Peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis after laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for early rectal cancer: report of a case

Laparoscopic anterior resection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective nonrandomized study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to present our experience of laparoscopic total mesorectal resection, including ultralow resection and coloanal anastomosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 2005, patients fit for general anesthesia, with resectable cancers, and with lower edge of tumor beyond 5 cm of the anal verge were subjected to laparoscopic anterior resection with sphincter preservation. Double stapling technique is used to establish bowel continuity.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients, 88 males and 82 females, were subjected to successful laparoscopic anterior resection, which included high anterior resection (n=90), low anterior resection (n=52), ultralow anterior resection (n=20), and coloanal anastomosis (n=8). The average age of patients was 58.4 years (12-90 years). Mean operating time was 130 min and mean hospital stay was 7 days. The morbidity was 13.5% with nil mortality. With an average follow-up of 49 months (range 9 years to 3 months), 9 patients developed local recurrence and 45 patients developed distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, laparoscopic anterior resection is possible for all levels of rectal tumors, allowing sphincter preservation and maintaining oncological safety.

Influence of laparoscopy on postoperative recurrence and survival in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatic resection

Background

Use of laparoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal cancer has been associated with port-site and peritoneal tumour metastases. The effect of laparoscopy on tumour recurrence and long-term survival in patients undergoing resection of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown.

Methods

Between June 1994 and December 2001, 59 patients with ruptured HCC underwent surgical exploration with a view to hepatic resection. Laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 33 patients; the other 26 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy without laparoscopy. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

Exploratory laparotomy was avoided in 12 of 13 patients with irresectable HCC who had a laparoscopy. The hospital stay of these 12 patients was significantly shorter than that of eight patients found to have irresectable HCC at exploratory laparotomy (median 11 versus 15 days; P = 0·043). Twenty patients had a laparoscopy followed by open resection of HCC, whereas 18 patients underwent laparotomy and resection without laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in disease-free (16 versus 19 per cent; P = 0·525) and overall (32 versus 48 per cent; P = 0·176) survival at 3 years between the two groups. The tumour recurrence pattern was similar between the two groups, and there were no port-site or wound metastases.

Conclusion

Use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with ruptured HCC helps avoid unnecessary exploratory laparotomy. The present data suggest that laparoscopy does not have an adverse effect on tumour recurrence or survival in patients who undergo resection.

Experimental assessment of tumor growth and dissemination of a microscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis after CO2 peritoneal insufflation or laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Based on clinical observations and previous animal studies, laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease is regarded as controversial. We used a rat model to measure and compare the tumor growth, proliferation, and dissemination of a microscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis after CO(2) intraperitoneal insufflation or laparotomy.

METHODS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was induced in three groups of 27 BD IX rats each with intraperitoneal injections of 106 DHD/K12 cells, an aneuploid tumor cell line. At 48 h after tumor cell injection, the animals were randomly divided into three groups to undergo different types of intervention. All animals were anesthetized for 20 min (Halothane). The control group had no surgical intervention (group C), group I had CO(2) insufflation (7 mmHg),and group L had a midline laparotomy (5-cm). Neither bowel manipulation nor any other traumatic action was performed. Two weeks later, the rats were killed and the incidence, type, and dissemination of carcinomatosis were evaluated. We also measured the tumor's weight. Malignant omentum was sampled for flow cytometry analysis (DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction).

RESULTS

The incidence of carcinomatosis did not differ among the groups. The mean score of macroscopic characteristics of the carcinomatosis was 2.8 +/- 1.9 in group L, 2.9 +/- 1.9 in group I, and 3 +/- 1.9 in group C (NS). The location of the implants did not differ, except for parietal peritoneum location, which was more frequent in group L (p < 0.01). The tumor weight was 4.96 g +/- 3.2 in group L, 5.55 g +/- 3.2 in group C, and 5.75 g +/- 3.4 in group I (NS). The percentage of aneuploid cells and S-phase fraction did not differ statistically among the groups.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that CO(2) insufflation does not cause more effects than laparotomy when tumors cells are present before the beginning of the surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the influence of other steps in laparoscopic surgery on tumor growth and dissemination.

[Management of adnexal tumors: role and risks of laparoscopy]

The laparoscopic management of adnexal tumeurs remains controversial because of the potentials risks of cancer dissemination suggested by many case reports and national surveys. From experimental data, the laparoscopic treatment of gynecologic cancer has potential advantages and disadvantages. The risk of dissemination appears high when a large number of malignant cells are present so that adnexal tumors with external vegetations, and bulky lymph nodes may be considered as contra-indications to CO2 laparoscopy. Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard in the treatment of benign adnexal tumeurs, whereas laparotomy remains the standard for the treatment of malignant tumors. The surgical diagnosis is the key to adequate management of adnexal tumeurs. In our experience, after a careful preoperative evaluation, the laparoscopic diagnosis of malignancy is reliable. Moreover in national surveys, many malignant tumeurs were considered as benign despite suspicious laparoscopic findings. Using strict guidelines, laparoscopic diagnosis can be proposed for both non suspicious and complex tumeurs, thus avoiding many unnecessary laparotomies for benign tumeurs suspicious at ultrasound. The more controversial limits of laparoscopic treatment are discussed. If a laparotomy was performed for all tumeurs suspicious at surgery, 80% of the cases would be treated by laparoscopy. The role of laparoscopy for restaging and second look operations for ovarian cancer requires further evaluation.