From evolution to revolution: restructuring the New Zealand health system

Commissioning in New Zealand: learning from the past and present

Over the past 25 years, New Zealand has had significant experience with two very different approaches to commissioning health and disability support services. The first is the purchaser–provider split model adopted during the 1990s. The second is the approach that replaced it in 2001, the District Health Board model, which is still in place today. Although the New Zealand health system has several desirable characteristics and recent developments in commissioning arrangements are improvements on earlier approaches, the system is slow at reorienting care, particularly towards primary healthcare services. Alternative arrangements have strengths and weaknesses but the current ‘alliancing’ approach in New Zealand needs time to consolidate and demonstrate whether it can deliver before those alternatives are seriously considered.

Outcome evaluation of an emergency department protocol of care on partner abuse

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a protocol on partner abuse (PA) at increasing identification and improving acute management of abused women by emergency department (ED) staff.

METHODS

A community intervention trial compared two public hospital EDs at baseline and following implementation of a PA intervention. The intervention involved training staff at one ED in a protocol for the identification and acute management of abused women. Outcomes were assessed by reviewing a random sample of women's medical records. Identification of PA was assessed for each record on a yes/no basis. Identified cases were classified as 'confirmed' or 'suspected' PA. Acute management was assessed by ascertaining staff documentation of abuse and use of interventions.

RESULTS

Approximately equal numbers of records were reviewed at each ED, pre and post implementation (total n = 8,051). Eighty-nine per cent of ED staff were trained. No difference in the overall identification of PA was found (chi 2 = 0.13, p = 0.72), but logistic regression analyses showed other significant changes. At the intervention site, there was an increase in confirmed cases of PA (chi 2 = 7.6, p = 0.006), a trend towards increased documentation (chi 2 = 3.5, p = 0.06) and a significant increase in interventions offered (chi 2 = 13.8, p = 0.002). Changes at the comparison site failed to reach significance.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this protocol resulted in a moderate increase in confirmed cases of abuse and improved the acute management offered to identified victims. The findings reinforce recommendations for widespread implementation of training and protocols to address partner abuse.

Primary care reform: a three country comparison of 'budget holding'

Governments in most developed nations have been looking to organisational and financial reform of health systems over the last decade. Although the structure and problems of the health care sector in each country may differ, with countries correspondingly adopting different reform agendas, there has been some element of commonality in reforms: that of (managed) competition. Of particular importance in such reforms has been the strengthening of primary care. General practitioners and primary care physicians, as 'gatekeepers' to the health system, are increasingly being called upon to be accountable; not only for their patients' health but also for the wider resource implications of any treatments prescribed. In some countries this role has been formalised through establishing 'budget holding' for general practitioners and primary care physicians, for example, through general practice 'fund holding' in the UK, Health Maintenance Organisations in the USA, and Independent Practice Associations in New Zealand. This paper examines: (i) what such budget holding seeks to achieve; (ii) the effectiveness of the budget holding experience to date in achieving these objectives; and (iii) factors which appear to determine the success of budget holding in achieving its objectives.

Purchaser/provider separation and managed competition: reform options for Australia's health system

A purchaser/provider separation and managed competition have been recommended as options for reform of Australia's health system. This paper presents the theoretical basis and supposed advantages of each model. The introduction of the purchaser/provider separation in the United Kingdom and New Zealand is described, as are the proposals for implementation of managed competition in the United States and the Netherlands. The potential for either model to deliver its promised benefits is critically evaluated in the light of existing evidence. As yet neither model can command unqualified support but both are worthy of further consideration.