Comparison of distal oesophageal temperature with "deep" and tracheal temperatures

Heat flux systems for body core temperature assessment during exercise

Heat flux systems are increasingly used to assess core body temperature. However, validation of multiple systems is scarce. Therefore, an experiment was performed in which three commercially available heat flux systems (3 M, Medisim and Core) were compared to rectal temperature (T_re). Five females and four males performed exercise in a climate chamber set at 18 °C/50% relative humidity until exhaustion. Exercise duration was 36.3 ± 5.6 min (mean ± standard deviation). T_re in rest was 37.2 ± 0.3 °C. Medisim's-values were lower than T_re (36.9 ± 0.4 °C, p < 0.05); 3 M (37.2 ± 0.1 °C) and Core's (37.4 ± 0.3 °C) did not differ from T_re. Maximal temperatures after exercise were 38.4 ± 0.2 °C (T_re), 38.0 ± 0.4 °C (3 M), 38.8 ± 0.3 °C (Medisim) and 38.6 ± 0.3 °C (Core); Medisim was significantly higher than T_re (p < 0.05). The temperature profiles of the heat flux systems during exercise differed to varying degree from the rectal profiles; the Medisim system showed a faster increase during exercise than T_re (0.48 ± 0.25 °C in 20 min, p < 0.05), the Core system tended to show a systematic overestimation during the entire exercise period and the 3 M system showed large errors at the end of exercise, likely due to sweat entering the sensor. Therefore, the interpretation of heat flux sensor values as core body temperature estimates should be done with care; more research is required to elucidate the physiological significance of the generated temperature values.

Comparison of tracheal temperature and core temperature measurement in living donor liver transplant recipients: a clinical comparative study

BACKGROUND

Body temperature is a vital sign, and temperature monitoring during liver transplantation is important. Tracheal temperature can be measured via an endotracheal tube with a temperature sensor on the cuff of the tube. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and trending ability of tracheal temperature measurement compared to those of the core temperature measured at the esophagus and pulmonary artery (PA) in living donor liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were enrolled. Patients were intubated using an endotracheal tube with a temperature sensor placed on the inner surface of the tube cuff. Tracheal, esophageal, and PA temperatures were recorded at five time points corresponding to the different phases of liver transplantation. The tracheal and esophageal, tracheal and PA, and esophageal and PA temperatures were compared using Bland-Altman analysis, four-quadrant plot/concordance analysis, and polar plot analysis.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analysis showed an overall mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between tracheal and esophageal temperatures of -0.10 °C (-0.37 °C to 0.18 °C), with a percentage error of 0.27%; between tracheal and PA temperatures, -0.05 °C (-0.91 °C to 0.20 °C), with a percentage error of -0.15%; and between esophageal and PA temperatures, 0.04 °C (-0.27 °C to 0.35 °C), with a percentage error of 0.12%. The concordance rates between tracheal and esophageal temperatures, tracheal and PA temperatures, and esophageal and PA temperatures were 96.2%, 96.2%, and 94.94%, respectively. The polar plot analysis showed a mean angular bias (radial limits of agreement) of 4° (26°), -3° (13°), and 2° (21°).

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring core temperature at the inner surface of the endotracheal tube cuff is accurate in all phases of LDLT with good trending ability; thus, it can be an excellent alternative for monitoring during LDLTs.

Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites

Many types of thermometers have been developed to measure body temperature. Infrared thermometers (IRT) are fast, convenient and ease to use. Two types of infrared thermometers are uses to measure body temperature: tympanic and forehead. With the spread of COVID-19 coronavirus, forehead temperature measurement is used widely to screen people for the illness. The performance of this type of device and the criteria for screening are worth studying. This study evaluated the performance of two types of tympanic infrared thermometers and an industrial infrared thermometer. The results showed that these infrared thermometers provide good precision. A fixed offset between tympanic and forehead temperature were found. The measurement values for wrist temperature show significant offsets with the tympanic temperature and cannot be used to screen fevers. The standard operating procedure (SOP) for the measurement of body temperature using an infrared thermometer was proposed. The suggestion threshold for the forehead temperature is 36 °C for screening of fever. The body temperature of a person who is possibly ill is then measured using a tympanic infrared thermometer for the purpose of a double check.

Intraoperative core temperature monitoring: accuracy and precision of zero-heat flux heated controlled servo sensor compared with esophageal temperature during major surgery; the ESOSPOT study

Monitoring of intraoperative core temperature is strongly recommended to reduce the risk of perioperative thermic imbalance and related complications. The zero-heat-flux sensor (3M Bair Hugger Temperature monitoring system, ZHF), measures core temperature in a non-invasive manner. This study was aimed at comparing accuracy and precision of the ZHF sensor compared to the esophageal thermometer. Patients scheduled for major elective abdominal or urologic surgery were considered eligible for enrollment. Core body temperature was measured using both an esophageal probe (T_ESO) and a ZHF sensor (T_ZHF) every 15 min from induction until the end of general anaesthesia. A Bland-Altman plot for repeated measures was performed. The proportion of measurements within ± 0.5 °C was estimated; from a clinical point of view, a proportion greater than 90% was considered sufficiently accurate. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for repeated measures were calculated. To evaluate association between the two methods, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) simple linear regression model, was elaborated. A GEE multiple regression model was also performed in order to adjust the estimate of the association between measurements from surgical and patient's features. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Bland-Altman plot bias was 0.005 °C with upper and lower limits of agreement for repeated measures of 0.50 °C and - 0.49 °C. The percentage of measurements within 0.5 °C of the reference value was 97.98% (95% confidence interval 92.89-99.75%), indicating a clinically sufficient agreement between the two methods. This was also confirmed by a CCC for repeated measures of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94). The GEE simple regression model (slope value of 0.77) was not significantly influenced by any patient or surgical variables. According to GEE multiple regression model results, the explored patient- and surgery-related variables did not influence the association between methods. ZHF sensor has shown a clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for body core temperature monitoring during elective major surgery. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical trial number: NCT03820232.

The focus of temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technology (3M Bair-Hugger): a clinical study with patients undergoing craniotomy

In the noninvasive zero-heat-flux (ZHF) method, deep body temperature is brought to the skin surface when an insulated temperature probe with servo-controlled heating on the skin creates a region of ZHF from the core to the skin. The sensor of the commercial Bair-Hugger ZHF device is placed on the forehead. According to the manufacturer, the sensor reaches a depth of 1-2 cm below the skin. In this observational study, the anatomical focus of the Bair-Hugger ZHF sensor was assessed in pre- and postoperative CT or MRI images of 29 patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Assuming the 2-cm depth from the forehead skin surface, the temperature measurement point preoperatively reached the brain cortex in all except one patient. Assuming the 1-cm depth, the preoperative temperature measurement point did not reach the brain parenchyma in any of the patients and was at the cortical surface in two patients. Corresponding results were obtained postoperatively, although either sub-arachnoid fluid or air was observed in all CT/MRI images. Craniotomy did not have a detectable effect on the course of the ZHF temperatures. In Bland-Altman analysis, the agreement of ZHF temperature with the nasopharyngeal temperature was 0.11 (95% confidence interval - 0.54 to 0.75) °C and with the bladder temperature - 0.14 (- 0.81 to 0.52) °C. As conclusions, within the reported range of the Bair-Hugger ZHF measurement depth, the anatomical focus of the sensor cannot be determined. Craniotomy did not have a detectable effect on the course of the ZHF temperatures that showed good agreement with the nasopharyngeal and bladder temperatures.

Novel Zero-Heat-Flux Deep Body Temperature Measurement in Lower Extremity Vascular and Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare deep body temperature obtained using a novel noninvasive continuous zero-heat-flux temperature measurement system with core temperatures obtained using conventional methods.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Operating room of a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 15 patients undergoing vascular surgery of the lower extremities and 15 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Zero-heat-flux thermometry on the forehead and standard core temperature measurements.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Body temperature was measured using a new thermometry system (SpotOn; 3M, St. Paul, MN) on the forehead and with conventional methods in the esophagus during vascular surgery (n = 15), and in the nasopharynx and pulmonary artery during cardiac surgery (n = 15). The agreement between SpotOn and the conventional methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman random-effects approach for repeated measures. The mean difference between SpotOn and the esophageal temperature during vascular surgery was+0.08°C (95% limit of agreement -0.25 to+0.40°C). During cardiac surgery, during off CPB, the mean difference between SpotOn and the pulmonary arterial temperature was -0.05°C (95% limits of agreement -0.56 to+0.47°C). Throughout cardiac surgery (on and off CPB), the mean difference between SpotOn and the nasopharyngeal temperature was -0.12°C (95% limits of agreement -0.94 to+0.71°C). Poor agreement between the SpotOn and nasopharyngeal temperatures was detected in hypothermia below approximately 32°C.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this preliminary study, the deep body temperature measured using the zero-heat-flux system was in good agreement with standard core temperatures during lower extremity vascular and cardiac surgery. However, agreement was questionable during hypothermia below 32°C.

Temperature monitored on the cuff surface of an endotracheal tube reflects body temperature

OBJECTIVE

When treating patients with cardiac arrest with mild therapeutic hypothermia, a reliable and easy-to-use temperature probe is desirable. This study was conducted to investigate the accuracy and safety of tracheal temperature as a measurement of body temperature.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest intended for mild hypothermia therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Intubation was performed with a newly developed endotracheal tube that contains a temperature sensor inside the cuff surface. During the cooling, mild hypothermia maintenance, and rewarming phases, the temperature was recorded minute by minute. These data were compared with the temperature assessed by esophageal and blood temperature probes. Thereafter, tracheoscopy was performed to evaluate the condition of the tracheal mucosa.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Approximately 2000 measurements per temperature sensor per patient were recorded in 21 patients. The mean bias between the blood temperature and the tracheal temperature was -0.16 degrees C (limits of agreement: -0.36 degrees C to 0.04 degrees C). The mean bias between the esophageal and tracheal temperatures was -0.22 degrees C (limits of agreement: -0.49 degrees C to 0.07 degrees C). Agreement between temperature probes investigated by the Bland-Altman method showed a mean bias of less than -(1/4) degrees C, and time lags assessed graphically by hysteresis plots were negligible. No clinically relevant injury to the tracheal mucosa was detected.

CONCLUSION

Temperature monitoring at the cuff surface of an endotracheal tube is safe and provides accurate and reliable data in all phases of therapeutically induced mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

Non-invasive continuous cerebral temperature monitoring in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia: an observational pilot study

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate if body temperature as measured with a prototype of a non-invasive continuous cerebral temperature sensor using the zero-heat-flow method to reflect the oesophageal temperature (core temperature) during mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

In patients over 18 years old with restoration of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest, a temperature sensor that uses the zero-heat-flow principle was placed on the forehead during the periods of cooling and re-warming. This temperature was compared to oesophageal temperature as the primary temperature-monitoring site. To assess agreement, we used the Bland-Altman approach and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

From September 2008 to April 2009, data from 19 patients were analysed. The median time from restoration of spontaneous circulation until temperature sensor application was 53min (interquartile range, 31; 96). All sensors were removed when a core temperature of 36 degrees C was reached. These measurements were in agreement with oesophageal temperature measurements. No allergic reaction, rash or other irritation occurred on the skin around or under the probes. Bland-Altman results showed a bias of -0.12 degrees C and 95% limits of agreement of -0.59 and +0.36 degrees C. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Body temperature measurements using a non-invasive continuous cerebral temperature sensor prototype that uses the zero-heat-flow method accurately reflected oesophageal temperature measurements during mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with restoration of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest.

Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation

Most clinically available thermometers accurately report the temperature of whatever tissue is being measured. The difficulty is that no reliably core-temperature-measuring sites are completely noninvasive and easy to use-especially in patients not undergoing general anesthesia. Nonetheless, temperature can be reliably measured in most patients. Body temperature should be measured in patients undergoing general anesthesia exceeding 30 min in duration and in patients undergoing major operations during neuraxial anesthesia. Core body temperature is normally tightly regulated. All general anesthetics produce a profound dose-dependent reduction in the core temperature, triggering cold defenses, including arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering. Anesthetic-induced impairment of normal thermoregulatory control, with the resulting core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat, is the primary cause of hypothermia in most patients. Neuraxial anesthesia also impairs thermoregulatory control, although to a lesser extent than does general anesthesia. Prolonged epidural analgesia is associated with hyperthermia whose cause remains unknown.

Core temperature monitoring with new ventilatory devices

Widespread use of new airway devices, such as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), preclude measuring core temperature in the distal esophagus. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that core temperature measured with a thermocouple positioned on a LMA or COPA is sufficiently accurate and precise for clinical use. Temperatures were recorded from thermocouples positioned on the cuffs of LMAs or COPAs in 36 patients scheduled for prolonged orthopedic surgery or therapeutic hyperthermia for cancer. These temperatures, recorded at 15-min intervals, were compared with simultaneously obtained nasopharynx and tympanic membrane temperatures. Data were compared by linear regression and the bias calculated. Temperatures measured on the LMA correlated well with both nasopharyngeal (r(2) = 0.94) and tympanic membrane (r(2) = 0.94) temperatures. Temperatures measured on the COPA also correlated well with those on the nasopharynx (r(2) = 0.97) and tympanic membrane (r(2) = 0.96). The fraction of temperatures that differed from nasopharynx temperature by more than +/-0.5 degrees C was 8% with LMA and 11% with COPA; the fraction of temperatures that differed from tympanic temperature by more than +/-0.5 degrees C was 7% with LMA and 10% with COPA. These results suggest that body temperature measured from the cuffs of COPA or LMAs is sufficiently accurate for routine clinical use.

IMPLICATIONS

Temperatures measured on airway devices correlated well with independent measurements of core body temperature. Thus, body temperature measured on the cuffs of airway devices is sufficiently accurate for routine use.

"Deep-forehead" temperature correlates well with blood temperature

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and precision of "deep-forehead" temperature with rectal, esophageal, and tympanic membrane temperatures, compared with blood temperature.

METHODS

We studied 41 ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgery scheduled to require at least three hours. "Deep-forehead" temperature was measured using a Coretemp thermometer (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Blood temperature was measured with a thermistor of a pulmonary artery. Rectal, tympanic membrane, and distal esophageal temperatures were measured with thermocouples. All temperatures were recorded at 20 min intervals after the induction of anesthesia. We considered blood temperature as the reference value. Temperatures at the other four sites were compared with blood temperature using correlation, regression, and Bland and Altman analyses. We determined accuracy (mean difference between reference and test temperatures) and precision (standard deviation of the difference) of 0.5 degrees C to be clinically acceptable.

RESULTS

"Deep-forehead" temperature correlated well with blood temperature as well as other temperatures, the determination coefficients (r2) being 0.85 in each case. The bias for the "deep-forehead" temperature was 0.0 degrees C, which was the same as tympanic membrane temperature and was smaller than rectal and esophageal temperatures. The standard deviation of the differences for the "deep-forehead" temperature was 0.3 degrees C, which was the same as rectal temperature.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that the "deep-forehead" temperature has excellent accuracy and clinically sufficient precision as well as other three core temperatures, compared with blood temperature.

Preventing hypothermia: convective and intravenous fluid warming versus convective warming alone

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that warming intravenous (i.v.) fluids in conjunction with convective warming results in less intraoperative hypothermia (core temperature < 36.0 degrees C) than that seen with convective warming alone.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University affiliated tertiary care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

61 ASA physical status, I, II, and III adults undergoing major surgery and general anesthesia with isoflurane.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received convective warming. Group 1 patients received warmed fluids (setpoint 42 degrees C). Group 2 patients received room temperature fluids (approximately 21 degrees C).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Lowest and final intraoperative distal esophageal temperatures were higher (p < 0.05) in Group 1 (mean +/- SEM: 35.8 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C) versus Group 2 (35.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C, respectively). Compared with Group 1, more Group 2 patients were hypothermic at the end of anesthesia (10 of 26 patients, or 38.5% vs. 4 of 30 patients, or 13%; p < 0.05). After 30 minutes in the recovery room, there were no differences in temperature between groups (36.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). Intraoperative cessation of convective warming because of core temperature greater than 37 degrees C was required in 33% of Group 1 patients (vs. 11.5% in Group 2; p = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of convective and fluid warming was associated with a decreased likelihood of patients leaving the operating room hypothermic. However, average final temperatures were greater than 36 degrees C in both groups, and intergroup differences were small. Care must be taken to avoid overheating the patient when both warming modalities are employed together.