Functional results of colonic J-pouch anastomosis for rectal cancer

Better functional outcome provided by short-armed sigmoid colon-rectal side-to-end anastomosis after laparoscopic low anterior resection: a match-paired retrospective study from China

PURPOSE

Side-to-end anastomosis using the descending colon has been proved to be as effective as J pouch in alleviating low anterior resection syndrome. However, using the sigmoid colon, which is less compliant for reconstruction after rectal cancer surgery, is common in China due to less prevalence of diverticulosis. The effectiveness of using the sigmoid colon for a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis in improving bowel dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer has not been investigated. This study was designed to compare the functional and surgical outcomes between the two anastomoses.

METHODS

From October 2007 to December 2008, 16 rectal cancer patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with short-armed (length of side limb 2-4 cm) side-to-end sigmoidorectal anastomosis at our department. The bowel functional results of these patients at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively were recorded and compared with that of another 1:2 matched 30 patients undergoing straight anastomosis.

RESULTS

Bowel movement frequency in the side-to-end group was obviously less than that in the straight group 6 months postoperatively. Patients in the side-to-end group also had an improved incontinence score, a better ability to defer defecation, and less repeated evacuation. No differences were found between two groups 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that the short-armed side-to-end colorectal anastomosis using the sigmoid colon can also improve the short-term bowel function in patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection.

The long-term gastrointestinal functional outcomes following curative anterior resection in adults with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Significant variability and a lack of transparency exist in the reporting of anterior resection outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the long-term functional outcomes and assessment tools used in evaluating patients with rectal cancer following anterior resection, to quantify the incidence of these outcomes, and to identify risk factors for long-term incontinence.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using the terms rectal neoplasms, resection, and gastrointestinal function.

STUDY SELECTION

The studies included were in English and evaluated adults with rectal cancer, curative anterior resection, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients with recurrent/metastatic disease were excluded. Of the 805 records identified, 48 articles were included.

INTERVENTION

The intervention performed was anterior resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was incontinence (gas, liquid stool, and solid stool).

RESULTS

The histories of 3349 patients from 17 countries were summarized. Surgeries were conducted between 1978 to 2004 with a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 12, 57). Sixty-five percent of studies did not use a validated assessment tool. Reported outcomes and incidence rates were variable. The reported proportion of patients with incontinence ranged from 3.2% to 79.3%, with a pooled incidence of 35.2% (95% CI 27.9, 43.3). Risk factors for incontinence, identified by meta-regression, were preoperative radiation 0.009 and, in particular, short-course radiation (P = .006), and study quality (randomized controlled trial P = .004, observational P = .006).

LIMITATIONS

The meta-analysis was limited by the significant heterogeneity of the primary data.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional outcomes are inconsistently assessed and reported and require common definitions, and the more regular use of validated assessment tools, as well. Preoperative radiation and, in particular, short-course radiation may be a strong risk factor for incontinence; however, further studies are needed.

Bowel dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Rectal cancer is a common disease in Western populations. Improved treatment modalities have resulted in increased survival and tumour control. With increasing survival there is a growing need for knowledge about the long-term side effects and functional results after the treatment.

AIM

To describe the long-term functional outcome in patients treated for rectal cancer through a systematic review of the current literature and to provide an outline of the promising developments within this area.

RESULTS

Standard resectional surgery with loss of the rectal reservoir function results in poor functional results in up to 50-60% of the patients. New methods of surgery including the construction of a neoreservoir and improvement of the technique for local excision have been developed to minimize the functional disturbances without compromising the oncological result. The addition of chemo and/or radiotherapy approximately doubles the risk of poor functional results. During the last decades the techniques for chemo/radiotherapy has been markedly improved with a positive impact on functional outcome. New methods for treatment of functional disturbances e.g. bowel irrigation and sacral nerve stimulation are currently under development.

PERSPECTIVES

To improve the functional outcome in this growing patient population several approaches can be taken. The primary cancer treatment must be improved by minimizing the surgical trauma and optimizing the imaging and radiation techniques. Population screening should be considered in order to find the cancers at an earlier stage, hereby increasing the proportion of patients eligible for local excision without the need for chemo/irradiation. All patients recovering from rectal resection should be examined and registered systematically regarding their functional results and treatment should be offered to the severely affected patients. More studies are still needed to evaluate the efficacy of irrigation and nerve stimulation in this patient group.

The effect of neo-rectal wall properties on functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It has been suggested that normal function of both anal sphincters is essential for a good functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPAA). However, CPAA patients may have impaired continence despite adequate sphincter function. The present study was designed to identify those factors, which contribute to the functional outcome after a handsewn CPAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients were studied before and 1 year after pouch surgery. Faecal continence was evaluated using the Rockwood faecal incontinence severity index (RFISI). At both occasions, maximum anal resting pressure (MARP) and maximum anal squeeze pressure (MASP) were recorded. In addition, sensory perception threshold-volumes (SPT-V) and compliance were assessed using an 'infinitely' compliant polyethylene bag connected to an electronic barostat assembly.

RESULTS

The median RFISI score 1 year after surgery was higher than the median RFISI score before surgery (13 vs 7 (p < 0.01). The median MARP dropped significantly (p < 0.01) whereas the median MASP remained unaffected. The mean compliance, calculated at three different sensation levels, and the pouch sensory perception threshold-volumes (PSPT-V) were lower than those of the original rectum (p < 0.05). The reduction of MARP showed no correlation with the post-operative change in RFISI scores. Low PC and low PSPT-V were associated with higher RFISI scores.

CONCLUSION

Low pouch compliance and low SPT-V adversely affect functional outcome after a handsewn colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection

Background and methods

The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic J-pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty or straight CAA were analysed. Endpoints included postoperative complications, and functional and physiological outcomes measured within 6 months, 1 year and 2 years or more after the procedure. A random-effect model was used to aggregate the study endpoints and assess heterogeneity.

Results

Thirty-five studies containing 2240 patients (1066 straight CAA, 1050 J-pouch and 124 coloplasty) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the three groups. There was a significant reduction in the frequency of defaecation per day by 1·88, 1·35 and 0·74 motions at the three time intervals in the J-pouch group compared with the straight CAA group. Faecal urgency was less prevalent in patients with a J-pouch than those with a straight CAA (odds ratio 0·27 at 6 months or less and 0·21 at 1 year). There was no difference in functional outcome between J-pouch and coloplasty anastomosis.

Conclusions

The colonic J-pouch provided functional benefits over straight anastomosis with no increase in postoperative complications. Coloplasty appeared to have similar benefits but further studies are required for validation.

Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Restoration of neo-rectal capacity is of importance in obtaining better bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. However, evacuatory disorders, such as incomplete evacuation, have been reported in some patients undergoing colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Therefore, we conducted this study to explore the possible factor affecting incomplete evacuation following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The subjects were 37 consecutive patients who had undergone low anterior resection for rectal tumor (colonic J-pouch in 13 patients, straight anastomosis in 24). Clinical and physiological outcomes were determined at a mean follow-up time of 12 months after the operation, and the parameters were compared between patients with and without postoperative incomplete evacuation.

RESULTS

Although anastomosis level from the anal verge was lower in the J-pouch group (6.5 cm vs 3.9 cm, P<0.05), there was no significant difference between J-pouch and straight reconstruction regarding clinical and physiological outcomes. Postoperative incomplete evacuation was significantly more frequent in the J-pouch group than in the straight group (46% vs 25%, P<0.05). Postoperative large contractions on ano-rectal manometry were also significantly more apparent in the J-pouch group than in the straight group (31% vs 4%, P<0.05). Presence of postoperative large contractions (P=0.004), anastomotic stricture (P=0.019) and smaller postoperative maximum tolerable volume ( P=0.009) were significantly and independently associated with incomplete evacuation by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Colonic J-pouch reconstruction following ultra-low anterior resection was comparable with higher level straight anastomosis from the clinical and physiological point of view. The presence of large contractions might be an important indicator of incomplete evacuation in patients who are undergoing rectal resection.

Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis

ILEAL POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because the disease is cured by surgical resection, functional results, pouch survival prognosis, and disease or dysplasia control are the major determinants of success. There is controversy as to whether the IPAA should be handsewn with mucosectomy or stapled, preserving the mucosa of the anal transitional zone. Crohn's disease is a contraindication for IPAA, but long-term outcome after IPAA is similar to that for MUC in patients with indeterminate colitis who do not develop Crohn's disease. As development of dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch have been reported, a standardized surveillance program is mandatory in cases of MUC, FAP, and chronic pouchitis. COLONIC POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Construction of a colonic pouch is a widely accepted technique to improve functional outcome after low or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Several randomized studies comparing colo-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPA) with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) have found the pouch functionally superior. Most controlled studies cover only 1-year follow-up, but randomized studies with 2-year follow-up show similar functional results of CPA and CAA. Evacuation difficulty as initially observed was related to pouch size, and the results with smaller pouches (5-6 cm) are more favorable, showing adequate reservoir function without compromising neorectal evacuation. The transverse coloplasty pouch may offer several advantages to J-pouch reconstruction. Current series question whether the neorectal reservoir is the physiological key of the pouch, but rather the decreased motility. The major advantage reported with colonic pouch reconstruction is the lower incidence of anastomotic complications.

Circular transanal stapled procedure for incomplete rectal prolapse associated with outlet obstruction versus conventional procedure

The circular stapled procedure for mucosal prolapse of the rectum takes less time, is a less risky, less painful rectal procedure, and permits the preservation of more mucosa than conventional procedures. We compared retrospectively the early outcome of the circular transanal stapled procedure (n = 13), for incomplete rectal mucosal prolapse associated with outlet obstruction, with the current standard Milligan-Morgan procedure (n = 15). Under spinal anaesthesia, patients underwent a standardised diathermy perianal operation, or had a circumferential doughnut of mucosal prolapse at least 2 cm above the dentate line, using a circular end-to-end stapler (Ethicon Endosurgery SDH 33). All patients received the same preoperative analgesic and laxative regimens. The operating time for the stapled group was shorter (22-58 min, median 38) versus (42-79 min, median 68). The use of analgesics was significantly less, with 85% of the patients not using analgesics on and following the first postoperative day. The hospital stay was significantly shorter for the stapled group (3-5 days, median 3.2 versus 7-14 days, median 12.2). Constipation before procedure was improved in both groups. Early and late complications, and the functional outcome, measured by rectoanal manometry, appeared to be similar in short-term follow-up. However, the long-term results of recurrence, symptomatic and functional outcome, have yet to be evaluated in the extended follow-up.

Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes of patients who had a delayed coloanal anastomosis for a lower third rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 1988 to December 1997, 35 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum received preoperative radiotherapy (45Gy) followed by a rectal resection, combining an abdominal and transanal approach. Colorectal resection was performed about 32 days after the end of the radiotherapy. The distal colon stump was pulled through the anal canal. On postoperative day 5 the colonic stump was resected and a direct coloanal anastomosis performed without colostomia diversion.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. There was no leakage. One patient had a pelvic abscess. One patient had a necrosis of the left colon requiring reoperation. Another delayed coloanal anastomosis could be performed. Median followup was 43 months (range 6 to 113 months). Functional results were evaluated with a new scoring system including 13 items. Function was considered good in 59% and 70% at 1 and 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This new procedure is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving operation that avoids a diverting stoma for patients with rectal cancer of the lower third of the rectum. This technique is well adapted for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy, with low local morbidity and good functional results. Further adaptation could be imagined for a coelioscopic approach.