Surgical treatment for a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm

Aortoesophageal fistula as a late complication of type B aortic dissection

We present a patient with aortoesophageal fistula that occurred years after an acute type B aortic dissection that was treated medically. This patient developed aneurysmal dilatation of the chronically dissected aorta, which finally eroded into the esophagus. Endovascular management with the placement of a stent graft was performed, but the patient ultimately died of multiorgan failure and possible myocardial infarction.

Early outcomes after elective and emergent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic pathology has emerged as a viable alternative to open surgical repair in both the elective and emergent settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative work-up, intra-operative strategy, and outcomes of endovascular stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta in patients undergoing elective repair and those undergoing emergent repair.

METHODS

All patient information was obtained by a retrospective review of an established clinical database for all endovascular thoracic stent-graft cases. From October 1999 to August 2005, 70 patients were treated with endovascular stent-grafts for lesions of the thoracic aorta. Thirty-five patients had an elective endovascular procedure, and 35 patients had an emergent procedure.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients in the endovascular (EL) group were treated for aneurysm (n = 34) and type B dissection (n = 1). Thirty-five patients in the emergent (EM) group were treated for aneurysm (n = 10), intramural hematoma (n = 10), type B dissection (n = 7), traumatic rupture (n = 7), and aortoesophageal fistula (n = 1). Preoperative angiography was performed in 94.3% (33/35) of EL patients but in only 45.7% (16/35) EM patients (P < .005). The EM procedures had significantly shorter operative times, used lower contrast volumes, used fewer stent-graft components (mode 2, range 1 to 5 vs mode 1, range 1 to 3; P = .02), and spinal cerebrospinal fluid drains were used significantly less often (82.9% vs 57.1%, P = .04). Both groups had similar 30-day morbidity, mortality (0/35 EL vs 1/35 [2.9%] EM, P = .99), postoperative endoleak (9/35 [25.7%] EL vs 7/35 [20.0%] EM, P = .78), endovascular failure (3/35 [8.6%] EL vs 5/35 [14.3%] EM, P = .71), and patient survival.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the underlying pathology, preoperative evaluation, and operative course between elective and emergency treatment endovascular procedures for lesions of the thoracic aorta. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions can be accomplished with low perioperative mortality and morbidity rates, as well as acceptable endoleak and endovascular failure rates for both elective and emergency procedures.

Emergency surgery results in life-threatening thoracic aortic disease

OBJECTIVE

Emergency surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysm continues to involve high mortality. We review our experience in emergency surgery for life-threatening thoracic aortic disease.

METHODS

Between September 1994 and June 2000, 65 consecutive patients--38 men and 27 women aged 18 to 84 years (mean: 64.3 years)--underwent emergency surgery for thoracic aortic disease. Of these, 40 (61%) were treated for acute type A dissection, 16 (25%) for aortic rupture, and 9 (14%) for impending aneurysmal rupture. Ascending aorta repair was conducted in 21, aortic arch repair in 30, distal arch repair in 2, descending aorta repair in 9, and thoracoabdominal aorta repair in 3. Of the 65, 42 were under 70 years old and 23 were 70 years of age and older.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 (12%) died in the hospital--3 (7.5%) of acute type A dissection, 3 (19%) of ruptured aneurysm, and 2 (22%) of impending rupture. Of these, 3 (7.1%) were younger than 70 years and 5 (22%) 70 years and older. The following perioperative factors significantly influenced hospital mortality: pump time (p = 0.019), postoperative severe cardiac failure (p = 0.006), postoperative respiratory failure (p = 0.045), and postoperative acute renal failure (p = 0.0007). Of the 57 survivors followed up for an average of 2.8 years (1 month to 6 years), 3-year survival was 73% overall--88% in patients younger than 70 years and 38% in those 70 years and older (p = 0.0004). Seven of the 9 patients suffering strokes during surgery died in the hospital (2) or after discharge (5). Overall hospital and late deaths involved 2 of 4 patients younger than 70 years and all of 5 patients 70 years and older.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients undergoing emergency surgery for life-threatening thoracic aortic disease can undergo graft replacement with acceptable mortality, morbidity, and late survival, but early and late mortality for patients older than 70 remains extremely high.