Concurrent abdominal aortic aneurysm and urologic neoplasm: an argument for simultaneous intervention

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the management of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysms and renal tumours

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysms and renal tumours is controversial. The aim of this study was to ascertain which of the following three strategies, one-stage open aneurysm repair and nephrectomy, two-stage open aneurysm repair and nephrectomy or two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair and nephrectomy, is the best approach.

METHODS

systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published between January 1992 and April 2021 describing the treatment of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysms and renal tumours.

RESULTS

A total of 1168 records were identified. After the selection process, 12 studies with data on 89 patients were included. Sixty-two patients underwent one-stage open procedures, 18 patients underwent two-stage open procedures and nine underwent two-stage endovascular procedures. The overall postoperative mortality was 0.82% (95% CI, 0.00-4.61). The postoperative mortality for one-stage open procedures was 3.09% (95% CI, 0.00-10.11). No deaths occurred in the postoperative period open two-stage procedures or two-stage endovascular procedures. The weighted postoperative morbidity for all procedures was 23.86% (95% CI, 12.64-35.08) and for open one-stage procedures was 37.40% (95% CI, 14.33-60.47). Data concerning postoperative complications of two-stage open procedures were extractable from only one patient in whom no complications were reported. Two postoperative complications were reported after two-stage endovascular procedures from a total of six patients with extractable postoperative data. We were unable to perform meta-analysis on long-term outcomes as the data were reported non-uniformly.

CONCLUSION

There is currently no evidence to suggest that any procedure is associated with better outcomes. However, a one-stage open approach was the most commonly used option, favoured as it avoids delaying treatment of either of the conditions. Two-stage open procedures were preferred in cases where the surgical risk of a one-stage procedure was higher than the potential benefit. For such cases, two-stage endovascular repair is becoming more popular as a less invasive approach.

Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients with Simultaneous Urological Disorders: a Single Center Experience

Introduction

Although rare, co-existence of abdominal aortic aneurysms with urological manifestations, suggests a challenging surgical entity in terms of successful aneurysmal repair along with minimally or null urological complications.

Case reports

There are neither available data regarding the incidence of their co-existence nor consensus regarding optimal surgical management. Given the infrequency of their simultaneous presentation, the report of unusual cases as well as proposal for successful surgical management, are always useful and educative.

Conclusion

Precise imaging pre-operatively and meticulous surgical technique intra-operatively are of utmost importance and suggest our vast allies in successful outcomes. Herein, we present our small case series of 3 interesting cases.

Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Synchronous Intra-abdominal Malignancy

OBJECTIVES

The management of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy (IAM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a challenge, even though malignancy is common in an elderly population. By means of systematic review and meta-analysis, the aim was to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing open (OAR) or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) that have a concomitant malignancy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed (Medline and EMBASE databases) to identify all series reporting outcomes of AAA repair (OAR or EVAR) in patients with concomitant IAM. Meta-analysis was applied to assess mortality and major morbidity at 30 days and long term.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 36 series (543 patients) and the majority (18 series) reported on patients with colorectal malignancy and AAA. Mean weighted mortality for OAR at 30 days was 11% (95% CI: 6.6% to 17.9%); none of the EVAR patients died peri-operatively. The weighted 30-day major complication rate for EVAR was 20.4% (10.0-37.4%) and for OAR it was 15.4% (7.0-30.8%). Most patients had their AAA and malignancy treated non-simultaneously (56.6%, 95% CI, 42.1-70.1%). In the EVAR cohort, three patients (4.6%) died at last follow-up (range 24-64 months). In the OAR cohort 23 (10.6%) had died at last follow up (range from 4 to 73 months).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, OAR was associated with significant peri-operative mortality in patients with an IAM. EVAR should be the first-line modality of AAA repair. The majority of patients were not treated simultaneously for the two pathologies, but further investigation is necessary to define the optimal timing for each procedure and malignancy.

Complete regression of renal tumour following ligation of an accessory renal artery during repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

The existence of concomitant intra-abdominal pathology with abdominal aortic aneurysms is not uncommon. The optimal management is often controversial. We describe the successful treatment of a case of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associated with a renal tumour without performing a nephrectomy. An accessory lower pole renal artery supplying the tumour was ligated at the time of open AAA repair. The lower pole renal tumour (suspected renal cell carcinoma) reduced in size dramatically and progressively on follow-up computed tomography and the patient remains well at over two years after surgery. The successful treatment of the two conditions in such a manner represents an alternative management strategy and adds to the options available in selected patients who present with challenging and unusual pathology.

Simultaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm and resection of unexpected, associated abdominal malignancies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The management of unexpected intra-abdominal malignancy, discovered at laparotomy for elective treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), is controversial. It is still unclear whether both conditions should be treated simultaneously or a staged approach is to be preferred. To contribute in improving treatment guidelines, we retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing laparotomy for elective AAA repair.

METHODS

From January 1994 to March 2003, 253 patients underwent elective, trans-peritoneal repair of an AAA. In four patients (1.6%), an associated, unexpected neoplasm was detected at abdominal exploration, consisting of one renal, one gastric, one ileal carcinoid, and one ascending colon tumor. All of them were treated at the same operation, after aortic repair and careful isolation of the prosthetic graft.

RESULTS

The whole series' operative mortality was 3.6%. None of the patients simultaneously treated for AAA and tumor resection died in the postoperative period. No graft-related infections were observed. Simultaneous treatment of AAA and tumor did not prolong significantly the mean length of stay in the hospital, compared to standard treatment of AAA alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for malignancies of organs requiring major surgical resections, simultaneous AAA repair and resection of an associated, unexpected abdominal neoplasm can be safely performed, in most of the patients, sparing the need for a second procedure. Endovascular grafting of the AAA can be a valuable tool in simplifying simultaneous treatment, or in staging the procedures with a very short delay.

Simultaneous Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) and Invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma

A prospective case-control study on simultaneously occurring abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (TCCB) was carried out to evaluate short- and long-term mortality and morbidity of the one-stage surgical treatment.

Methods

From January 1995 to December 2000 16 patients presented a concomitant AAA and TCCB. A standard operative protocol included AAA graft replacement before bladder resection and urinary reconstruction. Control patients (16 AAA and 16 TCCB alone) matched according to time of intervention, type of vascular and urinary procedure and pathologic staging.

Results

No vascular complications and graft infections were observed. Systemic and urologic complications were similar in study and control groups. One patient simultaneously treated for AAA and TCCB died of MI 32 days after surgery after an uncomplicated postoperative period. Estimated 6–year survival rate was 68% in AAA and TCCB patients simultaneously treated, 93% and 54% in matched control patients undergoing AAA and TCCB treatment alone respectively.

Conclusions

The present study shows that the one-stage is a safe approach to simultaneous occurring AAA and TCCB. Long-term survival of treated patients is dependent upon cancer progression. Whenever endovascular treatment is not advisable, the simultaneous surgical treatment of coexisting AAA and TCCB is recommended in highly specialized centers.

Simultaneous surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and carcinoma of the bladder

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term results of simultaneous surgical treatment of coexisting abdominal aortic aneurysm and bladder carcinoma.

METHODS

A prospective study was carried out to compare patients undergoing simultaneous surgical treatment of abdominal aneurysm and bladder carcinoma with control patients undergoing surgery for either one of the two diseases alone. From January 1995 to December 2000, 16 consecutive patients were seen with concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and bladder carcinoma at our institutional referral center. All patients underwent a standard operative protocol that included aneurysm graft replacement, radical cystoprostatectomy, and urinary reconstruction. Endovascular treatment of the aneurysm was considered in the last 2 years of the study. After each simultaneous treatment case, two control patients were selected according to the same type of vascular or urinary procedure, respectively, and pathologic staging. The analyzed endpoint was mortality, and confounder variables included common and disease-specific risk factors. Frequencies of vascular, urologic, and systemic complications were carefully considered with special attention to graft infection and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Endovascular treatment was not performed for morphologic reasons. No perioperative mortality was observed. A trend toward inferior survival rates in simultaneously treated patients was observed in the early follow-up period, but survival analysis with log-rank test showed no statistical difference among the groups (P =.19). Cox proportional hazard model results proved no influence of the different group treatments on survival (P =.49) and no influence of age and risk factors, except for preoperative renal status (P =.015). The increased mortality rate of the simultaneous treatment group could be ascribed to the presence of preoperative moderate renal insufficiency in two study group patients. Long-term survival of treated patients is mainly dependent on cancer progression. Graft infection and other vascular complications were not observed. Systemic and urologic complications were similar in study and control groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the simultaneous surgical approach to coexisting abdominal aortic aneurysm and transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder represents a suitable choice of treatment in highly specialized centers, but patients with preoperative renal insufficiency should be carefully evaluated. Endovascular treatment represents an appealing alternative whenever indicated.

Prioritizing treatment in cases of concurrent abdominal aortic aneurysm

Patients with concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and intra-abdominal malignancy present a clinical dilemma because of the difficulty in deciding which pathology to address first. As this scenario is not commonly encountered, clear guidelines are not available to help in the decision-making process. Surgery for malignancy has been said to increase the risk of postoperative aneurysm rupture, but simultaneous cancer surgery and primary repair of the aneurysm may carry the risk of prosthetic graft infection. This paper describes a further complication that may arise in the setting of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy carcinoma and AAA, namely peripheral embolism.

Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic pathology in patients with concomitant malignancy

The advent of endoluminal aortic repair has gained increasing popularity as an alternative to traditional open surgery in the setting of multiple comorbid disease states. This study analyzes a single center experience of excluding aortic disease in patients with concomitant malignancy. As part of a Federal Drug Administration FDA-approved trial, 318 patients underwent aortic stent-graft repair between June 1996 and February 2001. During that period five patients with advanced-stage neoplasia were treated. Endovascular management of symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with a mean diameter of 7.8 cm (range, 6-10 cm), was performed in four patients. In the fifth patient, a custom-made aortic prosthesis was utilized to exclude a paraanastamotic abdominal aneurysm (PAAA) from a previous open AAA repair. Malignancies included esophageal, lung, renal, prostate, and urinary bladder cancers. A mean follow-up of 10.1 months was available. Successful endoluminal repair was accomplished in all five patients with minimal in-hospital morbidity. Mean length of stay was 3.4 days. There were no device-related mortalities and no persistent endoleaks detected for the duration of follow-up. Aneurysm sac enlargement was not seen in any of the patients and complete resolution of the PAAA was noted at one year. Exclusion of AAA and other aortic pathology in patients with an associated malignancy can be performed with a relatively low procedure-related morbidity and mortality. In this population, stent-graft repair remains an individualized option with a multidisciplinary team necessary to explore this therapeutic approach.

Co-existing abdominal aortic aneurysm and intra-abdominal malignancy: reflections on the order of treatment

BACKGROUND

The management of simultaneously occurring abdominal aortic aneurysm and intra-abdominal malignancy is controversial. It is unclear whether to treat the aneurysm first or the malignancy, or both simultaneously. If the malignancy is resected first there is a risk of postoperative rupture of the aneurysm. If simultaneous surgery is performed there is a risk of prosthetic graft infection from contamination by gastrointestinal or urinary tract contents.

METHODS

Relevant papers from 1960 to 1996, identified from Medline and manual searching, were reviewed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The literature supports the conclusion that the lesion of greater priority is that posing the greater threat to the patient; this is usually the aneurysm, especially if it is over 6 cm in diameter. For renal malignancies simultaneous surgery is the treatment of choice, but for bladder cancer the best management is unclear. Large aneurysms should usually be resected in preference to colorectal cancer unless the cancer is locally advanced, perforated or likely to result in early intestinal obstruction. If both lesions are complicated there may be a case for simultaneous treatment.

Technique of radical cystectomy and simultaneous repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

Surgical repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in conjunction with radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion can be safely performed without morbidity secondary to excessive blood loss, operative time, or vascular graft infection. The techniques required for this combined procedure and a case report are discussed.