Results of surgery for malignant bowel obstruction in advanced, unresectable, recurrent colorectal cancer

Management of primary and metastatic malignant small bowel obstruction, operate or palliate. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The management of patients presenting with malignant small bowel obstruction is a challenging paradigm. The aim of this systematic review was to examine different management strategies in these complex patients. The primary outcomes evaluated were the type of intervention, 30-day morbidity and mortality and overall survival rates.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of EMBase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for studies reporting on conservative and operative management of malignant small bowel obstruction.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 882 patients) reporting on outcomes for malignant small bowel obstruction were analysed. Outcomes measured were primarily survival and relief of obstructive symptoms. The median age ranged from 52 to 66 years. The most common cause of malignant small bowel obstruction was gynaecological in nature (56%), followed by colorectal (19%). Four hundred and eighty-six patients underwent primary surgical management and the remaining 396 patients were assigned to non-surgical intervention. Median overall survival in the operative studies ranged from 2.5 to 7.4 months compared with 0.9 to 1.9 months (P < 0.05). The 30-day mortality ranged from 13% to 28% in those who underwent surgical interventions versus 2% to 61% in the non-surgical group (P = 0.09). No significant difference in median survival in gastrointestinal (GI) and gynaecological malignancies was observed (4.3 versus 5.0 months, P = 0.12). Morbidity ranged from 21% to 85% in the surgical group and 12% to 29% in the percutaneous groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention in malignant small bowel obstruction is associated with significant morbidity, although it may improve survival in selected patients with gynaecological and colorectal malignancy. It is imperative that realistic goals and expectations are discussed with patients preoperatively.

A laparoscopic approach is associated with a decreased incidence of SSI in patients undergoing palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

Several authors have reported on the utility of a laparoscopic approach for the palliation of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO); however, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for MBO have not yet been confirmed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent palliative surgery for MBO between 2007 and 2015. Laparoscopic procedures have been performed when technically possible since 2014. Successful palliation was defined as the ability to tolerate solid food (TSF) for at least 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients underwent laparoscopic palliative surgery, and 171 patients underwent conventional open palliative surgery to relieve the symptoms of MBO. Laparoscopic palliative surgery was performed for patients with MBO due to colorectal cancer (n = 12), uterine cancer (n = 3), and other types of cancers (including gastric, prostate, and renal cancer). The following laparoscopic procedures were performed: stoma placement (n = 18), palliative resection (n = 3) and bypass (n = 2). The median operative time was 100 min and the median operative blood loss was 9 ml. The laparoscopic palliative operation allowed 91% (20/22) of the patients to consume a solid diet for more than 2 weeks, and be discharged from hospital. There were no significant differences between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery with regard to the ability to TSF or the postoperative mortality rate. The postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ II) rates in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups were 14% and 32%, respectively. Laparoscopic surgery led to a significantly lower rate of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in comparison to open surgery (4.5% vs 32%; P = 0.0053).

CONCLUSION

A laparoscopic approach in palliative surgery for MBO was safe and feasible, and was associated with a lower incidence of SSIs. By minimizing the postoperative morbidity rate, the laparoscopic approach may provide significant benefits to patients with MBO who have a limited life expectancy.

Emergency department patients with small bowel obstruction: What is the anticipated clinical course?

BACKGROUND

Emergency physicians (EPs) often care for patients with acute small bowel obstruction. While some patients require exploratory laparotomy, others are managed successfully with supportive care. We aimed to determine features that predict the need for operative management in emergency department (ED) patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 370 consecutive patients admitted to a large urban academic teaching hospital with a diagnosis of SBO over a two-year period. We evaluated demographic characters (prior SBO, prior abdominal surgery, active malignancy) and clinical findings (leukocytosis and lactic acid) to determine features associated with the need for urgent operative intervention.

RESULTS

Patients with a prior SBO were less likely to undergo operative intervention [20.3% (42/207)] compared to those without a prior SBO [35.2% (57/162)]. Abnormal bloodwork was not associated with need for operative intervention. 68% of patients with CT scan findings of both an SBO and a hernia, however, were operatively managed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of SBO were less likely to require operative intervention at any point during their hospitalization. Abnormal bloodwork was not associated with operative intervention. The CT finding of a hernia, however, predicted the need for operative intervention, while other findings (ascites, duodenal thickening) did not. Further research would be helpful to construct a prediction rule, which could help community EPs determine which patients may benefit from expedited transfer for operative management, and which patients could be safely managed conservatively as an initial treatment strategy.

Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2000. Intestinal obstruction commonly occurs in progressive advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancers. Management of these patients is difficult due to the patients' deteriorating mobility and function (performance status), the lack of further chemotherapeutic options, and the high mortality and morbidity associated with palliative surgery. There are marked variations in clinical practice concerning surgery in these patients between different countries, gynaecological oncology units and general hospitals, as well as referral patterns from oncologists under whom these patients are often admitted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of surgery for intestinal obstruction due to advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases for the original review in 2000 and again for this update in June 2015: CENTRAL (2015, Issue 6); MEDLINE (OVID June week 1 2015); and EMBASE (OVID week 24, 2015).We also searched relevant journals, bibliographic databases, conference proceedings, reference lists, grey literature and the world wide web for the original review in 2000; we also used personal contact. This searching of other resources yielded very few additional studies. The Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group no longer routinely handsearch journals. For these reasons, we did not repeat the searching of other resources for the June 2015 update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

As the review concentrates on the 'best evidence' available for the role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in known advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer we kept the inclusion criteria broad (including both prospective and retrospective studies) so as to include all studies relevant to the question. We sought published trials reporting on the effects of surgery for resolving symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction for adult patients with known advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used data extraction forms to collect data from the studies included in the review. Two review authors extracted the data independently to reduce error. Owing to concerns about the risk of bias we decided not to conduct a meta-analysis of data and we have presented a narrative description of the study results. We planned to resolve disagreements by discussion with the third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

In total we have identified 43 studies examining 4265 participants. The original review included 938 patients from 25 studies. The updated search identified an additional 18 studies with a combined total of 3327 participants between 1997 and June 2015. The results of these studies did not change the conclusions of the original review.No firm conclusions can be drawn from the many retrospective case series so the role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction remains controversial. Clinical resolution varies from 26.7% to over 68%, though it is often unclear how this is defined. Despite being an inadequate proxy for symptom resolution or quality of life, the ability to feed orally was a popular outcome measure, with success rates ranging from 30% to 100%. Rates of re-obstruction varied, ranging from 0% to 63%, though time to re-obstruction was often not included. Postoperative morbidity and mortality also varied widely, although again the definition of both of these surgical outcomes differed between many of the papers. There were no data available for quality of life. The reporting of adverse effects was variable and this has been described where available. Where discussed, surgical procedures varied considerably and outcomes were not reported by specific intervention. Using the 'Risk of bias' assessment tool, most included studies were at high risk of bias for most domains.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction needs careful evaluation, using validated outcome measures of symptom control and quality of life scores. Further information could include re-obstruction rates together with the morbidity associated with the various surgical procedures.Currently, bowel obstruction is managed empirically and there are marked variations in clinical practice by different units. In order to compare outcomes in malignant bowel obstruction, there needs to be a greater degree of standardisation of management.Since the last version of this review none of the new included studies have provided additional information to change the conclusions.

Palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from carcinomatosis: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Care of patients with malignant bowel obstruction caused by peritoneal metastases may present an ethical dilemma for surgeons when nonoperative management fails.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize outcomes of palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from peritoneal carcinomatosis to guide decision making about surgery and postoperative interventions for patients with terminal illness.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, and Google Scholar and performed manual searches of selected journals from inception to August 30, 2012, with no filters, limits, or language restrictions. We used database-specific combinations of the terms intestinal obstruction, malignant, surgery or surgical, and palliat*. We included studies reporting outcomes after palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from peritoneal carcinomatosis from any primary malignant neoplasm and excluded case studies, curative surgery, isolated percutaneous procedures, stenting for intraluminal lesions, and studies in which benign and malignant obstructions could not be distinguished. We assessed quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

FINDINGS

We screened 2347 unique articles, selected 108 articles for full-text review, and included 17 studies. Surgery was able to palliate obstructive symptoms for 32% to 100% of patients, enable resumption of a diet for 45% to 75% of patients, and facilitate discharge to home in 34% to 87% of patients. Mortality was high (6%-32%), and serious complications were common (7%-44%). Frequent reobstructions (6%-47%), readmissions (38%-74%), and reoperations (2%-15%) occurred. Survival was limited (median, 26-273 days), and hospitalization for surgery consumed a substantial portion of the patient's remaining life (11%-61%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although palliative surgery can benefit patients, it comes at the cost of high mortality and substantial hospitalization relative to the patient's remaining survival time. Preoperatively, surgeons should present realistic goals and limitations of surgery. For patients choosing surgery, clarifying preferences for aggressive postoperative interventions preoperatively is critical given the high complication rate and limited survival after surgery for malignant bowel obstruction.

Outcome measures other than morbidity and mortality for patients with incurable cancer and gastrointestinal obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate outcome measures of patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation for gastrointestinal obstruction.

METHODS

Patients with an incurable malignancy undergoing consultation for gastrointestinal obstruction were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to July 2012. We evaluated two patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]) and treatment satisfaction (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General Version 1 [FACIT-TS-G]) and five observational outcome measures (symptom improvement, 30 "good days," ability to tolerate diet at discharge, discharge home, and death within 90 days).

RESULTS

Of 53 patients enrolled, 13 had gastric outlet obstruction, 22 had small bowel obstruction, and 18 had large bowel obstruction. Patient-reported measures could not be analyzed because only 19 patients (36%) completed the FACT-G and FACIT-TS-G survey at 1-month follow-up. However, we were able to obtain results for the 5 clinical observational outcomes in all patients. Symptom improvement was obtained in 41 (77%) patients, 30 "good days" in 40 (75%), ability to tolerate diet at discharge in 45 (85%), discharge to home in 46 (87%), and 18 (34%) of patients died within 90 days of evaluation. Large bowel obstruction was associated with symptom improvement, and noncolorectal cancer histology and carcinomatosis were negatively associated with having 30 "good days." The ability to tolerate oral intake at discharge was associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and no recent chemotherapy administration. Death within 90 days was independently associated with noncolorectal cancer histology, ascites, and nonsurgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational outcome measures can provide follow-up data and the identification of variables associated with outcome for patients who are unable to respond to outpatient surveys.

Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients: epidemiology, management, and factors influencing spontaneous resolution

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent complication in advanced cancer patients, especially in those with abdominal tumors. Clinical management of MBO requires a specific and individualized approach that is based on disease prognosis and the objectives of care. The global prevalence of MBO is estimated to be 3% to 15% of cancer patients. Surgery should always be considered for patients in the initial stages of the disease with a preserved general status and a single level of occlusion. Less invasive approaches such as duodenal or colonic stenting should be considered when surgery is contraindicated in obstructions at the single level. The priority of care for inoperable and consolidated MBO is to control symptoms and promote the maximum level of comfort possible. The spontaneous resolution of an inoperable obstructive process is observed in more than one third of patients. The mean survival is of no longer than 4-5 weeks in patients with consolidated MBO. Polymodal medical treatment based on a combination of glucocorticoids, strong opioids, antiemetics, and antisecretory drugs achieves very high symptomatic control. This review focuses on the epidemiological aspects, diagnosis, surgical criteria, medical management, and factors influencing the spontaneous resolution of MBO in advanced cancer patients.

Pharmacological treatment of bowel obstruction in cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of advanced cancer, occurring most frequently in gynaecological and colorectal cancer. Its management remains complex and variable. This is in part due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines for the clinicians involved. Although surgery should be considered the primary treatment, this may not be feasible in patients with a poor performance status or advanced disease. Advances have been made in the medical management of MBO which can lead to a considerable improvement in symptom management and overall quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

This review emphasizes the importance of a prompt diagnosis of MBO with early introduction of pharmacological agents to optimize symptom control. The authors summarize the treatment options available for bowel obstruction in those patients for whom surgical intervention is not a feasible option. The authors also explore the complexities involved in the introduction of parenteral hydration and total parenteral nutrition in this group of patients.

EXPERT OPINION

It is not always easy to distinguish reversible from irreversible bowel obstruction. Early and aggressive management with the introduction of pharmacological agents including corticosteroids, octreotide and anti-cholinergic agents have the potential to maintain bowel patency, and allow for more rapid recovery of bowel transit. A combination of analgesics, anti-emetics and anti-cholinergics with or without anti-secretory agents can successfully improve symptom control in patients with irreversible bowel obstruction.

Surgical management for a malignant bowel obstruction with recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common clinical complication in patients with recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma, which has a poor prognosis and a limited life expectancy. This study considered the effectiveness of surgical management for MBO.

METHODS

This study reviewed the clinical course of 70 patients who underwent surgery for MBO and compared the outcomes in three groups: patients with (A) peritonitis carcinomatosis without manifest ascites, (B) peritonitis carcinomatosis with ascites, (C) local recurrence without peritonitis carcinomatosis.

RESULTS

The 1-year survival rate and median survival time (MST) in the patients in group A were 33.3% and 228 days, which was statistically longer than those (6.7% and 46 days) in the patients in group B (P = 0.026). The rate of the patients with possible oral intake of solid meals for 6 months and median oral intake periods were 45.4% and 161 days in patients in group A and 28.0% and 93 days in patients in group C. In contrast, 66.7% in group B could not take solid meals for more than 1 month, and five patients could not take solid meals at all.

CONCLUSION

Palliative operations for the patients with manifest ascites of MBO are risky and rarely effectively improve oral intake, but this is not considered to be a contraindication for surgical management. Informed consent is therefore important in the surgical management of MBO.

Efficacy of granisetron in the antiemetic control of nonsurgical intestinal obstruction in advanced cancer: a phase II clinical trial

The objective of this study was to assess antiemetic efficacy of granisetron in inoperable intestinal obstruction caused by advanced cancer. The study was open, prospective, and multi-centered. We assessed 24 patients (mean age: 61.3 years; 10 males, 14 females) with intestinal obstruction who were refractory to previous antiemetics. Obstruction involved the upper intestine in six patients, the lower intestine in three, and was at multiple levels in 15. Daily treatment included intravenous granisetron (3mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg); nasogastric drainage was not allowed. Subcutaneous haloperidol was available as rescue therapy. A numeric scale was used to evaluate nausea, pain, asthenia, and anorexia at baseline visit and every 24 hours up to the completion of four days of treatment (final visit). Treatment failure was defined as nausea >4 on the numeric scale, vomiting 2/day or more, and rescue therapy with haloperidol at 5mg/day or more. Of the 24 patients, 23 were evaluable for efficacy. Evaluation pre- vs. post-treatment indicated a significant decrease in the severity of nausea (score 6.9 vs. 0.8; P<0.001), number of episodes of vomiting (5.3 vs. 1.0; P<0.001), and abdominal pain (score 4.4 vs. 1.2; P<0.001). Nausea and vomiting control was achieved in 86.9% of patients. Although there was a trend toward greater efficacy in the lower and multiple levels of obstruction, the differences were not statistically significant owing, probably, to small sample size. We conclude that granisetron may be highly efficacious in the control of emesis resulting from intestinal obstruction caused by metastatic cancer, and can be used effectively in patients refractory to other antiemetics.

Palliative surgery for rectal cancer in a national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Whether resection of the primary tumour is of benefit to patients with incurable rectal cancer (RC) remains a matter of debate. In this study we analyse prospectively recorded data from a national cohort.

METHOD

Among 4831 patients diagnosed with RC between 1997 and 2001, 838 (17%) patients were treated with palliative surgery. Patients were stratified according to disease stage, age and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A significantly longer median survival, 12 (range 10-13) months, was observed in patients treated with resection of the primary tumour compared with 5 (range 4-6) months in patients treated with nonresective procedures (P < 0.001). Median survival in months was significantly (P < 0.001) related to age (13; < 60 years of age, 10; 60 to 69 years, 7; 70 to 79 years, 6; >/= 80 years of age). In patients over 80 years, survival was similar regardless of the treatment. Thirty-day mortality varied from 2.5% to 20%, according to age groups.

CONCLUSION

The longer survival observed in patients with resection of the primary tumour may partly be explained by patient selection. Elderly patients (>/= 80 years) had a similar survival, irrespective of resection of the primary tumour or not. Careful consideration of the individual patient, extent of disease and treatment-related factors are important in decision-taking for palliative treatment for patients with advanced RC.

Surgery as a bridge to palliative chemotherapy in patients with malignant bowel obstruction from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a feature of the clinical course of 10-28% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in palliative chemotherapy regimens have prolonged survival in patients with stage IV CRC. Few reports exist that describe outcomes in patients who have had surgery for MBO and subsequent chemotherapy as part of their treatment. The objective of this study was to review surgical outcomes in patients with MBO for CRC and to evaluate the extent to which surgery can serve as a bridge to palliative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who presented with MBO and had surgical treatment were identified from a prospectively kept database at a single tertiary care center between 09/99 and 08/04. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and clinical and outcomes data were abstracted.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were identified who had surgery as part of the treatment for MBO from CRC. Operations included resections, bypasses and stoma creation. Overall, 80% of patients were able to tolerate solid food post-operatively and return home. The median survival for the entire cohort was 3.5 months. Seven patients died within 30 days of surgery. Of the remainder, 24 patients were palliated with surgery alone and 16 patients ultimately received palliative chemotherapy. Survival in the final cohort was significantly prolonged (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery can adequately palliate a substantial proportion of patients with MBO from CRC with acceptable morbidity and mortality. In addition, in a subset of patients it can facilitate palliative chemotherapy that is associated with improved overall survival.

Palliating Patients Who Have Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: Creating the Right Framework and Salient Symptom Management

The last phases of colorectal malignant illness may be the most challenging and saddening for all involved, but they offer opportunities to become the most rewarding. This transformation of hopelessness to fulfillment requires a willingness by surgeon, patient, and patient's family to trust one another to realistically set goals of care, stick together, and not let the treatment of the disease become a surrogate for treating the suffering that characterizes grave illness.

Surgical palliation of bowel obstruction

MBO is a common but difficult problem for surgeons caring for cancer patients. Nonsurgical interventions should be considered in all patients who have MBO, especially in those with limited expected survival time or for whom surgery will have little effect on disease control. Surgical options can be helpful in the setting of MBO, as long as reasonable goals and realistic out-comes are clear. There is no defined algorithm for all patients with MBO, and decision-making is based on reasonable estimates of survival and treatment-related success. Therefore, better prospective data need to be collected for this population of patients. In addition, a randomized prospective trial comparing treatments based on the clinical scenario could help practitioners who care for patients with this condition.

Venting direct percutaneous jejunostomy (DPEJ) for drainage of malignant bowel obstruction in patients operated on for gastric cancer

Malignant chronic bowel obstruction (MCBO) is a syndrome caused by abdomen-pelvic diffusion of neoplastic diseases of any origin. It generally occurs in an advanced disease, affecting 3-15% of patients recently operated, untreated, or submitted to radiotherapy. Patients complain of chronic pain and vomitus. The approach to this problem is multidisciplinary, involving the surgeon, the endoscopist, the oncologist, and the pain-therapy expert. Direct percutaneous jejunostomy (DPEJ) using a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is a jejunal percutaneous access procedure indicated for nutrition in those patients whose stomach cannot be used, as in cases of partially or totally gastrectomized ones. A venting PEG or percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) is a solution to drain the gastrointestinal tract for MCBO even in difficult cases represented by patients with previous abdominal surgery, those with partial or total gastrectomies, ascites, or peritoneal carcinosis. We report our five-case experience of draining an MCBO in patients previously operated on for gastric cancer, using a DPEJ technique that we believe is the best technique for this purpose.

Comparison of stent placement and colostomy as palliative treatment for inoperable malignant colorectal obstruction

BACKGROUND

Stent placement is a useful palliative treatment for inoperable acute malignant colorectal obstruction. However, data comparing stent placement with colostomy are scarce.

METHODS

We compared the clinical outcome of 18 patients who had stent placement and 17 patients who underwent only colostomy.

RESULTS

The postoperative hospital stay was 22.3 days for stent placement compared with 47.4 days for colostomy (p = 0.016). The duration to readmission was 129.2 days for stent placement and 188.4 days for colostomy. The estimated duration of primary stent patency was 106 days. Mean survival period was 134 days in patients with stent placement and 191 days in patients with colostomy.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients with stent placement but duration to readmission and survival were longer in patients with colostomy. However, stent placement increases the option of palliative treatment and is an effective treatment contributing to improving quality of life.

Surgical management of malignant bowel obstruction

MBO is a common but difficult problem for surgeons caring for cancer patients. Nonsurgical interventions should be considered in all patients with MBO, especially inpatients with limited survival or for whom surgery will have little effect on disease control. Although there is no algorithm for all patients with MBO, decision-making is based on reasonable expectations of survival and treatment-related success. Surgical options can be helpful in the setting of MBO as long as reasonable goals and realistic outcomes are clear.

Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: the impact of diversion ileostomy

BACKGROUND

The incidence of small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery has not been well documented in the era of sphincter-preserving surgery. This report aimed to study the incidence, aetiologies and outcomes of small bowel obstruction in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The factors that might affect the incidences of small bowel obstruction were analysed.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer from August 1993 to March 1999 were studied. Patients with unplanned admissions, with the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction, were reviewed. The aetiologies and outcome of small bowel obstruction were documented.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 39 months; 22 patients presented with 30 episodes of small bowel obstruction, and operations were necessary in nine patients (40.9%). Malignant obstruction occurred in two patients (10.3%). Obstruction within 6 weeks of surgery (including closure of stoma) occurred in 13 patients (6.1%). Early obstruction occurred at a higher incidence in those patients who had had an ileostomy than in those who did not (9.1% vs 2.9%, P=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery occurred in 10.3% of patients. The majority of the obstruction was benign in nature. The presence of diversion ileostomy was associated with an increased incidence of early obstruction, and the use of loop ileostomy for proximal diversion should be further assessed.

Palliative management of malignant bowel obstruction

Bowel obstruction may be a mode of presentation of intra-abdominal and pelvic malignancy or a feature of recurrent disease following anticancer therapy. Malignant bowel obstruction is well-recognized in gynecologic patients with advanced cancer. Retrospective and autopsy studies found the frequency at approximately 5-51% of patients with gynecological malignancy(1-7). Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is particularly frequent in patients with ovarian cancer where it is the most frequent cause of death(7). Patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer and those with high-grade lesions are at higher risk for MBO as compared to patients with lower stage or low-grade tumors(1,8). Ovarian carcinoma accounted for 50% of small bowel obstruction and 37% of large bowel obstruction treated in a large gynecological oncology service(8-11).

Outcome of palliative operations for malignant bowel obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from nongynecological cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) secondary to peritoneal carcinomatosis carries a grave prognosis. We evaluated clinicopathologic factors that predict outcomes after palliative operations for MBO.

METHODS

Data on patients undergoing laparotomy for palliation of gastrointestinal MBO at City of Hope between 1995 and 2000 were retrospectively collected. Successful palliation was defined as the ability to tolerate solid food (TSF).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients underwent operative treatment. In 20 patients, MBO was the first presentation of disease; for others, the median disease-free interval was 15 months. The complication rate was 44%, and postoperative mortality was 15%. The median length of stay was 12 days. Twenty-nine patients (45%) were discharged from the hospital on a regular diet; 22 (76%) continued to eat until their last follow-up. Median survival was 90 days. Univariate factors for longer survival were TSF on discharge, colorectal primary, and nonmetastatic status at first diagnosis. Patients with ascites and whose cancer first presented with MBO had an inferior survival. Noncolorectal primary remained a multivariate predictor for decreased survival. TSF was predicted by the absence of ascites, an obstruction not involving the small bowel, and a preoperative albumin of >3.0 mg/dl. Multiple logistic regression analysis yielded presence of ascites and small-bowel obstruction as predictors of inability to TSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one third of patients with MBO from peritoneal carcinomatosis will have prolonged postoperative palliation with significant, but acceptable, treatment-related morbidity. TSF at discharge is a useful predictor of continued palliation for most patients. Patients with colorectal cancer may have superior survival outcome and better palliation; others are at risk for poor outcomes, especially in the presence of ascites and MBO of small bowel. In these patients, highly selective use of laparotomy is recommended.

Use of self-expanding metal stents for palliation of rectosigmoid cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with large bowel obstruction can be palliated by colostomy or by endoscopic modalities that restore luminal patency. The clinical results of a series of patients with rectosigmoid cancer in whom self-expanding metal stents were inserted at endoscopy are presented.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with symptoms related to obstructive rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma were treated by endoscopic insertion of self-expanding metal stents.

RESULTS

Metal stents were correctly placed in 36 of 37 patients (97%) with no immediate complications. Early dislodgment of the stent (within 1 week) was observed in 3 cases. The remaining 33 patients (92%) were followed for a median of 7 months (3 weeks-33 months). In 28 patients (78%) there was long-term restoration of luminal patency and disappearance of obstructive symptoms without further treatments. They experienced no pain, tenesmus, or incontinence during the follow-up period. The incidence of complications (early and late) and the mortality rate related to the procedure were 22% and 3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic metal stents can be considered a simple and effective solution for long-term palliation of rectosigmoid cancer.

Covered metal stents for management of inoperable malignant colorectal strictures

BACKGROUND

Metal stents have been reported as an effective alternative to surgery for the palliation of patients with colorectal neoplastic obstruction. Because most of the published series describe the use of uncovered stents, the purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, safety, and outcome of covered stents for the palliative treatment of malignant colorectal strictures.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with advanced distal colorectal cancer underwent placement of 10 and 12 cm long, 23 mm diameter covered stents under fluoroscopic and endoscopic control. Clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled at 3- to 6-week intervals.

RESULTS

Stent insertion was successful in 15 of 16 patients (93%). Perforation occurred in one patient during stent placement requiring colostomy. Relief of bowel obstruction was documented in all successfully treated patients. The median follow-up was 21 weeks (range 1 to 46). No recurrence of obstruction was observed during the follow-up period. Stent migration occurred in 2 patients, 7 and 21 days after stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Covered stents may provide safe and effective palliation of patients with malignant rectosigmoid strictures. Prolonged luminal patency and sealing of fistulous tracts are potential advantages of covered versus uncovered stents in the palliative treatment of colorectal malignancies. ¿

Role of octreotide, scopolamine butylbromide, and hydration in symptom control of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction and nasogastric tubes: a prospective randomized trial

Bowel obstruction may be an inoperable complication in patients with end-stage cancer. Scopolamine butylbromide (SB) and octreotide (OCT) have been successfully used with the aim of reducing gastrointestinal (GI) secretions to avoid placement of a nasogastric tube (NGT); however, there have been no comparative studies concerning the efficacy of these drugs. Furthermore, there is little information about the role played by parenteral hydration in symptom control of these patients. In a prospective trial that involved all 17 inoperable bowel-obstructed patients presenting to our services with a decompressive NGT, patients were randomized to OCT 0.3 mg/day or SB 60 mg/day for 3 days through a continuous subcutaneous infusion. Clinical data, survival time, and the time interval from the first diagnosis of cancer to the onset of inoperable bowel obstruction were noted. The intensity of pain, nausea, dry mouth, thirst, dyspnea, feeling of abdominal distension, and drowsiness were assessed by means of a verbal scale before starting treatment with the drugs under study (T0) and then daily for 3 days (T1, T2, T3). Moreover, daily information was collected regarding the quantity of GI secretions through the NGT, the oral intake of fluids, the quantity of parenteral hydration, and the analgesic therapy used. The NGT could be removed in all 10 home care and in 3 hospitalized patients without changing the dosage of the drugs. OCT significantly reduced the amount of GI secretions at T2 (P = 0.016) and T3 (P = 0.020). Compared to the home care patients, the hospitalized patients received significantly more parenteral hydration (P = 0.0005) and drank more fluids (P = 0.025). There was no difference in the daily thirst and dry mouth intensity in relation to the amount of parenteral hydration or the treatment provided (OCT or SB). Independent of antisecretory treatment, the patients receiving less parenteral hydration presented significantly more nausea (T0 P = 0.002; T1 P = 0.001; T2 P = 0.003; T3 P = 0.001) and drowsiness at T3 (P < 0.5). Pain relief was obtained in all 17 patients and only two patients required an increase in morphine dose at T1. All patients with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction should undergo treatment with antisecretory drugs so as to evaluate the possibility of removing the NGT. When a more rapid reduction in GI secretions is desired, OCT should be considered as the first choice drug. Parenteral hydration over 500 ml/day may reduce nausea and drowsiness.

Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Intestinal obstruction commonly occurs in progressive advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancers. Management of these patients is difficult due to the patients deteriorating mobility and function (performance status), the lack of further chemotherapeutic options and the high mortality and morbidity associated with palliative surgery. There are marked variations in clinical practice concerning surgery in these patients between different countries, gynaecological oncology units, and general hospitals as well as referral patterns from oncologists under whom these patients are often admitted under. There is therefore a need for all the present information to be collated, analysed (with appropriate palliative care outcomes) to establish if surgery is of benefit and what further research is needed.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to locate, appraise and summarise evidence from scientific studies on intestinal obstruction due to advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer, in order to assess the efficacy of surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive list of studies was provided by an extensive search of electronic databases, relevant journals, bibliographic databases, conference proceedings, reference lists, the grey literature, personal contact and the world wide web.

SELECTION CRITERIA

As the review concentrates on the 'best evidence' available of the role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer the inclusion criteria were kept broad (included both prospective and retrospective studies) so as to include all studies relevant to the question.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction forms were used to collect data from the studies included in the review. Two researchers extracted the data independently to reduce error. Due to the methodological quality of the studies, only a qualitative assessment was possible.

MAIN RESULTS

The role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction remains controversial, and no firm conclusions from the many retrospective case series can be made. Control of symptoms varies from 42% to over 80%, though it is often unclear how symptoms were measured and whether the tools used to collect symptom scores are validated. There is a large range in the rates of re-obstruction, from 10-50%, though time to re-obstruction was often not included. There is a wide range of postoperative morbidity and mortality, although again the definition of both these surgical outcomes varied between many of the papers.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The role of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction needs careful evaluation, using validated outcome measures of symptom control and quality of life scores. Further information would include re-obstruction rates together with the morbidity associated with the various surgical procedures. Currently, bowel obstruction is managed empirically, and there are marked variations in clinical practice by different units. There needs to be a greater standardisation of management so that comparisons between different series can be made.

Recurrent intraabdominal cancer causing intestinal obstruction: Washington Hospital Center experience with 42 patients managed by surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Reoperative surgery was used as a treatment for patients with recurrent obstructing cancer. In this group of patients intraperitoneal chemotherapy was used in an attempt to prolong the beneficial effects of treatment. This aggressive approach may be recommended irrespective of patient performance status if the patient is not terminally ill. This treatment was associated with a high rate of postoperative complications (55%) but low mortality (7%). To avoid or reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, this treatment should be performed only by an experienced surgical oncologist. Long-term benefits of this treatment were related to biologic factors reflected by cancer origin in the appendix, low-grade tumor histopathology, and a free interval of > 2 years. Treatment-related factors were completeness of cytoreduction and administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The best outcome was achieved with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin with a time interval between surgeries of 2 or more years, a complete cytoreduction, and treatment with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This treatment modality can be recommended for palliation of patients with recurrent obstruction due to other gastrointestinal and ovarian malignancies, although, long-term results may not be so encouraging as with appendix tumors. In the group of colorectal cancer patients treated by aggressive reoperative surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, 35.3 percent survived 1 year, which differs significantly from the 4-5 month survival after treatment by the standard approach.

Palliative endoscopic therapy of rectal carcinoma

Curative surgery is not feasible in a considerable proportion of patients with rectal cancer because of extensive local spread or metastatic disease. However, most of these patients require palliative treatment to improve the symptoms of the disease, e.g. obstruction, pain and haemorrhage. Palliative surgery may be associated with a morbidity of 20-40% and a mortality of more than 10%. Endoscopic procedures can provide effective palliation with less complications. Before the development of lasers, endoscopic electrocoagulation and cryosurgery were used with some success. Currently, endoscopic Nd:YAG photocoagulation must be considered the treatment of choice in non-resectable rectal cancer. Laser therapy allows effective palliation in 85-95% of the patients, and generally, treatment-related complications occur in less than 10% of the patients and mortality is negligible. Transanal endoscopic resection may be effective in selected patients. New approaches to endoscopic palliation include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and implantation of self-expanding metal stents.

Surgical palliation of colorectal cancer

After curative resection of primary colorectal cancer, some tumors will recur in the local or regional area or metastasize to sites amenable to surgical extirpation: the liver, lung, abdominal wall, peritoneum, bone, brain, ovaries, or penis. The local recurrence or metastasis may be resected with curative intent. Frequently, however, that is not possible, and an approach to control symptoms is necessary. The role of surgical extirpation of disease without an expectation of cure is warranted in many instances.