Epidural beta-endorphin in treatment of pain

Preclinical toxicity evaluation of AAV for pain: evidence from human AAV studies and from the pharmacology of analgesic drugs

Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) has advanced in the last few years from promising results in animal models to >100 clinical trials (reported or under way). While vector availability was a substantial hurdle a decade ago, innovative new production methods now routinely match the scale of AAV doses required for clinical testing. These advances may become relevant to translational research in the chronic pain field. AAV for pain targeting the peripheral nervous system was proven to be efficacious in rodent models several years ago, but has not yet been tested in humans. The present review addresses the steps needed for translation of AAV for pain from the bench to the bedside focusing on pre-clinical toxicology. We break the potential toxicities into three conceptual categories of risk: First, risks related to the delivery procedure used to administer the vector. Second, risks related to AAV biology, i.e., effects of the vector itself that may occur independently of the transgene. Third, risks related to the effects of the therapeutic transgene. To identify potential toxicities, we consulted the existing evidence from AAV gene therapy for other nervous system disorders (animal toxicology and human studies) and from the clinical pharmacology of conventional analgesic drugs. Thereby, we identified required preclinical studies and charted a hypothetical path towards a future phase I/II clinical trial in the oncology-palliative care setting.

An Assessment of the Antinociceptive Efficacy of Intrathecal and Epidural Contulakin-G in Rats and Dogs

Contulakin-G is a novel conopeptide with an incompletely defined mechanism of action. To assess nociceptive activity we delivered Contulakin-G as a bolus intrathecally (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 3 nmol) or epidurally (10, 30, 89 nmol) in rats. Intrathecal Contulakin G significantly decreased Phase II and, to a lesser degree, Phase I paw flinching produced by intradermal formalin. Intrathecal and epidural doses of ED50s were 0.07 nmol and 45 nmol, respectively, giving an epidural/intrathecal ED50 ratio = 647). In dogs, intrathecal Contulakin-G (50-500 nmoL) produced a dose-dependent increase in the thermally evoked skin twitch latency by 30 min after administration, as did morphine (150 and 450 nmol). Epidural morphine (750 and 7500 nmol), but not epidural 1000 nmol Contulakin-G, also significantly decreased skin twitch in dogs. No changes in motor function were seen in any rats or dogs receiving these doses of Contulakin-G. In dogs, no physiologically significant dose-dependent changes in motor function, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, or body temperature were found. Contulakin-G is a potent antinociceptive drug when delivered intrathecally with no observable negative side effects in rats or dogs and may provide an alternative to opioid spinal analgesics.

Pharmacology and mechanisms of opioid analgesic activity

Opiates by an action at specific receptors can induce a highly selective alteration in the response of humans and animals to strong and otherwise aversive chemical, mechanical or thermal stimuli. Specific investigations in a variety of species from rodent to primate using microinjection techniques to examine the pharmacology of local drug action have shown potent antinociceptive actions to be mediated by a receptor specific action at a number of sites within the brain, including the periaqueductal gray (PAG: mu receptor), the rostral ventral medulla (mu/delta receptor) and the substantia nigra (mu receptor) and within the spinal dorsal horn (mu/delta/kappa receptor). Mechanistic studies have shown these actions in the different sites to be mediated by several discrete mechanisms. For example, in the PAG, the local opiate effect is likely mediated by the indirect activation of bulbospinal pathways, rostral projections to forebrain sites and by a local alteration in afferent input into the brainstem core. In the spinal cord, this effect is mediated by an action presynaptic to the primary afferent and by a post-synaptic effect to hyperpolarize projection neurons. In addition, it is now appreciated that mu and kappa receptors in the periphery can modulate the sensitized state of the small afferent terminal innervating inflamed tissue and exert an anti-hyperalgesic action. After systemic delivery of an opiate, it is thus clear that a wide array of central and peripheral systems serve to explain the powerful analgesic effect exerted by this class of agents.

An evaluation of the antiinflammatory effects of intraarticular synthetic beta-endorphin in the canine model

We sought to evaluate the antiinflammatory effects of synthetic human beta-endorphin (SHB) when injected into the canine knee joint. Sixteen healthy dogs, aged 1-2 yr, were selected. SHB was injected pre- and postinjury into each knee. The sample size was n = 32 after a randomized factorial arrangement; 2 x 4 with four cases per treatment being performed. Factors considered were: Factor A with two levels: A1 = Preinjury and A2 = Postinjury; Factor B (SHB dose) with four levels: B1 = Control, B2 = 250 micrograms, B3 = 500 micrograms, B4 = 1000 micrograms. The control group received 0.9% NaCl solution. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous thiopental, 14 mg/kg, and acepromazine, 0.5 mg/kg. Injury was produced with an intraarticular injection of 4 mL HCl 0.5 M, which was left in situ for 20 min. Inflammation was measured using the 610 nm absorbency of Evans blue extravasate in biopsy specimens. Histopathologic studies were performed on each knee. We found that beta-endorphin has a clear, dose-related, antiinflammatory effect, reducing the tissue extravasation of Evans blue and its absorbency, especially with large doses. This finding was consistent with the histopathologic observations. We conclude that SHB has an antiinflammatory effect. It is still not clear which mechanisms inhibit polymorphonuclear cell adhesion to vascular endothelium or cell and plasmatic protein extravasation.

Opioid receptor systems and the endorphins: a review of their spinal organization

A review of the spinal organization of opioid receptor systems and endorphins is presented. The review is a consideration of the physiological mechanisms underlying the effect of spinal opioids, the pharmacology of the opioid receptors that moderate a variety of spinal processing systems, and the endorphin systems that act upon the spinal receptors.

Spinal opiates: a review of their effect on spinal function with emphasis on pain processing

Several opiate receptor systems have been identified in the spinal cord. They produce a powerful analgesia when opioid agonists are administered intrathecally in the intact, unanesthetized animal. These effects appear mediated by an action on opioid receptors which are located presynaptically, in the terminals of primary afferents, and postsynaptically on certain dorsal horn neurons. Based on structure-activity relationships in different tests, quantitative studies of naloxone antagonism and selective cross tolerance, it appears that, in the spinal cord, there are three distinguishable populations of opioid receptors: mu, delta and kappa. Aside from the effects on nociception, these receptors are also associated with a variety of spinal mechanisms related to other aspects of sensory, autonomic and motor functions. Though in some cases these represent important side-effects (e.g. inhibition of the micturition reflex), in others, the subtle effects may have important therapeutic benefits (e.g. relieving spasticity in spinal injured patients).

Intraspinal analgesia: an historical overview

The application of opioids in the proximity of the spinal cord is a recent addition to the forms of treatment available for pain relief. During the last 20 years we have learned more about the intimate mechanisms of the action of opiates then we had in the preceding 5 millennia. Opium, in fact, has been used for medical purposes from prehistoric times. On the basis of the newly acquired knowledge, we are now applying opioids in more effective ways and providing more patients with long overdue relief of their pain.

Role of epidural and intrathecal narcotics and peptides in the management of cancer pain

The spinal administration of opioids may provide analgesia of long duration to patients with bilateral or midline lower abdominal or pelvic cancer pain. However, cross-tolerance to orally and parenterally administered narcotics and the rapid development of tolerance to spinal narcotics have limited their usefulness. Opioids have extensive distribution in the CSF and plasma when administered into the epidural or intrathecal space, and delivery of drug to brain stem sites may account for many of the toxic and therapeutic effects of spinal opioids. Further clinical and pharmacokinetic studies are required to provide the information regarding: the optimal opioids for use as spinal analgesics; equieffective dose ratios of spinal opioids in comparison to parenteral or oral opioids; strategies useful to forestall the development of tolerance of spinally administered opioids; the analgesic efficacy of this therapy in opioid-tolerant patients; and the role of spinally administered nonopioid analgesics in the management of cancer pain in the tolerant patient. These questions will need resolution before this therapy can be recommended for routine use in the management of cancer pain.