Intravenous benztropine and propranolol challenges in tardive akathisia

[Antipsychotic-induced motor symptoms in schizophrenic psychoses-Part 1 : Dystonia, akathisia und parkinsonism]

Acute antipsychotic-induced movement disorders (AIMD) are clinically relevant since they are frequently associated with high subjective distress, and since over the long-term they can negatively impact treatment adherence of patients with schizophrenic psychoses. This review article summarizes the relevant studies on the prevalence, risk factors, prevention and treatment options and instruments for early prediction of acute AIMD in schizophrenic psychoses. The current evidence and treatment recommendations are divided into three main areas: acute dystonia, akathisia, and parkinsonism. For the treatment of acute dystonia trihexyphenidyl and biperiden have shown their efficacy. Considering pharmacological treatment of akathisia, there is some preliminary evidence for medication with lipophilic beta-receptor blockers (propranolol and pindolol), clonidine, benzodiazepines, mianserin, mirtazapine und trazodone. The treatment options for drug-induced parkinsonism include reduction or switching from one antipsychotic to another with a lower affinity for dopamine D₂ receptors, amantadine or in the regular administration of anticholinergic drugs. In conclusion, acute AIMD is easily to recognize but is not always effectively and durably treated. Early recognition and treatment of acute AIMD could be associated with improved treatment outcomes.

Benzodiazepines for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disfiguring movement disorder, often of the orofacial region, frequently caused by using antipsychotic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage TD, and for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the benzodiazepine group of drugs have been suggested as a useful adjunctive treatment. However, benzodiazepines are very addictive.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of benzodiazepines for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other chronic mental illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

On 17 July 2015 and 26 April 2017, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (including trial registers), inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of each included trial for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) and antipsychotic-induced TD that compared benzodiazepines with placebo, no intervention, or any other intervention for the treatment of TD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from the included studies and ensured that they were reliably selected, and quality assessed. For homogenous dichotomous data, we calculated random effects, risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We synthesised continuous data from valid scales using mean differences (MD). For continuous outcomes, we preferred endpoint data to change data. We assumed that people who left early had no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

The review now includes four trials (total 75 people, one additional trial since 2006, 21 people) randomising inpatients and outpatients in China and the USA. Risk of bias was mostly unclear as reporting was poor. We are uncertain about all the effects as all evidence was graded at very low quality. We found no significant difference between benzodiazepines and placebo for the outcome of 'no clinically important improvement in TD' (2 RCTs, 32 people, RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.09, very low quality evidence). Significantly fewer participants allocated to clonazepam compared with phenobarbital (as active placebo) experienced no clinically important improvement (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.96, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). For the outcome 'deterioration of TD symptoms,' we found no clear difference between benzodiazepines and placebo (2 RCTs, 30 people, RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.22 to 9.82, very low quality evidence). All 10 participants allocated to benzodiazepines experienced any adverse event compared with 7/11 allocated to phenobarbital (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.41, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the incidence of participants leaving the study early for benzodiazepines compared with placebo (3 RCTs, 56 people, RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.15 to 48.04, very low quality evidence) or compared with phenobarbital (as active placebo) (no events, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, which are outcomes designated important by patients. No trials comparing benzodiazepines with placebo or treatment as usual reported on adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is only evidence of very low quality from a few small and poorly reported trials on the effect of benzodiazepines as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotic-induced TD. These inconclusive results mean routine clinical use is not indicated and these treatments remain experimental. New and better trials are indicated in this under-researched area; however, as benzodiazepines are addictive, we feel that other techniques or medications should be adequately evaluated before benzodiazepines are chosen.

Anticholinergics for neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia

BACKGROUND

Neuroleptic-induced akathisia is one of the most common and distressing early-onset adverse effects of first generation 'typical' antipsychotic drugs. It is associated with poor compliance with treatment, and thus, ultimately, with an increased risk of relapse. We assessed the role of anticholinergic drugs as an adjunct therapy to standard antipsychotic medication in the pharmacological treatment of this adverse effect.

OBJECTIVES

To review anticholinergic drugs for neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 1999), Biological Abstracts (1982-1999), CINAHL (1982-1999), Cochrane Library (Issue 4 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), LILACS (1982-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999) and PsycLIT (1974-1999). References of all identified studies were inspected for more trials and we contacted first authors. Each included study was sought as a citation on the Science Citation Index database. For this 2005-6 update, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (July 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials of adjunctive anticholinergic drugs in addition to antipsychotic medication compared with placebo, for people with neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We quality assessed and extracted data independently. We calculated the fixed effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) for homogeneous dichotomous data on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no relevant randomised controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is no reliable evidence to support or refute the use of anticholinergics for people suffering from neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia. Akathisia is a distressing movement disorder that remains highly prevalent in people with schizophrenia, both in the developed and developing world. This review highlights the need for well designed, conducted and reported clinical trials to address the claims of open studies as regards the effects of the anticholinergic group of drugs for akathisia.

Drug Insight: from disturbed motility to disordered movement—a review of the clinical benefits and medicolegal risks of metoclopramide

Metoclopramide, the only drug approved by the FDA for treatment of diabetic gastroparesis, but used off-label for a variety of other gastrointestinal indications, has many potentially troublesome adverse neurologic effects, particularly movement disorders. In this article, we comprehensively review the indications and side effects of metoclopramide, and describe some common pitfalls and strategies to minimize the medicolegal risks to the prescribing physician. Metoclopramide accounts for nearly a third of all drug-induced movement disorders, a common reason for a malpractice suit. The entire spectrum of drug-induced movement disorders, ranging from subtle to life-threatening, can ensue from its use; akathisia and dystonia are generally seen early in the course of metoclopramide-induced movement disorders, whereas tardive dyskinesia and parkinsonism seem to be more prevalent in chronic users. Female sex, age and diabetes are the major risk factors for metoclopramide-induced movement disorders. It is therefore incumbent on gastroenterologists and other prescribing physicians to become familiar with the adverse neurologic effects associated with the use of metoclopramide, and to take appropriate preventive and defensive measures.

Drug-induced movement disorders in children and adolescents

The use of psychotropic medication among children and adolescents is increasing with a concomitant increase in the incidence of drug-related movement disorders. This class of adverse reactions to medications can be divided into those that are acute in onset, others that are continuous as long as the offending drug is administered, and a final category consisting of symptoms that are persistent, even after the causative agent has been discontinued. Within these three categories, this review discusses the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features and treatment of acute dystonic reactions, drug-induced parkinsonism, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, serotonin syndrome, acute akathisia, and the tardive syndromes. In addition, drugs that commonly cause tremor, chorea, or myoclonus are included.

Restless legs syndrome and drug-induced akathisia in headache patients

The purpose of the research presented in this article was to characterize restless leg syndrome (RLS) in a headache population and correlate treatment induced risks with dopamine blockers. Fifty patients with severe headache who were admitted to an outpatient infusion center were enrolled. The diagnosis of RLS was established using the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group criteria. Patients were screened for baseline akathisia using an akathisia scale and reexamined for akathisia after receiving intravenous infusion with one of four dopamine receptor blocking agents as treatment for their headaches. A change from baseline to post-infusion assessment of two points on a global assessment of akathisia was considered positive for drug-induced akathisia. Our results indicated that 41 (82%) of patients had episodic or chronic migraine. The rest had new daily persistent headache, cluster, or posttraumatic headache. Seventeen subjects (34%) met the criteria for RLS. Nineteen (38%) of the subjects developed drug-induced akathisia. Thirteen (76.5%) of the subjects with RLS developed akathisia compared with only 6 of the 33 (18.2%) without RLS (P<.0001). Finally, we concluded that headache patients with RLS are at a greatly increased risk of developing drug-induced akathisia when treated with intravenous dopamine receptor blocking agents.

The placebo effect in neurological disorders

Recent evidence suggests that the placebo effect is mediated by the dopaminergic reward mechanisms in the human brain and that it is related to the expectation of clinical benefit. On the basis of this theory, we propose some criteria for the proper investigation of the placebo effect, and review the evidence for a placebo effect in Parkinson's disease, depression, pain, and other neurological disorders. We also discuss the evidence for the use of placebos in long-term substitution programmes for the treatment of drug addiction.

Beta-blocker supplementation of standard drug treatment for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia or similar severe mental disorders do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, among them beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia or similar severe mental disorders.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications in all languages were searched from the following databases: Biological Abstracts, CENTRAL of The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and PsycLIT. The reference section of papers included were screened.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing beta-blockers with placebo as an adjunct to conventional antipsychotic medication for those with schizophrenia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were selected and then data extracted, independently, by at least two reviewers. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Currently the review includes five studies but data are poorly presented and do not evidence any effect of beta-blockers as an adjunct to conventional antipsychotic medication.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

At present beta-blockers cannot be recommended in the treatment of schizophrenia. Any possible benefit of adjunctive beta-blockers is obscured by the poor reporting of the included studies. Existing data on beta-blockers as adjunctive medication to antipsychotics for those with schizophrenia should be collected and re-analysed in order to allow confident conclusions about the effect of this treatment or the need for further trials.

Pharmacologic management of Alzheimer disease, Part II: Antioxidants, antihypertensives, and ergoloid derivatives

OBJECTIVE

To provide information about research evaluating antioxidants in Alzheimer disease (AD) and to discuss the potential role of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, clonidine, guanfacine, nimodipine, and ergoloid derivatives in AD therapy.

DATA SOURCES

Studies, review articles, and editorials identified from MEDLINE searches (from 1989 to 1997) and bibliographies of identified articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies and review articles addressing antioxidant, antihypertensive, and ergoloid derivative pharmacotherapy research.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information was selected and the data synthesized into a review format.

DATA SYNTHESIS

AD is a progressive neuropsychiatric disorder of unknown etiology. Studies evaluating the possible association between a free radical mechanism in AD and the potential role of antioxidants are reviewed. Additionally, the role of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, clonidine, guanfacine, nimodipine, and ergoloid derivatives in AD management are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary evidence suggests that antioxidants may have a protective effect against the development of AD. Additional prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are needed to determine the role of antioxidants in the prevention and management of AD. Understanding the role of antioxidants in AD may suggest alternative agents that have similar pharmacologic activity. Beta-blockers may be an option to control agitation in AD patients for whom anxiolytics or antipsychotics are ineffective or are contraindicated because of their adverse effect profiles. Other agents that may have a role in AD therapy include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, nimodipine, and ergoloid derivatives. Clonidine and guanfacine have thus far shown little promise in improving cognitive function in AD. Further prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials will be necessary to elucidate the role of these agents in AD management.

Negative symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, tardive akathisia and tardive dyskinesia

This study examined the relationship of neuropsychological deficits and negative symptoms with tardive akathisia in chronic schizophrenic patients. Consecutive volunteers (n = 100) were recruited from Community Health Centres with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenic disorder, chronic and on stable medication. Subjects were subgrouped into tardive akathisia (TA), tardive dyskinesia (TD) and control groups using four sets of criteria. Detailed single examinations were performed using the following measures: sociodemographic, illness-related and treatment-related variables, Negative Symptom Rating Scale (NSRS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side-Effects (EPSE), Akathisia Rating Scale, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and a brief neuropsychological test battery. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed in order to test the significance of findings. TA ratings showed a significant association with NSRS subscale scores, and with some neuropsychological test scores (Symbol Digits Modalities Test, and to a lesser extent Trail Making Test and Finger Tapping Test). TD scores showed a consistent association with age, and a less consistent association with gender, and their association with NSRS subscale scores and neuropsychological dysfunction was positive but less significant. Higher EPSE scores predicted TA and limb truncal (LT) dyskinesia. In conclusion, TA showed a more significant association with some clinical indices of organic brain dysfunction than the oral-lingual-buccal-facial dyskinetic syndrome. Prospective studies are necessary to determine whether organicity is a vulnerability factor for TA. Both our data and the published literature suggest that the movement disorder seen in TA and TD is but one feature of complex syndromes that include motor and cognitive features.