Percutaneous drainage of peridiverticular abscess followed by primary sigmoidectomy

Benefits of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The traditional therapy for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with peritonitis is emergency colectomy usually with colostomy. We report laparoscopic exploration with peritoneal lavage as an alternative in seven patients who required emergency surgery for diverticulitis.

METHODS

Six patients presented with diffuse peritonitis and one with a failure of percutaneous therapy. All patients were explored laparoscopically and the peritoneal cavity was lavaged with saline in addition to receiving intravenous antibiotics. Patient demographics, clinical response, length of stay, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Six patients had resolution of peritonitis resolved and patients were discharged from the hospital. One of these patients who developed a pelvic abscess required a percutaneous drainage postoperatively. This patient ultimately returned 3 months later with recurrent symptoms and underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis. One patient failed to improve initially and underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis on the same admission. Five patients subsequently had elective sigmoid resections, four laparoscopic and one open. Mean length of stay was 7.7 days. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that laparoscopic exploration and peritoneal lavage can be performed safely in patients with diffuse, purulent peritonitis. Using this approach, most patients with purulent peritonitis can avoid emergent laparotomy with the risk of colostomy, and the need for a second surgery.

Long-term experience with the laparoscopic approach to perforated diverticulitis plus generalized peritonitis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of perforated diverticulitis is changing form the current standard of laparotomy with resection, Hartmann procedure, and colostomy to a minimally invasive technique. In patients with complicated acute diverticulitis and peritonitis without gross fecal contamination, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, inspection of the colon, and intraoperative drain placement of the peritoneal cavity appears to alleviate morbidity and improve the outcome. In this article, we report our experience of a laparoscopic peritoneal lavage technique with delayed definitive resection when necessary.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Records of patients who underwent intraoperative peritoneal lavage for purulent diverticulitis at the Texas Endosurgery Institute from April 1991 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study, with a male/female ratio of 26:14. The average age was 60 years. Many had associated co-morbidities. The average operating time was 62 minutes. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Apart from mild postoperative paralytic ileus in six patients and chest infections in two, there were no significant peroperative or postoperative complications. Just over 50% underwent elective interval laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. During the mean follow-up of 96 months, none of the other patients required further surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic lavage of the peritoneal cavity and drainage is a safe alternative to the current standard of treatment for the management of perforated diverticulitis with or without gross fecal contamination. It is associated with a decrease in the overall cost of treatment; the use of a colostomy is avoided; patient improvement is immediate; and there is a reduction in mortality and morbidity as definitive laparoscopic resection can be performed in a nonemergent fashion. Perhaps the most important benefit, other than avoiding a colostomy, is the association of fewer wound complications such as dehiscence, wound infection, and the high risk of hernia formation. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage should be considered in all patients in whom medical and/or percutaneous treatment is not feasible. It carries minimal morbidity and should be considered the standard of care.

Computerized tomographic scan-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Preoperative and postoperative modalities in colon and rectal surgery

PURPOSE

Computerized tomographic (CT) scan-guided percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses has changed the colon and rectal surgeon's approach to preoperative and postoperative intra-abdominal infections. This study is an effort to prove the efficacy of CT scan-guided percutaneous drainage.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 133 patients who underwent CT scan drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses over a 6.3-year period.

RESULTS

67 patients had underlying lower gastrointestinal disease. Twenty-three of these patients (34 percent) had spontaneous abscesses and underwent drainage as a preoperative or final modality, whereas 44 patients (66 percent) were drained postoperatively. In 78 percent of patients, surgery was successfully avoided or delayed. Ten patients had acute diverticulitis associated with a large pelvic abscess. Eight patients underwent successful CT scan-guided percutaneous drainage, yielding an 80 percent success rate. Morbidity from the CT scan-guided percutaneous drainage procedure in spontaneous and postoperative groups was 0 percent and 9 percent, respectively. Mortality was 9 percent and 11 percent, respectively, and associated with an elevated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.

CONCLUSION

CT scan-guided percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses is an important adjunct to colon and rectal surgery because roughly 80 percent of spontaneous and postoperative abscesses were successfully managed.

Incidence, outcome, and proposed management of isolated abscesses complicating acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. A prospective study of 140 patients

In a prospective evaluation of 140 consecutive patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis demonstrated by computerized tomography (CT) in all cases, 22 (16 percent) were found to have an associated abscess without peritonitis. Thirteen of these 22 required surgery (seven during the first stay and six from 2 to 11 months after the acute episode; median, three months). Nine patients were treated conservatively, eight of whom are now totally asymptomatic 24 months after the initial attack (range, 10-47 months). There were 10 mesocolic abscesses (seven treated with antibiotics alone), nine pelvic abscesses (seven requiring surgery), and three intra-abdominal abscesses, all operated upon. These results suggest that mesocolic abscesses can usually be managed conservatively without drainage; should surgery be necessary, en bloc resection with immediate anastomosis can usually be safely performed. Pelvic and intraabdominal abscesses behave more aggressively and usually require a two-stage surgical procedure when initial percutaneous drainage cannot be performed or is felt to be hazardous.

Diverticular disease

Although most often clinically silent, colonic diverticula are responsible for a large number of gastrointestinal illnesses in our society. Complications of diverticular disease, including perforation and hemorrhage, may occur in 15% to 20% of patients with diverticula during their lifetime, and although often mild and self-limiting diseases, they too frequently cause life-threatening problems that require prompt surgical intervention. Despite a cadre of sophisticated laboratory and radiologic tests that have been developed to aid in the diagnosis of complicated diverticular disease, the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis still relies heavily on patient history, physical examination, physician judgment, and the patient's clinical response to treatment. Thus it is important for the managing physician to fully understand the pathogenesis of diverticula, the clinical consequences and modes of presentation of complicated diverticular disease, and the array of interventions available for treatment of these problems. This monograph summarizes our knowledge of diverticular disease to date and tries to give specific guidelines for the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis. However, it must be understood that the presentation and severity of these complications vary widely from patient to patient. Thus one cannot take a single approach toward a patient who has diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding. Rather, successful outcomes depend on an individual approach to each patient while maintaining certain generally accepted principles of treatment.

Role of computed tomography in diverticulitis

Fourteen patients with diverticulitis who were clinically believed to require radiologic investigation form the basis of this report. An inflammatory mass (n = 10) or abscess (n = 2) were reliable findings on computed tomography. Other signs encountered were abnormal density of pericolic fat, thickening of colonic wall, and narrowing of the lumen of the colonic wall. Colovesical fistulas, all of which were suspected clinically, occurred in three patients. Computed tomography should be performed with administration of rectal contrast medium to demonstrate the origin of inflammation from the colon, assess pericolic extent, and confirm colovesical fistula.