Effect of preferential insertion of LDL receptors near coated pits

Surface aggregation patterns of LDL receptors near coated pits III: potential effects of combined retrograde membrane flow-diffusion and a polarized-insertion mechanism

Although the process of endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) macromolecule and its receptor have been the subject of intense experimental research and modeling, there are still conflicting hypotheses and even conflicting data regarding the way receptors are transported to coated pits, the manner by which receptors are inserted before they aggregate in coated pits, and the display of receptors on the cell surface. At first it was considered that LDL receptors in human fibroblasts are inserted at random locations and then transported by diffusion toward coated pits. But experiments have not ruled out the possibility that the true rate of accumulation of LDL receptors in coated pits might be faster than predicted on the basis of pure diffusion and uniform reinsertion over the entire cell surface. It has been claimed that recycled LDL receptors are inserted preferentially in regions where coated pits form, with display occurring predominantly as groups of loosely associated units. Another mechanism that has been proposed by experimental cell biologists which might affect the accumulation of receptors in coated pits is a retrograde membrane flow. This is essentially linked to a polarized receptor insertion mode and also to the capping phenomenon, characterized by the formation of large patches of proteins that passively flow away from the regions of membrane exocytosis. In this contribution we calculate the mean travel time of LDL receptors to coated pits as determined by the ratio of flow strength to diffusion-coefficient, as well as by polarized-receptor insertion. We also project the resulting display of unbound receptors on the cell membrane. We found forms of polarized insertion that could potentially reduce the mean capture time of LDL receptors by coated pits which is controlled by diffusion and uniform insertion. Our results show that, in spite of its efficiency as a possible device for enhancement of the rate of receptor trapping, polarized insertion nevertheless fails to induce the formation of steady-state clusters of receptor on the cell membrane. Moreover, for appropriate values of the flow strength-diffusion ratio, the predicted steady-state distribution of receptors on the surface was found to be consistent with the phenomenon of capping.

Optimal control of receptor reinsertion in the low density lipoprotein endocytic cycle

On the basis of this study, it is concluded that within physiological limits the minimum value for the mean capture time of LDL receptors by coated pits must be induced fundamentally by an optimal characterization of their insertion rate function. The corresponding steady-state surface aggregation patterns for the unbound receptors are consistent with experimental observations. The implications of the derived results for the estimation of the minimum physiological value for the referred mean capture time are also discussed.

Display of low density lipoprotein receptors is clustered, not dispersed, in fibroblast and hepatocyte plasma membranes

Although the principal details of low density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis and its subsequent intracellular fate have been thoroughly investigated, an aspect of this mechanism that continues to provoke controversy concerns the manner of display of LDL receptors upon their initial insertion at the cell surface. While our studies based on electron microscopy of platinum/carbon replicas of gold-labeled cells have previously suggested a clustered display pattern, others have concluded, before and since, that LDL receptors are inserted individually at random widely dispersed sites in the plasma membrane. In this article, we present a series of experiments designed to discriminate between these competing hypotheses. In addition to the use of LDL-colloidal gold complexes, visualized electron microscopically, on cells subjected to a variety of experimental procedures, these experiments include the application of anti-apolipoprotein B-100 antibodies, anti-LDL-receptor antibodies, and direct visualization of native (unlabeled) LDL molecules at the cell surface. All results point to a loose-cluster arrangement, not one involving widely dispersed individual units, as the initial display pattern of newly inserted LDL receptors. A comparison of LDL and beta-very low density lipoprotein receptor distribution in fibroblasts and hepatocytes suggests that this cluster pattern is a characteristic of the LDL (apolipoprotein B/E) receptor across cell types, but that the closely related apolipoprotein E receptor differs in that it is inserted individually in a highly dispersed state, in common with a variety of other receptor types.

Effect of membrane flow on the capture of receptors by coated pits. Theoretical results

Coated pits trap cell surface receptors and mediate their internalization. Once internalized, many receptors recycle back to the cell surface. When recycled receptors are inserted into the plasma membrane, they move until they are again trapped in coated pits. The mechanisms for moving receptors from their insertion sites to coated pits are unknown. Unaided diffusion as the transport mechanism is consistent with the observed kinetics of receptor recycling. Another candidate for the transport mechanism is convection. For receptors that recycle to random positions on the cell surface, or to restricted regions about coated pits, we assess the importance of convective flow in the transport of receptors to coated pits. First we consider local flows set up by the formation of coated pits and their transformation into coated vesicles. As coated pits form and round into coated vesicles, surrounding membrane is drawn inward, creating flows directed toward the coated pit centers. We show that unless the lifetime of a coated pit is very short, 10 s or less, such local flows have a negligible effect on the time it takes receptors to reach coated pits. We also show that they are unlikely to be the mechanism that keeps receptors that have reached coated pits trapped within coated pits until they are internalized. Finally we calculate the mean time tau for a diffusing receptor to reach a coated pit in the presence of membrane flow that is constant in magnitude and direction, as may occur on moving cells. We show that for typical membrane flow velocities, tau can be reduced significantly from its value in the absence of flow. For example, a velocity v = 2.8 micron/min cuts the mean transport time in half.