Loss of intrathecal morphine analgesia in terminal cancer patients is associated with high levels of excitatory amino acids in the CSF

Inflammatory mediators of opioid tolerance: Implications for dependency and addiction

Each year, over 50 million Americans suffer from persistent pain, including debilitating headaches, joint pain, and severe back pain. Although morphine is amongst the most effective analgesics available for the management of severe pain, prolonged morphine treatment results in decreased analgesic efficacy (i.e., tolerance). Despite significant headway in the field, the mechanisms underlying the development of morphine tolerance are not well understood. The midbrain ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) is a primary neural substrate for the analgesic effects of morphine, as well as for the development of morphine tolerance. A growing body of literature indicates that activated glia (i.e., microglia and astrocytes) facilitate pain transmission and oppose morphine analgesia, making these cells important potential targets in the treatment of chronic pain. Morphine affects glia by binding to the innate immune receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), leading to the release of proinflammatory cytokines and opposition of morphine analgesia. Despite the established role of the vlPAG as an integral locus for the development of morphine tolerance, most studies have examined the role of glia activation within the spinal cord. Additionally, the role of TLR4 in the development of tolerance has not been elucidated. This review attempts to summarize what is known regarding the role of vlPAG glia and TLR4 in the development of morphine tolerance. These data, together, provide information about the mechanism by which central nervous system glia regulate morphine tolerance, and identify a potential therapeutic target for the enhancement of analgesic efficacy in the clinical treatment of chronic pain.

Toll-like Receptor 4 Mediates Morphine-Induced Neuroinflammation and Tolerance via Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling

Opioid tolerance and the potential for addiction is a significant burden associated with pain management, yet its precise underlying mechanism and prevention remain elusive. Immune signaling contributes to the decreased efficacy of opioids, and we recently demonstrated that Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated neuroinflammation in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) drives tolerance. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a product of TLR4 signaling, promotes inflammation and facilitates glutamatergic signaling, key components of opioid tolerance. Therefore, we hypothesize that TLR4-mediated opioid tolerance requires TNF signaling. By expression of a dominant-negative TNF peptide via lentiviral vector injection in rat PAG to sequester soluble TNF (solTNF), we demonstrate that solTNF mediates morphine tolerance induced by TLR4 signaling, stimulates neuroinflammation (increased IL-1β and TLR4 mRNA), and disrupts glutamate reuptake (decreased GLT-1 and GLAST mRNA). We further demonstrate the efficacy of the brain-permeant PEGylated version of the anti-solTNF peptide, XPro1595, injected systemically, to normalize morphine-induced CNS neuroinflammation and morphine- and endotoxin-induced changes in glutamate transport, effectively preserving the efficacy of morphine analgesia and eliminating tolerance. Our findings provide a novel pharmacological target for the prevention of opioid-induced immune signaling, tolerance, and addiction.

A novel role of spinal astrocytic connexin 43: mediating morphine antinociceptive tolerance by activation of NMDA receptors and inhibition of glutamate transporter-1 in rats

AIMS

Connexin 43 (Cx43) has been reported to be involved in neuropathic pain, but whether it contributes to morphine antinociceptive tolerance remains unknown. The present study investigated the role of spinal Cx43 in the development of morphine tolerance and its mechanisms in rats.

METHODS

Morphine tolerance was induced by intrathecal (i.t.) administration of morphine (15 μg) daily for seven consecutive days. The analgesia effect was assessed by hot-water tail-flick test. Expression of proteins was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemistry assay.

RESULTS

Chronic morphine markedly increased the expression of spinal Cx43. Gap26, a specific Cx43 mimic peptide, attenuated not only morphine antinociceptive tolerance, but also the up-regulation of spinal Cx43 expression, the activation of astrocytes, and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors (NR1 and NR2B subunits), as well as the decreased GLT-1 expression induced by chronic morphine. MK-801, a noncompetitive NMDA receptors antagonist, suppressed the chronic morphine-induced spinal Cx43 up-regulation, astrocytes activation and decline of GLT-1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The spinal astrocytic Cx43 contributes to the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance by activating astrocytes and NMDA receptors, and inhibiting GLT-1 expression. We also demonstrate that the role of interaction between the spinal astrocytic Cx43 and neuronal NMDA receptors is important in morphine tolerant rats.

Spinal opioids in adult patients with cancer pain: a systematic review: a European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) opioid guidelines project

BACKGROUND

A systematic review, undertaken according to an initiative to revise European Association for Palliative Care guidelines on the use of opioids for cancer pain, which aimed to analyse analgesic efficacy and side effects of spinal opioids in adult cancer patients previously treated with systemic opioids.

METHODS

Search strategy elaborated with MeSH terms and words related to cancer, palliative care, pain, spinal route and opioids. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane assessed in Nov 2009. Studies were analysed and classified according to quality of evidence and strength of recommendation.

RESULTS

Out of 2939 abstracts, 44 articles were selected (nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two non-randomized cohort studies, 28 uncontrolled prospective studies, and five case series). Relief of pain and/or side effects were reported in 42 articles; however, there were few studies of high quality design (RCTs) and these studies had methodological limitations that reduced their quality of evidence to very low.

CONCLUSION

There are few RCTs and these are of very low quality. As a result, they provide weak recommendation for using spinal opioids in adult cancer patients. Further studies are clearly needed.

Co-administration of ultra-low dose naloxone attenuates morphine tolerance in rats via attenuation of NMDA receptor neurotransmission and suppression of neuroinflammation in the spinal cords

Although mechanisms underlying ultra-low dose naloxone-induced analgesia have been proposed, possible interactions with glutamatergic transmission and glial cell activation have not been addressed. In the present study, we examined the effect of ultra-low dose naloxone on spinal glutamatergic transmission and glial cell activity in rats chronically infused with morphine. In male Wistar rats, intrathecal morphine infusion (15microg/h) for 5days induced (1) antinociceptive tolerance, (2) downregulation of glutamate transporters (GTs) GLT-1, GLAST, and EAAC1, (3) increasing of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) NR1 subunit expression and phosphorylation, (4) upregulation of protein kinase C gamma (PKCgamma) expression, and (5) glial cell activation. On day 5, morphine challenge (15microg/10microl) caused a significant increase in the concentration of the excitatory amino acids (EAAs) aspartate and glutamate in the spinal CSF dialysates of morphine-tolerant rats. Intrathecal co-infusion of ultra-low dose naloxone (15pg/h) with morphine attenuated tolerance development, reversed GTs expression, inhibited the NMDAR NR1 subunit expression and phosphorylation, and PKCgamma expression, inhibited glial cell activation, and suppressed the morphine-evoked EAAs release. These effects may result in preservation of the antinociceptive effect of acute morphine challenge in chronic morphine-infused rats. Ultra-low dose naloxone infusion alone did not produce an antinociceptive effect. These findings demonstrated that attenuation of glutamatergic transmission and neuroinflammation by ultra-low dose naloxone co-infusion preserves the lasting antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats chronically infused with morphine.

Intrathecal analgesia for refractory cancer pain

The use of intrathecal analgesics is an important treatment consideration for many patients with chronic cancer pain. This review describes the various opioid and nonopioid analgesics that have been used in this setting, including morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, meperidine, methadone, sufentanil, local anesthetics, clonidine, ketamine, baclofen, midazolam, betamethasone, and octreotide. We discuss available evidence for their analgesic and adverse effects.

Ultra-low-dose naloxone restores the antinociceptive effect of morphine and suppresses spinal neuroinflammation in PTX-treated rats

The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of ultra-low-dose naloxone on pertussis toxin (PTX)-induced thermal hyperalgesia in rats and its underlying mechanisms. Male Wistar rats, implanted with an intrathecal catheter with or without a microdialysis probe, received a single intrathecal injection of PTX (1 microg in 5 microl saline). Four days after PTX injection, they were randomly given a different dose of naloxone (either 15 microg or 15 ng in 5 microl saline), followed by a morphine injection (10 microg in 5 microl saline) after 30 min. The results found that PTX injection induced thermal hyperalgesia and increasing excitatory amino acid (EAA; L-glutamate and L-aspartate) concentration in the spinal CSF dialysates. Ultra-low-dose naloxone not only preserved the antinociceptive effect of morphine but also suppressed the PTX-evoked EAA release as well. Moreover, ultra-low-dose naloxone plus morphine administration inhibited the downregulation of L-glutamate transporters (GTs) and the L-glutamate-metabolizing enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS), and, moreover, inhibited microglial activation and suppressed cytokine expression in PTX-treated rat spinal cords. These results show that ultra-low-dose naloxone preserves the antinociceptive effect of morphine in PTX-treated rats. The mechanisms include (a) inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, (b) attenuation of PTX-evoked EAA release, and (c) reversion of the downregulation of GT expression.

N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 attenuates morphine tolerance and associated glial fibrillary acid protein up-regulation: a proteomic approach

BACKGROUND

It is well known that long-term morphine administration results in tolerance, which limits the clinical use of this drug in pain management.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to receive one of four different infusions: morphine [15 microg/h, intrathecal (i.t.)], saline, MK-801 (5 microg/h, i.t.) plus morphine (15 microg/h, i.t.), or MK-801 (5 microg/h, i.t.) alone.

RESULTS

Morphine infusion induced a maximal antinociceptive effect on day 1 and tolerance on day 3, and the maximal anti-receptive tolerance was observed on day 5. Co-infusing MK-801 with morphine attenuated morphine's anti-receptive tolerance. Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of spinal proteins revealed that eight protein spots were up-regulated in morphine-tolerant rats, and that they were significantly inhibited by MK-801 co-infusion. Among the up-regulated proteins, glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), a glial-specific maker, was identified by mass spectrometry. This finding was also confirmed by Western blot analysis.

CONCLUSION

Using proteomic analysis, we identified eight GFAP protein spots that were up-regulated in the dorsal horn of morphine-tolerant rat spinal cords. This up-regulation was partly inhibited by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 co-infusion, which suggests that GFAP protein can be considered to be a pathogenesis marker of morphine tolerance.

Role of spinal metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 in the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception in rat

Prolonged intrathecal (i.t.) administration of morphine results in tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception. We found that co-administration of selective metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 antagonist MPEP with morphine could suppress the loss of morphine-induced antinociception and inhibit the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociceptive effect. Whereas, the specific metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 agonist CHPG does the opposite. As the activation of NMDA receptor after chronic morphine administration has been verified, we suppose there is an enhanced activation of mGluR5 during the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception. Activation of mGluR5 may mobilize the release of intracellular Ca(2+) and activate PKC, leading to morphine-induced antinociception suppression. We conclude that mGluR5 contributes to the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception after chronic morphine exposure.

Opioid-related side-effects after intrathecal morphine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind dose-response study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation was to assess the dose-effect characteristics of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal administration of small doses of morphine (from 0.015 to 0.25 mg) in opioid-naïve, non-surgical patients.

METHODS

With Ethic Committee approval and written informed consent 144 opioid-naïve patients suffering from non-cancerous chronic back-pain, and receiving intrathecal morphine as diagnostic test for their chronic pain, were randomly allocated to receive intrathecal injection of 0.015 mg (Group I, n=25), 0.03 mg (Group II, n=30), 0.06 mg (Group III, n=31) or 0.25 mg (Group IV, n=33) morphine. The control group consisted in 25 further patients not included in the dose-effect study and receiving a placebo injection of normal saline in the interspinous ligament. A blinded observer recorded the occurrence of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and respiratory depression (respiratory rate<6 bpm) at 2, 4 and 24 h after injection.

RESULTS

Clinically significant pain relief was observed in all patients receiving intrathecal morphine but only six patients (25%) of the control group (P=0.0005). The incidence of pruritus was lower in patients of Groups III (6%) and IV (3%) than in Groups I (12%) and II (20%) (P=0.002). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher at 2- and 4-h observation times, and decreased 24 h after intrathecal injection. Surprisingly, nausea was more frequent in Groups I (56%) and II (50%) than in Groups III (33%) and IV (24%) (P=0.0005). Vomiting was higher in patients receiving morphine than in control group, but without differences among the four doses. No urinary retention was observed in the control group, while 2 h after intrathecal injection urinary retention was observed in 20-40% of cases, and decreased to less than 10% 24 h after spinal injection without differences among the four doses.

CONCLUSIONS

The onset and incidence of minor opioid-related side-effects after intrathecal morphine administration do not depend on its dose, occurring with even very small doses of morphine. Accordingly, they can be considered as a patient-dependent effect of the drug, suggesting the presence of a primary dose-independent excitatory component that might be related to the theory of the bimodal activation of opioid receptors. The very low incidence major respiratory depression prevents us from drawing any conclusion about the dose-effect relationship for this side-effect, and further properly powered studies should be advocated to evaluate major respiratory depression after spinal morphine.

Attenuation of morphine tolerance by intrathecal gabapentin is associated with suppression of morphine-evoked excitatory amino acid release in the rat spinal cord

This study was designed to investigate the effect of acute and chronic intrathecal (i.t.) injection of gabapentin (GBP) on the antinociceptive effect of morphine and tolerance development using a tail-flick latency test. Levels of excitatory amino acids (EAA) in i.t. CSF dialysates were also measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Male Wistar rats were implanted with either one or two i.t. catheters for drug injection or pump infusion and with a microdialysis probe for CSF dialysate collection. The effect of acute GBP (10 microg i.t.) injection on the morphine dose response was examined in both naïve rats and rats made tolerant by continuous infusion of morphine (15 microg/h i.t.) for 5 days. At such a low dose (10 microg i.t.), GBP did not enhance morphine's antinociception in naïve rats. In morphine-tolerant rats, however, acute GBP (10 microg i.t.) injection potentiated morphine's antinociception and yielded a 14.6-fold shift in morphine's dose-response curve. When GBP (10 microg/h i.t.) was co-infused with morphine (15 microg/h i.t.) to examine its effect on the development of morphine tolerance, GBP attenuated the development of morphine tolerance. The effect of GBP and morphine on CSF glutamate and aspartate levels was examined in naïve rats, and the effect of morphine challenge on CSF glutamate and aspartate levels was examined in rats previously infused for 5 days with morphine alone or morphine plus GBP. Acute injection of GBP (10 microg i.t.), morphine (50 microg i.t.), or GBP (10 microg i.t.) followed by morphine (50 microg i.t.) 30 min later had no significant effect on CSF EAA concentration in naïve rats; however, in tolerant rats, morphine challenge (50 microg i.t.) increased aspartate and glutamate levels to 221 +/- 22% and 296 +/- 43%, respectively, of those before morphine challenge, and this phenomenon was inhibited by GBP co-infusion. Our results show that GBP, at a dose without enhanced effect on morphine's antinociception in naïve rats, not only potentiates morphine's antinociceptive effect in morphine-tolerant rats but also attenuates the development of morphine tolerance. The mechanism of the effect of GBP on morphine tolerance might be via suppression of the EAA concentration in spinal CSF dialysate.

Dexamethasone modulates the development of morphine tolerance and expression of glutamate transporters in rats

We recently demonstrated an increase in spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) excitatory amino acids (EAAs) in morphine-tolerant rats after morphine challenge. The present study examined whether co-infusion of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) co-infusion inhibited morphine tolerance and the morphine challenge-induced EAAs increase after long-term morphine infusion. Intrathecal (i.t.) catheters and one microdialysis probe were implanted to male Wistar rats. Rats were divided into four groups: i.t. morphine (15 microg/h), saline (1 microl/h), DEX (2 microg/h), or DEX (2 microg/h) plus morphine (15 microg/h) infusion for 5 days. Tail-flick responses were examined before drug infusion and daily after the start of infusion for 5 days. Moreover, on day 5 after morphine challenge (50 microg, i.t.), CSF EAAs was also measured. Rat spinal cords were removed on day 5, and prepared for Western blot analysis of different glutamate transporters (GTs). The AD50 (analgesic dose) on day 5 was 1.33 microg in saline-infused rats, 83.84 microg in morphine-tolerant rats, and 10.15 microg in DEX plus morphine co-infused rats. Single DEX (2 microg, i.t.) injection did not enhance morphine's antinociceptive effect in either naïve or morphine-tolerant rats. No difference in CSF EAA level was observed in all groups between baseline (before drug infusion) and on day 5 after tolerance developed. Surprisingly, on day 5, after morphine challenge, an increase in glutamate and aspartate (284+/-47% and 201+/-18% of basal) concentration was observed, and morphine lost its antinociceptive effect (maximum percent effect, MPE = 41+/-12%), whereas DEX/morphine co-infusion inhibited morphine-evoked EAA increase with a MPE = 97+/-2%. DEX co-infusion prevented the downregulation of glial glutamate transporters (GLAST (Glu-Asp transporter) and GLT-1 (Glu transporter-1)), but not the neuronal GT EAAC1 (excitatory amino acid carrier). Upregulation of GLT-1 was also observed (204+/-20% of basal). DEX co-infusion inhibits the morphine-challenge induced EAA increase and prevents the loss of morphine's antinociceptive effect after long-term morphine infusion.

Increasing of intrathecal CSF excitatory amino acids concentration following morphine challenge in morphine-tolerant rats

Excitatory amino acids (EAAs) are involved in the development of opioid tolerance. The present study reveals that an increasing of CSF EAAs concentration might be responsible for the losing of morphine's antinociceptive effect in morphine tolerant rats. Male Wistar rats were implanted with two intrathecal (i.t.) catheters and one microdialysis probe, then continuously infused i.t. for 5 days with saline (1 microl/h; control group), morphine (15 micrograms/h), the NMDA antagonist, MK-801 (5 micrograms/h), or morphine (15 micrograms/h) plus MK-801 (5 micrograms/h). Each day, tail-flick responses were measured; in addition, CSF dialysates were collected and CSF amino acids measured by high performance liquid chromatography using a fluorescence detector. Morphine started to lose its analgesic effect on day 2 and this effect was overcome by MK-801. The AD(50) (AD: analgesic dose) was 1.33 micrograms in control animals, 83.83 micrograms in morphine-tolerant rats (a 63-fold shift), and 11.2 micrograms (a 8.4-fold shift) in rats that had received MK-801 plus morphine. No significant differences were observed in CSF amino acid release between the groups from day 1 to day 5. On day 5, after basal dialysate collection, a 10-micrograms challenge of morphine was administered i.t., and CSF samples collected over the next 3 h. After morphine challenge, morphine-tolerant rats showed a significant increase in the release of glutamate and aspartate (131+/-9.5% and 156+/-12% of basal levels, respectively), and no antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick latency test, while MK-801/morphine co-infused rats showed no increase in morphine-induced EAA release and a partial antinociceptive effect (MPE=40%). The present study provides direct evidence for a relationship between EAA release and a lack of an antinociceptive response to morphine, and shows that the NMDA antagonist, MK-801, attenuates both of these effects.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2002

This paper is the twenty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2002 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).