Platelet count may predict abnormal bleeding time among pregnant women with hypertension and preeclampsia

Retrospective audit of outcome of regional anesthesia for delivery in women with thrombocytopenia

Regional anesthesia for pain at delivery in the presence of maternal thrombocytopenia is a clinical dilemma. We reviewed 10,369 obstetric cases (12 months) from our tertiary center. Generally, hemodilution of pregnancy does not result in thrombocyte counts of <150,000/mm(3) at delivery. A total of 166 births (1.6%) were recorded in women with thrombocytes <150,000/mm(3) at delivery. Parturients with >150,000/mm(3) at week 36 were separated post hoc (n=35; 21%) and the remaining parturients were divided as having <100,000/mm(3) (n=30; 18%) or 101,000-150,000/mm(3) (n=101; 60.5%). Epidural or spinal anesthesia was administered to 30% women with <100,000/mm(3) whereas 56% women with >101,000/mm(3) received these options (P=0.003). A total of 13.9% of parturients with trimester-long thrombocytopenia required blood products; 10/23 (43.5%) parturients undergoing cesarean section also required blood products (P=0.000). Four of six babies with Apgar scores of <or=7 at 1-min were born to women with platelets <100,000/mm(3) (P=0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in mean birth weights. Women with thrombocytes <150,000/mm(3) at birth but within the normal range at week 36 were more likely multiparas (P=0.001). We conclude that a difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes exists between mothers who were thrombocytopenic only at delivery compared to those with trimester-long thrombocytopenia, with the latter mothers and babies having more adverse events.

Regional Anaesthesia in Pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia is a multisystemic disorder that is characterised by endothelial cell dysfunction as a consequence of abnormal genetic and immunological mechanisms. Despite active research for years, the exact aetiology of this potentially fatal disorder remains unknown. Although understanding of the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia has improved, management has not changed significantly over the years. Anaesthetic management of these patients remains a challenge. Although general anaesthesia can be used safely in pre-eclamptic women, it is fraught with greater maternal morbidity and mortality. Currently, the safety of regional anaesthesia techniques is well established and they can provide better obstetrical outcome when chosen properly. Thus, regional anaesthesia is extensively used for the management of pain and labour in women with pre-eclampsia. This article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of regional anaesthetic techniques including epidural, spinal and combined spinal-epidural analgesia, used as a part of the management of pre-eclampsia. The problems associated with general anaesthesia and controversies in relation to obstetric regional anaesthesia are discussed.

Pre-eclampsia: fluids, drugs, and anesthetic management

Severe pre-eclampsia is a complex disease, which taxes the expertise of even the most experienced obstetric anesthesiologist. The treatment should focus on stabilization of blood pressure, optimization of fluid status, and prevention of convulsions. Neuraxial blocks for labor and delivery offer many benefits to the mother and her infant. For cesarean section, there is unequivocal evidence of superiority of neuraxial anesthesia over general anesthesia. If general anesthesia is needed, careful preanesthetic preparation and meticulous airway management is essential. The successful and safe peripartum management of the pre-eclamptic patient and her infant is a team effort among the anesthesiologist, obstetrician, and neonatologist.

Anaesthesia for non-scheduled caesarean delivery

In many countries there has been an increase in the number of women who deliver by caesarean section. This article reviews anaesthetic management of non-scheduled caesarean section. The choice of anaesthetic technique (regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia) is discussed and highlighted particularly from the viewpoint of urgency of operative delivery. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory especially in emergency cases to prevent morbidity and mortality in mothers and neonates.