Duration and reproducibility of initial hemodynamic effects of flosequinan in patients with congestive heart failure

Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of flosequinan in patients with heart failure

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the central and peripheral hemodynamic effects of 100 mg oral flosequinan and the impact of this drug on neurohormonal activation were noninvasively evaluated in 18 patients with congestive heart failure, after the first administration and after 10 days of treatment. No significant hemodynamic and neurohormonal changes were observed after acute administration. After 10 days, flosequinan produced central and peripheral hemodynamic improvement characterized by an increase in left ventricular circumferential fiber shortening velocity (+12%), a decrease in total systemic resistance (-36%), and an increase in leg blood flow (+37%). No significant changes were observed in heart rate and arterial pressure in patients receiving flosequinan, though a slight increase in heart rate (+17%) was recorded. Despite these favorable hemodynamic effects, flosequinan significantly increased plasma norepinephrine (+38%) and plasma renin activity (+13%) after 10 days of treatment. Thus, the beneficial central and peripheral hemodynamic effects of flosequinan are accompanied by activation of the sympathetic and reninangiotensin systems. This might be related to the unfavorable effects of the drug on survival in patients with heart failure.

Long-term vasodilator treatment with flosequinan does not lead to hemodynamic tolerance or neurohormonal activation in severe heart failure

Flosequinan is a balanced-type vasodilator with a prolonged mode of action due to an approximate 38-hour half-life of its active first metabolite, BTS 53554. As this may lead to tolerance and neurohormonal activation, the acute and long-term pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and neurohormonal profile of flosequinan was evaluated. On three consecutive days, 23 patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-IV), despite digitalis and diuretics, underwent invasive hemodynamic studies after receiving 100 mg oral flosequinan (day 1), placebo (day 2), and 100 mg flosequinan (day 3), followed by repeat invasive evaluation after long-term flosequinan (100 mg daily) for 17 +/- 2 weeks. On each study day, plasma flosequinan levels increased to 1.9 +/- 0.2 mg/L after 1 hour, but returned to baseline levels at 24 hours. In contrast, BTS 53554 increased progressively, reaching relatively high plateau levels (6 mg/L) during chronic therapy. First-dose flosequinan decreased the pulmonary wedge, right atrial pressure, and systemic resistance by 50, 60, and 22%, respectively, whereas the cardiac index was increased by 40%; these effects lasted for 48 hours. During long-term treatment, baseline values of the pulmonary wedge and right atrial pressure were comparable to prestudy values, whereas systemic resistance had decreased by 22%, and the cardiac index and heart rate had increased by 22 and 14%, respectively. Readministration of flosequinan did not further affect hemodynamics, apart from a moderate reduction in the pulmonary wedge and right atrial pressure. Neurohumoral activation did not occur during acute or long-term therapy. Thus, although changes in left and right heart filling pressures are attenuated during long-term treatment, flosequinan induces sustained arterial dilatation and improves cardiac pump function without activation of circulating neurohormones.

Acute and chronic effects of flosequinan on resting and exercise haemodynamics in congestive heart failure

1 The acute and chronic (8 weeks) haemodynamic responses to oral flosequinan have been investigated in 12 male patients of mean age 58.9 years with congestive heart failure of N.Y.H.A. classes II and III. 2 Flosequinan 125 mg orally significantly reduced right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure prior to and following 8 weeks chronic treatment (125 mg daily). A significant decrease in systemic pressure and an increase in heart rate were also observed with acute flosequinan prior to chronic treatment. A reduction in systemic vascular resistance and an increase in cardiac index reached significance in response to flosequinan 125 mg orally following 8 weeks of therapy. 3 In the erect position, flosequinan reduced pulmonary wedge pressure and tended to reduce systemic vascular resistance, without decreasing mean arterial pressure. 4 Following chronic treatment, there was a trend towards a reduction in pulmonary wedge pressure and an increase in cardiac index, otherwise resting and exercise haemodynamics were unchanged. 5 The response to flosequinan was similar at week 1 and after 8 weeks of treatment for all of the haemodynamic parameters. 6 Flosequinan increased bicycle exercise times and attenuated exercise-induced increases in pulmonary arterial and systemic pressures. There was a trend towards an increase in treadmill exercise time. 7 Sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (0.5 mg) and oral flosequinan (125 mg) had similar effects on right atrial pressure, pulmonary arterial and pulmonary wedge pressures at 5 min and 2 h respectively post-dosing. A small additive effect on pulmonary arterial and wedge pressures was observed.

Vasodilator therapy without converting-enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure--usefulness and limitations

Despite a well-established rationale for pharmacologically induced arterial and venous vasodilatation in congestive heart failure, the clinical usefulness of long-term vasodilator therapy without concomitant converting-enzyme inhibition generally has been disappointing. With the exception of nitrates and, possibly, the combination of nitrates and hydralazine, the use of converting-enzyme inhibitors in many aspects appears preferable in the majority of patients. This article reviews the pathophysiology of inappropriate vasoconstriction in heart failure, the cellular mode of action of the various vasodilators, hemodynamic effects with respect to the peripheral site of action, clinical usefulness and limitations of different vasodilators, and the various determinants of clinical efficacy. Finally, an attempt is made to assess when and how to introduce vasodilator treatment with and without concomitant ACE inhibition.