Bleeding time and antiplatelet agents in normal volunteers

Clinical trial protocol of the ASTER trial: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for enhanced early detection of colorectal neoplasms

ᅟ

Immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (iFOBTs) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In our preceding observational study, sensitivity for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms by iFOBT was 70.8% among users of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid compared with 35.9% among non-users (p = 0.001), whereas there were only very small differences in specificity. In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) was much higher for acetylsalicylic acid users than for non-users, with particularly strong differences in men (0.87 versus 0.68, p = 0.003). These findings suggested that use of acetylsalicylic acid before conduct of iFOBT might be a promising approach to improve non-invasive screening for CRC.

Methods/design

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the diagnostic performance of two iFOBTs for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms after a single low-dose of acetylsalicylic acid (300 mg) compared to placebo is evaluated. Acetylsalicylic acid or placebo is administered at least 5 days before a planned, study-independent colonoscopic screening in 2400 participants aged 40 to 80 years. Stool samples are obtained before and on three different days after the single dose of acetylsalicylic acid or placebo. In addition, optional blood samples are taken for future biomarker analyses. The diagnostic performance of the iFOBTs will be compared to the results of the colonoscopy as a gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms. Additionally, gender-specific performance of the tests and gain in diagnostic performance by test application on multiple days will be evaluated.

Discussion

If the findings from our preceding observational study will be confirmed in this large trial, the proposed low-risk, inexpensive intervention would considerably improve the diagnostic accuracy of iFOBTs and thus lead to enhanced early detection of colorectal neoplasms. Thus, the results of this trial may have a large public health impact.

Trial registration

This trial was registered before recruitment of the participants in www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu on the 30th of May 2012: EudraCT No.: 2011–005603-32 and in www.drks.de on 13th of March 2012: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00003252.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4826-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Study for determination of the optimal cessation period of therapy with anti-platelet agents prior to invasive endoscopic procedures

BACKGROUND

Anti-platelet agents are widely used for the treatment and prevention of thrombotic diseases. On the other hand, continuation of anti-platelet agents increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy, and cessation of anti-platelet agents exposes the patient to the risk of thromboembolism. Only a few studies have actually studied the whether a cessation period is required prior to endoscopic procedures and if so, the optional duration of the period. The present study assessed the time course of primary hemostasis after the cessation of anti-platelet agents.

METHODS

Eleven healthy men (age range, 19-29 years) were assigned to each of the following regimens: aspirin (ASA; 100 mg/day), ticlopidine (TP; 300 mg/day), and a combination of ASA (100 mg/day) and TP (300 mg/day) for 7 days. There was a washout period of more than 3 weeks between each regimen. A quantitative bleeding time test (QBT test) and platelet aggregation test were performed before the beginning of administration, on the last day of administration, and at 1, 3, and 5 days after cessation, and also at 7 days after cessation for the combination regimen.

RESULTS

The average bleeding time (BT) and total bleeding loss volume (Tv) of the 11 subjects after administration of the three regimens were significantly increased compared with those before administration. With the administration of ASA, increases of BT and Tv at 3 days after cessation were not significant. The Tv at 5 days after cessation of TP was not significantly increased. With the combination regimen, the BT and Tv at 7 days after cessation were not significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-day cessation period for ASA, a 5-day cessation period for TP, and a 7-day cessation period for ASA+TP administration seem to be sufficient.

A randomized crossover comparative study of aspirin, cilostazol and clopidogrel in normal controls: analysis with quantitative bleeding time and platelet aggregation test

The effects of three antiplatelet drugs, aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol, were examined and compared using a quantitative bleeding time (QBT) test apparatus. In 12 healthy adult male subjects, a QBT test and platelet aggregation test were performed before and after medication. Cilostazol was found to be as effective as aspirin and clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet aggregation. Following the oral administration of aspirin and clopidogrel for 7 days, the bleeding time was significantly prolonged. In contrast, none of these QBT parameters were altered by the cilostazol treatment. This suggests that cilostazol has potent efficacy in inhibiting platelet aggregation without prolonging the bleeding time and changing the bleeding pattern.

Indobufen: an updated review of its use in the management of atherothrombosis

Indobufen inhibits platelet aggregation by reversibly inhibiting the platelet cyclooxygenase enzyme thereby suppressing thromboxane synthesis. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of oral indobufen in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with or without atrial fibrillation, in the prevention of graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and in the treatment of intermittent claudication. In the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events indobufen 200 mg once or twice daily was significantly more effective than no treatment although not as effective as ticlopidine 250 mg once or twice daily, during 1-year nonblind clinical trials. Compared with placebo, indobufen 100 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk of stroke in a small 28-month trial of patients at increased risk of systemic embolism (50% had atrial fibrillation). Furthermore, in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a recent cerebrovascular event enrolled in the 1-year Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale (SIFA) trial, indobufen 100 or 200 mg twice daily was as effective as warfarin (titrated to produce an international normalised ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events; the incidences of the composite end-point of major vascular events (10.6 vs 9.0%) and recurrent stroke (5 vs 4%) were similar between treatments. In 2 large 12-month trials, the Studio Indobufene nel Bypass Aortocoronarico (SINBA) and the UK study, indobufen 200 mg twice daily was as effective as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 300 or 325 mg plus dipyridamole 75 mg 3 times daily in the prevention of early and late occlusion of saphenous grafts in patients after CABG surgery. Indobufen 200 mg twice daily for 6 months significantly improved walking capacity compared with placebo, and caused a more pronounced improvement in both pain-free and total walking distance than either pentoxifylline 300 mg or aspirin 500 mg twice daily in separate 6- and 12-month studies of patients with intermittent claudication. Oral indobufen up to 200 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated in >5000 patients with atherosclerotic disease. Adverse events (predominantly gastrointestinal), reported by 3.9% of patients, rarely required withdrawal from treatment. In the SINBA and UK studies, fewer adverse events and less gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with indobufen than with aspirin plus dipyridamole treatment, while in the SIFA trial, noncerebral bleeding events occurred significantly less frequently in indobufen than warfarin recipients (0.6 vs 5.1%) and major bleeding events occurred only in the warfarin group.

CONCLUSION

Indobufen is as effective as warfarin in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, as aspirin plus dipyridamole in the prevention of CABG occlusion and may be more effective than aspirin or pentoxifylline in improving walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. The improved tolerability profile of indobufen (favourable gastric tolerance and reduced haemorrhagic complications) compared with aspirin 300 to 325 mg 3 times daily or warfarin, in addition to a similar antiplatelet effect, suggests indobufen can be considered a drug with a definite role in the management of atherothrombotic events. In particular, indobufen may be an effective alternative for at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or who are at higher risk of bleeding.

The role of adenosine 5'-diphosphate receptor blockade in patients with cardiovascular disease

Aspirin, which has been the mainstay of antiplatelet agent for many decades, affects a single pathway in the platelet activation process and provides incomplete protection against cardiovascular events. Aspirin also may blunt the hemodynamic effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Dipyridamole may provide some additional benefit, but there is little evidence to suggest its superiority alone or in combination with aspirin compared to standard doses of aspirin. Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, although initially promising, have had disappointing results in recent clinical studies. A new class of medications, the thienopyridines, blocks the activity of platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) receptors, thereby reducing platelet activation. This review discusses the pharmacology, clinical studies, and potential uses of these agents, which include ticlopidine and clopidogrel. ADP inhibitors, by blocking an alternate pathway of platelet activation, are slightly more effective than aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.

Compelling evidence for discretionary brain computed tomographic imaging in those patients with mild cognitive impairment after blunt trauma

OBJECTIVE

To identify computed tomographic-detected intracranial hemorrhage (CTIH) risk factors and outcome in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) blunt trauma patients.

METHODS

In 2,587 consecutive patients, 251 (9.7%) had CTIH.

RESULTS

Analysis is on 2,252 direct transports with 163 CTIH, because transfers were different (7.2 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.0001). CTIH rates for patients age 14-60 and > 60 years were 6.3 and 15.9%, p = 0.001. In those 14-60 years (n = 2,032), CTIH (n = 128) was independently related to arrival Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and cranial soft tissue injury (CSTI) (p = 0.0001). [table: see text] Craniotomy was < or = 0.6% in each group except GCS score of 13 with CSTI, 7.4%. Of those with CTIH, 98.4% survived. Of those at low risk (GCS score of 14 without CSTI and GCS score of 15), 1,504 had no CTIH. Of these, 64.4% were available for serial cognitive evaluation (noncranial injuries mandated hospitalization; tracheal intubation was not required). In those > 60 years (n = 220), CTIH (n = 35) was independently related to GCS and CSTI (p = 0.003). CTIH for GCS score of 15 without CSTI was 5.8%, but > or = 16% for others. One craniotomy was required. Of those with CTIH, 91.4% survived.

CONCLUSIONS

In mild cognitive impairment patients triaged directly to a Level I trauma center, age, arrival GCS score, and cranial soft tissue injury are risk factors for CT-detected intracranial hemorrhage. Neurologic deterioration and death are infrequent. These data strongly suggest that observation and discretionary brain CT imaging are a rational approach for blunt-injury mild cognitive impairment.