Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Initial registry results

Comparing advanced platforms for local excision of rectal lesions

BACKGROUND

Transanal surgery facilitates organ preservation in select patients with benign and early malignant rectal lesions to avoid the functional consequences of radical surgery. The transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) platform created a standard for local excision with lower margin positivity and recurrence rates than traditional transanal excision. The single-port robot (SP r) presents a promising alternative transanal platform. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative and pathologic outcomes of TEM and SP r for excision of rectal lesions.

METHODS

A review of consecutive patients who underwent local excision of rectal lesions at a tertiary referral center from 1/2001 to 5/2022 was performed. Cases were stratified into TEM or SP rTAMIS in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for all baseline characteristics. Clinical, tumor-specific, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, and Mann-Whitney U-tests. The main outcomes were oncologic quality measures, complications, and operative time.

RESULTS

Matching resulted 50 patients in each cohort. Groups had similar age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, diagnosis, lesion characteristics, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation rates. There were no intraoperative complications in either cohort. Three SP rTAMIS cases were converted intraoperatively; there were no conversions in TEM. SP rTAMIS had significantly shorter operative times than TEM (mean 104 vs. 245, p = 0.027). The rates of positive distal margins (2% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) and piecemeal resection (4% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) were similar. SP rTAMIS had significantly lower postoperative morbidity rates than TEM (9% vs. 20%, p = 0.031). There was no mortality in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

SP robotics provided high-quality outcomes similar to TEM for local excision of rectal lesions. SP robotics had faster operative time with comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to TEM. These early data are promising for expanding use of SP robotic platforms.

Development and validation of a transanal endoscopic rectal purse string simulator

BACKGROUND

Rectal purse string placement for transanal mesorectal excision is challenging, and practice is difficult. The objective of this study is to build an endoscopic rectal purse string simulator and provide evidence for the validity of its use.

METHODS

A low-cost transanal endoscopic rectal purse string simulator was created and used to measure the performance of participants. Participants included general surgery residents, fellows, and staff surgeons from several Canadian university-affiliated institutions across Canada. The performance of the rectal purse string placement was measured by the time to completion of the task as well scoring with a modified objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score and a modified advanced laparoscopic suturing (ALS) score.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine participants were recruited into the study. Participants were split into three groups, based on prior experience with laparoscopic suturing, for the analysis of suturing a rectal purse string on the simulator based on three performance measures. There was a significant difference found in all three measures of performance in the three groups (time to completion p = 0.014, mean blinded OSATS score p = 0.007, mean blinded ALS score p = 0.020). Participants with previous laparoscopic suturing had significantly faster times to completion and higher skills scores when compared to residents (time: 5.1 ± 1.4 min vs 9.0 ± 4.8 min, p = 0.005; OSATS: 19.7 ± 2.8 vs 13.0 ± 5.8, p = 0.00398, ALS: 27.4 ± 4.0 vs 18.9 ± 8.5, p = 0.0151).

CONCLUSIONS

A transanal endoscopic purse string simulator was constructed and preliminary testing has shown variable performance based on prior laparoscopic suturing experience.

Peritoneal perforation during transanal endoscopic microsurgery is not associated with significant short-term complications

BACKGROUND

In patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), breach of the peritoneal cavity is a feared intraoperative challenge. Our aim is to analyze predictors and short-term outcomes of patients with peritoneal perforation (TEM-P) when compared to similar patients with no peritoneal compromise (TEM-N).

METHODS

At St. Paul's Hospital, demographic, surgical, pathologic, and follow-up data for all patients treated by TEM is maintained in a prospectively populated database. A retrospective review was performed and two groups were established for comparison: TEM-P and TEM-N. Statistical analysis was performed using student's t or chi-squared test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 619 patients treated by TEM between 2007 and 2016, 39 (6%) patients were in the TEM-P group and 580 (94%) in the TEM-N group. There were no differences between the groups in patient age, gender, histology, or tumor size. Patients who had peritoneal perforations had more proximal lesions (11 vs. 7 cm, p < 0.0001), anterior lesions (56 vs. 43%, p < 0.05), and longer operations (80 vs. 51 min, p < 0.005). While most defects were closed endoluminally, 2 patients with perforation were converted to transabdominal surgery. There was a difference in overall hospital stay with TEM-P patients staying on average 2 days in hospital with fewer patients managed as day surgery (31 vs. 73%, p < 0.0001). There were no mortalities or significant 30-day complications in the TEM-P group and only one patient required readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The St. Paul's Hospital TEM experience suggests patients with peritoneal breach during TEM can be safely managed with outcomes similar to patients without peritoneal entry. Proximal, anterior lesions are at highest risk of peritoneal perforation.

Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has shown mixed results. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) might be advantageous in this population. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term oncologic and operative outcomes of salvage surgery after TEM, comparing TaTME to conventional salavge TME (sTME).

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with salvage surgery after TEM were identified. Patients who underwent TaTME were compared to those who had conventional sTME. The primary outcome was the ability to perform an appropriate oncologic procedure defined by a composite outcome (negative distal margins, negative radial margins and complete or near complete mesorectum specimen).

RESULTS

During the study period, 41 patients had salvage surgery after TEM. Of those, 11 patients had TaTME while 30 patients had sTME. All patients in the TaTME group met the composite outcome of appropriate oncologic procedure compared to 76.7% for the conventional sTME group (p = 0.19). TaTME was associated with significantly higher rates of sphincter preservation (100 vs. 50%, p = 0.01), higher rates of laparoscopic surgery (100 vs. 23.3%, p < 0.001) and lower rates of conversion to open surgery (9.1 vs. 57%, p < 0.001). No difference was found in postoperative morbidity (36.3 vs. 36.7%, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that for patients requiring salvage surgery after TEM, TaTME is associated with significantly higher rates of sphincter-sparing surgery when compared to conventional transabdominal TME while producing adequate short-term oncologic outcomes. Salvage surgery after TEM might be a clear indication for TaTME rather than conventional surgery.

Endoscopic Treatment of Carpet-Like Adenomas of the Rectum

Background

Transanal microsurgery, endoscopic laser photocoagulation and snare resection have all been used to treat large sessile adenomas of the rectum alternatively to a surgical approach. However, such modalities are often defective due to the carpet-like shape and the frequently large extension of the lesions.

Methods

Ten patients with carpet-like adenoma were submitted to transanal endoscopic resection by urological resectoscope.

Results

Complete eradication was obtained in all lesions. The mean number of treatment sessions was 3 (range, 1-5). The mean time between the first treatment and the complete eradication was 6 months (range, 1-18). The only complications were an intraoperative and an early postoperative bleeding. There was no early or late mortality related to the procedure.

Conclusions

Transanal endoscopic resection by urological resectoscope appears to be a suitable therapeutic approach for sessile and carpet-like adenomas of the rectum or for pTI cancer in patients who refuse major surgery.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) techniques encompass a variety of approaches, including transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery. These allow a surgeon to perform local excision of rectal lesions with minimal morbidity and the potential to spare the need for proctectomy. As understanding of the long-term outcomes from these procedures has evolved, so have the indications for TES. In this study, we review the development of TES, its early results, and the evolution of new surgical techniques. In addition, we evaluate the most recent research on indications and outcomes in rectal cancer.

The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance

AIM

Despite transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) being used for over 30 years, there has been slow adoption of this modality in many centres. There remains a paucity of research regarding the learning curve and early performance of surgeons who begin to offer TEM. We sought to determine predictors of longer rates of tumour excision and improvements in operative time in a newly established TEM programme.

METHOD

All patients who underwent TEM at the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada, between October 2009 and September 2014 were included. Data were abstracted through a retrospective chart review. The average rate of lesion excision (ARE) was calculated to standardize the operation time by size of the pathological specimen (min/cm³ ), representing a measure of surgical efficiency. Surgical efficiency was plotted using restricted cubic splines. Predictors of higher ARE were determined using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

During the study period 108 patients underwent TEM. ARE was available for 95 patients of mean age 67.2 years. The mean ARE was 18.6 min/cm³ . On adjusting for important covariates, the ARE improved with each additional case until 16 cases were completed. Significant predictors of higher ARE on multivariable analysis were age < 50 years, experience of fewer than five cases, and carcinoid/gastrointestinal stromal tumour or scar histology.

CONCLUSION

Operative efficiency appears to improve as surgeons completed 16 TEM cases. We have identified important factors that result in longer operating time. The study has important implications with regard to surgical training and operative planning for new TEM programmes.

Transanal Endoscopic Operation for Rectal Tumor: Short-term Outcomes and Learning Curve Analysis

PURPOSE

We aim to report outcomes and learning curve of transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) for rectal tumors, using standard laparoscopic instruments under a magnifying laparoscopic monitor view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2014, local excision was performed using a TEO system in 46 consecutive patients with rectal tumors. Patient and tumor characteristics and perioperative outcomes were prospectively assessed.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 56 years for 15 women and 31 men. The mean tumor size was 1.8 cm, and the mean distance from the anal verge was 7.8 cm. The mean operative time was 85 minutes, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.5 days. The postoperative pathologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma for 17 patients (37%), adenoma for 4 patients (9%), carcinoid tumor for 23 patients (50%), and leiomyoma and lipoma for the 2 remaining patients (2%). A positive resection margin was documented for 4 patients (9%). No mortality was associated with the procedure although postoperative bleeding, leakage, perianal fistula, fecal incontinence, and voiding difficulty developed in 8 patients. According to the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, the operation time and hospital stay significantly decreased after 17 case experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

TEO is a feasible and safe treatment option for local excision of rectal tumors. TEO has the advantage of being a precise surgical procedure with a stable and magnifying endoscopic view. However, TEO requires a learning period and a careful selection of patients through proper indications and preoperative diagnostics.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) for Rectal Cancer: University Hospital of North Tees Experience

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique that is increasingly being used to treat early rectal cancer (T1/T2). We studied the outcomes of TEM for rectal cancer at our institution looking at the indication, recurrence rate, need for further radical surgery, 30-day and 12-month mortality and complication rate. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of cases between 2008 and 2012: 110 TEM procedures were performed during this period: 40 were confirmed rectal cancers and 70 were benign. We analysed the data for the 40 patients with confirmed rectal cancer. Thirty (75 %) of the subjects were male with a mean age of 71 ± 10 years (range 49-90 years) and 19 (48 %) patients were ASA 3 and 4. Nineteen (48 %) of cancers were pT1, eighteen (45 %) were pT2, two (5 %) were pT3 and one was yPT0. Mean specimen size was 66 ± 20 mm (range 33-120 mm) with a mean polyp size of 41 ± 24 mm (range 18-110 mm). The mean cancer size was 24 ± 13 mm (range 2-50 mm). Average distance from the anal verge was 70 ± 37 mm (range 10-150 mm), and the mean operating time was 72 ± 22 min (range 40-120 min), with an average blood loss of 28 ± 15 ml (range 10-50ml). Median hospital stay was 2 ± 1 days (range 1-7 days). Complete excision (R0) was achieved in 37 (93 %) patients. Minor post-operative complications included urinary retention in two and pyrexia in three patients. There were no 30-day or 12-month mortalities. Mean follow-up was 13 ± 11 months, range (3-40 months) Local recurrence occurred in two (5 %) patients, both underwent redo TEM. Twelve (30 %) patients underwent laparoscopic radical resections (seven AR and five APER) post-TEM. Post-operative histology confirmed pT0N0 in 7/12 patients. Three were lymph node-positive (T0N1), one was pT3N1 and the fifth was pT3N2. TEM is associated with quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than radical surgery. It is a good alternative to radical surgery in early rectal cancer, especially for high-risk patients. Recurrent tumours can be treated with redo TEM.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a review

Rectal adenomas and cancers occur frequently. Small adenomas can be removed colonoscopically, whereas larger polyps are removed via conventional transanal excision. Owing to technical difficulties, adenomas of the mid- and upper rectum require radical resection. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was first designed as an alternative treatment for these lesions. However, since its development TEM has been also used for a variety of rectal lesions, including carcinoids, rectal prolapse and diverticula, early stage carcinomas and palliative resection of rectal cancers. The objective of this review is to describe the current status of TEM in the treatment of rectal lesions. Since the 1980s, TEM has advanced substantially. With low recurrence rates, it is the method of choice for resection of endoscopically unresectable adenomas. Some studies have shown benefits to its use in treating early T1 rectal cancers compared with radical surgery in select patients. However, for more advanced rectal cancers TEM should be considered palliative or experimental. This technique has also been shown to be safe for the treatment of other uncommon rectal tumours, such as carcinoids. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery may allow for new strategies in the treatment of rectal pathology where technical limitations of transanal techniques have limited endoluminal surgical innovations.

Transanal colorectal resection using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)

The surgical management of rectal cancer has evolved over the past century, with total mesorectal excision (TME) emerging as standard of care. As a result of the morbidity associated with open TME, minimally invasive techniques have become popular. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been held as the next revolution in surgical techniques, offering the possibility of 'incisionless' TME. Early clinical series of transanal TME with laparoscopic assistance (n = 72) are promising, with overall intraoperative and postoperative complication rates of 8.3% and 27.8%, respectively, similar to laparoscopic TME. The mesorectal specimen was intact in all patients, and 94.4% had negative margins. There was no oncological recurrence in average-risk patients at short-term follow up, and 2-year survival rates in high-risk patients were comparable to that after laparoscopic TME. These preliminary studies demonstrate transanal NOTES TME with laparoscopic assistance to be clinically feasible and safe given careful patient selection, surgical expertise, and appropriate procedural training. We are hopeful that with optimization of transanal instruments and surgical techniques, pure transanal NOTES TME will become a viable alternative to open and laparoscopic TME in the future.

Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was first published by the late Professor Buess in 1983. The procedure initially had a slow acceptance due to its perceived difficulty, the cost of the equipment, and limited indications. However, the widespread adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery provided an impetus to increase the penetration of the platform. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the TEM learning curve (LC).

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, all patients who underwent TEM, from November 2005 to October 2008 were identified from a prospective database. The operations were performed by a single, board-certified colorectal surgeon (DRS), after learning the technique from Professor Buess. Patient, operative, and postoperative variables were obtained by retrospective chart review. Rates of excision in minutes per cm(2) of tissue were calculated. The CUSUM method was used to plot the LC. Variables were compared using χ (2) and Student's t test. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent TEM (median age 61 years, 69.5 % male). Mean operative time was 130.5 (range 39-254) min, and the mean specimen size was 16.6 (7.4-42) cm(2). Average rate of excision (ARE) was 8.9 min/cm(2). A stabilization of the LC was observed after the first four cases, showing an ARE of 13.8 min/cm(2) for the first four cases versus 7.9 min/cm(2) for the last 19 cases (p = 0.001). An additional rising and leveling of the LC was observed after the first 10 cases, when an increasing number of lesions located cephalad to 8 cm from the dentate line were being resected (lesions above 8 cm in the first 10 cases: 20 % vs. last 13 cases: 61 %; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The ARE significantly declined after the first four cases. The LC for TEM is associated with a significant decrease in operative time after four cases.

Previous transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer represents a risk factor for an increased abdominoperineal resection rate

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) represents a surgical option in the treatment of selected early rectal cancers. However, when definitive histopathology shows negative prognostic factors, rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence. No studies have yet analyzed the impact of previous TEM on the perioperative outcomes of immediate laparoscopic TME (LTME) for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of LTME after TEM for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database. All patients undergoing LTME within 8 weeks after full-thickness TEM for rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2011 were included. Each patient was matched on the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics with two patients undergoing primary LTME for rectal cancer during the same period. Age, gender, body mass index, tumor distance from the anal verge, tumor size, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, previous TEM, rectal wall defect size created during TEM, and intraoperative complications were included in a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for abdominoperineal resection (APR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients undergoing TEM followed by LTME were compared to 34 patients undergoing primary LTME. Mean operative time of LTME after TEM was significantly higher (206 vs. 188 min, P = 0.025). APR was more frequently performed after TEM [odds ratio (OR) 5.25, P = 0.028] and in male patients (OR 9.04, P = 0.034). On multivariate analysis, a previous TEM was the only independent predictor of APR (OR 4.13, P = 0.046). The incidence and severity of postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Mesorectum integrity was complete in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LTME after TEM is a challenging procedure, with a significantly higher risk of APR compared to primary LTME. Future improvements in preoperative patient selection for TEM are needed to reduce this risk.

Current experience and future directions of completely NOTES colorectal resection

Clinical implementation and widespread application of natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) has been limited by the lack of specialized endoscopic equipment, which has prevented the ability to perform complex procedures including colorectal resections. Relative to other types of translumenal access, transanal NOTES using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) provides a stable platform for endolumenal and direct translumenal access to the peritoneal cavity, and specifically to the colon and rectum. Completely NOTES transanal rectosigmoid resection using TEM, with or without transgastric endoscopic assistance, was demonstrated to be feasible and safe in a swine survival model. The same technique was successfully replicated in human cadavers using commercially available TEM, with endoscopic and laparoscopic instrumentation. This approach also permitted complete rectal mobilization with total mesorectal excision to be performed completely transanally. As in the swine model, transgastric and/or transanal endoscopic assistance extended the length of proximal colon mobilized and overcame some of the difficulties with TEM dissection including limited endoscopic visualization and maladapted instrumentation. This extensive laboratory experience with NOTES transanal rectosigmoid resection served as the basis for the first human NOTES transanal rectal cancer excision using TEM and laparoscopic assistance. Based on this early clinical experience, NOTES transanal approach using TEM holds significant promise as a safe and substantially less morbid alternative to conventional colorectal resection in the management of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Careful patient selection and substantial improvement in NOTES instrumentation are critical to optimize this approach prior to widespread clinical application, and may ultimately permit completely NOTES transanal colorectal resection.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumors: outcomes and recommendations

PURPOSE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery provides a minimally invasive alternative to radical surgery for excision of benign and malignant rectal tumors. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery to clarify its role in the treatment of different types of rectal pathology.

METHODS

A prospective database documented all patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery from October 1996 through June 2008. We analyzed patient and operative factors, complications, and tumor recurrence. For recurrence analysis, we excluded patients with fewer than 6 months of follow-up, previous excisions, known metastases at initial presentation, and those who underwent immediate radical resection following transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-nine patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign (n = 158) and malignant (n = 111) tumors. Procedure-related complications (21%) included urinary retention (10.8%), fecal incontinence (4.1%), fever (3.8%), suture line dehiscence (1.5%), and bleeding (1.5%). Local recurrence rates for 121 benign and 83 malignant tumors were 5% for adenomas, 9.8% for T1 adenocarcinoma, 23.5% for T2 adenocarcinoma, 100% for T3 adenocarcinoma, and 0% for carcinoid tumors. All 6 (100%) recurrent adenomas were retreated with endoscopic techniques, and 8 of 17 (47%) recurrent adenocarcinomas underwent salvage procedures with curative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and effective method for excision of benign and malignant rectal tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery can be offered for (1) curative resection of benign tumors, carcinoid tumors, and select T1 adenocarcinomas, (2) histopathologic staging in indeterminate cases, and (3) palliative resection in patients medically unfit or unwilling to undergo radical resection.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal adenomas is safe and has low recurrence rates. However, the feasibility of the procedure for all rectal adenomas is unclear. This issue was investigated prospectively.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2007, 353 consecutive rectal adenomas were evaluated according to a standard protocol. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was intended in all rectal adenomas.

RESULTS

The median diameter was 3 cm and median distance was 8 cm. The peritoneum was opened peroperatively without any adverse effects in 8.7 percent. The conversion rate was 9.6 percent, with an alternative local procedure performed in 4.2 percent and a transabdominal procedure performed in 5.4 percent. Conversion rate correlated with the distance of the tumor (P = 0.007) and the operating surgeon's level of experience (P = 0.004). The median operation time was 45 minutes. Operation time correlated with specimen area, experience, and operating surgeon (all P < 0.001). All rectal adenomas were excised in one piece. Complete margins were observed in 85 percent. Rectal adenomas with incomplete margins were larger (P < 0.001) and were located more proximally (P < 0.001). Morbidity was 7.8 percent and mortality 0.6 percent. The median hospital stay was four days. The median follow-up was 27 months. The recurrence rate at three years was 9.1 percent. The median time from operation to recurrence was 12 (range, 4-54) months. Resection margin status was a predictor of recurrence, with 6.1 percent recurrence in cases of complete margins and 25.2 percent in cases of incomplete margins (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For nearly all rectal adenomas, transanal endoscopic microsurgery is safe, feasible, and has excellent results.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, results and controversies

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was introduced in 1983 as a minimally invasive technique allowing the resection of adenomas and early rectal carcinomas unsuitable for local or colonoscopic excision which would otherwise require major surgery. After 25 years, there is still much debate about the procedure. This article presents the TEM technique, indications, results and complications, focusing on its role in rectal cancer. The controversial points addressed include long-term results, TEM in high-risk T1 lesions, TEM associated with combined modality therapy (CMT) for invasive rectal cancer and salvage therapy after TEM. The future perspectives for TEM are promising and its association with CMT will probably expand the select group of patients who will benefit from the procedure.

Is the increasing role of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery in curation for T1 rectal cancer justified? A systematic review

Driven by the aim to avoid a permanent colostomy and also the morbidity and mortality of major radical surgery for rectal cancer, the proportion of patients with rectal cancer treated by local excision has increased the last ten years or so. In T1 carcinomas local excision is considered a curative option in selected tumors. However, the scientific base upon which this treatment regimen is built remains controversial. In this systematic review we try to elucidate current literature regarding local excision for T1 rectal carcinomas. Several questions are addressed. First, is there enough evidence to propagate LE as a curative option in selected (T1) rectal carcinomas? Second, if LE is justified, which technique should be the method of choice? Third, can we adequately identify, pre- and postoperatively, tumors suitable for LE? Finally, future perspectives are discussed.

Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease

Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer is a burgeoning field of general surgery. Randomized controlled trials have assessed short-term patient-oriented and long-term oncologic outcomes for laparoscopic resection. These trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach is equivalent to open surgery with a shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic resection also may result in improved short-term patient-oriented outcomes and equivalent oncologic resections versus the open approach. Transanal excision of select rectal cancer using endoscopic microsurgery is promising and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is an emerging modality. The efficacy of minimally invasive treatment for rectal cancer compared with conventional approaches will be clarified further in randomized controlled trials.

Harmonic long shears further reduce operation time in transanal endoscopic microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Previous research indicates that application of 5-mm harmonic shears rather than diathermia significantly reduces operation time in transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Frequently, however, additional instruments were required to complete resection. We investigated whether the new 5-mm harmonic long shears (H-LS) are better equipped for TEM compared with regular harmonic shears (HS).

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2006, 162 tumors (117 adenomas, 42 carcinomas, and 3 other tumors; mean distance 6.6 cm, mean area 40 cm(2)) were excised in 161 patients (82 men, 79 women; mean age 66 years).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight resections were performed with HS and 74 with H-LS. Tumor and patient characteristics were similar except for specimen area. Tumors resected by H-LS were on average smaller than those resected by HS (34.4 versus 44.1 cm(2); Mann-Whitney U-test: p = 0.027). Mean operation time was 48 min and proportional to area in both groups (univariate analysis of variance p < 0.001). Mean operation time was 54 min using HS and 41 min using H-LS (t-test: p < 0.001). After correction for area, operation time for H-LS was reduced by 14% compared with HS (t-test: p < 0.001). H-LS is singly capable of completing resection in 88% compared with 26% for HS (Mann-Whitney U-test: p < 0.001). Mean blood loss was 16 cc for HS and 3 cc for H-LS (p < 0.001). Morbidity (11%) and mortality (0.6%) were not different between the two groups (Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

Performing transanal endoscopic microsurgery with 5-mm harmonic long shears reduces operation time compared with regular shears, and completing resection seldom requires other instruments.

TEMS: an alternative method for the repair of benign recto-vaginal fistulae

INDICATIONS

The repair of high recto-vaginal fistula can be challenging since access may be limited via the endo-anal approach yet the alternative trans-abdominal route carries significant morbidity. We report the use of TEMS to repair a recto-vaginal fistula following anterior resection and pelvic radiotherapy.

METHOD

The patient was placed prone and a 25 cm rectoscope was inserted. A proximally based mucosal advancement flap was raised to repair the fistula. The patient was discharged 2 days later and a contrast study confirmed closure of the fistula. COMPARISON WITH OTHER TECHNIQUES: TEMS allows excellent visualisation of a rectovaginal fistula compared to standard endo-anal or trans-vaginal techniques. The morbidity is lower than the trans-abdominal route.

COMMENTS

TEMS is a useful technique for the repair of benign recto-vaginal fistula and has distinct advantages over conventional techniques.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer: time for a trial?

OBJECTIVE

The optimal aim of oncological surgery is to balance cancer outcomes with preservation of function and quality of life. Radical resection (RR) offers the best curative procedure in colorectal cancer but at significant morbidity. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) offers an alternative with less morbidity and better function. Its role remains unclear and needs to be established in the light of new emerging trends in rectal cancer. This review aims to evaluate the use of TEM and its limitations.

METHOD

PubMed and MEDLINE search was performed.

RESULTS

Strongest level of evidence (Level II) favoured TEM over RR and laparoscopic resection in term of mortality and morbidity. There was no difference in recurrence at follow-up of 41 and 56 months but neither study was adequately powered to detect a difference in recurrence/survival. Three retrospective case comparisons (Level III) also favoured TEM over RR but were subject to selection bias. Twenty eight published case series (Level IV) reported varying results due to different cancer stages, study population, full excision, adjuvant therapy and treatment indication. The oncological outcomes in TEM are similar to RR in highly selected cases but with far less mortality (near 0%), morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay and genitourinary/gastrointestinal dysfunction. TEM alone (+/- adjuvant therapy) appears sufficient for 'favourable' T1 tumours. 'Unfavourable' T1 or T2 tumours require adjuvant treatment. TEM should only be used for palliation in T3+ cancers. Seven functional studies reported significant transient dysfunction following TEM with full clinical recovery within a year. TEM is cost-effective providing sufficient cases are performed.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity limits conclusions from current literature. A trial is required. Alternate end-points to local recurrence may be required in assessing the optimal surgical approach, which balances disease control with quality of life, and probability of noncancer related death.

Management of early rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early rectal cancer (ERC) is adenocarcinoma that has invaded into, but not extended beyond, the submucosa of the rectum (that is a T1 tumour). Local excision is curative for low-risk ERCs but for high-risk cancers such management is controversial.

METHODS

This review is based on published literature obtained by searching the PubMed and Cochrane databases, and the bibliographies of extracted articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

ERC presents as a focus of malignancy within an adenoma, as a polyp, or as a small ulcerating adenocarcinoma. Preoperative staging relies on endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pathological staging uses the Haggitt and Kikuchi classifications for adenocarcinoma in pedunculated and sessile polyps respectively. Lymph node metastases increase with the Kikuchi level, with a 1-3 per cent risk for submucosal layer (Sm) 1, 8 per cent for Sm2 and 23 per cent for Sm3 lesions. Low-risk ERCs may be treated endoscopically or by a transanal procedure. Transanal excision or transanal endoscopic microsurgery may be inadequate for high-risk ERCs and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be appropriate. There is a low rate of recurrence after local surgery for low-risk ERCs but this increases to up to 29 per cent for high-risk cancers.

Outcome of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with T2 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The use of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal cancer has recently gained wide acceptance as a valid and safe alternative for the surgical treatment of T1 tumors. The adequacy of such treatment for T2 tumors, however, is still controversial. This study was designed to evaluate our results with local excision of T2 cancers.

METHODS

Patients with T2 cancer admitted to our hospital between 1995 and 2005 were offered surgery by transanal endoscopic microsurgery if found medically unfit or were unwilling to undergo radical surgery. Patients who were preoperatively staged as T1 tumor but were found to be pathologically T2 also were included.

RESULTS

Overall, we performed 59 transanal endoscopic microsurgery operations for rectal cancers, of which 21 were for T2 cancers. In 16 (76 percent) of the T2 patients, the tumors were completely removed with clear margins by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and no additional surgery was performed, except for 2 patients who developed radiation-induced complications. Radical surgery was performed in a second operation in five patients because of involved margins and residual disease was found in two. At a median follow-up of three years, all 12 patients who received local excision and radiotherapy remained disease free, whereas a 50 percent recurrence rate was observed in patients who refused adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the feasibility of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of selected patients with T2 rectal cancer. The addition of radiotherapy may decrease the rates of early local recurrence. However, at present, this treatment strategy should not be routinely considered for patients who may undergo radical procedures.

TEM/local excision: indications, techniques, outcomes, and the future

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has emerged as a safe method for excising virtually any rectal adenoma and carefully selected cancers. Extended applications include treatment of extra- and supra-sphincteric fistulae, rectovaginal fistulae, anastomotic strictures, and sinus tracts. The procedure utilizes an air-tight system, long shafted instruments, high-quality magnifying optics, and constant carbon dioxide insufflation, all of which facilitate a precise excision and closure with clear margins. Complications are few, most patients can be treated as an outpatient.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: local recurrence rate following resection of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe and effective treatment for the excision of benign rectal adenomas. In recent years it has been used for the excision of malignant lesions, although its use in this context remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the local recurrence of rectal cancers following local excision by TEM.

METHOD

Forty-two patients with rectal cancer were treated by TEM between 1998 and 2005. However, six patients went on to have immediate radical surgery and are excluded from the study. Of the remaining 36 the treatment intention was for cure in 16 (38.1%), compromise in 17 patients unfit for radical surgery (40.5%), and palliation in three (7.1%).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 75 years (range 41-90). The mean lesion area was 15 cm(2) (range 0.8-42) and mean distance from the dentate line was 6.6 cm (range 0-11). The mean follow up was 34 months (range 4-94). During the follow-up period there have been eight local recurrences (22%). The recurrence rates were 26% (6/23) for pT1, 22% (2/9) for pT2 and 0% (0/4) for pT3 lesions. The mean time to recurrence was 18.3 months (range 5-42).

CONCLUSION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe procedure with obvious advantages over radical procedures. However, in this study the local recurrence rate is high. The recurrence rate may be an acceptable compromise in elderly or medically unfit patients but is hard to justify for curative intent.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) resection of rectal tumors

Local excision of rectal cancer is an attractive alternative to avoid the morbidity associated with radical rectal surgery. Oncologic concerns, specifically the inability to fully assess the status of the perirectal lymph nodes and the risk of local recurrence after local excision remain significant barriers to widespread adoption of this technique. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an alternative minimally invasive technique used for transanal excision of rectal polyps and tumors. It offers the advantage of better exposure, magnified stereoscopic view, and greater reach into the middle and upper rectum. This technique, combined with careful patient selection, has demonstrated optimistic results compared to standard transanal techniques and even total mesorectal excision when utilized for certain early rectal cancers.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal adenomas

OBJECTIVE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for excision of selected benign and malignant rectal neoplasms. It is considered a safe and effective treatment but recurrence rates of 1-13% are reported for benign lesions. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal lesions and to evaluate mortality and morbidity following TEM.

METHOD

Data were prospectively collected from all patients undergoing TEM for benign adenomas from January 1998 to March 2005. The procedure was performed by a single surgeon and patients were regularly followed up.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six procedures were included, with a median patient age of 74 years (range 22-92 years). The mean lesion area was 16 cm(2) (range 0.3-150 cm(2)) and the median distance from the dentate line was 9 cm (range 0-17 cm). Immediate complications included bleeding (six) and acute urinary retention (six). There has been one (0.68%) procedure-related death. After a median follow up of 39 months (range 4-89 months) there have been seven recurrences (4.8%), recurring at a mean time of 23.3 months (range 5-48 months). Only microscopic involvement of the circumferential resection margin was found to be significantly associated with recurrence (P = 0.0059). Recurrence was not associated with age, size of lesion, previous treatment, severity of dysplasia or use of the harmonic scalpel.

CONCLUSION

TEM is a safe and effective treatment for benign rectal adenomas. Circumferential resection margin involvement is associated with recurrence, which tends to occur late. Therefore extended follow up is recommended.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

TEM has been used effectively to treat large rectal polyps and early rectal malignancy for more than 20 years in Europe. Until recently, only a few specialized centers offered TEM in the United States, where it is now gaining popularity. Many hospitals have purchased equipment and are offering TEM; however, the equipment is expensive and the learning curve is steep. Therefore, it is essential that anyone performing TEM have an adequate number of cases to develop and maintain expertise in this technique. That being said, TEM remains unique when compared with laparoscopy and other minimally invasive techniques that incorporate less invasive methods of performing old operations. TEM allows surgeons to perform operations that were impossible before the development and acceptance of this technique.

Curative Resection of Rectal Carcinoid Tumors with Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a minimally invasive technique for local resection of rectal tumors. Its place needs to be defined for resection of carcinoid tumors of the rectum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2004, rectal carcinoid tumors were diagnosed in 5 patients. The diagnosis was suggested at biopsy in all patients. All tumors were resected full thickness with transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Data were obtained retrospectively from a review of hospital charts.

RESULTS

At the time of operation all tumors were small without clinical or biochemical signs of metastasis. All resected tumors were highly differentiated and had free margins without invasion into the submucosa. Operative times ranged from 15 to 35 minutes. Hospital stays ranged from 2 to 4 days. No morbidity or mortality was observed. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 75 months. No recurrences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an excellent technique for removal of carcinoid tumors of the rectum and even the distal part of the sigmoid, if the diameter is <1 cm without invasion of the rectal wall.

The Kraske procedure: a critical analysis of a surgical approach for mid-rectal lesions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To analyze the Kraske procedure as an approach to mid-rectal disease.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients underwent a Kraske procedure at either Duke University Medical Center, the Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, or the Durham Regional Hospital between 1992 and 1997. The clinical and pathologic characteristics of these patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with previous published series.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, 13 underwent resection of an adenocarcinoma and 9 underwent resection of a villous adenoma. Post-operative complications included four fecal fistulas (two of which required a temporary diverting colostomy), two wound infections, two cases of urinary retention, and one case of transient fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kraske procedure minimizes exposure of mid-rectal lesions without the morbidity of a major laparotomy. However, it does carry a moderate complication rate and thus should be utilized selectively in managing patients with mid-rectal tumors not amenable to other treatment options.

Factors predicting early recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision for rectal adenoma

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is an accepted way of excising rectal adenomas with low morbidity and mortality, avoiding major resectional surgery. However, there are no agreed criteria for surveillance following TEM. The purpose of this study was to identify criteria to guide surveillance programmes, thus reducing the surveillance burden for those patients at low risk of recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had undergone TEM for rectal adenomas were identified, and a retrospective review of patient, pathological and histological parameters was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (40 male) patients were identified; median age 70 years (39-85). There were seven tubular, 33 tubulo-villous and 35 villous adenomas. All were considered completely excised by the operating surgeon. Forty-seven (62.7%) were reported as being completely excised histologically. There was no significant association between recurrence at 6 months and sex, age, type or position of adenoma, height above the anal verge, or degree of dysplasia. Recurrence rates at six months were 0% for the completely excised adenomas and 21.4% for the incompletely excised ones; this was statistically significant (Pearson chi(2), P < 0.001). In all there were 12 recurrences, 10 in the incompletely excised group at a median follow up of 31 (6-80) months (P < 0.001). In addition, a significant association for large adenomas to recur was noted at median follow up (Armitage Trend test, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological assessment of completeness of excision of rectal adenoma and size of adenoma are important predictors of early recurrence and have potential to guide follow-up strategies after TEM.

Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities

The field of minimally invasive surgery has seen tremendous growth since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 1987. The key question is not how successful these techniques are currently, but rather where may they lead in the future? New technologies promise to usher in an era of even less invasive procedures. The terms being coined in the literature include "incisionless," "endoluminal," "transluminal," and "natural orifice" transluminal endoscopic surgery. These techniques certainly have the potential to become the next wave of minimally invasive procedures. A recent editorial in Surgical Endoscopy by Macfadyen and Cuschieri highlighted the ongoing developments in endoscopic surgery and stressed the critical importance of surgeons being involved in future applications and permutations of these techniques [1]. There are early signs of such involvement. The work of numerous investigators in the field was presented recently at the 2005 Digestive Disease Week. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, recently organized a postgraduate course in endoluminal therapy at the spring 2005 meeting held in Hollywood, Florida. The course is being offered again at the 2006 SAGES annual meeting. Similar courses are being offered at other regional and national meetings. This review attempts to highlight some of the available and evolving endoluminal therapies reviewed at that forum, including techniques for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoluminal bariatric surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transgastric endoscopic surgery, as well as new technologies and possible future directions in luminal access surgery.

Transanal endoscopic micro-surgery (TEMS) for the management of large or sessile rectal adenomas: a review of the technique and indications

In this review article the surgical technique of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) is examined. A number of techniques have been used to treat adenomas of the rectum. The treatment of large adenomas which occupy a large surface of the rectal lumen or adenomas which are flat and grow in a "carpet-like" fashion is particularly challenging. Major rectal surgery carries a risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly and unfit patients. Although local excision with transanal resection (TAR) and the Kraske sacral operation have been used in the past, during the last twenty years TEMS has become the method of choice for those lesions. TEMS is efficient and minimally invasive. The technique allows the patient to recover rapidly and the incidence of complications is much lower than that of major surgery. In case of recurrence the option of repeat TEMS or major surgery remain available. TEMS has been slow to gain popularity mainly for reasons of cost and steep learning curve but it is now an established procedure and a valuable therapeutic option which is particularly useful for elderly and unfit patients. Gastroenterologists should be aware of the nature and indications of TEMS in order to advise and refer selected patients with rectal adenomas accordingly.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of pT1 rectal tumors

PURPOSE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has emerged as an improved method of transanal excision of neoplasms because its enhanced visibility, superior optics, and longer reach permit a more complete excision and precise closure. This study will show that transanal endoscopic microsurgical treatment of pT1 rectal cancers is safe and achieves low local recurrence and high survival rates.

METHODS

Retrospective review performed of all pT1 rectal cancers treated by a single surgeon (TS) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery between 1991 and 2003. Patient age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, lesion size, operative time, blood loss, complications, recurrence, and survival rates were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (average age, 65.6 (range, 31-89) years) were studied. Forty-nine percent were male. Average tumor distance from the anal verge was 7 (range, 0-13) cm; average size was 2.4 (range, 1-10) cm. Radiation and/or chemotherapy were not administered. Sixteen patients had pT1 lesions removed piecemeal during colonoscopy; there was no residual tumor after transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of the polyp site. Mean follow-up was 2.84 years. Fifty-one percent had longer than two-year follow-up. For the entire group, there were four recurrences (7.5 percent) occurring at 9 months, 15 months, 16 months, and 11 years. Two were treated with abdominoperineal resection, one with low anterior resection, and one with fulguration alone. There were no recurrences in the 16 patients who had excision of the polypectomy site. If excluded, recurrence was 11 percent (4/37). Patients were examined at three-month intervals for the first two years and every six months thereafter. There have been no cancer-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of pT1 rectal cancers yields low recurrence rates. Close follow-up permits curative salvage for those that do recur. Transanal excision remains a viable option.

Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Local Resection

Local treatment of rectal cancer aims to decrease the morbidity and the functional sequela associated with radical surgery without compromising local tumor control and long-term survival. Local excision is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence compared with radical surgery, and salvage radical surgery cannot guarantee equivalent long-term survival compared with radical surgery as the primary form of therapy. Therefore, strict criteria for patient selection are critical for local excision to be successful. Selecting the optimal therapy for an individual patient with rectal cancer is crucial and requires consideration of both tumor and patient characteristics. Endorectal ultrasonography is essential for the accurate assessment of rectal wall invasion and nodal metastasis. Only patients with well- or moderately differentiated T1 tumors without blood vessel or lymphatic vessel invasion are candidates for curative local excision as the only form of treatment. Tumors penetrating the muscularis propria should not be treated by local excision alone. These patients can be asked to participate in a trial of chemoradiation followed by local excision. Otherwise, they should undergo radical surgery. The tumor should be removed by full-thickness local excision with an adequate normal margin for pathologic evaluation. Final decisions regarding the treatment strategy should be based on the pathology of the surgical specimen. Intense, close follow-up is critical for early diagnosis of local recurrences as many of them may be surgically salvaged by radical resection. Local treatment can also be used for palliation of patients with histological unfavorable or advanced tumors, and those who are medically unfit for radical surgery.

Minimally invasive surgery for early lower GI cancer

Two technical developments in colorectal surgery-i.e. transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease-are now available for the treatment of early lower GI cancer. Benign lesions and early-stage tumours of the rectosigmoid are amenable for a transanal approach. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is performed using a rectoscope 4 cm in diameter with a four-port insert. After installation of a pneumorectum, lesions up to 25 cm from the anal verge, including circumferential lesions, can be removed with a recurrence rate of 0-5% for adenomas, 3% for low-risk T1 carcinomas, and 8% for all carcinomas. Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy, laparoscopic wedge resection or laparoscopic-assisted colostomy have a 67-100% success rate for avoiding a formal bowel resection for benign tumours that cannot be treated by colonoscopy alone. Early colonic cancer requires laparoscopic colectomy guided by preoperative colonoscopy or preoperative endoscopic tattooing for localisation of the affected segment.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence relating to the safety and efficacy of transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a relatively new technique used to locally excise rectal tumors, compared with existing techniques such as anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections or local excisions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of comparative studies and case series of transanal endoscopic microsurgery from 1980 to August 2002.

RESULTS

Three comparative studies (including one randomized, controlled trial) and 55 case series were included. The first area of study was the safety and efficacy of adenomas. In the randomized, controlled trial, no difference could be detected in the rate of early complications between transanal endoscopic microsurgery (10.3 percent) and direct local excision (17 percent) (relative risk, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29-1.29). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resulted in less local recurrence (6/98; 6 percent) than direct local excision (20/90; 22 percent) (relative risk, 0.28; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.12-0.66). The 6 percent rate of local recurrence for transanal endoscopic microsurgery in this trial is consistent with the rates found in case series of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (median, 5 percent). The second area of study was the safety and efficacy of carcinomas. In the randomized, controlled trial, no difference could be detected in the rate of complications between transanal endoscopic microsurgery and direct local excision (relative risk for overall early complication rates, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.22-1.42). No differences in survival or local recurrence rate between transanal endoscopic microsurgery and anterior resection could be detected in either the randomized, controlled trial (hazard ratio,1.02 for survival) or the nonrandomized, comparative study. There were 2 of 25 (8 percent) transanal endoscopic microsurgery recurrences in the randomized, controlled trial, but no figures were given for recurrence after anterior resection. In the case series, the median local recurrence rate for transanal endoscopic microsurgery was 8.4 percent, ranging from 0 percent to 50 percent. The third comparison was cost of the procedures. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had both a lower recurrence rate and a lower cost than local excision or anterior resection for adenomas. Although the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery could not be established for carcinomas, costs were lower than those for either anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence regarding transanal endoscopic microsurgery is very limited, being largely based on a single relatively small randomized, controlled trial. However, transanal endoscopic microsurgery does appear to result in fewer recurrences than those with direct local excision in adenomas and thus may be a useful procedure for several small niches of patient types--e.g., for large benign lesions of the middle to upper third of the rectum, for T1 low-risk rectal cancers, and for palliative, not curative, use in more advanced tumors.

Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel and multifunctional tem400 instrument complement in transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

For transanal endoscopic microsurgery, the ultracision Harmonic Scalpel (UC) and the multifunctional TEM400 instrument (T400) seem advantageous. This study investigated their clinical use.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of tumor, patient, and operation characteristics was performed for 196 tumor resections per instrument intended for application.

RESULTS

The T400 instrument was applied in 162 operations, and the UC in 34 operations. Tumor and patient characteristics were similar except for tumor area (respectively, 7.5 and 17 cm(2); p = 0.003). Operative time was proportionate to the tumor area (p < 0.001) and inversely proportionate to its distance from the dentate line to the lower margin of the tumor of the UC (p = 0.002). Application reduced operative time by 26% (p = 0.02, corrected for area). Whereas, T400 was always singly sufficient for excision, the UC required T400 application in 50% of operations, especially for larger tumors (p = 0.026), with the result that more rectal wall circumference was captured (p = 0.043). Both groups had similar safety parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The UC substantially reduced operative time compared with the T400, but frequently required the T400 for procedure completion. The T400 is always singly sufficient.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results

OBJECTIVE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has become increasingly common in the management of rectal adenomas and also in selected cases of rectal carcinomas. The aim of this study was to assess the results in a consecutive series of patients after introducing the TEM technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 58 patients operated with TEM from January 1996 to January 1999 were evaluated in a retrospective review. Forty-eight patients answered a clinically validated questionnaire a median of 22 months after TEM. Eighty patients who had undergone transanal excision and 12 who had undergone York Mason's procedure served as a reference group with respect to recurrence rates.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 5% (immediate) and 14% (long-term). The overall 30-day mortality rate was zero. An impairment of continence was seen in 18 (37%) patients. Of these, all 18 experienced varying degree of incontinence to liquid stool, 14 also to flatus and 5 of them even to solid stool. The recurrence rate was 11% in adenomas and 14% in cancers; T1, 1 (10%) recurrence and T2, 1 (50%) recurrence. There was a correlation between operating time and impairment of continence as well as recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

TEM is a safe procedure, having a low recurrence rate and an acceptable functional outcome.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications and results after 100 cases

OBJECTIVE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), a minimally invasive technique has been employed in the excision of benign and well-selected malignant rectal tumours since June 1998. We present a prospective descriptive study and analyse the currently accepted indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 4-year period 100 patients underwent TEM for treatment of rectal tumours located between 4 and 18 cm from the anal verge.

RESULTS

TEM was performed in 71 cases for adenomas, 20 potentially curative excisions for pre-operative staged low-grade carcinoma, 3 palliative procedures for advance carcinoma, 5 carcinoids and 1 solitary ulcer. The local complication rate included wound breakdown in 7 patients, three of them requiring ileostomy. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in two patients. Five adenomas recurred and were successfully treated by TEM. Of the cancers, four patients required immediate salvage therapy by means of total mesorectal excision. Three patients underwent palliative TEM procedures combined with radiotherapy. A single cancer recurrence was treated by means of abdomino-perineal resection after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM appears to be an effective method of excising benign tumours and selected T1 carcinomas of the rectum. The superior exposure of tumours higher in the rectum combined with the greater precision of excision make this minimally invasive technique an attractive surgical approach.

Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications

PURPOSE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for full-thickness excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasms located 4 to 24 cm above the anal verge. Entrance into the peritoneal cavity during TEM has been regarded as a complication that mandates conversion to open laparotomy for adequate repair of the defect. This study compares the rate of complications arising from TEM with and without intraperitoneal entry.

METHODS

Patients undergoing peritoneal entry were compared to those who did not.

RESULTS

No perioperative deaths occurred. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. No major complications occurred with peritoneal entry, and all peritoneal entries were closed transanally via endoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Entry into the peritoneum during TEM is not associated with an increased incidence of complication. Entry into the peritoneum during TEM excision does not mandate conversion to open laparotomy but may be safely repaired endoscopically. Lesions likely to be above the peritoneal reflection and within reach of the endoscope (4 to 24 cm) should be considered for TEM excision.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has gained increasing acceptance as a local treatment of early rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of TEM and radical surgery in patients with T1 and T2 rectal cancer.

METHODS

From October 1994 to December 2000, 74 patients with T1 and T2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with TEM were compared with 100 patients with T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with radical surgery. Retrospective analysis was performed regarding to recurrence and survival rate. Neither group received adjuvant chemoradiation. There was no significant difference in age, gender, tumor location, or follow-up period between the two groups. The only difference was in tumor size.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients in TEM group, 52 were T1 (70.3%) and 22 were T2 (29.7%). Of the 100 patients in radical surgery group, 17 were T1 (17%) and 83 patients were T2 (83%). The 5-year local recurrence rates were 4.1% for T1, 19.5% for T2 after TEM, 0% for T1, and 9.4% for T2 after radical surgery. There was no statistical difference between the TEM and radical surgery groups for T1 rectal cancer ( p = 0.95), but for T2 rectal cancer, the 5-year local recurrence rate was higher after TEM than after radical surgery ( p = 0.04). There were no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the 5-year disease-free survival rate and the survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

For T1 rectal cancer, there was no difference in recurrence or 5-year survival rate between the TEM and the radical surgery groups. For T2 rectal cancer, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year survival rate between the two groups, but TEM carried higher risk of local recurrence. Therefore, careful selection of the patients is required for TEM, and when proper muscle invasion is proven, the TEM procedure should be supplemented by further treatment, or radical surgery should be performed.

Local excision of rectal tumors

Local excision is increasingly being used to treat rectal cancer. It appears to be an attractive option because of low morbidity and excellent functional results. Controversies remain regarding available techniques, selection criteria and results with or without adjuvant therapy. Role of salvage therapy remains uncertain. This review examines available evidence in an attempt to clarify the role of local excision in the management of rectal cancer.