Role of quality assessment in improving red blood cell transfusion practice

Seeking Strategies to Optimize Blood Utilization: The Preliminary Experience with Implementing a Patient Blood Management Program in a Greek Tertiary Hospital

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to assess blood utilization after implementation of a patient blood management (PBM) program in a Greek tertiary hospital.

METHODS

An electronic transfusion request form and a prospective audit of transfusion practice were implemented. After the one-year implementation period, a retrospective review was performed to assess transfusion practice in medical patients.

RESULTS

Pre-PBM, a total of 9478 RBC units were transfused (mean: 1.75 units per patient) compared with 9289 transfused units (mean: 1.57 units per patient) post-PBM. Regarding the post-PBM period, the mean hemoglobin (Hb) level of the 3099 medical patients without comorbidities transfused was 7.19 ± 0.79 gr/dL. Among them, 2065 (66.6%) had Hb levels >7.0 gr/dL, while 167 (5.3%) had Hb levels >8.0 gr/dL. In addition, 331 (25.3%) of the transfused patients with comorbidities had Hb >8.0 gr/dL. The Hb transfusion thresholds significantly differed across the clinics (p < 0.001), while 21.8% of all medical non-bleeding patients received more than one RBC unit transfusion.

CONCLUSION

A poor adherence with the restrictive transfusion threshold of 7.0 gr/dL was observed. The adoption of a less strict threshold might be a temporary step to allow physicians to become familiar with the program and be informed on the safety and advantages of the restrictive transfusion strategy.

Appropriate use of red blood cell transfusion in emergency departments: a study in five emergency departments

BACKGROUND

Transfusion of blood components continues to be an important therapeutic resource into the 21^st century. Between 5 and 58% of transfusions carried out are estimated to be unnecessary. According to several studies, at least 20% of packed red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) are administered in hospital emergency departments (ED), but few data are available about the appropriateness of RBCT in this setting. This multicentre, cross-sectional observational study aims to assess the appropriateness of RBCT indications and transfused volumes in patients who attend ED.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort is made up of consecutive consenting adult patients (≥18 years old) who received RBCT in ED over a 3-month period and for whom relevant clinical data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Data from 908 RBCT episodes (2±1 units per transfused patient) were analysed. RBCT was considered appropriate in 21.4% (n=195), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p<0.001), hospital level (p<0.001) and prescribing physician (p=0.002). Pre-transfusion haemoglobin level (Hb) negatively correlated with RBCT appropriateness (r=-0.616; p<0.01). Only 72.4% of appropriate RBCT had a post-transfusion Hb assessment (n=516). Of these, 45% were considered to be over-transfused (n=232), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p=0.012) and prescribing physician (p=0.047). Overall, 584/1,433 (41%) of evaluable RBC units were unnecessarily transfused.

DISCUSSION

The appropriateness of RBCT in ED is similar to other hospital departments, but the rate of over-transfusion was high. These data support the need for a reassessment after transfusion of each RBC unit before further units are prescribed. In view of these results, we recommend that physicians should be made more aware of the need to prescribe RBCT appropriately in order to reduce over-transfusion.

Perioperative red blood cell transfusion for patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery: an audit at a Chinese tertiary hospital

Perioperative blood transfusion still takes a large proportion in inappropriate blood transfusion. As the data are limited in China, we reported a perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices in a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China. In 2008-2009, patients who underwent elective surgeries receiving RBC transfusions were recorded and the rate of overtransfusion was analyzed. Overtransfusion was defined as discharge hemoglobin (Hb) exceeding 10 g/dL. The median amount of RBC transfused perioperatively was four units in all 2572 patients. The overall rate of overtransfusion was 48.6% and the Department of Neurosurgery had the highest overtransfusion rate. These results are of great use for the future management of blood resource.

Variation in the numbers of red blood cell units transfused at different medical institution types from 2006 to 2010 in Korea

Background

This study aimed at assessing the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused at different types of medical institution and examining the characteristics of transfusion recipients.

Methods

We calculated and compared the number of transfusion recipients, total RBC units transfused, and RBC units transfused per recipient. Study data were extracted from insurance benefits reimbursement claims for RBC units at the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service from 2006 to 2010.

Results

Between 2006 and 2010, the number of recipients of RBC units increased from 298,049 to 376,445, the number of RBC units transfused increased from 1,460,799 to 1,841,695, and the number of RBC units transfused per recipient changed from 4.90 to 4.89. The number of recipients aged ≥65 yr increased from 133,833 (44.9%) in 2006 to 196,127 (52.1%) in 2010. The highest number of RBC units was transfused to patients with neoplastic diseases (31.9%) and diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (14.4%). More than 80% of the total number of RBC units were transfused at tertiary and general hospitals. However, this composition rate was slightly decreasing, with the composition rate for hospitals increasing from 12.6% to 16.3%.

Conclusions

This study revealed an increase in the number of RBC units transfused over a 5-yr period due to an increase in the number of transfused recipients, especially recipients aged ≥65 yr; moreover, the number of RBC units transfused differed based on medical institution type. These results provide fundamental data on RBC transfusions required for future research.

Reducing red blood cell transfusion in elective surgical patients: the role of audit and practice guidelines

In 1996, we prospectively audited peri-operative transfusion practice in elective surgical patients over a 3-month period. Two-unit transfusions represented 60% of all transfusions. Haemoglobin was measured infrequently prior to transfusion and the main 'trigger' for transfusion was an estimated blood loss in excess of 500 ml. Transfusion guidelines that required the haemoglobin level to be measured immediately before transfusion were introduced. The audit was repeated in 1998; transfusion 'triggers' and the number of transfusions for the two periods were compared. In the second audit, the total number of transfusions decreased by 43%. The mean estimated blood loss associated with a 2-unit transfusion had increased from 608 (373) ml to 1320 (644) ml (p < 0.01) and the estimated haemoglobin concentration after transfusion had decreased from 12.4 (1.8) g.dl-1 to 9.9 (2.4) g.dl-1 (p < 0.01). These results suggest that transfusion guidelines can have a significant impact on clinical practice.

The transfusion audit as a tool to improve transfusion practice: a critical appraisal

Transfusion audits have a long history and they are required by many regulatory agencies. These audits have been touted as effective in reducing unnecessary transfusions as evidenced by many published articles on the subject. Most of these studies, however, have one or more flaws in their design including the use of historical controls, disregard of the Hawthorne effect, use of multiple interventions, and publication bias. Studies differ in the baseline rate of inappropriate transfusions and have different methods of measuring these rates. There is also little data on how long the effect of implementing a transfusion audit system may last. Transfusion audits appear most successful when there is a high baseline rate of inappropriate transfusions and interventions other than the audit itself are performed. Individual institutions should critically evaluate whether or not their current system of transfusion audits is useful.