Pulmonary resection for metastatic colon and upper rectum cancer. Is it useful?

Less aggressive treatment for less aggressive disease? A retrospective single-center study of pulmonary-limited metastases associated with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the appropriate treatment strategies, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with pulmonary-limited metastases derived from colorectal cancer (CRC), usually manifested as a less aggressive course.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in 331 CRC patients diagnosed with pulmonary-limited metastases at a single institution between January 2011 and November 2017. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS). Further analysis was conducted according to treatment modalities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine potential prognostic factors influencing OS.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 38.6 months, the median OS in all patients was 45.2 months. A total of 163 patients received intensive local treatment with a median OS of 76.4 months, whereas 168 patients received palliative systemic treatment with a median OS of 29.7 months. The median OS was 68.9 months for patients treated with radiotherapy/radiofrequency ablation, with similar efficacy compared to surgery group, whose OS had not reached yet. No survival benefits were observed from the additional targeted therapy in systemic treatment group. The prognostic analysis demonstrated unilateral/bilateral lesions, synchronous/metachronous metastases, intensive local treatment, and resection of primary lesion that were significantly associated with survival of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive local treatment alone for pulmonary lesions was associated with excellent survival in certain patients with CRC presented with metastases confined to lungs. Doublet systemic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment also revealed satisfied efficacy and safety.

Survival and prognostic factors of isolated pulmonary metastases originating from colorectal cancer: An 8-year single-center experience

Background

Isolated pulmonary metastasis (IPM) is a rare entity that accounts for 10% of pulmonary metastases seen in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to evaluate the overall 5-year survival of IPM originating from CRC and identify potential prognostic factors affecting the overall survival (OS).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care center. The study included all patients diagnosed with CRC aged 18–75 years who underwent primary tumor resection with curative intent between 2008 and 2015, and developed IPM. Patients with no follow-up and those with extra-pulmonary metastases were excluded.

Results

The prevalence of IPM in the overall CRC cases was 4.18% (20/478 patients). The mean age of patients with IPM was 52.7 ± 12.9 years. Ten patients had synchronous IPM (50%), thirteen had unilateral (65%), and eleven underwent metastasectomy (55%). The 5-year OS was 40%, and the mean OS was 3.12 ± 1.85 years. Several factors were found to be associated with a favorable outcome, which include unilateral IPM (3.69 vs. 2.07 years; P = 0.024), metachronous (4.25 vs. 2.14 years; P = 0.017), metastasectomy (4.81 vs. 1.83 years; P = 0.005). In addition, mortality was likely to be decreased by more than 90% after metastasectomy (unadjusted odds ratio = 0.071; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.8; P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Forty percent of the included patients survived the 5-year follow-up. Better survival was associated with the metastases being unilateral, metachronous, and metastasectomy. Mortality was lower in patients with pulmonary recurrence after metastasectomy.

•

IPM showed an incidence of 4% among resectable CRC patients.

•

IPM demonstrated 40% 5-year overall survival.

•

Survival was not influenced by age, comorbidities, KRAS mutation, nor the number of pulmonary lesions.

•

Unilateral lesions, metachronous metastases, and metastasectomy were associated with a favorable outcome.

•

The mortality was likely to be decreased by >90% after metastasectomy.

Early Systemic Failure After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Rectal Cancer

Purpose

Distant metastasis can occur early after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients who developed early systemic failure.

Methods

The patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for a rectal adenocarcinoma between June 2007 and July 2015 were included in this study. Patients who developed distant metastasis within 6 months after CRT were identified. We compared short- and long-term clinicopathologic outcomes of patients in the early failure (EF) group with those of patients in the control group.

Results

Of 107 patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer, 7 developed early systemic failure. The lung was the most common metastatic site. In the EF group, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen was higher (5 mg/mL vs. 2 mg/mL, P = 0.010), and capecitabine as a sensitizer of CRT was used more frequently (28.6% vs. 3%, P = 0.002). Of the 7 patients in the EF group, only 4 underwent a primary tumor resection (57.1%), in contrast to the 100% resection rate in the control group (P < 0.001). In terms of pathologic outcomes, ypN and TNM stages were more advanced in the EF group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.047, respectively), and numbers of positive and retrieved lymph nodes were much higher (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively).

Conclusion

Although early distant metastasis after CRT for rectal cancer is very rare, patients who developed early metastasis showed a poor nodal response with a low primary tumor resection rate and poor oncologic outcomes.

Is Surgery Warranted for Oligometastatic Disease?

The development of metastases after curative treatment can be seen as a failure. A common justification for the removal of metastases is that the knowledge that they are there may cause psychological distress, a real symptom that may be relieved by their removal. Although it is a commonly used justification for metastasectomy, the authors are unaware of any studies confirming or quantifying the health gain. This article strongly challenges the belief in clinical effectiveness and demonstrates that it is supported neither by a sound biological rationale nor by any good evidence. Reasons are suggested why this unfounded belief has become so prevalent.

History and present status of pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer

Clinical practice with respect to metastatic colorectal cancer differs from the other two most common cancers, breast and lung, in that routine surveillance is recommended with the specific intent of detecting liver and lung metastases and undertaking liver and lung resections for their removal. We trace the history of this approach to colorectal cancer by reviewing evidence for effectiveness from the 1950s to the present day. Our sources included published citation network analyses, the documented proposal for randomised trials, large systematic reviews, and meta-analysis of observational studies. The present consensus position has been adopted on the basis of a large number of observational studies but the randomised trials proposed in the 1980s and 1990s were either not done, or having been done, were not reported. Clinical opinion is the mainstay of current practice but in the absence of randomised trials there remains a possibility of selection bias. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are now routine before adoption of a new practice but RCTs are harder to run in evaluation of already established practice. One such trial is recruiting and shows that controlled trial are possible.

Should preoperative chest CT be recommended to all colon cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) and the risk factors for lung metastasis in colon cancer patients without liver metastasis who had negative findings on initial chest X-ray (CXR).

BACKGROUND

Preoperative staging with chest CT is recommended in colon cancer patients. However, there have been only scant data on the clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Three hundred nineteen consecutive colon cancer patients without liver metastasis were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The patients had negative findings on preoperative CXR, and they underwent surgery for colon cancer during the period of January 2008 to April 2010.

RESULTS

Lung nodule on chest CT was found in 136 patients (42.6%). Twenty of those were definitely diagnosed with lung metastasis (6.3%) by follow-up chest CT or pathologic confirmation. There was no case of delay in surgery due to findings of lung nodule. Comparing the group with lung metastases to that without lung metastases, postoperative pathologic findings reported more advanced T and N status (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively), and lymphatic invasion was more frequent (P = 0.003) in the group with lung metastasis. By multivariate analysis, CT-predicted lymph node metastases and pathologic lymph node metastases were risk factors for lung metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative staging chest CT is not beneficial to colon cancer patients without liver metastasis and lymph node metastasis suggested on abdominal and pelvic CT who had negative finding on initial CXR.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Reports Prompt a Review of the Available Evidence

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer is commonplace surgery, but the practice has grown on the basis of follow-up studies. These studies base their conclusion on the effectiveness of metastasectomy on the survival rates at 5 years of very highly selected patients. Three publications in the last year, a registry study, a meta-analysis and a randomised controlled trial of monitoring and early detection of cancer recurrence, prompted a review of the evidence. A critical examination of the evidence suggests that much of the apparent benefit may be due to selection of patients most likely to survive on the basis of well-known prognostic features, explicitly stated in the clinical record. Clinicians also assess their patients over time and do not offer surgery to those with faster progression. Such clinical judgements are of their nature often subtle and undocumented and thus cannot be retrieved from the clinical record. Although some patients may have long survival following pulmonary metastasectomy, and indeed their survival might be believed to be due to resection of pulmonary metastases, how many patients must be operated on to find these survivors? What is the number 'needed to treat'? It may be that of the patients having metastasectomy, for the greater proportion it does not materially alter their survival. A randomised controlled trial to resolve this uncertainty is in progress. The Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) trial is recruiting in Britain and Europe.

Incidence and predictive factors for pulmonary metastases after curative resection of colon cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the actuarial incidence of pulmonary metastases as the first site of metastasis after R0 resection of colon cancer and to clarify predictive factors for pulmonary metastases as the first site of metastasis.

METHODS

Data for 746 patients who underwent R0 resection for colon cancer from 2000 to 2006 were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 56.9 months.

RESULTS

Pulmonary metastases developed in 35 patients. Mean duration from colon surgery to identification of pulmonary metastases was 20.0 months. The overall occurrence rates of 5-year pulmonary metastasis according to Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage were 0.6 % (stage I), 2.2 % (stage II), 9.8 % (stage III), and 24.6 % (stage IV), respectively. Surgery for pulmonary metastases was performed first 18 patients (51.4 %), and 16 (88.9 %) of these 18 patients achieved R0 surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of regional lymph node involvement and preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (≥5 ng/ml) were significant independent risk factors for pulmonary metastases. Five-year actuarial incidence of pulmonary metastases increased significantly with increased number of risk factors (0 factors, 2.2 %; 1 factor, 6.6 %; 2 factors, 18.4 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study clearly demonstrated predictive factors for pulmonary metastases after R0 resection of colon cancer. Actuarial incidence of pulmonary metastases was significantly related to the number of risk factors present. The data should facilitate the establishment of novel algorithms for predicting pulmonary metastases after resection of colon cancer, which may lead to the appropriate surveillance strategies after colon surgery.

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules in rectal cancer: a recommendation for follow-up guidelines

BACKGROUND

Incidental visualization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules is considered a clinical dilemma.

METHODS

We identified patients for inclusion in this study by searching for the term "indeterminate nodules" in the radiology database of rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery. Patients with definite metastatic disease were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 224 patients underwent chest computerized tomography (CT) and 59 of these patients had indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected more than twice by CT scan. Six patients (10.2%) were confirmed to have metastatic lesions on follow-up evaluation. Pulmonary nodule size (P=0.028), pathologic N status (P=0.049), positive nodal status (P=0.036) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P=0.033) were significant risk factors for pulmonary metastasis. In the pulmonary metastasis group, the patients who had received adjuvant oxaliplatin-based (FOLFOX4) chemotherapy had longer intervals to developing metastasis compared to patients who had not received it.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not necessary to perform excessive surveillance routinely for all rectal cancer patients who have indeterminate pulmonary lesions. Intensive follow-up chest CT or other invasive diagnostic modalities should be considered only in patients with pulmonary nodules larger than 5.7 mm or positive nodal status. In addition, patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX4 chemotherapy should be followed-up for longer periods.

Preoperative chest computerized tomography in patients with locally advanced mid or lower rectal cancer: its role in staging and impact on treatment strategy

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary metastasis is frequent in rectal cancer. Some guidelines recommend chest computerized tomography (CT) for preoperative workup in rectal cancer patients, which have no solid evidence to support this recommendation. This study was designed to evaluate the role of chest CT on preoperative staging in rectal cancer patients and to assess the impact on treatment strategy.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from 103 clinically T3/T4 mid or lower rectal cancer patients who had chest X-ray (CXR) and CT to evaluate lung metastasis. The chest images were classified into four groups: metastasis, indeterminate, benign, and negative. Patients showing indeterminate lesions had follow-up CTs at 3- to 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

Nine patients (8.7%) had pulmonary metastases detected on CT. CXR did not reveal any pulmonary metastatic lesions in four of the nine patients. Of these four, treatment was changed in three patients because of these findings. Forty (38.8%) patients had indeterminate nodules on chest CT. Of these, 37 patients had follow-up CTs and four patients (10.8%) showed interval changes that were confirmed as pulmonary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems reasonable to perform chest CT for preoperative staging in patients with T3/T4 mid or lower rectal cancer.

Oncological outcome of unresectable lung metastases without extrapulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer

AIM: To explore the oncological outcomes of unresectable lung metastases without extrapulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Patients with unresectable isolated lung metastases from colorectal cancer were prospectively collected in a single institution during a 5-year period. All patients received either the fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin, fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin regimen as first-line treatment. The resectability after preoperative chemotherapy was evaluated. Patients’ outcome and predictive factors for overall survival were also investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the study. After standardized first-line chemotherapy, only 4 patients (5.7%) were converted to resectable disease. The median overall survival time in all patients was 19 mo (95% CI: 12.6-25.4), with a 2-year overall survival rate of 38.8%. No survival difference was found among different first-line chemotherapeutic regimens. Prognostic analysis demonstrated that only the first response assessment for first-line treatment was the independent factor for predicting overall survival. The median survival time in partial response, stable disease and progressive disease patients were 27 mo, 16 mo and 8 mo (P = 0.00001).

CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy can only be performed in a small part of unresectable lung metastases patients after chemotherapy. Patients’ first response assessment is an important prognostic factor.

Lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: is this surgery effective in prolonging life?

The commonest context in which pulmonary metastasectomy is performed is for recurrent colorectal cancer. With a more active policy of surveillance among cancer teams, ready access to ever faster CT scans and a willingness to perform further surgery to control recurrent cancer, the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy is increasing. In this pro/con debate the issues are explored. It is recognized by both sides that there is no randomized trial evidence on which to base the practice. The difference of opinion is whether there is sufficient evidence from very many case series of both pulmonary and hepatic metastasectomy on which to base current practice. The surgeon's view is that the weight of evidence from many follow-up studies is in favour of continuing this practice. The mathematician's view is that case selection could account for nearly all the observed results.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Surgical removal of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer is undertaken increasingly but the practice is variable. There have been no randomized trials of effectiveness. We needed evidence from a systematic review to plan a randomized controlled trial.

DESIGN

A formal search for all studies concerning the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy was undertaken including all published articles using pre-specified keywords. Abstracts were screened, reviewed and data extracted by at least two of the authors. Information across studies was collated in a quantitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Of 101 articles identified, 51 contained sufficient quantitative information to be included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 1971 and 2007, and reported on 3504 patients. There was little change over time in patient characteristics such as age, sex, the time elapsed since resection of the primary cancer, its site or stage. The proportion with multiple metastases or elevated carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) did not change over time but there was an apparent increase in the proportion of patients who also had hepatic metastasectomy. Differences in 5-year survival between groups defined by CEA or by single versus multiple metastases persisted over time. Few data were available concerning postoperative morbidity, postoperative lung function or change in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence available concerning pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer is not sufficient to draw inferences concerning the effectiveness of this surgery. There is great variety in what was reported and its utility. Given the burdensome nature of the surgery involved, better evidence, ideally in the form of a randomized trial, is required for the continuance of this practice.

How uncommon are isolated lung metastases in colorectal cancer? A review from database of 754 patients over 4 years

BACKGROUND

It is commonly thought that colon cancer metastases to the lungs without involvement of the liver are rare.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between December 2003 and August 2007 in Singapore. Isolated lung metastases were determined as (1) Definite if there was confirmed histology or cytology of the lung lesion(s) in the absence of liver lesions on CT scan, and (2) Probable if there were only radiological evidence suggestive of lung metastases rather than lung primary also in the absence of liver lesions on CT scan.

RESULTS

There were 196 patients with rectal and 558 patients with colon cancer (369 left-sided and 189 right-sided). There were 13 definite isolated lung metastases, and the remaining 43 were probable. Twenty-three (12%) patients with rectal cancer and 33 (6%) patients with colon cancer had isolated lung metastases (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.21-3.70). Patients with >or=pT3 lesions (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.75-4.93) and >or=pN1 (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.86- 2.83) were more likely to have isolated lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The true incidence of isolated lung without liver metastases in colorectal cancer is likely to lie between 1.7% and 7.2%. While the incidence of isolated lung metastases is twice as common in patients with rectal cancer, it is still significant in patients with colon cancer. The absence of liver involvement should not preclude a search for lung metastases.

Staging of advanced colorectal cancer

The management of advanced colorectal cancer has changed dramatically during the last decade. By redefining resectability, and with the use of modern chemotherapy, nearly 10% of unresectable patients are now alive 5 years after diagnosis, and, overall, 20% are alive at 5 years when the combined results of surgery and chemotherapy are considered. These achievements are not reflected in the current staging, which categorizes all disease spread beyond the lymph node basin of the primary tumor as unstratified stage 4. This article discusses the merits of a number of proposals for a new, meaningful staging system for advanced colorectal cancer.

Review article: Multimodality treatment of liver metastases increases suitability for surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer occur frequently, but only 10-20% are eligible for liver surgery. Recent new developments changed the concepts of treating patients with colorectal liver metastases.

AIM

To describe the available modalities that can result in increasing resectability rate.

METHODS

Potentials and drawbacks of portal vein embolization, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), trans-ablated tumour hepatectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the approach to patients with extrahepatic metastases are described.

RESULTS

Portal vein embolization is a well-established technique to increase the volume of the future liver remnant. RFA should be applied if partial liver resection alone cannot make the liver tumour-free. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable liver metastases can result in secondary resectability rates of 15-40%. Hepatotoxicity can lead to a higher complication rate after partial liver resection. A limited number of extrahepatic tumour localizations should be resected as well.

CONCLUSIONS

A more aggressive approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases improves resectability rate and survival. Unfortunately, these new options have not been thoroughly evaluated in randomized controlled trials. For some of these modalities, the currently available results are so promising that it might be difficult to start such trials in the future.

Resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Although pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC) often represent systemic and uncontrolled tumour growth, in a number of patients lung disease is limited and the patient remains well. When the metastases can be removed, long term survival is a possibility, with 5- and 10-year survivals in the order of 44% and 25%. Chemotherapy, the only alternative treatment only very rarely leads to survival beyond 24 months. Pulmonary metastases which are suitable for resection are usually detected on chest radiography, especially when carried out during monitoring of patients. They are rarely a cause of symptoms and the majority of patients have otherwise healthy lungs. CT scans supplemented by PET scans usually confirm the diagnosis, but percutaneous biopsy is sometimes necessary to exclude a primary lung cancer. The criteria for resecting CRC pulmonary metastases are (1) the primary tumour is controlled or is controllable; (2) complete resection is possible; and (3) the patient has adequate pulmonary reserve to tolerate the planned resection. Surgical approaches include posterolateral thoracotomy, staged bilateral thoracotomies, median sternotomy, clamshell incision, and video-assisted thoracic surgery. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The majority of patients having resection of pulmonary metastases from CRC recover well with very few post-operative complications. Following resection favourable prognostic factors include a long disease-free interval, small number and small size of metastases, a normal carcinoembryonic antigen level, and an absence of concomitant liver metastases and mediastinal lymph node spread. Surgery for pulmonary metastases of CRC remains the best means of local control and the best way to render the patient disease-free. Patients with complete resection of pulmonary metastases have an improved long-term survival when compared to patients with unresected metastases.

Surgical management of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer in 153 patients

BACKGROUND

Surgery has become a recognized therapeutic means in selected patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal origin. We reviewed our experience in the surgical treatment of 153 patients with pulmonary colorectal metastases and investigated factors affecting survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the records of all patients (n = 153) with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent thoracotomy between 1978 and 2003 at a single surgical center was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three patients with pulmonary metastases from colon (n = 61) or rectal (n = 92) cancer underwent 180 thoracotomies. The 2- and 5-year probabilities of survival after the first thoracotomy were 64% and 37%, respectively. Sex, age, site, International Union Against Cancer stage of the primary tumor, prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen level, size of metastases, and previous resection of hepatic metastases were not found to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Number of metastases (solitary vs. multiple), mode of operation (wedge vs. anatomical resection), disease-free interval (DFI; > 36 months), negative hilar or mediastinal lymph node status, resection margin > 10 mm, and administration of intraoperative blood substitution were predictors of a longer survival duration by univariate analysis, but only number of metastases (P = .019), mode of operation (P = .004), DFI (P = .027), and intraoperative blood substitution (P = .002) were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer is safe and results in long-term survival in selected patients. Single metastases, anatomical resection, intraoperative blood substitution, and DFI > 36 months seem to be the most reliable predictors of survival.

Resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma

A retrospective study was made on 22 patients who underwent surgery (28 operations) for lung metastases of colorectal origin from 1986 to 1995 at the Department of Surgery II, Padova University. The overall 5-year survival (OS) following pulmonary resection was 62% and the 5-year disease-free interval after metastasectomy (DFIM) 45%. The median survival was 23.6 months and the median DFIM 15.3 months. Univariate (Mantel Cox) and multivariate (Cox's model) analyses were used to identify any prognostic factors significant for OS and DFIM. Site and stage of primary colorectal carcinoma, number of pulmonary metastases at presentation, disease-free intervals between treatment of primary tumour and diagnosis of lung metastases (DFIP) appeared to have no influence on OS and DFIM. However, patients who underwent radical resection for metastases had a significantly longer DFIM than those who underwent 'non-radical' resections (P = 0.02), but radical resection had no significant positive effect on OS. A short DFIP, multiple and/or bilateral lesions, lung metastases occurring after liver resection with a curative aim are not contraindications to surgery in patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, the main criterion for selection of patients being the possibility of performing 'radical' resection.

Surgical palliation of colorectal cancer

After curative resection of primary colorectal cancer, some tumors will recur in the local or regional area or metastasize to sites amenable to surgical extirpation: the liver, lung, abdominal wall, peritoneum, bone, brain, ovaries, or penis. The local recurrence or metastasis may be resected with curative intent. Frequently, however, that is not possible, and an approach to control symptoms is necessary. The role of surgical extirpation of disease without an expectation of cure is warranted in many instances.

Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases. 127 cases

— The Authors analyse the success of surgical treatment for pulmonary metastasis on the basis of survival rate. The case histories of 127 patients are analysed and compared to those in literature.

Treatment options for the patient with colorectal cancer

Treatment decisions for patients with colorectal cancer depend on the site and extent of the cancer. Medical factors rarely preclude appropriate treatment. For colonic and upper rectal cancer, curative treatment is almost entirely operative. Even patients with disseminated colon cancer merit a limited palliative resection to abort bleeding and prevent obstruction. When surgery is elective, colostomy is rarely necessary, although it may be required in patients who have obstructed or perforated colon cancer. For distal rectal cancer, various treatment options, including radiation therapy, have reduced the need for a colostomy, although maintaining comparable cure rates. Currently, only about one in seven patients with rectal cancer requires a permanent colostomy.

Colorectal lung metastases: results of surgical excision

Between 1960 and 1988, 139 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Median interval between colon resection and lung resection was 34 months. Ninety-eight patients (70.5%) had a solitary metastasis. Wedge excision was performed in 68 patients, lobectomy in 53, lobectomy plus wedge excision in 9, bilobectomy in 4, and pneumonectomy in 5. Operative mortality was 1.4%. Localized extrapulmonary colorectal cancer was also resected in 20 patients. Median follow-up was 7 years (range 1 to 20.4 years). Overall 5- and 20-year survival was 30.5% and 16.2%, respectively. Five-year survival for patients with solitary metastasis was 36.9%, as compared with 19.3% for those with two metastases (p less than 0.05) and 7.7% for those with more than two (p less than 0.01). Patients with normal carcino-embryonic antigen had a 5-year survival of 46.8% versus 16.0% for patients with increased levels (p less than 0.01). Five-year survival for patients with resected extrapulmonary disease was 30.0% versus 30.7% for those without extrapulmonary cancer (p = not significant). Repeat thoracotomy for recurrent metastases was done in 19 patients. Five-year survival after the second lung resection was 30.2%. We conclude that resection of colorectal lung metastases is safe and effective, that resectable extrapulmonary disease does not necessarily contraindicate pulmonary resection, and that repeat thoracotomy is warranted in selected patients with recurrent colorectal lung metastases.