Failure to improve height prediction in short-stature pubertal adolescents by inhibiting puberty with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue

Effects of different therapy regimens to increase final adult height in males at advanced bone age with idiopathic short stature

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study explored the effect on adult height of a combination of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), or rhGH and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa), and compared their effects with rhGH alone in males at advanced bone age with idiopathic short stature (ISS).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, rhGH or rhGH combined with GnRHa or rhGH combined with AI therapy was given to males with advanced bone age (13-15 years) and diagnosed with ISS. The patients were followed to assess their adult height.

RESULTS

(1) A total of 68 patients were reviewed; 22 males were treated with rhGH for 24.9 ± 4.47 months, 22 males were treated with GnRHa + rhGH for 34.1 ± 3.36 months, and 24 males were treated with AI + RHGH for 22.7 ± 2.49 months. (2) Before treatment, the HtSDS-CA for the three groups were -1.04 ± 0.95, -1.23 ± 1.06, and -0.85 ± 0.98, respectively, and the HtSDS-BA were -2.14 ± 0.29, -2.14 ± 0.21, and-2.26 ± 0.31, respectively. The target heights for each group were 169.7 ± 4.0 cm, 169.7 ± 3.9 cm, and 169.1 ± 3.9 cm, respectively. The predicted adult heights were 161.7 ± 3.35 cm, 162.3 ± 1.75 cm, and 161.6 ± 2.89 cm, respectively. (3) After treatment, the HtSDS-CA for the rhGH group increased by 1.30 ± 0.58, and the HtSDS-BA increased by 2.00 ± 0.27. For the GnRHa + rhGH group, the HtSDS-CA and HtSDS-BA increased by1.42 ± 0.73and 2.74 ± 0.28, respectively. The AI + RHGH group increased by1.39 ± 0.64 and 2.76 ± 0.31, respectively. (4) There was no significant difference between the adult height (170.9 ± 0.7 cm) and target height for the rhGH group (P > 0.05), but the adult heights for the GnRHa + rhGH and AI + RHGH groups (173.2 ± 1.5 cm and 173.5 ± 1.0 cm, respectively, P > 0.05) were higher than the target height (P < 0.05). (5) Compared with the predicted adult height, the adult heights for the three groups improved significantly (P < 0.05). (6) No severe adverse reactions during the treatment occurred in any of the children. However, the total incidence of side effects in the three groups was significant (χ2 = 20.433, P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

Different therapeutic approaches have been investigated to improve the final adult height of males at advanced bone ages with ISS, and the optimal strategy remains controversial. In children at advanced bone ages with ISS, clinicians should carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages prior to treatment.

A meta-analysis of combination therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone for children with idiopathic short stature and normal timed puberty

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether the combination therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) are effective in the treatment of children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and normal timed puberty by interrogating data from clinical controlled trials.

METHODS

Literature retrieval, trail selection, data abstraction and quality assessment were completed independently by two authors. STATA software (version 14.1) was used for data analyses.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis was conducted based on 8 (4 randomized and 4 non-randomized) controlled trials. A total of 245 ISS children with normal timed puberty were financially analyzed. Overall, combination therapy with GnRHa and rhGH can slightly increase final height by 3.70 and 3.43 cm compared with GH treatment alone and no treatment, final height standard deviation score (FHSDS) by 0.10 and 0.22, final height minus predicted adult height (FH-PAH) by 1.5 and 5.32 cm, final height minus predicted adult height (FH-TH) by 7.70 and 4.32 cm, respectively. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that study type, sample size, GnRHa duration, and percentage of boys were potential sources of between-trial heterogeneity. There was a low probability of publication bias for above comparisons, as indicated by Egger's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analytical findings indicate that the combination therapy with GnRHa and rhGH can slightly increase the final height of ISS children with normal timed puberty, and the effect was not more obvious than GH alone. We do not recommend the combination therapy as a routine treatment for ISS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019133438.

The Effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogue on Final Adult Height in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature

OBJECTIVE

To assess final adult height (FAH) in children with short stature treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa).

METHODS

All patients with idiopathic short stature (ISS) with normally timed puberty and a Tanner stage between 2 and 3, who achieved their FAH between 2005 and 2015, were included in this clinical historical cohort study. Height gain, FAH, and mid-parental height of 28 children with ISS who received GnRHa treatment for 1.8 ± 1.0 years to delay their puberty were compared to 31 untreated children.

RESULTS

The FAHs of the treated and the untreated girls were 151.3 ± 5.1 and 146.8 ± 3.8 cm (p = 0.01), respectively. The FAHs of the treated and the untreated boys were 156.4 ± 4.7 and 152.3 ± 5.7 cm (p = 0.111), respectively. The height gain in the treated and the untreated girls was 1.6 ± 7.8 and -3.6 ± 5.7 cm (p = 0.036), respectively. Height gain in the treated and the untreated boys was -5.1 ± 13.6 and -11.5 ± 8.4 cm (p = 0.171), respectively.

CONCLUSION

GnRHa therapy has a modest effect in improving FAH in adolescent females with ISS but not in boys.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapy for central precocious puberty and other childhood disorders affecting growth and puberty

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog therapy relies primarily on the ability of these compounds to bind to and modulate GnRH-receptor activity. GnRH analogs have been used in pediatric patients where endogenous gonadotropin release is undesirable or potentially harmful, such as in: (i) patients with central precocious puberty (CPP); (ii) healthy short children where pubertal delay would provide an opportunity to supplement pre-pubertal linear growth; and (iii) children with malignancies and other disorders where treatment requires the use of gonadotoxic compounds. In the first two groups of patients, GnRH agonists may be used alone or in conjunction with somatropin (growth hormone [GH]) to prevent early skeletal maturation and increase the subsequent adult height, while in the latter case, GnRH agonists are used alone or in conjunction with GnRH antagonists in an attempt to preserve gonadal function.In children and adolescents with CPP, timely use of GnRH agonists alone can result in an adult height within the genetic potential of the individual (target height); however, minimal height is gained when GnRH agonist therapy is commenced after a marked advancement of skeletal age. This provides the rationale for combined therapy with GnRH agonists and somatropin in such patients, and studies have shown improved growth with this approach compared with GnRH agonists alone. Combination therapy with GnRH agonists and somatropin has also been shown to increase adult heights to a greater extent than GnRH agonists alone in pediatric patients with concomitant CPP and GH deficiency, those with idiopathic short stature, and those born small for gestational age; however, such combination therapy has shown no increased benefit over somatropin alone in pediatric patients with GH deficiency. Limited results in children and adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and chronic primary hypothyroidism have also shown increased growth rates, while no growth benefit was seen in pediatric renal transplant recipients.GnRH analogs also have potential as gonadoprotective agents; studies of GnRH agonists used alone and in combination with GnRH antagonists in women undergoing cytotoxic therapy have shown increased preservation of reproductive potential in patients who were receiving GnRH analog therapy versus those who were not.The adverse effects of GnRH analogs mainly consist of menopausal-like complaints. Increases in bodyweight and body mass index in children receiving GnRH agonist therapy have been shown; however, these increases do not persist after discontinuation of therapy. Adult bone mineral density and fertility are also not adversely affected by childhood GnRH agonist therapy.GnRH analog therapy appears to be both well tolerated and effective in pediatric patients, as it allows the preservation or improvement of adult height, and shows no longstanding negative effects on body composition, bone density, reproductive function, or endocrine physiology. These agents may also be useful for preservation of gonadal function in children and adolescents undergoing cytotoxic therapy.

Aromatase inhibitors for short stature in male children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

As a result of the essential role of oestrogens in epiphyseal closure, aromatase inhibitors have been trialled as an intervention to improve height outcomes in male children and adolescents by inhibiting the conversion of testosterone to oestradiol.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of aromatase inhibitors in male children and adolescents with short stature.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify relevant trials, we searched the Cochrane Library (2014, Issue 7), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP trial register from their inception until August 2014. In addition, we conducted citation searches and screened reference lists of included trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) if they compared use of an aromatase inhibitor with placebo in male children and adolescents with short stature.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. Both authors carried out screening for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, with any disagreements resolved following discussion. We assessed trials for quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument. We contacted study authors regarding missing information. Primary outcomes were final or near-final height, adverse events, and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cognitive outcomes, socioeconomic effects, laboratory measures, short-term growth parameters, and assessment of effects on bone health. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the substantial clinical heterogeneity between trials; we presented the findings of the review in narrative format.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs involving 207 participants (84 on interventions) in the review. Trials included males with constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP), idiopathic short stature (ISS), and growth hormone (GH) deficiency. Three of the trials had an overall low or unclear risk of bias for primary outcomes. Short-term growth outcomes, such as predicted adult height, improved in all trials. Just one trial reported the primary outcome of final and near-final height as an extension under non-randomised conditions. None of the trials assessed health-related quality of life. One publication provided detailed information regarding the incidence of adverse events. A significant proportion (45%) of prepubertal boys with ISS treated with letrozole developed mild morphological abnormalities of their vertebrae, compared with none in the placebo group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggested that aromatase inhibitors improved short-term growth outcomes. There was no evidence to support an increase in final adult height, based on limited data, with only one of four trials publishing final height data under non-randomised conditions.

Idiopathic short stature: management and growth hormone treatment

In the management of ISS auxological, biochemical, psychosocial and ethical elements have to be considered. In boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty androgens are effective in increasing height and sexual characteristics, but adult height is unchanged. GH therapy is efficacious in increasing height velocity and adult height, but the inter-individual variation is considerable. The effect on psychosocial status is uncertain. Factors affecting final height gain include GH dose, height deficit in comparison to midparental height, age and first year height velocity. In case of a low predicted adult height at the onset of puberty, addition of a GnRH analogue can be considered. Although GH therapy appears safe, long-term monitoring is recommended.

[Clinical expression of precocious pubertal development in girls]

The paediatric endocrinologist is frequently asked whether pubertal development in a girl is normal, early or too early (precocious). This review will cover all clinical expression of premature development of puberty: central precocious puberty (neurogenic, secondary, and idiopathic) where treatment with GnRHa is considered, early puberty, partial puberty or pubertal variants and peripheral or pseudo precocious puberty related to an antonomous hypersecretion of estrogens by the ovaries. A special attention should be paid also to the role of environmental disruptors in the development of peripheral precocious puberty. GnRHa treatment should be considered only when evidence of central activation of the gonadotropic axis is proved by the LHRH-test.

Treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist in adolescents with short stature

BACKGROUND

Treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist increases adult height in children with LHRH-dependent precocious puberty and is prescribed by some practitioners to augment height in short adolescents. We performed a randomized clinical trial to determine whether treatment with an LHRH agonist increases adult height in short adolescents with normally timed puberty.

METHODS

Fifty short adolescents (18 boys and 32 girls) with low predicted adult height (mean [+/-SD], 3.3+/-1.2 SD below the population mean) received either placebo (24 subjects) or an LHRH agonist (26 subjects). The mean (+/-SD) duration of treatment was 3.5+/-0.9 years in the LHRH-agonist group and 2.1+/-1.2 years in the placebo group (P<0.001). Adult height was measured when bone age exceeded 16 years in girls and 17 years in boys and when the rate of growth was less than 1.5 cm per year.

RESULTS

Forty-seven adolescents (94 percent) were followed until they attained adult height. At the time adult height was achieved, the subjects who had been treated with an LHRH agonist were older than those who had received placebo (20.5+/-2.1 years vs. 18.0+/-2.5 years, P=0.01) and were taller (standard-deviation score, -2.2+/-1.1 vs. -3.0+/-1.2; P=0.01). Analysis of covariance showed that LHRH-agonist treatment resulted in an increase of 0.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.9) in the standard-deviation score for height, or an increase of 4.2 cm (95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 6.7), over the initially predicted adult height (P=0.01). Treatment with an LHRH agonist resulted in significantly greater adult height than did placebo in boys and girls, in adolescents with idiopathic short stature, and in those who had a growth-limiting syndrome. The principal adverse event in the LHRH-agonist group was decreased accretion of bone mineral density (mean lumbar vertebral bone mineral density at the time adult height was achieved, 1.6+/-1.2 SD below the population mean, vs. 0.3+/-1.2 SD below the population mean in the placebo group; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with an LHRH agonist for 3.5 years increases adult height by 0.6 SD in adolescents with very short stature but substantially decreases bone mineral density. Such treatment cannot be routinely recommended to augment height in adolescents with normally timed puberty.

Human growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog combination therapy increases predicted height in short normal girls

The "short normal" child constitutes a real challenge for the pediatric endocrinologist. In a subgroup of short normal children, puberty starts at a normal age but with low height, and hence, the final height is expected to be quite compromised. Efforts to improve the outcome in this group have been made in the past with equivocal results. We present the growth data of 8 short girls with normal growth hormone values on provocative testing and low height at puberty initiation. At intervention the height and the stage of puberty were 129.3 +/- 5 cm and II to III, respectively, and the predicted height was 148.8 +/- 2.6 cm. Gonadotropin releasing hormone analog, triptorelin (3.6 +/- 0.5 microg/kg/day) and growth hormone (0.5 IU/kg/week) were used in different sequential order and simultaneously in each child. The mean total treatment period was 47.6 +/- 11.2 months. The mean predicted and the mean final height in the total group were 148.8 +/- 2.6 and 154.5 +/- 3.6 cm, respectively (p:0.028). The final height did not differ from the target height (154.8 +/- 8 cm versus 154.5 +/- 3.6 cm), while in 4 children, the final height was greater than the target height. The height gain (delta Final height - Predicted height) was 5.7 +/- 1.3 cm. If we analyze separately the girls in whom growth hormone was started first and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog followed versus those who started the analog first, the delta Final height - Predicted height was 8 +/- 3 cm in the former and 4.8 +/- 3.1 cm in the latter (p:0.03). It seemed that the difference was accounted for by duration of growth hormone therapy (51.3 +/- 10.6 months versus 28.6 +/- 10.6 months) (p:0.026), rather than by other factors. In conclusion, under the conditions of the present study, the combination of puberty arrest and growth hormone therapy significantly improved predicted height. The most significant determinant of the height gain was the duration of growth hormone therapy.

Final height after combined growth hormone and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue therapy in short healthy children entering into normally timed puberty

OBJECTIVE

Combined gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue and recombinant human growth hormone therapy has been used in an attempt to improve the final height of short non-GH deficient adolescents with normally timed puberty; its use, however, is still controversial as only short-term studies in a very limited number of patients have been undertaken, with either improvement in height prognosis or no beneficial effect on predicted growth. We have treated a group of extremely short healthy children with very low predicted adult heights entering into normally timed puberty with combined therapy, in order to determine whether we could improve their final height above their pretreatment predicted adult height.

PATIENTS

We treated 10 healthy adolescent short children (7 girls and 3 boys) simultaneously for 30.0 +/- 5.2 months with the GnRH analogue leuprolide acetate (0.3 mg/kg im every 28 days) and with rhGH (0.1 U/kg/day, sc, 6 days a week). The mean chronological age of our patients was 11.8 +/- 1.3 years, with a mean bone age of 11.2 +/- 0.9 years, height of 128.9 +/- 7.5 cm (-2.4 +/- 0.4 SD below the mean) and a predicted adult height of 150.7 +/- 9.8 cm; they were all in Tanner stage II-III of puberty. Ten healthy short children (7 girls and 3 boys) in the early stages of puberty with a mean chronological age of 11.4 +/- 1.0 years, a mean bone age of 11.0 +/- 0.8 years, height of 128.9 +/- 7.8 cm (-2.3 +/- 0.4 SD below the mean) and a mean adult predicted height of 151.8 +/- 10.1 cm served as controls and were simultaneously followed without therapy for the same study period.

MEASUREMENTS

Height and pubertal status were followed every 3 months during combined therapy and until final height of our patients was reached; bone ages were obtained every 6 months. Growth hormone deficiency was ruled out in all our subjects prior to beginning of the study by a normal response to oral clonidine and normal IGF-1 levels. Basal serum testosterone and/or oestradiol levels, as well as LH and FSH following administration of LH-releasing hormone were obtained before treatment and after 6 weeks and 4 months of combined therapy and every 6 months thereafter. Routine biochemistry as well as thyroid function tests were obtained at each visit.

RESULTS

Combined treatment resulted in an interruption of pubertal development with a suppression of gonadal steroids and of the LH response to LH-releasing hormone. Growth velocity decreased from 6.5 +/- 1.6 cm/year before treatment to 5.5 +/- 1.5 cm/year and 3.9 +/- 1.3 cm/year during the first and second year of treatment (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively) resulting in a height Z score reduction, declining from -2.4 +/- 04 to -2.6 +/- 0.7 SD. Bone age maturation declined averaging 0.75 bone age year/year of treatment but height SDS for bone age declined from -1.7 +/- 0.7 to -2.2 +/- 0.5 at the end of the second year of therapy with no improvement in predicted adult height (150.7 +/- 9.8 cm before and 150.0 +/- 8.0 after 2 years of therapy). After discontinuing treatment growth velocity did not improve and bone maturation advanced more rapidly (averaging 2.0 +/- 0.4 year/year of follow up) and the mean final height of our patients was 151 +/- 2.4 cm (-2.6 +/- 0.6 SD below the mean) which was not greater than the mean pretreatment predicted adult height and well below their target height; these results were also similar to those of the control population in whom the predicted adult height at the beginning of the study and after 2 years of follow up, was not different from their final height and well below their target height.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that combined rhGH and GnRH analogue therapy in short adolescents with normally timed puberty does not contribute to increase their final height above their pretreatment predicted adult height; we can therefore not recommend this form of therapy for this group of patients given the poor results obtained, as well as the cost of these medications and the

Effects of long-term gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analog treatment on growth, growth hormone (GH) secretion, GH receptors, and GH-binding protein in the rat

Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs (GnRH-a) suppress gonadal steroid production and are used in precocious puberty, resulting in an arrest of pubertal development, a slower epiphyseal maturation, and a deceleration of growth, but an increased final height. However, the way that GnRH-a affect growth is not clear. GnRH-a treatment might not only affect gonadal steroid production but might also modulate the GH axis and thereby affect growth. We used a rat model to investigate the long-term effects of prepubertally started GnRH-a treatment (triptorelin) on growth, spontaneous GH secretion, hepatic GH receptors (GHR), and GH-binding protein (GHBP) and compared it with surgical gonadectomy. Triptorelin affected most parameters in the same direction as surgical gonadectomy but to a lesser extent. In females, growth was enhanced by triptorelin, baseline GH secretion was decreased, and hepatic GHR and GHBP were decreased. Apart from these effects on the GH axis, reduction of the direct inhibiting effect of estrogen on growth could be responsible for the triptorelin-induced growth. In males, triptorelin treatment enhanced body weight gain and slightly enhanced gain in length. GH peak amplitude was the only parameter of GH secretion affected and decreased, whereas GHR or GHBP were not affected. This stimulation of weight gain by long-term triptorelin treatment in male rats, which is opposite the effect of surgical gonadectomy, could indicate an interference of GnRH-a in the hormonal regulation of food intake and body weight control. We conclude that triptorelin treatment affected growth and the GH-GHR-GHBP axis in rats, more markedly in females than in males. However, triptorelin was not as effective as surgical gonadectomy.

Growth promotion by oxandrolone in a girl with short stature and early pubertal development treated with growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-analogue. A case study

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-analogues are widely used for treating precocious puberty, and occasionally in short patients and patients with growth-hormone deficiency, in order to delay pubertal development and increase final height. Yet, many of these children only decelerate growth velocity and neither improve in final height nor even in height prediction. As GnRH-analogue treatment dramatically reduces sexual steroid levels, I hypothesized the need for steroid hormone substitution during this treatment. Growth promotion was tried in a healthy girl, with a very unsatisfying height prediction of only 144 cm, using a combination of GnRH-analogue (75 micrograms/kg/4 weeks), plus growth hormone (4 IU/m2/d), plus oxandrolone (1 mg/d). Knemometric measurements of lower leg growth velocity demonstrated that GnRH-analogue alone depresses growth. Additional GH administration only sporadically increases growth velocity, and not until the additional substitution of oxandrolone does growth velocity catch up and return to near pretreatment level. In spite of a 10.3 cm increase in body height during the 15-month period of observation, little bone age progression took place, and height prediction improved from 144 cm to over 149 cm after 9 months, and to 152 cm after 15 months of observation.

Combination treatment with growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in short normal girls

To improve final adult height, we treated with growth hormone (0.65 +/- 0.07 (mean +/- SD) IU.kg-1.wk-1) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (66 +/- 9 micrograms.kg-1 every 28 days) a group of seven short normal girls in early puberty with a chronologic age (CA) of 11.50 +/- 0.95 years, predicted adult height (PAH) lower (0.003 < p < 0.001) than mean target height, and without any endocrine abnormalities. The results were compared with those obtained in a similar group of seven untreated girls considered as control subjects. The mean period of combined therapy was 2.01 +/- 0.52 years; in two subjects treatment is still in progress. The value of height standard deviation score for bone age (BA) improved from -1.69 +/- 0.47 to -1.04 +/- 0.56 (p = 0.001); height age (HA)/BA ratio also increased from 0.83 +/- 0.05 to 0.90 +/- 0.04 (p < 0.01), as did PAH (from 146.8 +/- 4.4 to 152.9 +/- 3.6 cm; p < 0.002). The ratio of gain in HA to gain in BA was 2.08 +/- 0.78. Pubertal stages showed an arrest in five cases and a regression in the other two girls. After administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs was interrupted, in four of five girls growth hormone was administered alone for a further period of 6 to 18 months to improve their physiologic growth spurt. The present height in five girls is higher than PAH before therapy. In the treated girls the height values for BA, for BA/CA and HA/BA ratios, and for PAH were higher (0.002 < p < 0.04) than those in control subjects. This preliminary study demonstrates that combination therapy with growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in short, endocrinologically normal girls may be useful in improving both height prognosis and predicted adult height. Further studies are necessary to reach definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this kind of therapy.