assessment of coronary stenosis by fractional flow reserve (FFR) are currently used to define the severity of such lesions. There are very few studies with a small sample size that have a head-to-head comparison between IVUS and FFR in the evaluation of angiographically de novo intermediate lesions. There are no randomized, controlled trials to demonstrate the superiority of IVUS versus FFR in providing improved clinical outcomes in comparison with angiography alone. However, the issue of superiority might be irrelevant, because IVUS and FFR could be complementary techniques to be used in the catheterization laboratory to provide critical anatomic and functional data that permit more accurate decisions in the management of the patient.

Turbulent flow as a cause for underestimating coronary flow reserve measured by Doppler guide wire

Background

Doppler-tipped coronary guide-wires (FW) are well-established tools in interventional cardiology to quantitatively analyze coronary blood flow. Doppler wires are used to measure the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). The CFVR remains reduced in some patients despite anatomically successful coronary angioplasty. It was the aim of our study to test the influence of changes in flow profile on the validity of intra-coronary Doppler flow velocity measurements in vitro. It is still unclear whether turbulent flow in coronary arteries is of importance for physiologic studies in vivo.

Methods

We perfused glass pipes of defined inner diameters (1.5 – 5.5 mm) with heparinized blood in a pulsatile flow model. Laminar and turbulent flow profiles were achieved by varying the flow velocity. The average peak velocity (APV) was recorded using 0.014 inch FW. Flow velocity measurements were also performed in 75 patients during coronary angiography. Coronary hyperemia was induced by intra-coronary injection of adenosine. The APV maximum was taken for further analysis. The mean luminal diameter of the coronary artery at the region of flow velocity measurement was calculated by quantitative angiography in two orthogonal planes.

Results

In vitro, the measured APV multiplied with the luminal area revealed a significant correlation to the given perfusion volumes in all diameters under laminar flow conditions (r² > 0.85). Above a critical Reynolds number of 500 – indicating turbulent flow – the volume calculation derived by FW velocity measurement underestimated the actual rate of perfusion by up to 22.5 % (13 ± 4.6 %). In vivo, the hyperemic APV was measured irrespectively of the inherent deviation towards lower velocities. In 15 of 75 patients (20%) the maximum APV exceeded the velocity of the critical Reynolds number determined by the in vitro experiments.

Conclusion

Doppler guide wires are a valid tool for exact measurement of coronary flow velocity below a critical Reynolds number of 500. Reaching a coronary flow velocity above the velocity of the critical Reynolds number may result in an underestimation of the CFVR caused by turbulent flow. This underestimation of the flow velocity may reach up to 22.5 % compared to the actual volumetric flow. Cardiologists should consider this phenomena in at least 20 % of patients when measuring CFVR for clinical decision making.

Coronary Flow Reserve after Coronary Intervention is Similar in Patients with Preserved Viability in Previous Myocardial Infarction and in Those with Angina Pectoris

The relationship between coronary flow reserve (CFR) and viability in the infarcted myocardium has not been fully clarified. We measured coronary blood flow velocity immediately after coronary intervention (with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] or stenting) in 38 patients with previous myocardial infarction and preserved viability and 48 with angina pectoris. CFR was calculated and was similar between the two patient groups. No differences in the incidence of post-intervention CFR > 2.0 were detected; there were no differences in postintervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent PTCA. Coronary stenting reduced the percentage diameter stenosis in both groups compared with PTCA and slightly increased the post-intervention CFR. No differences were, however, detected in postintervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent additional stenting. These results reveal that in patients with preserved myocardial viability, post-intervention CFR was restored to values similar to those in patients with angina pectoris.

Vein graft function improvement after percutaneous intervention: evaluation with MR flow mapping

PURPOSE

To provide functional reference values in single and sequential vein grafts by using magnetic resonance (MR) flow mapping and to examine the effect of percutaneous intervention (PCI) on coronary artery bypass graft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fast MR flow mapping at baseline and during adenosine-induced stress was performed in 39 nonstenotic single vein grafts and 20 nonstenotic sequential vein grafts, as well as in 15 stenotic vein grafts before and 7.3 weeks +/- 1.5 after successful PCI. We evaluated the following parameters (in terms of mean values +/- SDs): average peak velocity (APV) at baseline, stress APV, and velocity reserve. Parameters in nonstenotic single and sequential vein grafts were compared by means of unpaired two-tailed Student t testing. To evaluate changes in velocities before and after PCI, a paired two-tailed Student t test was used. P <.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

Reference values in single vein grafts for baseline APV, stress APV, and velocity reserve were 8.6 cm/sec +/- 3.4, 20.2 cm/sec +/- 9.5, and 2.4 +/- 0.8, respectively. In sequential vein grafts, significantly higher values for baseline APV (12.2 cm/sec +/- 5.0) and stress APV (27.2 cm/sec +/- 10.6) but a similar velocity reserve (2.3 +/- 0.7) were found. Significant improvements were observed after PCI in baseline APV (before PCI: 9.2 cm/sec +/- 6.6; after PCI: 12.9 cm/sec +/- 7.9; P =.008) and stress APV (before PCI: 12.9 cm/sec +/- 6.3; after PCI: 27.1 cm/sec +/- 13.9; P <.001). No improvement in velocity reserve was observed.

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher absolute velocity and flow values were observed in sequential versus single vein grafts, underscoring the need for separate functional reference values for different graft types. Graft function showed significant improvement after PCI to the point that it was restored or nearly restored to reference values.

Intermediate coronary artery stenosis: evidence-based decisions in interventions to avoid the oculostenotic reflex

The prevalence of intermediate coronary artery stenosis (defined as a diameter stenosis of 40% to 70%) is quite large in patients undergoing PTCA. The coronary angiogram is considered the 'gold standard' for the definition of coronary anatomy, in spite of various limitations associated with its use. In recent years, sensor tipped guidewire based methods of physiologic assessment of stenosis severity, like myocardial fractional flow reserve, and poststenotic coronary flow reserve had established their role in the decision making in catheterization laboratory. The decision making should combine morphologic and physiologic assessment as better evidence based approach in guiding therapy to avoid the 'oculostenotic reflex'.

Improvement of myocardial perfusion reserve early after coronary intervention: assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the potential value of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion in the follow-up of patients after coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

In some patients a residual impairment of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) early after successful coronary intervention has been observed. In this study we evaluated an MPR index before and after intervention with magnetic resonance.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with single- and multivessel coronary artery disease were studied before and 24 h after intervention. The signal intensity time curves of the first pass of a gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentacetic acid bolus injected via a central vein catheter were evaluated before and after dipyridamole infusion. The upslope was determined using a linear fit. Myocardial perfusion reserve index was estimated from the alterations of the upslope.

RESULTS

The MPR index in segments perfused by the stenotic artery was significantly lower than in the control segments (1.07 +/- 0.24 vs. 2.18 +/- 0.35, p < 0.001) and improved significantly after intervention (1.89 +/- 0.39, p < 0.001) but did not normalize completely (p < 0.01). After intervention the MPR index remained significantly lower in the balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group (1.72 +/- 0.38; n = 13) in comparison with the stent group (1.99 +/- 0.36, n = 18, p < 0.05). In the stent group a complete normalization of the MPR index was found 24 h after stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements allow a reliable assessment of MPR index. An improvement of MPR index can be observed after coronary intervention, which is more pronounced after stenting. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements allow the assessment and may be useful for the follow-up of patients with coronary artery disease after coronary intervention.

Safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of Doppler-tipped guide wires, intracoronary Doppler flow measurement has been increasingly accepted as an additional diagnostic approach in the catheterization laboratory. However, the safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement has not been well-investigated. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement using the Doppler FloWire (Cardiometrics, Mountain View, Calif).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 906 patients were examined by intracoronary Doppler with a 0.014-inch or an 0.018-inch Doppler FloWire. For coronary flow reserve measurement, intracoronary injection of adenosine or papaverine was used. Of the patients studied, 77 were cardiac transplant recipients and 829 were patients who had not received a transplant, of whom 617 had undergone diagnostic coronary procedures and 212 had coronary interventions. In 27 (2.98%) of 906 patients adverse cardiac events were observed. Fifteen (1.66%) of 906 patients had severe transient bradycardia develop (asystole or second- to third-degree atrioventricular block) after intracoronary administration of adenosine, 14 of which occurred in the right coronary artery and 1 in the left anterior descending artery. Nine (0.99%) of 906 patients had coronary spasm during the passage of the Doppler wire (5 in the right coronary artery, 4 in the left anterior descending artery). Two (0.22%) of 906 patients had ventricular fibrillation during the procedure. Hypotension with bradycardia and ventricular extrasystole each occurred in 1 (0.11%) of 906 patients. The incidence of complication was significantly higher in transplant recipients than in patients who underwent either diagnostic or interventional procedures (12.99% vs 2.43% vs 0.94%, P <.001). The Doppler measurements in the right coronary artery were associated with a higher incidence of complications, especially bradycardia, compared with the left anterior descending and the left circumflex arteries (right coronary, 5.87% vs left anterior descending, 1.05% vs left circumflex, 0.17%; P <.001). All complications were cured medically.

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary Doppler flow measurement with Doppler wires and intracoronary administration of adenosine is a safe method. However, severe complications such as bradycardia and coronary spasm can occur. Attention should be paid to the examination of the right coronary artery, especially in heart transplant recipients.

Pressure-wire guided balloon angioplasty in allograft coronary vasculopathy

We report a case of successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty guided from pressure-wire measurements in a transplanted patient. Fractional flow reserve, a lesion-specific, pressure-independent index of functional stenosis severity, was used to guide the intervention.

Prevalence of microvascular disease in patients with significant coronary artery disease

Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement using intracoronary Doppler techniques has been increasing accepted for the assessment of physiological significance of epicardial stenosis and the functional changes after coronary interventions. However, large discrepancy exists concerning the acute changes of CFVR immediately after intervention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of microvascular dysfunction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Intracoronary Doppler flow measurements were performed in a total of 212 patients who underwent coronary interventions because of significant epicardial stenosis using 0.014" Doppler flow wire (Cardiometrics, Inc, Mountain View, CA). Intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine (12 micrograms for the right coronary and 18 micrograms for the left coronary arteries) was used to induce hyperemic reaction. CFVR was registered as the ratio of average peak velocity during hyperemia (hAPV) to at baseline (bAPV). Successful coronary interventions either by percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) or by stenting could significantly improve the CFVR. In 80 patients with PTCA, the bAPV elevated from 16.6 +/- 2.1 cm/s to 20.6 +/- 13.4 cm/s and hAPV from 30.1 +/- 15.9 cm/s to 45.2 +/- 17.7 cm/s (both p < 0.001) with PTCA and the CFVR increased from 1.94 +/- 0.78 to 2.58 +/- 0.87 correspondingly (p < 0.001). Significant elevation of coronary flow parameters were also found in 132 patients with subsequent stent implantation (bAPV from 15.3 +/- 6.7 cm/s to 18.7 +/- 9.1 cm/s, hAPV from 28.7 +/- 14.4 cm/s to 44.3 +/- 17.7 cm/s and CFVR from 1.90 +/- 0.70 to 2.59 +/- 0.87, all p < 0.001). Reduction of CFVR (< 3.0) after intervention still existed in 46 (61.3%) of 80 patients after PTCA and 88 (66.7%) of 132 patients after stenting. Moreover, CFVR < 3.0 were found in 50 (45.9%) of 109 reference vessels in patients with single vessel disease. Significant improvement of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve could be obtained after successful angioplasty. However, microvascualr dysfunction existed in a large proportion of patients either in normal reference vessels or in target vessels after interventions.

Coronary microembolization--its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions

The diagnosis coronary artery disease is classically based on patient's symptoms and morphology, as analyzed by angiography. The importance of risk factors for the development of coronary atherosclerosis and disturbance of coronary vasomotion is clearly established. However, microembolization of the coronary circulation has also to be taken into account. Microembolization may occur as a single or as multiple, repetitive events, and it may induce inflammatory responses. Spontaneous microembolization may occur, when the fibrous cap of an atheroma or fibroatheroma (Stary i.v. and Va) ruptures and the lipid pool with or without additional thrombus formation is washed out of the atheroma into the microcirculation. Such events with progressive thrombus formation are known as cyclic flow variations. Plaque rupture occurs more frequently than previously assumed, i.e. in 9% of patients without known heart disease suffering a traffic accident and in 22% of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Also, in patients dying from sudden death microembolization is frequently found. Patients with stable and unstable angina show not only signs of coronary plaque rupture and thrombus formation, but also microemboli and microinfarcts, the only difference between those with stable and unstable angina being the number of events. Appreciation of microembolization may help to better understand the pathogenesis of ischemic cardiomyopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy and acute coronary syndromes, in particular in patients with normal coronary angiograms, but plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound. Also, the benefit from glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist is better understood, when not only the prevention of thrombus formation in the epicardial atherosclerotic plaque, but also that of microemboli is taken into account. Microembolization also occurs during PTCA, inducing elevations of troponin T and I and elevations of the ST segment in the EKG. Elevated baseline coronary blood flow velocity, as a potential consequence of reactive hyperemia in myocardium surrounding areas of microembolization, is more frequent in patients with high frequency rotablation than in patients with stenting and in patients with PTCA. The hypothesis of iafrogenic microembolization during coronary interventions is now supported by the use of aspiration and filtration devices, where particles with a size of up to 700 microns have been retrieved. In the experiment, microembolization is characterized by perfusion-contraction mismatch, as the proportionate reduction of flow and function seen with an epicardial stenosis is lost and replaced by contractile dysfunction in the absence of reduced flow. The analysis of the coronary microcirculation, in addition to that of the morphology and function of epicardial coronary arteries, and in particular appreciation of the concept of microembolization will further improve the understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease.

Effect of stenting on coronary flow velocity reserve: comparison of coil and tubular stents

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether coil stents are as effective as tubular stents in improving coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) after stent deployment.

METHODS

Distal CFVR was measured with a 0. 014 inch Doppler guide wire before and after stenting in 33 patients. A coil stent was implanted in 16 patients and a tubular stent was used in 17 patients. Coronary flow velocity within the stent was also recorded during a slow pullback.

RESULTS

Following placement of the stents, the percentage diameter stenosis was similar for both the tubular and coil stents (mean (SE) 11 (2)% v 13 (2)%, NS). However, distal CFVR was higher after stenting with a tubular stent compared with a coil stent (2.46 (0.13) v 1.96 (0.14), p < 0.05). Furthermore, pullback through the stent detected a major flow velocity increase within coil stents but not in tubular stents (83 (24)% v 5 (5)%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of similar angiographic improvement, placement of coil stents was associated with inferior functional results compared with tubular stents. The flow velocity acceleration within the coil stents suggests the presence of a residual narrowing within the stent, which is not appreciated on angiography.

Early recovery of coronary flow reserve after stent implantation as assessed by positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate myocardial flow reserve in patients early after coronary stent implantation using positron emission tomography.

BACKGROUND

Delayed restoration of coronary flow reserve after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been observed using a variety of techniques. Altered distal vasoregulation as well as residual stenosis have been considered possible explanations for this phenomenon. Although the implantation of stents may influence some of these mechanisms, little data are available characterizing coronary flow reserve early after stent placement.

METHODS

In 14 patients 1.6 +/- 0.6 days after stenting, N-13-ammonia positron emission tomographic studies were performed at rest and during adenosine-induced vasodilation. Myocardial blood flow was quantified using a three-compartment model. Rest and stress flow data, as well as coronary flow reserve of stented vascular territories, were compared with that of remote areas.

RESULTS

The stenosis decreased from 72.1 +/- 7.3% to 3.7 +/- 6.7% after stent implantation. Coronary flow in the stented areas did not differ significantly from that in remote areas either at rest (76.1 +/- 18.5 and 75.7 +/- 17.7 ml/min/100 g, respectively), or during maximal vasodilation (205.5 +/- 59.9 and 179.4 +/- 47.4 ml/min/100 g, respectively). In addition, there was no significant difference in the calculated values of coronary reserve of these two regions (2.74 +/- 0.64 and 2.43 +/- 0.55, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical support of dilated arteries by a stent not only restores the macroscopic integrity of epicardial arteries, but also results, in contrast to conventional PTCA procedures, in early recovery of flow reserve.

Measuring maximal percent area stenosis poststent placement with intracoronary Doppler and the continuity equation and correlation with intracoronary ultrasound and angiography

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) are methods for anatomic assessment of stent deployment. Intracoronary Doppler is primarily a method for the physiologic assessment of coronary stenoses. It correlates well with traditional noninvasive measurements of lesion significance. Intracoronary Doppler was used for the anatomic assessment of de novo coronary artery stenosis with variable success; however, its use for anatomic assessment of adequate stent deployment is unavailable. A rapid, automated software program was developed based on a modified continuity equation to calculate the maximal in-stent percent area stenosis by comparing the maximal in-stent velocity to an average reference velocity (proximal and distal). This study was designed to compare the Doppler method of an anatomic assessment with QCA and ICUS in 15 patients. Physiologic success of stent deployment was determined by the distal coronary flow reserve to 24 to 36 microg of intracoronary adenosine. Following successful stent deployment, distal coronary flow reserve increased significantly from a baseline of 1.6 +/- 0.5 to 2.9 +/- 1.1. There was a significant correlation between the maximal in-stent percent area stenosis as measured by Doppler and both QCA (r = 0.78, p <0.01) and ICUS (r = 0.84, p <0.01). This study demonstrates that maximal in-stent percent area stenosis can be measured by intracoronary Doppler and a novel software program. The intracoronary Doppler guidewire method can assess the adequacy of stent deployment using both anatomic and physiologic principles and may supplement other quantitative methodologies.

Accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with stents in native coronary arteries

Strategies to noninvasively evaluate patients after coronary stenting have not been evaluated. To determine the accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging in patients after coronary stenting, 209 patients who had undergone stenting followed by late stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging were evaluated. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in 33 patients following SPECT imaging. SPECT restenosis was defined as a reversible or fixed defect within the stented vascular territory. Angiographic restenosis was examined using 2 definitions: total area narrowing > or =50% or > or =70% of the stent site or stented artery. The SPECT and angiographic findings were concordant in 22 of 33 stented vascular territories using the 50% definition of restenosis and in 29 of 33 stented territories using the 70% definition. Use of the 70% definition of restenosis resulted in improved accuracy of SPECT to detect a significant stenosis in the stented artery. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SPECT were 95%, 73%, 88%, 89%, and 88% respectively. In patients with positive SPECT scans, the most significant stenosis in the stented artery was outside the stent site in 50% of cases. SPECT imaging appears to be accurate to predict significant stenosis in the stented artery, although the most severe stenosis is frequently distant from the stent site.

Clinical application of coronary flow reserve using an intracoronary Doppler guide wire

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a critical measurement in the assessment of the coronary circulation. The development of this physiologic variable in animal and human studies is reviewed. Human studies documenting the limitations of coronary angiography, especially in the setting of severe diffuse coronary artery disease, are analyzed. Furthermore, the important variables that must be accounted for when CFR is measured are examined. With this background, the application of CFR in a variety of clinical settings and the development and use of the Doppler FloWire for its measurement are discussed.

Ultrasound-guided stent placement

IVUS imaging has dramatically increased understanding of the process of coronary stent placement. Preintervention or diagnostic IVUS has been shown to be of value before stent placement to assess lesion severity and length as well as the degree and location of calcification. Before stent placement, ultrasound dimensions may also be used to select the appropriate type and size of device. Although studies are in progress to define the role of prestent ultrasound imaging, much interest centers around the use of IVUS to detect significant superficial coronary calcium and direct rotational atherectomy before stent placement. Clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of IVUS-guided coronary stent placement without postprocedure warfarin anticoagulation. Although it has been established subsequently that reduced anticoagulation may be administered to low-risk patients without IVUS guidance, three important points have been established by these trials. First, IVUS is superior to angiography for assessment of adequate stent expansion and apposition. As noted in several studies, angiography frequently overestimates lumen dimensions after stent placement. Second, IVUS-guided stent implantation yields larger acute stent dimensions. Third, IVUS-guided therapy in the form of additional stent placement or use of a larger balloon does not increase stent procedure complication rates when appropriate criteria for optimal stent placement are used. A randomized clinical trial (AVID) of angiography-directed versus IVUS-directed coronary stent placement is in progress (with a second soon to begin enrollment). In this trial, ultrasound guidance has been shown to improve acute procedural results, providing larger lumen dimensions without an increase in complication rates. IVUS guidance, however does not appear to affect the incidence of stent thrombosis within 30 days in the present era of high-pressure balloon inflations and aggressive antiplatelet therapy. Results concerning the effect of ultrasound-guided therapy on long-term target lesion revascularization rates are pending. To date, IVUS imaging has greatly contributed to advancements in coronary stent placement techniques. The future of IVUS-guided coronary stent placement will, of course, depend on the results of several ongoing clinical trials.

Coronary flow reserve during coronary angioplasty in patients with a recent myocardial infarction: relation to stenosis and myocardial viability

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we examined post-stenotic coronary flow before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with and without a recent myocardial infarction (MI) and related it to stenosis severity and residual viability.

BACKGROUND

Post-stenotic coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFVR) has been used with success to estimate functional stenosis severity in patients with stable angina. However, in patients with a recent MI, the impaired coronary vasodilator response of the reperfused myocardium may substantially alter the flow dynamics of the infarct-related artery.

METHODS

Distal coronary flow velocities were recorded before and after PTCA in 36 patients at day 13 +/- 7 (mean +/- SD) after acute MI and in 38 patients without MI. The CFVR was assessed by the ratio of distal hyperemic to baseline average peak velocity, using a 0.014-in. Doppler guide wire. Stenosis severity was analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography, and infarct size was assessed scintigraphically.

RESULTS

For similar angiographic stenosis severity, pre- and post-PTCA values of CFVR were significantly lower in patients with than without MI: 1.22 +/- 0.26 versus 1.50 +/- 0.45 before PTCA (p < 0.05) and 1.72 +/- 0.43 versus 2.21 +/- 0.74 after PTCA, respectively (p < 0.01). Although CFVR increased significantly (p < 0.0001) after angiographically successful PTCA in both study groups, abnormal CFVR (< or = 2.0) was still observed in 80% of patients with MI and in 44% of those without MI (MI vs. no MI, p = 0.001). Patients with an extensive infarction (relative infarct size > or = 50%) and those with a small infarction (relative infarct size < 50%) had comparable levels of post-PTCA CFVR (1.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.5, p = NS). Among a variety of factors, angiographic stenosis severity was the most important determinant of CFVR in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a recent MI, CFVR was significantly lower than in those without MI, both before and after PTCA. Besides the presence of this postreperfusion-related impairment of the coronary vasodilating response, CFVR was mainly influenced by stenosis severity and not by residual viability.

Coronary artery stenting: indications and cost implications

The practice of coronary stenting is evolving rapidly, with new stent designs, deployment techniques, and adjunctive therapy. In many respects, clinical practice is changing in advance of the availability of supporting data. The consistent excellent angiographic result with stent deployment exceeds that achieved by any other previous interventional device, and the extent to which this accounts for the exponential increase in stent utilization cannot be accurately determined but is undoubtedly considerable. Controlled randomized trials have confirmed that stent deployment is superior to balloon angioplasty in certain lesion subsets or clinical scenarios. These include focal de novo native vessel lesions, lesions with late recoil after balloon angioplasty, acute closure after balloon angioplasty, and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions. In addition, observational data is persuasive in focal coronary saphenous vein graft lesions and aorto-ostial lesions. On the other hand, the evidence supporting the use of stents strictly to improve on a suboptimal result, possibly the most frequent indication, is indirect and circumstantial. Stents are expensive, but it was anticipated that with the reduction in restenosis not only would they be cost-effective but also ultimately would reduce costs. This hope has not as yet been realized. However, there is little question that the introduction of intracoronary stents has been the most significant and exciting development since the introduction of percutaneous revascularization almost 20 years ago. It has revitalized the field.