Defunctioning of the anorectum: historical controlled study of laparoscopic vs. open procedures

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pre-Treatment Loop Colostomy for Fecal Diversion in Rectal Cancer Patients: Is Laparoscopic Colostomy Better?

Diversion colostomy plays a crucial role in the management of carcinoma rectum in low- and middle-income countries as significant number of patients present with partial intestinal obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open approaches for fecal diversion done in patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum as a pretreatment procedure. The primary end point of our study was time to initiation of neoadjuvant chemo radiation. It was a retrospective study that included all patients diagnosed to have carcinoma rectum and underwent a pretreatment fecal diversion between 2012 and 2014. A total of 55 patients underwent pretreatment diversion colostomy of which 33 were performed via the laparoscopic approach while 22 had open diversion. The time for initiation of neoadjuvant therapy was shorter in the laparoscopic group compared to the open approach (16 days vs. 20.5 days, P = 0.31). The study concluded that pretreatment diversion colostomy using the laparoscopic approach was a safe option in low- and middle-income countries as it was associated with faster recovery and early initiation of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with partially obstructed locally advanced carcinoma rectum.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Sigmoid Loop Colostomy: A Comparative Study from a Cohort of 62 Patients Requiring Temporary Faecal Diversion at a Tertiary Care Center in North India

Background

Over decades, colostomies have been done through open method, but laparoscopic creation of an intestinal stoma is safe, feasible and has distinct advantages over conventional techniques in specific procedures. The aim of this study compares operative and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open sigmoid loop colostomy formation for temporary fecal diversion.

Subjects and Methods

A single institution, comparative study conducted in the department of surgery for patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open sigmoid loop colostomy. The 2 years' study was from December 1, 2013, to November 30, 2015. Subjects were prospectively enrolled in the study after informed consent, both genders of >12 years of age. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0. Variables were tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, compared using unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney Test, Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sixty-two patients were enrolled; laparoscopy group - 29 patients (46.77%) versus open group - 33 patients (53.22%). Laparoscopic group/open surgery group showed less blood loss (20.69 + 17.71 ml / 121.97 + 35.29ml, P-value 0.0005), lower requirement of analgesics (4.28 ± 1.76 days/6.88 ± 2.75 days), shorter hospital stay (8.79 ± 5.57 days and 11.73 ± 6.61 days, P = 0.001), early return of the bowel function and tolerance to diet. Complications and readmission requirement for any complication was lower in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic sigmoid loop colostomy is a simple alternative to open sigmoid loop colostomy with respect to postoperative pain, earlier return of bowel function, lower analgesic requirement, and lesser hospital stay.

Single-incision laparoscopic ileostomy is a safe and feasible method of fecal diversion for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection

Purpose

Currently, many operations are performed using the single-incision laparoscopic method. Although there have been recent reports on single-incision laparoscopic ileostomy, none have compared this method to conventional laparoscopic ileostomy. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic ileostomy for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resections.

Methods

From April 2012 to April 2017, 38 patients underwent laparoscopic ileostomy (single-incision; 19 patients referred to as group A, conventional laparoscopy; 19 patients referred to as group B) for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection. We analyzed surgical and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Patients in whom a protective ileostomy was carried out during the initial laparoscopic low anterior resection were excluded from this study.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of patient demographics and initial operation details. Incisional surgical site infections occurred less in group A than in group B (2 of 19 vs. 9 of 19, P = 0.029). The median ileostomy operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, parastomal hernia ratio, hospital stay duration after ileostomy, postoperative pain score were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Single-incision laparoscopic ileostomy is safe and feasible method of fecal diversion for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Laparoscopic-assisted divided colostomy for anorectal malformation case series: a description of technique, clinical outcomes and a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To present a case series of pediatric patients who underwent a laparoscopic-assisted divided colostomy for anorectal malformations, describe our technique, and provide a review of the literature on laparoscopic-assisted colostomy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of six patients born with anorectal malformations, who received a laparoscopic-assisted colostomy from 2012 to 2016 at Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center.

RESULTS

The average operating time was 74.5 min. Laparoscopic colostomy types included divided (n = 5) and end colostomy with Hartmann's (n = 1). Location of the colostomy was selected just distal to the descending colon (n = 5) or at the sigmoid flexure (n = 1). Feeds and stoma production was achieved within 24 h from surgery in most patients. There were no major complications except one patient having a mucosal fistula prolapse that was easily reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy in the management of anorectal malformations is a safe and effective technique. It offers similar advantages of the open technique, with the added benefits of avoiding wound-related complications and improved cosmetic results.

Trephine Transverse Colostomy Is Effective for Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Rectal Surgery

PURPOSE

Colostomy creation is an essential procedure for colorectal surgeons, but the preferred method of colostomy varies by surgeon. We compared the outcomes of trephine colostomy creation with open those for the (laparotomy) and laparoscopic methods and evaluated appropriate indications for a trephine colostomy and the advantages of the technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 263 patients who had undergone colostomy creation by trephine, open and laparoscopic approaches between April 2006 and March 2016. We compared the clinical features and the operative and postoperative outcomes according to the approach used for stoma creation.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three patients (62%) underwent colostomy surgery for obstructive causes and 100 (38%) for fistulous problems. The mean operative time was significantly shorter with the trephine approach (trephine, 46.0 ± 1.9 minutes; open, 78.7 ± 3.9 minutes; laparoscopic, 63.5 ± 5.0 minutes; P < 0.001), as was the time to flatus (1.8 ± 0.1 days, 2.1 ± 0.1 days, 2.2 ± 0.3 days, P = 0.025). Postoperative complications (<30 days) were not different among the 3 approaches (trephine, 4.3%; open, 1.2%; laparoscopic, 0%; P = 0.828). In patients who underwent rectal surgery, a trephine colostomy was feasible for a diversion colostomy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The trephine colostomy is safe and can be implemented quickly in various situations, and compared to other colostomy procedures, the patient's recovery is faster. Previous laparotomy history was not a contraindication for a trephine colostomy, and a trephine transverse colostomy is feasible for patients who have undergone previous rectal surgery.

Single-port laparoscopic fecal diversion: more than cosmetic benefits?

Single-port laparoscopic surgery is usually performed on patients with minor comorbidities. The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of single-port fecal diversion in patients who had previous abdominal operations or comorbidities. Between October 2010 and March 2012, 14 patients with a median age of 57 years were diverted. The reasons for diversion were perianal infection/abscess (n=5), anal incontinence (n=3), radiation proctitis (n=2), colovesical fistula causing sepsis (n=1), outlet obstruction of ileal S pouch (n=1), perforation during pouchoscopy (n=1), and peritoneal carcinomatosis with enterocutaneus fistula (n=1). Median estimated blood loss was 20 mL, operative time was 52 minutes, and length of hospital stay was 4 days. Two patients had ileus postoperatively. One patient had a parastomal hernia 4 months after diversion. Single-port laparoscopic fecal diversion is a safe and feasible operation for patients with significant comorbidities and a history of multiple abdominal operations.

Laparoscopic incisionless stoma creation for patients with colorectal malignant stricture

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques have been applied with increasing frequency to stoma creation. A recent focus in the field of minimally invasive surgery is laparoscopic single-site surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether this procedure is a feasible option compared with other techniques of stoma creation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We introduced laparoscopic surgery to fecal diversion in April 2010 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. This technique was performed on 53 patients, including 15 laparoscopic single-site surgeries, from April 2010 to December 2011.

RESULTS

Of these 15 cases, 8 ileostomies and 7 colostomies were created. The mean operative time was 65.9 minutes (range, 32 to 93 min). The estimated volume of blood loss was small in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications. All patients started an oral diet on the second postoperative day with the exception of 1 patient who suffered from prolonged paralytic ileus.

CONCLUSIONS

A laparoscopic single-site approach to stoma creation may be a feasible option in fecal diversion.

Single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation: experience with 31 consecutive cases

INTRODUCTION

Fecal diversion may be performed using various techniques. Each technique has advantages that affect patient selection. In this report, we report our experience with 31 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation using only a pre-selected stoma site as the point of port access.

METHODS

A 2.5-cm skin incision was made at a previously marked stoma site, and two 5-mm trocars were placed into the abdomen through the stoma site. An optional third trocar was inserted at the stoma site only if the bowel needed to be mobilized or if adhesions needed to be divided. After full intra-abdominal exploration, a selected intestinal loop was brought up to the stoma site, and the ostomy was then matured using standard techniques.

RESULTS

Between April 2009 and March 2012, 31 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 68 years (range, 46-87 years) underwent single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation. Fecal diversion included ileostomy (n = 18) and colostomy (n = 13). There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients (6.5%) required additional port placement in the midline suprapubic area. Conversion to open laparotomy was required in two patients (6.5%) because of the presence of extensive adhesions. Postoperative complications were observed in two patients and included peristomal ileus and dehydration due to high ileostomy output.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation is an effective technique that allows full intra-abdominal visualization and bowel mobilization, while reducing the need for additional skin incisions beyond that of the stoma site.

Intestinal stomas: indications, management, and complications

The ability to appropriately construct and care for an ostomy is crucial to good colorectal surgical practice. Enterostomal therapy is critical to the successful management of ostomies and their complications. Although associated with morbidity, a well-constructed ostomy can provide our patients with a good, durable QoL.

Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy: a novel technique

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has become a favorable alternative to conventional open surgery for the creation of intestinal stomas, and it offers many benefits including reduced postoperative pain, ileus, and hospital stay. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been described for many abdominal operations. It may offer better cosmetic outcomes and reduce incisional pain, adhesions, and recovery time.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to describe a novel technique of scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy for fecal diversion and to report our experience with 8 patients who underwent this procedure within a 1-year period.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a retrospective case series.

SETTINGS

This investigation was conducted at a single-institution, tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eight consecutive patients undergoing scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy between August 2009 and August 2010 were included.

INTERVENTION

Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomies were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Among the outcomes measured were operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery of intestinal function, length of hospital stay, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent surgery for active Crohn's disease refractory to medical therapy. One patient underwent surgery for radiation-induced rectovesical fistula. Median surgery time was 76 minutes, and median intraoperative blood loss was 10 mL. Median length of postoperative hospitalization was 7 days. Of the 8 patients included in our series, 2 patients (25%) required reoperation for stoma ischemia because of vascular congestion that we attribute to a tight fascial opening or extensive bowel manipulation. Other surgical complications included nonoperative readmission for ileus and partial small-bowel obstruction (n = 2), anal dilation to evacuate an obstructed distal colon (n = 1), and peristomal cellulitis (n = 1).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its small sample size and its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy is a feasible alternative to standard laparoscopy for fecal diversion. Surgeons attempting this technique should do so with caution, given the high stoma ischemia rate in our small case series.

Laparoscopic colostomy in gynecologic cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to report on our case series of 7 patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent laparoscopic colostomy for elective fecal diversion. Our aim was to retrospectively estimate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the laparoscopic approach in the setting of gynecologic malignancy, given the high incidence of earlier abdominal surgery and pelvic radiation treatment in this select population.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

All patients with a history of gynecologic cancers who underwent laparoscopic colostomy during the study period.

INTERVENTIONS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic diverting colostomy in our department of gynecologic oncology. Surgical indications, medical history, operative and stomal complications, estimated blood loss, return of bowel function, and length of hospital stay were collected.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seven patients underwent laparoscopic colostomy during the study period. Six of these patients underwent an end descending colostomy, and 1 patient underwent a loop colostomy. Indications included rectovaginal fistula (n = 5), colonic/pelvic fistula (n = 1), or large bowel obstruction (n = 1). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred, nor did any conversions to laparotomy. The median blood loss was 50 mL (range 10-75). Median operative time was 102 minutes (range 69-159). Six (86%) patients had a history of pelvic radiation. In addition, 3 (43%) patients had a history of laparotomy. The median patient weight was 59.8 kg (range 47.1-82.2). The median time to tolerance of a regular diet was 2 days (range 1-3) and the median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-4). No immediate or delayed stomal complications were noted with a median follow-up of 6 months (range 1-15).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colostomy in advanced gynecologic cancer may be a safe and feasible technique with minimal morbidity, rapid return of bowel function, and short hospital stay.

Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy in children

INTRODUCTION

Colostomy morbidity has been reported to be as high as 50%. Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy (LAC) is associated with decreased colostomy complication. LAC is recommended for stoma formation in adults but has not been previously reported in children. In this paper, we report on our initial experience with LAC in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a two- to four-port (3.5-mm) technique, LAC was performed in a female with an imperforate anus and 2 male patients with complicated Hirschsprung's disease (HD), respectively. Data collected included operative time, time to recover bowel function, and morbidity. Close follow-up was done until stoma closure.

RESULTS

The operative time was 144 minutes in the HD patients (including concomitant laparoscopic biopsies and a leveling colostomy) and 40 minutes in the imperforate anus patient. Median time to passage of both flatus and stool was 40 hours (range, 24-48). Time to commence feeds postop was 40 hours (range, 24-48). The median time of follow-up was 3 months (range, 2-9) until the stoma was taken down. No complications have occurred to date.

CONCLUSIONS

LAC is safe and easily performed in neonates and infants. It facilitates accurate stoma placement and orientation. It allows additional bowel mobilization, especially in HD. In accordance with the adult experience, LAC seems to obviate stoma-related complications. Encouraged by our initial low morbidity rate, a prospective evaluation of this technique is planned.

Minimally invasive stomas

Traditionally, stoma creation and end stoma reversal have been performed via a laparotomy incision. However, in many situations, stoma construction may be safely performed in a minimally invasive nature. This may include a trephine, laparoscopic, or combined approach. Furthermore, Hartmann's colostomy reversal, a procedure traditionally associated with substantial morbidity, may also be performed laparoscopically. The authors briefly review patient selection, preparation, and indications, and focus primarily on surgical techniques and results of minimally invasive stoma creation and Hartmann's reversal.

Palliative stoma creation: comparison of laparoscopic vs conventional procedures

BACKGROUND

The creation of a stoma is an established therapeutic concept for the palliation of non-resectable rectal carcinomas and advanced tumours infiltrating the pelvis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In two prospective country-wide multicentre studies, each conducted over a similar period of time, the peri-operative course and postoperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs laparotomy-based stoma construction were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients underwent palliative laparoscopic construction; 550 patients received a stoma via a laparotomy. The intra-operative complication rate was lower after open surgery than after laparoscopic surgery (2.7 vs 5.6%; p = 0.15), although the difference was not significant. With regard to general (30.9 vs 15.6%; p = 0.003) and also specific postoperative complications (13.8 vs 5.6%; p = 0.029), however, a significant advantage of the laparoscopic approach was seen. Furthermore, mortality in the laparoscopic group was also significantly lower (4.4 vs 14.0%; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Palliative stoma done via laparoscopy had significantly better outcomes in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in comparison with the open surgical procedure.

No-Trocar Laparoscopic Stoma Creation

Creation of an intestinal stoma may be necessary in a wide variety of colorectal diseases of both benign and malignant character. Open and laparoscopic techniques can be used for the fecal diversion. We report a case of a patient with a diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon with abscess formation and fistulation to the abdominal wall and vagina. Owing to severe comorbidity, a permanent fecal diversion was prepared. We performed a laparoscopic no-trocar technique. Only 1 incision, at the planned stoma site, was used. The abdominal wall was elevated with gaspers, no pneumoperitoneum or trocars were used. The laparoscope and reuseable laparoscopic graspers were introduced through the stoma site to correctly identify and grasp a loop of the terminal ileum. Finally, the loop ileostomy was placed on a bar. This laparoscopic technique is a valid alternative to standard laparoscopic stoma creation. Different techniques for stoma creation are discussed.

Laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic ileocolic (LI) resection for Crohn's disease has several potential advantages over the traditional open technique. The objective of this study was to compare early surgical outcomes in patients having laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resections for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Data collected prospectively from 21 patients having LI resection for Crohn's disease between 1995 and 2001 were compared to data from 19 patients having open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease between 1990 and 1995.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups had similar ages, sex distribution, and rates of previous abdominal surgery. Mean operating time was not significantly different between the groups. There was a nonsignificant trend to less postoperative analgesic requirement in the laparoscopic group. Resumption of liquid (P <.001) and solid (P =.01) diet, return of bowel function [flatus (P =.008), feces (P =.008)] and time to discharge (P =.001) all occurred significantly more quickly in the laparoscopic group. There was no difference in the rates of morbidity between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LI resection for Crohn's disease appears to be safe and has comparable if not superior results to open surgery in the short term.

Parastomal hernia following minimally invasive stoma formation

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive intestinal stoma formation using a laparoscopic approach or through a trephine, is widely described in published literature. The incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) following a stoma formed without formal laparotomy is not well reported. The present review aims to assess the current data available on minimally invasive stoma formation, with particular reference to the incidence of PH.

METHODS

A literature search using the Pubmed Medline database was performed, locating English language articles on minimally invasive stoma formation from 1970 to 2002. The manuscripts were searched manually for further references.

RESULTS

The number of published studies describing laparoscopic stoma formation is small (263 stomas) and the follow-up studied were short (none longer than 1 year). The incidence of PH was 0-6.7%. The incidence following a trephine stoma was 6.7-12%, and the number of patients was small (118) and the follow up short (up to 12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PH following minimally invasive stoma formation using a trephine or a laparoscopic technique remains unclear. Studies published to date are generally small and the follow up is short. A prospective randomized trial comparing minimally invasive stoma formation with stoma formation with laparotomy, is required.

Gasless laparoscopic-assisted intestinal stoma creation through a single incision

Intestinal stoma creation has been performed using both open and laparoscopic surgery. However, each technique still has disadvantages. We created the intestinal stoma through one incision, with the use of the laparoscope in a gasless fashion. This method has not been reported previously. Fourteen adult patients underwent this technique between February 1996 and December 1998. Indications for stoma creation were for various anorectal disease processes, most commonly for purposes of hygiene in patients with spinal cord injury. The average operative time to perform the stoma was 58 (range, 15-78) minutes, with minimal blood loss (<35 ml). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 22 months. Two cases (14 percent) were converted secondary to severe adhesions. All nonconverted patients were able to tolerate a regular diet within two days of surgery. There was only one stoma-related complication. Two patients (14 percent) died of comorbidities during follow-up. In conclusion, the initial experience with gasless laparoscopic-assisted intestinal stoma creation through a single incision is encouraging. Patients requiring ostomy creation as a single intervention may benefit from this approach.

Place of laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease

Laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's disease is feasible and safe. It may be conducted in appropriately selected patients including those with localized abscess, phlegmon, simple intra-abdominal fistulas, and perianastomotic recurrent disease. However, as the technique is just evolving and has yet to be shown to be of advantage over conventional open surgery, it should not be considered as a standard care. Randomized prospective clinical studies are needed to determine that laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is at least equivalent or better than conventional open surgery.