[Dynamic force measurement in implantation of total endoprostheses of the hip joint]

Acoustical determination of primary stability of femoral short stem during uncemented hip implantation

BACKGROUND

Preparing the medullary space of the femur aims to create an ideal form-fitting of cementless implants to provide sufficient initial stability, which is crucial for osseous integration, ensuring good long-term results. Hammering the implant into the proximal femur creates a press-fit anchoring of the endoprosthesis in the medullary space. Implanting the optimal size of the shaft for best fitting should avoid damage to the bone. Modified acoustic signals in connection with implantation are being detected by surgeons and might be related to the primary stability of the implant.

METHODS

This study aims to explore the relationship between frequency sound patterns and the change in stem stability. For this purpose, n = 32 Metha® short stems were implanted in a clinical setting by the same surgeon. During implantation, the sounds were recorded. To define a change in the acoustic system response during the operation, the individual blows of the implantation sequence were correlated with one another.

FINDINGS

An algorithm was able to subdivide through sound analysis two groups of hammer blows (area 1 and area 2) since the characteristics of these groups showed significant differences within the frequency range of 100 Hz to 24 kHz. The edge between both groups, detected by the algorithm, was validated with expert surgeons' classifications of the same data.

INTERPRETATION

In conclusion, monitoring, the hammer blows sound might allow quantification of the primary stability of the implant. Sound analysis including patient parameters and a classification algorithm could provide a precise characterization of implant stability.

How do the geometries of the broach handles relate to the distribution of force and moments in a femoral model?

The continuous improvement of minimally invasive hip endoprostheses surgery comes with a change in geometries of surgery instruments like the broach handles. Consequently, depending on the handles' curvature this results in a deviation between handle and femoral axis. Therefore, this study aimed to prove the influence of different handles' curvatures on the preparation of implant site and acting forces and moments in this process. Five femoral models attached to different handles (double-curved, single-curved, straight) were locked in a drop-weight device with standardize implantation forces and moments and five strokes were measured for each possible combination. Distribution of force and moment components was dependent on the handle's curvature, where the lowest variation from the standard force values was by the straight one (av:15.2% ± 0.5%) and the strongest discrepancies were exhibit by the double-curved one (av:54.3% ± 0.1%.). Moment values have also shown this trend with the lowest variation (12.4%-23.3%) by the straight one and the highest discrepancies (56,6%-90.9%) by the double-curved one. Results show that unguided axial impact introduces unwanted transverse forces and moments into the femur. Therefore, broach handles should be modified accordingly so that minimally invasive surgery remains feasible but unwanted forces or moments can still be compensated.

Modular tumor prostheses: are current stem designs suitable for distal femoral reconstruction? A biomechanical implant stability analysis in Sawbones

INTRODUCTION

High loosening rates after distal femoral replacement may be due to implant design not adapted to specific anatomic and biomechanical conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modular tumor system (MUTARS^®, Implantcast GmbH) was implanted with either a curved hexagonal or a straight tapered stems in eight Sawbones^® in two consecutively generated bone defect (10 cm and 20 cm proximal to knee joint level). Implant-bone-interface micromotions were measured to analyze main fixation areas and to characterize the fixation pattern.

RESULTS

Although areas of highest relative micromotions were measured distally in all groups, areas and lengths of main fixation differed with respect to stem design and bone defect size. Regardless of these changes, overall micromotions could only be reduced with extending bone defects in case of tapered stems.

CONCLUSIONS

The tapered design may be favorable in larger defects whereas the hexagonal may be advantageous in defects located more distally.

Influence of implant length and bone defect situation on primary stability after distal femoral replacement in vitro

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is the major reason for failure of distal femoral replacement using current modular megaprostheses. Although the same stems are used for proximal and distal replacement, survival rates in clinical studies with distal reconstruction were lower within the same system compared to proximal reconstruction. We analyzed whether primary stability as presupposition for long-term fixation can be achieved with a current tapered stem design. Additionally, we hypothesized that stem length affects primary stability depending on bone defect situations.

METHODS

A modular tumor system (Megasystem-C®, Link GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) with two different tapered stems (100 and 160mm) was implanted in eight Sawbones® in two consecutively created defect situations (10 and 20cm proximal to knee joint level). Primary rotational stability was investigated by measuring relative micromotions between implant and bone to identify the main fixation areas and to characterize the fixation pattern.

RESULTS

The fixation differed between the two stem lengths and with respect to both defect situations; however in each case the main fixation area was located at or close to the femoral isthmus. Highest relative micromotions were measured with the 160-mm stem at the distal end within small bone defects and at the proximal end when defects were increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The analyzed design seemed to create sufficient primary stability along the main fixation areas of the implant. Based on these results and with respect to oncologic or potential revision situations, we suggest the use of the shorter stem to be more favorable in case of primary implant fixation.

Fixation of the shorter cementless GTS™ stem: biomechanical comparison between a conventional and an innovative implant design

INTRODUCTION

Conventional cementless total hip arthroplasty already shows very good clinical results. Nevertheless, implant revision is often accompanied by massive bone loss. The new shorter GTS™ stem has been introduced to conserve femoral bone stock. However, no long-term clinical results were available for this implant. A biomechanical comparison of the GTS™ stem with the clinically well-established CLS(®) stem was therefore preformed to investigate the targeted stem philosophy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four GTS™ stems and four CLS(®) stems were implanted in a standardized manner in eight synthetic femurs. A high-precision measuring device was used to determine micromotions of the stem and bone during different load applications. Calculation of relative micromotions at the bone-implant interface allowed the rotational implant stability and the bending behavior of the stem to be determined.

RESULTS

Lowest relative micromotions were detected near the lesser trochanter within the proximal part of both stems. Maximum relative micromotions were measured near the distal tip of the stems, indicating a proximal fixation of both stems. For the varus-valgus-torque application, a comparable stem bending behavior was shown for both stems.

CONCLUSION

Both stems seem to provide a comparable and adequate primary stability. The shortened GTS™ design has a comparable rotational stability and bone-implant flexibility compared to a conventional stem. This study demonstrates that the CLS(®) stem and the GTS™ stem exhibit similar biomechanical behavior. However, a clinical confirmation of these experimental results is still required.

Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis

PURPOSE

In total hip arthroplasty fixation of revision stems can be demanding due to femoral bone loss. Strut grafts are often used for bone augmentation and stabilization of the newly inserted prosthesis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of strut grafts on primary stability under various stem fixation conditions.

METHODS

Two different revision stems (cylindrical and conical shape) were implanted into synthetic femora. Following a semicircular transfemoral osteotomy, three deficient femoral bearings were simulated (bony lid reattached with cable wires; weakened lid reattached with cable wires; strut grafts placed to the weakened lid with cable wires). Relative micro-movements were measured between prostheses and bones due to an axial moment applied to the stems.

RESULTS

Relative movements correlated to the stem shape. The cylindrical stem showed higher movements increasing significantly with a weakened bony lid and portrayed a slight decrease of movements with strut graft application. No unequivocal influence of the weakened lid could be detected for the conical implant. Strut graft application did not show an additional stabilizing effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary stability of the cylindrical fixation concept decreases with impaired fixation conditions of the femur. A clear restabilizing effect with strut grafts could not be proven. A decrease of primary stability due to the impaired bone could not be observed for the conical stem shape. Additionally, strut grafts do not enhance fixation for this stem shape. We conclude that surgeons should not rely on a stabilizing effect of strut grafts in revision hip surgery.

Primary stability of the Fitmore stem: biomechanical comparison

PURPOSE

After clinical introduction of the Fitmore stem (Zimmer), we noticed the formation of cortical hypertrophies in a few cases. We questioned whether (1) the primary stability or (2) load transfer of the Fitmore stem differs from other stems unassociated with the formation of hypertrophies. We compared the Fitmore stem to the well-established CLS stem.

METHODS

Four Fitmore and four CLS stems were implanted in eight synthetic femurs. A cyclic torque around the stem axis and a mediolateral cyclic torque were applied. Micromotions between stems and femurs were measured to classify the specific rotational implant stability and to analyse the bending behaviour of the stem.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found between the two stem designs with respect to their rotational stability (p = 0.82). For both stems, a proximal fixation was found. However, for the mediolateral bending behavior, we observed a significantly (p < 0.01) higher flexibility of the CLS stem compared to the Fitmore stem.

CONCLUSION

Hip stem implantation may induce remodelling of the periprosthetic bone structure. Considering the proximal fixation of both stems, rotational stability of the Fitmore® stem might not be a plausible explanation for clinically observed formation of hypertrophies. However, bending results support our hypothesis that the CLS stem presumably closely follows the bending of the bone, whereas the shorter Fitmore stem acts more rigidly. Stem rigidity and flexibility needs to be considered, as they may influence the load transfer at the implant-bone interface and thus possibly affect bone remodelling processes.

Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur

PURPOSE

Extended bone defects of the proximal femur can be reconstructed by megaprostheses for which aseptic loosening constitutes one of the major failure modes. The basic requirement for long-term success of endoprostheses is primary stability. We therefore assessed whether sufficient primary stability can be achieved by four different megaprostheses in a standardised bone defect of the proximal femur and whether their different design leads to different fixation patterns.

METHODS

Four different designs of proximal femoral replacements were implanted into 16 Sawbones® after preparing segmental bone defects (AAOS type II). Primary rotational stability was analysed by application of a cyclic torque of ±7 Nm and measuring the relative micromotions between bone and implant at different levels. The main fixation zones and differences of fixation patterns of the stem designs were determined by an analysis of variance.

RESULTS

All four implants exhibited micromotions below 150 μm, indicating adequate primary stability. Lowest micromotions for all designs were located near the femoral isthmus. The extent of primary stability and the global implant fixation pattern differed considerably and could be related to the different design concepts.

CONCLUSIONS

All megaprostheses studied provided sufficient primary stability if the fixation conditions of the femoral isthmus were intact. The design characteristics of the different stems largely determined the extent of primary stability and fixation pattern. Understanding these different fixation types could help the surgeon to choose the most suitable implant if the fixation conditions in the isthmus are compromised.

[Revision hip stems: an analysis of the fixation]

BACKGROUND

Revision hip replacements are complicated surgeries because the femoral quality is often reduced by large substance losses. Stem fixation in terms of sufficient primary stability is therefore a great challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon.

AIM

The aim of the present study was to examine two currently used prostheses in Germany (MHP and MRP) concerning their ability to securely bridge femoral defects.

RESULTS

Up to a segmental metaphyseal defect, both stems showed sufficient fixation in our experimental setup. However, because of its predominantly distal fixation, the MRP stem would unnecessarily bridge proximal bone areas still capable of load bearing. In the presence of a transfemoral approach, the surgeon should favour the distal fixation mode because in this situation the proximal fixation option is absent. Therefore, the isthmus takes a key role for both stem designs.

Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison

Bone stock losses in cementless femoral stem revisions compromise a stable fixation. The surgeon has to rely on his wealth of experience in deciding which stem shape to use. The aim of our study was to compare the primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems subjected to femoral defects. Four current prostheses (two cylindrical, two conical) were implanted into four synthetic femora. Micro-motion was measured under torque application and femoral neck osteotomy and segmental AAOS Type I and III defects were simulated. The relative movements of all prostheses were significantly influenced by the extent of bone loss (p<0.01). Major differences were seen in fixation behavior (p<0.01). The main fixation area of conical stems is within the distal femoral isthmus, whereas cylindrical implants are dependent on proximal bone stock. In our study, cylindrical stems are advantageous for minor defects because they provide a proximal fixation. In cases of extensive substance loss, the conical implants showed lesser relative movements. These findings should be taken into account for clinical decisions.

Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads

A novel method is presented which permits to assess implanted femoral components with regards to location of fixation and initial stability under cyclic torsional loads. The measurement apparatus tracks the spatial movement at several sites of stem and bone, allowing quantitative analysis of the micromotions and twisting of stem and bone, and the location of torque (force) transfer. Four types of prostheses were compared, which revealed striking differences in torque transfer. Our results for synthetic femurs are consistent with in vivo data on the osseointegration and radiolucensies observed for the stem types of this study. The method can be used to quantitatively compare various stem designs and implantation techniques.