Protective effects of pretreatment with intracoronary nifedipine on myocardial ischemia and dysfunction

Antiischemic effect of intracoronary diltiazem on myocardial ischemia during PTCA

To evaluate the effect of intracoronary diltiazem on myocardial ischemia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 38 patients were randomly assigned to receive inactive placebo (n = 19; group C) or a low dose (1 mg, n = 10; group D1), or a high dose (2 or 3 mg, n = 9; group D2) of diltiazem in a double-blind manner. The agent was administered directly into the coronary artery via a balloon catheter following a control balloon inflation. Chest pain score (maximum, 10) and the magnitude of ischemic ST elevation on standard and intracoronary electrocardiograms (ECGs) during a balloon inflation were assessed in the control and posttreatment periods. After the administration of diltiazem, the chest pain score was significantly decreased in group D1 (control: 5.1 +/- 3.6, posttreatment: 3.8 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) and group D2 (3.4 +/- 2.5 vs 2.5 +/- 2.0, P < 0.01), but not in group C (4.1 +/- 3.1 vs 3.7 +/- 3.3, difference not significant). The magnitude of ST elevation relative to the control on standard and intracoronary ECGs was significantly smaller in groups D1 and D2 than in group C (standard ECG; D1: 51.8 +/- 10.6% of control, D2: 41.6 +/- 28.7% vs C: 93.3 +/- 15.6% and intracoronary ECG; D1: 47.1 +/- 11.7% of control, D2: 27.5 +/- 26.9% vs C: 94.6 +/- 29.3%, all P < 0.01). Although systolic blood pressure decreased slightly in groups D1 and D2, there was no significant correlation between the change in ST elevation and the change in the rate-pressure product. Pretreatment with a small dose of intracoronary diltiazem attenuated myocardial ischemia during PTCA and this pretreatment may enable us to perform balloon inflation for a longer period.

Efficacy and safety of calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction

The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of hypertension and concomitant left ventricular dysfunction is reviewed. Some CCBs, particularly second-generation dihydropyridine agents such as felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nimodipine, and nitrendipine, have properties that enhance their usefulness in these patients. All CCBs have a similar mechanism of action. Differences in their selective action at various tissue sites determine which are most appropriate for patients with concomitant hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction. Most CCBs do not produce reflex stimulation of the heart or induce intravascular expansion. While all CCBs produce arteriolar dilation, all local beds and regional circulations in target organs are not affected equally. Most CCBs can decrease cardiac mass, and second-generation CCBs tend to have little or no negative inotropic effects at therapeutic dosages. In addition, they increase blood flow and reduce myocardial oxygen requirements. Because of differences in functional and electrophysiologic effects, specific CCBs may not be appropriate for all patients. Since second-generation dihydropyridine CCBs lack clinically relevant negative inotropic effects, and have been shown to improve exercise tolerance and coronary artery perfusion, they are appropriate for hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction, angina, and coronary heart disease. Second-generation CCBs tend to lack cardiodepressant side effects and are less likely to react with digoxin than are first-generation CCBs.

Beneficial actions of amlodipine in the multiple-stunned canine myocardium

The effects of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-entry blocker, amlodipine, on subendocardial segment shortening (%SS), regional myocardial blood flow (radioactive microspheres), and tissue high-energy phosphate levels were compared with those of a saline-treated group of barbital-anesthetized dogs subjected to nine 5-minute coronary artery occlusions interspersed with 15 minutes of reperfusion and finally by 1 hour of reperfusion (multiple stunned myocardium). Saline or amlodipine (200 micrograms/kg, IV) were administered 15 minutes prior to the first coronary occlusion. There were no major differences between groups in ischemic bed size or hemodynamics throughout the experiment. Subendocardial collateral blood flow was significantly increased in the amlodipine-treated group during coronary occlusion 1; however, tissue blood flow in the ischemic region was not significantly different between groups during occlusion 9. Following each occlusion, %SS in the ischemic region was equally reduced in both groups and passive systolic lengthening resulted. In spite of similar decreases in %SS during occlusion, the amlodipine-treated dogs showed a marked improvement in myocardial segment function (%SS) of the ischemic-reperfused region at 15 minutes following each occlusion (1-9) and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of reperfusion following occlusion 9, as compared to saline-treated animals. In addition, amlodipine attenuated the loss of adenine nucleotides in the ischemic-reperfused area at 1 hour of reperfusion. These results suggest that amlodipine has a favorable effect on the functional and metabolic recovery of the multiple-stunned myocardium and may have potential as a cardioprotective agent for the treatment of myocardial reperfusion injury.