Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome II) in Uruguay

Lynch syndrome in South America: past, present and future

After decades of unawareness about Lynch syndrome, the medical community in South America is increasingly interested and informed. The visits and support of mentors like H. T. Lynch had been crucial to this awakening. Several countries have at least one registry with skilled personnel in genetic counseling and research. However, this only represents a very restricted resource for the region. According to the GETH, there are 27 hereditary cancer care centers in South America (21 in Brazil, 3 in Argentina, 1 in Uruguay, 1 in Chile and 1 in Peru). These registries differ in fundamental aspects of function, capabilities and funding, but are able to conduct high quality clinical, research and educational activities due to the dedication and personal effort of their members, and organizational support. More support from the governments as well as the participation of the community would boost the initiatives of people leading these groups. Meantime, the collaboration among the South American registries and the involvement of registries and leaders from developed countries will allow to maximize the efficiency in caring for affected patients and their families. The aim of this article is to describe how the knowledge of LS began to be spread in South America, how the first registries were organized and to summarize the current state of progress. In addition, we will provide an update of the clinical and molecular findings in the region.

Prevalence of pathological germline mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in colorectal cancer

The prevalence of pathological germline mutations in colorectal cancer has been widely studied, as germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 confer a high risk of colorectal cancer. However, because the sample size and population of previous studies are very different from each other, the conclusions still remain controversial. In this paper, Databases such as PubMed were applied to search for related papers. The data were imported into Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2, which was used to estimate the weighted prevalence of hMLH1 and hMSH2 pathological mutations and compare the differences of prevalence among different family histories, ethnicities and related factors. This study collected and utilized data from 102 papers. In the Amsterdam-criteria positive group, the prevalence of pathological germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was 28.55% (95%CI 26.04%–31.19%) and 19.41% (95%CI 15.88%–23.51%), respectively, and the prevalence of germline mutations in hMLH1/hMSH2 was 15.44%/10.02%, 20.43%/13.26% and 15.43%/11.70% in Asian, American multiethnic and European/Australian populations, respectively. Substitution mutations accounted for the largest proportion of germline mutations (hMLH1: 52.34%, hMSH2: 43.25%). The total prevalence of mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in Amsterdam-criteria positive, Amsterdam-criteria negative and sporadic colorectal cancers was around 45%, 25% and 15%, respectively, and there were no obvious differences in the prevalence of germline mutations among different ethnicities.

Inherited predisposition to cancer: a historical overview

The hereditary predisposition to cancer dates historically to interest piqued by physicians as well as family members wherein striking phenotypic features were shown to cluster in families, inclusive of the rather grotesque cutaneous findings in von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis, which date back to the sixteenth century. The search for the role of primary genetic factors was heralded by studies at the infrahuman level, particularly on laboratory mouse strains with strong susceptibility to carcinogen-induced cancer, and conversely, with resistance to the same carcinogens. These studies, developed in the 19th and 20th centuries, continue today. This article traces the historical aspects of hereditary cancer dealing with identification and ultimate molecular genetic confirmation of commonly occurring cancers, particularly of the colon in the case of familial adenomatous polyposis and its attenuated form, both due to the APC germline mutation; the Lynch syndrome due to mutations in mismatch repair genes, the most common of which were found to be MSH2, MLH1, and MSH6 germline mutations; the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations; the Li-Fraumeni (SBLA) syndrome due to the p53 mutation; and the familial atypical multiple mole melanoma in association with pancreatic cancer due to the CDKN2A (p16) germline mutation. These and other hereditary cancer syndromes have been discussed in some detail relevant to their characterization, which, for many conditions, took place in the late 18th century and, in the more modern molecular genetic era, during the past two decades. Emphasis has been placed upon the manner in which improved cancer control will emanate from these discoveries.

Three new mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome II) in Uruguay

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC). Our purpose is to describe three extended HNPCC families, each of which manifests novel germline mutations in Uruguay, a small country that is a study model for cancer investigation given its high cancer incidence and mortality rate. This is a study of three extended HNPCC families in which extensive genealogic information, medical history, and pathology findings are critically reviewed. DNA testing was performed for evidence of HNPCC mutations. The findings reveal three novel germline mutations, namely MLH1, with a deletion resulting in a frameshift and a premature stop codon (codon 228) in one of the families; in the second family, MSH2 exon 1, codon 61 at nucleotide 181, which results in immediate stop of translation; and in the third family, a mutation in MSH2 at exon 3: the amino acid at nucleotide 530, codon 117, causing a frameshift and a premature stop codon eight base pairs later. We conclude that it is important to study HNPCC mismatch repair genes because of emerging evidence for genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which will harbor the potential to eventually translate this knowledge into specific screening and management protocols. Future projections for such mutations could even contribute to the emergence of molecular-based designer drugs developed through advances in genomics, proteomics, high-throughput screening, and bioinformatics, which would be effective therapeutically for these high-cancer risk patients.