Pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilve's syndrome), a genuine clinical conditions? Review of the literature (1948-1975) and report of five cases

Neostigmine treatment protocols applied in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction disease: A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

When conservative methods fail, neostigmine is recommended in the pharmacological treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO). The objective of this study was to analyze the response of patients to different neostigmine protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ACPO in the intensive care unit between January 2015 and September 2017 were retrospectively studied. Either of the two neostigmine protocols, the bolus dose (BD) or continuous infusion (CI), was applied to the ACPO patients who were unresponsive to conservative treatments, and the results were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 79 of 122 (64%) patients, the resolution of symptoms was observed with conservative treatments. Of 43 patients who did not respond to conservative treatments, 20 were applied neostigmine as BD, and 23 were applied by CI. A total of 55% of patients in the BD group and 60.9% patients in the CI group responded to neostigmine therapy after the first dose. The group-specific protocols were reapplied in patients unresponsive to the first dose. A total of 25% in the BD group and 8.7% in the CI group responded to the second dose treatment. As a result, 80% of patients from the BD group and 69.6% from the CI group responded to neostigmine therapy. Although an overall response rate was higher in the BD group, there was no significant difference between groups (P=0.322). Colonic complications were observed in 2 patients, 1 from each group. There were no major side effects requiring treatment cessation.

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness of both neostigmine protocols applied to ACPO patients were similar. Clinical and radiological responses were obtained without serious side effects with CI.

Tuberculous Peritonitis in Association with Pancytopenia and Pseudo-Obstruction of the Colon

We report the case of a 72-year-old woman with tuberculous peritonitis, complicated by the unusual association of pancytopenia and pseudo-obstruction of the colon.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: A systematic review of aetiology and mechanisms

AIM

To critically review the literature addressing the definition, epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify articles investigating the aetiology and pathophysiology of ACPO. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was undertaken.

RESULTS

No consistent approach to the definition or reporting of ACPO has been developed, which has led to overlapping investigation with other conditions. A vast array of risk factors has been identified, supporting a multifactorial aetiology. The pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear, but are likely related to altered autonomic regulation of colonic motility, in the setting of other predisposing factors.

CONCLUSION

Future research should aim to establish a clear and consistent definition of ACPO, and elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to altered colonic function. An improved understanding of the aetiology of ACPO may facilitate the development of targeted strategies for its prevention and treatment.

Ogilvie's syndrome-acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

Ogilvie's syndrome describes an acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) consisting of dilatation of part or all of the colon and rectum without intrinsic or extrinsic mechanical obstruction. It often occurs in debilitated patients. Its pathophysiology is still poorly understood. Since computed tomography (CT) often reveals a sharp transition or "cut-off" between dilated and non-dilated bowel, the possibility of organic colonic obstruction must be excluded. If there are no criteria of gravity, initial treatment should be conservative or pharmacologic using neostigmine; decompression of colonic gas is also a favored treatment in the decision tree, especially when cecal dilatation reaches dimensions that are considered at high risk for perforation. Recurrence is prevented by the use of a multiperforated Faucher rectal tube and oral or colonic administration of polyethylene glycol (PEG) laxative. Alternative therapeutic methods include: epidural anesthesia, needle decompression guided either radiologically or colonoscopically, or percutaneous cecostomy. Surgery should be considered only as a final option if medical treatments fail or if colonic perforation is suspected; surgery may consist of cecostomy or manually-guided transanal pan-colorectal tube decompression at open laparotomy. Surgery is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.

Mechanical obstruction of the small bowel and colon

Mechanical obstruction of the small bowel and colon is moderately common, accounting for several hundred thousand admissions per year in the United States. Patients generally present with abdominal pain, nausea and emesis, abdominal distention, and progressive obstipation. Clinical findings of high fever, localized severe abdominal tenderness, rebound tenderness, severe leukocytosis, or metabolic acidosis suggest possible complications of bowel necrosis, bowel perforation, or generalized peritonitis. Differentiation of total mechanical obstruction from partial mechanical obstruction and pseudo-obstruction is important because total mechanical obstruction is generally treated surgically,whereas the other two entities are usually treated medically. Mechanical obstruction is usually suggested by plain abdominal radiographs, and confirmed by small bowel follow through,abdominal CT, or CT enteroclysis.

Adynamic ileus and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

Ileus and colonic pseudo-obstruction cause functional obstruction of intestinal transit, without mechanical obstruction, because of uncoordinated or attenuated intestinal muscle contractions. Ileus usually arises from an exaggerated intestinal reaction to abdominal surgery that is often exacerbated by numerous other conditions. Colonic pseudo-obstruction is induced by numerous metabolic disorders, drugs that inhibit intestinal motility, severe illnesses, and extensive surgery. It presents with massive colonic dilatation with variable, moderate small bowel dilatation. Both conditions are initially treated with supportive measures that include intravenous rehydration, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, discontinuation of antikinetic drugs, and treatment of other contributing disorders. Specific therapies for colonic pseudo-obstruction include neostigmine (an anticholinesterase) for pharmacologic colonic decompression and colonoscopic decompression.

Bowel obstruction and pseudo-obstruction

The gastroenterologist is frequently involved in the care of patients with bowel obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. In the case of obstruction, the central problem is determining which patients should be managed surgically. In both SBO and LBO, evidence of vascular compromise to the gut mandates surgical intervention. Most patients with pseudo-obstruction respond to conservative therapy or neostigmine. Endoscopic decompression is indicated in recalcitrant cases, with surgery reserved as a last resort.

Assessment of predictors of response to neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

OBJECTIVE

Acute colonic pseudoobstruction (ACPO) most commonly develops after surgery, with narcotic administration, or in association with severe illness. Most cases resolve with conservative management. Colonoscopic decompression may be required in patients failing to respond to conservative treatment. Neostigmine has been proposed as an effective treatment for ACPO as an alternative to colonoscopic decompression. We sought to identify factors associated with spontaneous resolution of ACPO and to identify variables associated with a response to i.v. administration of neostigmine for the treatment of ACPO.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of Mayo Clinic's diagnostic index revealed all patients who developed ACPO between July, 1999 and September, 2001 at the Mayo Clinic Medical Center. We separately analyzed those patients who did not resolve ACPO with conservative management and to whom i.v. neostigmine was administered. Patient records were abstracted for demographic data, etiology of ACPO, management, and response to treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were identified with ACPO between July, 1999 and September, 2001; 117 patients (77%) had spontaneous resolution of symptoms. Of the 34 "nonresolvers," 18 patients received neostigmine, whereas 16 did not receive neostigmine. Of those 16 patients, 11 required colonoscopic decompression, two underwent surgery, and three died of underlying illness. "Spontaneous resolvers" were less likely to be taking narcotics (59% vs 74%, p = 0.08). Of the 16 nonresolvers who did not receive neostigmine, only one had a contraindication to neostigmine use. Of the 18 patients that who received neostigmine, 16 patients (89%) had prompt evacuation (<30 min) of flatus or stool. Sustained clinical response to neostigmine was noted in 11 of 18 (61%); the remaining seven patients (39%) required colonoscopic decompression or surgery for recurrent or persistent colonic dilation. Neostigmine-responders were more likely to be older (mean age, 76 yr vs 54 yr, p = 0.03), than nonresponders. Preneostigmine cecal diameter did not differ significantly between responders (median, 12 cm) and nonresponders (median, 13 cm), p = 0.9. Median time to resolution of ACPO in spontaneous resolvers was 4 days compared to 2 days in patients responding to neostigmine; p = 0.038.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with ACPO respond to conservative treatment. Female gender and older age are associated with a response to neostigmine in those patients who do not respond to conservative management. Neostigmine appears to be under-used in patients with ACPO who do not have a true contraindication to its use.

Retrospective Study of Neostigmine for the Treatment of Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) typically develops postoperatively or after severe illness. Studies suggest that pharmacologic manipulation with intravenous (IV) neostigmine (NSM) may be an effective and less invasive treatment modality for ACPO with minimal side effects. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the efficacy and incidence of complications of an IV NSM bolus in patients with ACPO. Eight patients with ten episodes of ACPO were treated with a bolus dose of NSM. Rapid and effective decompression of the colon was achieved in six episodes after a single dose of NSM at a mean of 22.8 ± 13.5 minutes. In three episodes decompression occurred after a second dose of NSM at a mean of 44.7 ± 37.7 minutes. One patient failed NSM treatment but responded to a Cystografin enema. One patient experienced significant bradycardia. NSM is a simple, safe, and effective treatment for ACPO and based on result comparison of this study and previous studies both bolus and slow infusion dosing practices of NSM are effective. The NSM bolus dosing side effect profile has been shown to include significant bradycardia, whereas when NSM was infused over one hour significant bradycardic episodes requiring treatment have not been encountered. We propose that a prospective study evaluating NSM dosing as an IV bolus versus an IV infusion would be useful in determining whether NSM infusion can be proven safer than bolus dosing for the treatment of ACPO.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) in the immunosuppressed patient is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Renal transplant recipients possess several comorbidities that increase the risk of acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon. The aims of this study were to present our experience with this syndrome and to evaluate the potentiating factors in these patients. A review of the literature for pseudo-obstruction following renal transplantation is presented.

METHODS

Seven patients who developed Ogilvie's syndrome were identified in a retrospective review of 550 kidney-only transplants. Pretransplant data, potential risk factors, presentation, management, and outcome details were retrieved. The medical literature was reviewed using Medline.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with Ogilvie's syndrome in the early posttransplant period have been reported. The associated morbidity and mortality was heightened in this immunocompromised population. Obese transplant recipients (body mass index >30 kg/m2) were at significantly increased risk for developing this syndrome.

CONCLUSION

A broad armamentarium of treatment options is available, but the key to successful resolution lies in early recognition.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

BACKGROUND

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is an acute non-mechanical colonic obstruction. Twenty patients with this condition presenting between 1988 and 1996 were retrospectively reviewed to identify the incidence and potential aetiologic factors, and to establish a uniform therapeutic approach.

METHODS

Patients who fulfilled the criteria of acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon were reviewed retrospectively from a computerized database, and from a study of the hospital notes.

RESULTS

There were 12 men and eight women with a median age of 71 years. Seventeen patients (85%) had various coexisting medical conditions, and none of the cases had a recent surgical operation or trauma. Four patients had previous similar attacks. Patients had a median duration of symptoms and a hospital stay of 3 and 7 days, respectively. Diagnosis was based on the clinical features coupled with the findings on plain abdominal X-rays and contrast enema. Sixteen patients were successfully treated conservatively over a median time of 5 days. Three patients had a laparotomy: two patients had tube caecostomy (followed by complications), and one patient had no further treatment. One patient had colonoscopy with an unsatisfactory result. Two patients (10%) died and three (15%) developed complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is an uncommon but serious condition. The majority of our patients (17/20) had associated significant medical problems. Most of the patients were successfully managed conservatively. This was the preferred initial line of treatment in this department during the study period.

Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction

Acute LBO has many possible causes. In the United States, the most common cause is colorectal carcinoma. Mechanical obstruction should be differentiated from pseudo-obstruction by contrast enema or colonoscopy because the treatments differ. The high postoperative mortality and morbidity of LBO compared with elective resection are explained by the multiple associated pathophysiologic changes of obstruction. Management of this condition requires careful assessment, awareness, and expertise in the current modalities of treatment. Gangrene and perforation should be avoided because they limit treatment options and are associated with an increase in mortality. We prefer, in most instances, to perform a single-stage procedure, which has the advantages of reduced hospital stay (and cost) and avoidance of a stoma. However, the appropriate treatment needs to be tailored to the individual situation. Recent developments in nonoperative decompressing procedures may demonstrate advantages in the future.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

The syndrome of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is well delineated but its aetiology remains poorly understood and patients are still treated inappropriately. This article reviews the pathogenesis and surgical management of this condition. Early diagnosis is stressed as a pivotal factor in reducing morbidity and mortality.

Ogilvie's syndrome in the postcesarean section patient

Two cases of colonic pseudo-obstruction (the so-called Ogilvie's syndrome) are reported. Both patients were in the immediate postcesarean section puerperium. The importance of early diagnosis in these cases is stressed, because this complication has a high mortality rate, frequently in relation to delayed diagnosis and treatment. One patient was successfully treated with conservative measures because diagnosis was made early. A plain X-ray abdominal film which shows cecum dilatation, with or without ascending and transverse colon dilatation, and no distal air, makes the diagnosis. A cecum diameter of 9 cm or more is a surgical indication, because the possibility of wall perforation is high. Surgical techniques are: puncture decompression or cecostomy. When cecum diameter is less than 9 cm, non-surgical measures (nasogastric suction, correction of any fluid and electrolytic imbalance, and maybe a flatus tube) are indicated. Observation through repeated X-ray abdominal films shows when the surgical indication appears: (1) failure of the conservative treatment (cecal distension continues or increases); or (2) cecal perforation is documented.

Epidural anesthesia for acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome)

With the theory that Ogilvie's syndrome is caused by sympathetic inhibition of contractility in the colon as a basis, 18 patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction were enrolled in a treatment program assessing the safety and efficacy of sympathetic blockade, by epidural anesthesia, in those who failed conservative management. In some cases colonoscopy had been performed initially and, if unsuccessful, these patients were referred for treatment with epidural anesthesia. Seven patients recovered with conservative treatment alone. One patient refused further treatment and died of her underlying disease. Five of eight patients treated by epidural anesthesia responded. There were no recurrences following successful epidural anesthesia. Five of eight patients treated by colonoscopic decompression responded. No patients required surgical intervention. One patient suffered a subendocardial infarction during colonoscopy. There were no significant complications from epidural anesthesia. Epidural anesthesia is safe, effective, simple, and well tolerated in the management of Ogilvie's syndrome.

Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon in a kidney-transplanted patient (Ogilvie's syndrome)

Ogilvie's syndrome is an acute massive dilation of the large bowel without organic obstruction. It can occur from a variety of causes and organ failures. We report on the first patient who has developed this syndrome twice, in both cases after kidney transplantation. The world literature concerning the subject is also reviewed.

Treatment of recurrent colonic pseudo-obstruction by endoscopic placement of a fenestrated overtube. Report of a case

The case of a 73-year-old man who developed acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) following chemotherapy for lymphoma is reported. Cecal dilatation resolved after a single colonoscopic decompression. Following his next course of chemotherapy, colonic dilatation again developed. The recurrence was treated successfully by introducing a fenestrated colonoscopic overtube transanally for continuous decompression. The literature concerning acute, colonic pseudo-obstruction is reviewed. The colonoscopic overtube is a convenient and effective treatment for recurrent colonic distention.

Massive colonic dilatation as initial presentation of mesenteric vein thrombosis

The case of a patient with primary mesenteric venous thrombosis presenting with massive dilatation of almost the entire colon is described. The differential diagnosis suggested by this presentation is briefly discussed with special attention to the diagnosis of acute colonic pseudoobstruction. Possible reasons for the atypical presentation of acute mesenteric venous thrombosis should, therefore, be considered in the differential diagnosis of all patients presenting with colonic distention and pseudoobstruction.

Pseudoobstruction of the colon

A previously unreported complication of extraperitoneal node dissection, pseudoobstruction of the colon, is described as a case report, and its etiology and treatment are discussed.

Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). An analysis of 400 cases

This study analyzes 400 cases of acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). Seven cases were reported at St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center between October 1982 and February 1985; 393 cases were reported in the literature from 1970-1985. Ogilvie's syndrome is most commonly reported in patients in the sixth decade, and is more predominant in men. It is caused by an unknown disturbance to the autonomic innervation of the distal colon, and is associated with different conditions. Plain abdominal roentgenogram is the most useful diagnostic test. If the cecal diameter is 12 cm or greater, or conservative management is unsuccessful, colonoscopic or operative decompression is needed. The mode of treatment, age, cecal diameter, delay in decompression, and status of the bowel significantly influence the mortality rate, which is approximately 15 percent with early appropriate management, compared with 36 to 44 percent in perforated or ischemic bowel.

Colonoscopic decompression for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). Report of 22 cases and review of the literature

This report has described a series of 22 patients who underwent colonoscopic decompression for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon and summarizes those cases previously reported in the literature. Twenty of the 22 patients (91 percent) were successfully treated by decompression initially. Fifteen patients (68 percent) were cured with the initial procedure, and 4 patients (18 percent) experienced recurrence. Overall, in 17 patients (77 percent), the pseudoobstruction resolved completely with colonoscopic decompression. Three patients (14 percent) underwent operation because of cecal dilatation refractory to colonoscopic decompression, and in one patient (4.5 percent), the colonic dilatation resolved spontaneously after a failed colonoscopy. Complications resulted in the death of one patient (4.5 percent). Our data are similar to those in the literature and indicate that colonoscopic decompression is a safe and efficacious first line of treatment for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon.

Pseudo-obstruction of the colon following cesarean section. A review

Pseudo-obstruction of the colon is characterized by an adynamic unobstructed colon which rapidly progresses to marked dilatation of the cecum and transverse colon. Disagreements exist regarding the etiology or pathogenesis of this syndrome; it has been associated with metabolic, traumatic, postoperative, and idiopathic causes. In reviewing the literature we have concluded that in pseudo-obstruction of the colon after cesarean section, the mean age of occurrence is 35 years. The symptoms occur in the first 72 hours after operation. Straight x-ray examination of the abdomen is the most useful diagnostic measure. All cecal perforations occurred by the fifth postoperative day. For this reason, we recommend early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention before that time. In cases when the cecal distention is 12 cm or more, decompression is urgent.

Colonoscopic decompression of acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon

The recent advances in technology have made it possible to decompress acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon with colonoscope instead of celiotomy and cecostomy. Twenty-two patients who developed acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon and underwent colonoscopy were analyzed. The authors were successful in completely or partially decompressing the dilated colon in 19 of 22 patients. There were no complications. Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon is usually secondary to intra- or extra-abdominal insult resulting in direct or reflex derangement of the sacral parasympathetic outflow. This causes a functional obstruction of the left colon. The goal of management is to prevent colonic perforation while treating the primary problems. Once the diagnosis has been made, colonoscopy should be attempted. Celiotomy should be reserved to cases in which colonoscopy is unsuccessful or in cases with perforation or impending perforation.

Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction): review of the literature (October 1948 to March 1980) and report of four additional cases

Four additional cases of Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction), representing the first cases described in Italy, are reported. The medical literature concerning the subject is also thoroughly reviewed. Ogilvie's syndrome is an acute massive dilatation of the large bowel without organic obstruction of the distal colon. Three hundred and fifty-one cases have been described in the literature to date. Eighty-eight per cent of the cases were associated with various extracolonic affections (metabolic and organ dysfunctions, postoperative and posttraumatic states, etc.). Twelve per cent of cases were not associated with known disorders and were defined as idiopathic. The pathophysiology of the syndrome is still unknown. Ogilvie, who first described the syndrome in 1948, suggested an imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of the colon: this neurogenic hypothesis has been shared by other authors, although explanations may differ slightly. The clinical and radiologic picture closely resembles mechanical obstruction of the large bowel. The most marked dilatation usually takes place in the right colon and cecum: if the distended cecum reaches a diameter larger than 9 to 12 cm, perforation is likely to occur; if perforation occurs, the mortality rate increases from 25 to 31 per cent to about 43 to 46 per cent. If conservative management fails to control the dilatation and cecal rupture is impending or suspected emergency surgery is indicated, the surgical procedure of choice is dictated by the general conditions of the patient as well as by the intestinal findings: operation may consist of cecostomy, colostomy, or right hemicolectomy or simply emptying the bowel.

Pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome)

Pseudo-obstruction of the colon is an acute abdominal problem that can occur from a variety of causes and multiple organ failures. It is characterized by massive colonic dilatation and a clinical picture suggestive of mechanical large-intestinal obstruction, without any organic obstruction. Decompression should be cautiously attempted with proctoscopy and, possibly, colonoscopy; if these fail, then surgical decompression, usually be a cecostomy, is indicated.