Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Approach Using Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Urological Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Caudal block is an effective regional anesthesia technique for perineal surgeries but is associated with various adverse effects. Recently, pudendal nerve block has emerged as a promising alternative for these procedures. This study assessed the effectiveness of a novel transperineal technique for ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block and compares it with ultrasound-guided caudal block for perineal surgeries in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The study included 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System grade I/II children aged 1-12 years and scheduled for elective perineal operations under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two equal groups: Group C (ultrasound-guided caudal block) and Group P (ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block). The groups were evaluated for time to first rescue analgesia (primary outcome), block performance time, total analgesic consumption, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores, time to achieve a Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) score of 9, and any complications.

RESULTS

The median interquartile range (IQR) first rescue analgesia time was significantly higher in the pudendal block (17.5 (17-18) hours vs 4.65 (4.5-4.77) hours; p<0.001). The median (IQR) dose of postoperative analgesia (diclofenac) required was similar in the pudendal block group and caudal group (10 (0-10) mg vs 10 (0-20) mg; p=0.290). The median (IQR) FLACC scores at "zero" hour post-surgery were 2 (2-2) and 2 (1-2) in the pudendal and caudal groups, respectively (p=0.052). The median (IQR) PADDS score was significantly higher in the pudendal group (10 (9.25-10) vs 9 (8-9); p<0.001). The time to reach a PADSS score of 9 was significantly longer in the pudendal group (21.4±3 vs 14.9±4.8 hours; p<0.0001). There were no complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that pudendal nerve block provides longer-lasting analgesia, lower pain scores, and faster readiness for discharge though with a similar analgesic consumption compared to caudal block. These results indicate the potential of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve blocks as a beneficial and safe alternative to caudal block for perineal procedures in children.

Effectiveness of pudendal nerve block in the management of acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain in Asian individuals using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)

BACKGROUND

Inadequate management of acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain is a major concern. Optimal pain management is necessary to reduce acute postoperative pain and improve care quality. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of postoperative pudendal nerve block (PNB) in reducing acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain in Asian individuals.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed 108 adult patients with grade 3 haemorrhoids. Patients with anorectal cancer were excluded from this study. Among the 108 patients, 79 and 29 received spinal anaesthesia (SA) with PNB (SAPNB) and SA alone, respectively. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were performed to adjust for the effects of confounders.

RESULTS

Patients receiving SAPNB had significantly lower postoperative pain scores 6, 12, and 18 h after haemorrhoidectomy but significantly higher postoperative pain scores 24 and 48 h after haemorrhoidectomy than did patients receiving SA alone. PNB, older age, female sex, reduced operation time, and absence of cardiovascular disease reduced the risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Only the addition of PNB was consistently associated with a reduced risk of moderate to severe pain 6, 12, and 18 h after haemorrhoidectomy. Patients receiving SAPNB had significantly lower risks of perianal swelling and urinary retention but a significantly higher risk of nausea than did those receiving SA alone. The two groups exhibited similarity in their rates of postoperative readmission because of poor pain management and their lengths of stay upon readmission.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PNB to SA may effectively reduce acute post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.

The impact of combined administration of ropivacaine and dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery with pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance: a prospective randomized controlled study

Background

In recent years, severe pain after perianal surgery has seriously affected the prognosis of hospitalized patients. How to maximize the improvement of postoperative pain and perioperative comfort becomes particularly important.

Methods

This study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial (Registration No.: ChiCTR2100048760, Registration Date: 16 July 2021, Link: www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130226), and patients were randomly divided into two groups: one group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine (P group), and the other group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine + 8 mg dexamethasone (PD group). The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe pain at the first postoperative dressing change. Secondary outcomes included Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 3 days after surgery, sleep quality, pain score at 3 days after surgery, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

In the main outcome indicators, the incidence was 41.7% in the P group and 24.2% in the PD group (p = 0.01). The QoR-15 score and sleep quality in PD group were better than those in P group 2 days before surgery. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was significantly decreased in PD group (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Local anesthesia with dexamethasone combined with pudendal nerve block after perianal surgery can reduce the incidence of moderate to severe pain during the first dressing change. This may be one of the approaches to multimodal analgesia after perianal surgery.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100048760.

The effect of bupivacaine on analgesia and safety in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis

Aim: There is no meta-analysis reporting the analgesic effect and safety of bupivacaine in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence of the effect of bupivacaine in hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: Studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science. Standardized mean difference (SMD), weighted mean difference (WMD), and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 index, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the effect of the single study on the pooled results. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pain level at 48 h was lower in the bupivacaine-combined other drug group than in the other drug group (WMD = -0.65, 95% CI: 1.18 to -0.11, and I2 = 37.50%). Compared to the bupivacaine group, the odds of pruritus (OR = 12.11, 95% CI: 1.49-98.59, and I2 = 0%) and urinary retention (OR = 4.45, 95% CI: 1.12-17.70, and I2 = 0%) were higher, and the pain level at 6 h (WMD = -2.13, 95% CI: 3.22 to -1.04, and I2 = 64.30%), at 12 h (WMD = -1.55, 95% CI: 2.19 to -0.90, and I2 = 56.10%), and at 24 h (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI: 1.89 to -0.42, and I2 = 82.5%) were lower in the bupivacaine-combined other drug group. Conclusion: Bupivacaine-combined other drugs had a good analgesic effect after hemorrhoidectomy, but the adverse reactions should be considered.

The role of pudendal nerve block in hemorrhoid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials

Background

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) is a commonly used anesthesia method that has been widely used in postoperative analgesia for hemorrhoids in recent years. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to analyze the effectiveness of PNB in postoperative analgesia for hemorrhoids.

Methods

Relevant data and studies published from inception until August 14, 2023, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to evaluate the beneficial effects of PNB for analgesia following hemorrhoidectomy.

Results

This meta-analysis included 6 double-blind RCTs comprising 501 patients. We evaluated the function of PNB in improving outcomes of postoperative analgesia of hemorrhoids. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative within 6 h (MD, -3.04; 95% CI, -4.13 to -1.95; P < 0.0001), 12 h (MD, -3.14; 95% CI, -3.87 to -2.40; P < 0.0001), and 24 h (MD, -2.25; 95% CI, -2.95 to -1.55; P < 0.0001) were enhanced by the application of PNB, but not in 48 h (MD, -2.54; 95% CI, -5.29 to 0.20; P = 0.07).

Conclusion

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) could effectively relieve postoperative pain of hemorrhoids. However, our results still need to be confirmed by multi-center clinical studies.

Parameters predicting postoperative pain and quality of life after hemorrhoidectomy: follow-up results from a prospective multicenter randomized trial

PURPOSE

Pain and reduced quality of life (QoL) are major subjects of interest after surgery for hemorrhoids. The aim of this study was to find predictive parameters for postoperative pain and QoL after hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

This is a follow-up analysis of data derived from a multicenter randomized controlled trial including 770 patients, which examines the usefulness of tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy. Different pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were correlated with pain level assessed by NRS and QoL by the EuroQuol.

RESULTS

At univariate analysis, relevant (NRS > 5/10 pts.) early pain within 48 h after surgery was associated with young age (≤ 40 years, p = 0.0072), use of a tamponade (p < 0.0001), relevant preoperative pain (p = 0.0017), pudendal block (p < 0.0001), and duration of surgery (p = 0.0149). At multivariate analysis, not using a pudendal block (OR 2.64), younger age (OR 1.55), use of a tamponade (OR 1.70), and relevant preoperative pain (OR 1.56) were significantly associated with relevant early postoperative pain. Relevant pain on day 7 was significantly associated only with relevant early pain (OR 3.13, p < 0.001). QoL overall remained at the same level. However, n = 229 (33%) patients presented an improvement of QoL and n = 245 (36%) an aggravation. Improvement was associated with a reduction of pain levels after surgery (p < 0.0001) and analgesia with opioids (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Early relevant pain affects younger patients but can be prevented by avoiding tamponades and using a pudendal block. Relevant pain after 1 week is associated only with early pain. Relief in preexisting pain and opioids improve QoL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00011590 12 April 2017.

A Prospective Observational Study Analyzing the Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block and Nerve Stimulator-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Repair

INTRODUCTION

Hypospadias repair is a common pediatric surgery. While caudal block (CB) is the most widely used procedure for analgesia, pudendal nerve block (PNB) can be utilized as an alternative. We evaluated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of CB and PNB in children undergoing hypospadias repair.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we evaluated 101 patients who received standard general anesthesia along with CB or PNB. Postoperative pain score (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability {FLACC} score) along with the total number of analgesic doses and the total amount of analgesic drugs consumed within 24 hours were noted. Time to first rescue analgesia, post-block penile length and midshaft circumference, surgeon satisfaction score, and postoperative complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 101 patients observed, 50 received CB, and 51 received PNB. At 24-hour interval, the median FLACC score in CB was 6, while in the PNB, it was 4 (p<0.001). None of the patients who were given PNB received more than three doses (p<0.001), and the average consumption of analgesic drugs within 24 hours was significantly higher in CB (38.4±4.28) compared to PNB (21.7±6.33) (p<0.0001). The median time to first rescue analgesia in CB was four hours, while in patients receiving PNB, it was eight hours (p<0.001). The increase in penile volume was significantly higher with CB as compared to PNB (p<0.001). Surgeon satisfaction score was found to be better with PNB (p<0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received PNB had significantly reduced pain scores and analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours post surgery.

Pudendal Nerve Block for Posthemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is common in hemorrhoidectomy patients. Local anesthetic given either as an intraoperative pudendal nerve block or as a local wound infiltration may help alleviate postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether the addition of an intraoperative pudendal nerve block to a perianal local wound infiltration and standardized analgesia regimen was superior to a perianal local wound infiltration and standardized analgesia regimen alone in reducing early postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. The secondary objective was to measure differences between treatment groups in perceived perianal numbness, oral opioid requirements, and adverse events.

DESIGN

This study was a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial approved by the Eastern Health Human Research and Ethics Committee in Melbourne, Australia (registration number: E09/2014).

SETTINGS

Patients were recruited across 3 Australian hospitals.

PATIENTS

Eighty patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids requiring hemorrhoidectomy in colorectal surgical outpatient clinics were successfully recruited and enrolled in the study, with 1 patient later dropping out.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to either the pudendal nerve block group or a control group. The pudendal nerve block group received 5 mL bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200,000 to both pudendal nerve trunks bilaterally. Both groups received 10 mL of the same local anesthetic injected into the post-hemorrhoidectomy wound bed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analogue scales were used to record patient pain scores. Dichotomous (yes/no) answers were recorded for secondary objectives.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in postoperative pain between groups at 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, or 24 hours. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to perceived perianal numbness, oral opioid usage or adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

The authors recognize that without a nerve stimulator, an argument can be made that the pudendal nerve block was not actually achieved.

CONCLUSION

Pudendal nerve block does not appear to demonstrate additional benefit in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain reduction beyond local anesthetic to the wound. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B780.

BLOQUEO DEL NERVIO PUDENDO PARA EL DOLOR POSHEMORROIDECTOMA ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO, ALEATORIO, CONTROLADO, CIEGO

ANTECEDENTES:El dolor posoperatorio es común en pacientes luego de una hemorroidectomía. La administración de anestésico local como bloqueo del nervio pudendo intraoperatorio o infiltración local de la herida puede ayudar a aliviar el dolor posoperatorio.OBJETIVOS:Determinar si agregar un bloqueo intraoperatorio del nervio pudendo a una infiltración local perianal de la herida y un régimen de analgesia estandarizado fue superior a una infiltración local perianal de la herida más un régimen de analgesia estandarizado para reducir el dolor posoperatorio precoz después de una hemorroidectomía. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron sensación de adormecimiento perianal, requerimientos de opioides orales y eventos adversos informados.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un ensayo controlado aleatorio, prospectivo, ciego, aprobado por el Comité de Ética e Investigación en Humanos de Eastern Health en Melbourne, Australia (número de registro: E09 / 2014).ESCENARIO:Los pacientes fueron reclutados en tres hospitales australianos.PACIENTES:Ochenta pacientes se inscribieron con éxito en el estudio, y más tarde un paciente abandonó.INTERVENCIÓN:Los pacientes fueron asignados al azar al grupo de bloqueo del nervio pudendo o al grupo control. El grupo de bloqueo del nervio pudendo recibió 5 ml de bupivacaína al 0,5% con adrenalina 1: 200.000 en ambos troncos del nervio pudendo bilateralmente. Ambos grupos recibieron 10 ml del mismo anestésico local inyectado en el lecho de la herida posterior a la hemorroidectomía.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:Se utilizaron escalas analógicas visuales para registrar las puntuaciones de dolor del paciente. Se registraron respuestas dicotómicas (sí / no) para los objetivos secundarios.RESULTADOS:No hubo diferencias significativas en el dolor posoperatorio entre los grupos a las 4, 8, 12 o 24 horas. Además, no hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos con respecto al adromecimiento perianal percibido, el uso de opioides orales o los eventos adversos.LIMITACIONES:Sin el uso de un estimulador nervioso, se puede argumentar que el bloqueo del nervio pudendo no se logró realmente.CONCLUSIÓNES:El bloqueo del nervio pudendo no parece demostrar un beneficio adicional en la reducción del dolor posterior a la hemorroidectomía más allá del anestésico local en la herida. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B780.

The Role of Pudendal Nerve Block in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery is associated with significant pain often requiring opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) can be administered with the aim to reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction. However, there are no current accepted guidelines for the use of PNB in colorectal surgery.

METHOD

We evaluated the available literature on the role of PNB in colorectal surgery to determine which technique and anesthetic agent may provide optimal pain relief and safety. Studies from January 1970 to December 2019 assessing PNB in colorectal surgery were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Indication for PNB, technique, anesthetic agent, postoperative pain outcomes, patient satisfaction and complications were extracted.

RESULTS

We initially identified 339 studies of which 17 (nine randomized controlled trials, three cohort studies, one case-control study and four reviews) specifically met the inclusion criteria. The most common indication found for PNB is hemorrhoidectomy using either bupivacaine or lidocaine. The anatomical landmark and neurostimulation are the most favorable techniques being applied. The majority of studies reported better pain scores, less analgesia requirement and higher patient satisfaction when performing a bilateral PNB, with no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence, though limited, supports the use of bilateral PNBs in colorectal surgical procedures in particular hemorrhoidectomies. PNBs can be safe and effective in improving patient outcomes particularly when using bupivacaine or lidocaine with either the anatomical landmark or neurostimulation technique.

Pudendal Nerve Block in Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain represents an important issue in traditional hemorrhoidectomy. Optimal pain control is mandatory, especially in a surgical day care setting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched up to December 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials evaluating the pudendal nerve block effect in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemorrhoidectomy under general or spinal anesthesia with or without pudendal nerve block was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Opioid consumption, pain on the visual analogue scale, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate were the main outcomes of interest and were plotted by using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed 749 articles, of which 14 were deemed eligible. A total of 1214 patients were included, of whom 565 received the pudendal nerve block. After hemorrhoidectomy, patients in the pudendal nerve block group received opioids less frequently (relative risk, 0.364; 95% CI, 0.292-0.454, p < 0.001) and in a lower cumulative dose (standardized mean difference, -0.935; 95% CI, -1.280 to -0.591, p < 0.001). Moreover, these patients experienced less pain at 24 hours (standardized mean difference, -1.862; 95% CI, -2.495 to -1.228, p < 0.001), had a shorter length of hospital stay (standardized mean difference, -0.742; 95% CI, -1.145 to -0.338, p < 0.001), and had a lower readmission rate (relative risk, 0.239; 95% CI, 0.062-0.916, p = 0.037). Sensitivity analysis excluded the occurrence of publication bias on the primary end point, and the overall evidence quality was judged "high."

LIMITATIONS

Occurrence of publication bias among some secondary end points and heterogeneity are the main limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis show significant advantages of pudendal nerve block use. A reduction in opioid consumption, postoperative pain, complications, and length of stay can be demonstrated. Despite the limitations, pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy should be considered.

Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Post-Hoc Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) has been demonstrated to reduce postoperative pain and re-admission rates after open hemorrhoidectomy and may reduce costs but, to date, no study has reported data on this aspect. The aim of our study was to perform a cost analysis on PNB use in in- and outpatients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy were included and randomized to undergo spinal anesthesia either with or without the PNB. Clinical data, direct and indirect costs for in- and outpatients, operating time and operating theatre occupancy were recorded. A cost-effectiveness analysis based on the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) and TARMED reimbursement systems was performed.

Results

Patients who underwent PNB in addition to spinal anesthesia had significantly less pain and a shorter length of hospital stay after open hemorrhoidectomy. The cost analysis included all 49 patients, 23 of whom, in addition to spinal anesthesia, received a PNB. There were no significant differences in operating theatre occupancy (p=0.662), mean operative time (p=0.610) or time required for anesthesia (p=0.124). Direct costs were comparable (482±386 vs 613±543 EUR, p=0.108), while indirect costs were significantly lower in the PNB group (2606±816 vs 2769±1506 EUR, p=0.005). We estimated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of −243 ± 881 EUR/pain unit on the VAS.

Conclusion

Despite limitations, the ultrasound-guided PNB seems to reduce costs in patient undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia. It was shown to be clinically beneficial and cost-effective, and therefore recommendable in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy.

Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background and Objectives. Several anesthesia techniques were applied to hemorrhoidectomy, but postoperative pain and urinary retention were still two unsolved problems. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) combined with deep sedation compared to spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. Methods. One hundred and twenty patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol (Group PNB, n = 60) or spinal anesthesia (Group SA, n = 60). Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain). The primary outcome was pain scores recorded at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h and on walking at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction after surgery. Results. Ultrasound-guided bilateral PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol could successfully be applied to Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p < 0.001) and during mobilization at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (p < 0.001) postoperatively. Sufentanil consumption in Group PNB was significantly lower than that in Group SA, during 0-24 h (p < 0.001) and during 24-48 h (p < 0.001) postoperatively. Urinary retention was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA (6.9% vs 20%, p=0.034). The patients in Group PNB had higher satisfaction compared to Group SA (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Ultrasound-guided PNB combined with propofol sedation is an effective anesthesia technique for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

S3-Leitlinie: Analfissur

Die Analfissur ist eine der häufigsten Pathologien, welche sich dem Proktologen präsentiert. Entsprechend ist es wichtig, verlässliche Leitlinien dazu zu entwickeln. Die aktuelle Leitlinie wurde anhand eines systematischen Literaturreview von einem interdisziplinären Expertengremium diskutiert und verabschiedet.

Die akute Analfissur, soll auf Grund ihrer hohen Selbstheilungstendenz konservativ behandelt werden. Die Heilung wird am besten durch die Einnahme von Ballaststoff reicher Ernährung und einer medikamentösen Relaxation durch Kalziumkanal-Antagonisten (CCA) unterstützt. Zur Behandlung der chronischen Analfissur (CAF), soll den Patienten eine medikamentöse Behandlung zur „chemischen Sphinkterotomie“ mittels topischer CCA oder Nitraten angeboten werden. Bei Versagen dieser Therapie, kann zur Relaxation des inneren Analsphinkters Botulinumtoxin injiziert werden. Es ist belegt, dass die operativen Therapien effektiver sind. Deshalb kann eine Operation schon als primäre Therapie oder nach erfolgloser medikamentöser Therapie erfolgen. Die Fissurektomie, evtl. mit zusätzlicher Botulinumtoxin Injektion oder Lappendeckung, ist die Operation der Wahl. Obwohl die laterale Internus Sphinkterotomie die CAF effektiver heilt, bleibt diese wegen dem höheren Risiko für eine postoperative Stuhlinkontinenz eine Option für Einzelfälle.

Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in children: A new technique of ultrasound-guided transperineal approach

BACKGROUND

Transperineal pudendal nerve block guided by nerve stimulator is used in pediatric anesthesia as an alternative to caudal analgesia in perineal surgery. The risk of rectal puncture or intravascular injection is inherent to this blinded technique. We described a new technique of transperineal pudendal nerve block, with ultrasound guidance, to improve safety of the technique.

AIMS

The first goal of this study was to describe this new technique and to test its feasibility. The second objective was to evaluate intra operative effectiveness and postoperative pain control.

METHODS

After parental and children consent, this prospective descriptive study included children aged 1-15 years, ASA status I-III, scheduled for general anesthesia associated with bilateral pudendal nerve block for an elective perineal surgery. After standardized general anesthesia, the anesthesiologist performed pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance with "out of plane" approach and evaluated the visualization of anatomical structures (ischial tuberosity, rectum, and pudendal artery), of the needle and of the local anesthetic spread. Pudendal nerve block failure was defined as an increase in mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate more than 20% compared to baseline values after surgical incision. In the postoperative period, the need for rescue analgesia was noted.

RESULTS

During the study period, 120 blocks were performed in 60 patients, including 59 boys. Quality of the ultrasonographic image was good in 81% of blocks, with easy visualization of ischium and rectum in more than 95% of cases. Localization of the tip of the needle was possible for all pudendal nerve blocks, directly or indirectly. The spread of local anesthetic was seen in 79% of cases. The block was effective in 88% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The new technique of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block, described in this study, seems to be easy to perform with a good success rate, and probably improves safety of the puncture and of the injection by real-time visualization of anatomical structures and local anesthetic spread.

Pudendal nerve blocks in men undergoing urethroplasty: a case series

The pudendal nerve block (PNB) is widely used for regional anesthesia during obstetric and anorectal procedures, but its role in urologic procedures has not been thoroughly studied. While transvaginal PNB is relatively straightforward, PNB in male patients often requires imaging guidance due to difficulty appreciating anatomic landmarks. We review the PNB and relevant sonoanatomy, and describe its analgesic efficacy in three male patients undergoing urethroplasty for urethral stricture. In this procedure, the patient was placed in lithotomy position, the ischial tuberosity was palpated, and the sacrotuberous ligament and pudendal artery were identified using ultrasound. Ropivacaine was injected medial to the pudendal artery and disappearance of muscle twitch was demonstrated. Two patients reported well-controlled pain at 24 hours postoperatively. One reported perineal pain requiring additional analgesia. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 without complications. Ultrasound-guided PNB provides safe and reasonably effective pain control to male patients undergoing urologic procedures.

Pudendal Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery is often challenging. Caudal block is used for analgesia but has limitations. This study compares the analgesic efficiency of pudendal block with that of caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study enrolled 84 patients receiving pudendal block or caudal block before hypospadias surgery. In the pudendal group, the pudendal nerve was identified using a nerve stimulator, and the block consisted of 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 mL/kg. In the caudal group, the caudal block used 0.2% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg. Our primary outcome was pain intensity within 24 hours postoperatively. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT02390388).

RESULTS

For the primary outcome, patients in the pudendal group had lower postoperative pain intensity when compared with the caudal group (P < 0.001). Three patients in the pudendal group and all of the patients in the caudal group needed additional analgesia within 24 hours after the surgery (P < 0.001). The family satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the pudendal group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For the pudendal group, the pain scores for the first 24 hours after the surgery were significantly lower and the duration of analgesia was longer.

Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council

Most patients who undergo surgical procedures experience acute postoperative pain, but evidence suggests that less than half report adequate postoperative pain relief. Many preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions and management strategies are available for reducing and managing postoperative pain. The American Pain Society, with input from the American Society of Anesthesiologists, commissioned an interdisciplinary expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline to promote evidence-based, effective, and safer postoperative pain management in children and adults. The guideline was subsequently approved by the American Society for Regional Anesthesia. As part of the guideline development process, a systematic review was commissioned on various aspects related to various interventions and management strategies for postoperative pain. After a review of the evidence, the expert panel formulated recommendations that addressed various aspects of postoperative pain management, including preoperative education, perioperative pain management planning, use of different pharmacological and nonpharmacological modalities, organizational policies, and transition to outpatient care. The recommendations are based on the underlying premise that optimal management begins in the preoperative period with an assessment of the patient and development of a plan of care tailored to the individual and the surgical procedure involved. The panel found that evidence supports the use of multimodal regimens in many situations, although the exact components of effective multimodal care will vary depending on the patient, setting, and surgical procedure. Although these guidelines are based on a systematic review of the evidence on management of postoperative pain, the panel identified numerous research gaps. Of 32 recommendations, 4 were assessed as being supported by high-quality evidence, and 11 (in the areas of patient education and perioperative planning, patient assessment, organizational structures and policies, and transitioning to outpatient care) were made on the basis of low-quality evidence.

PERSPECTIVE

This guideline, on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence on postoperative pain management, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe and effective postoperative pain management should be on the basis of a plan of care tailored to the individual and the surgical procedure involved, and multimodal regimens are recommended in many situations.

Nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block vs general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair: a prospective randomized trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Compare the effectiveness of nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) vs general anesthesia (GA) for anterior and posterior (AP) colporrhaphy in terms of pain relief and analgesic consumption within 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

PATIENTS

Fifty-seven patients whose ages ranged between 20 and 53 years scheduled to undergo AP colporrhaphy due to the presence of cystorectocele.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups receiving either nerve stimulator-guided PNB (n = 28) or GA (n = 29). A total volume of 0.7 mL/kg of the local anesthetic mixture was injected at 4 sites.

MAIN RESULTS

Both groups were similar with respect to age, weight, height, and surgery duration. There was a significant difference in average pain scores within the first and second postoperative days (P values = .005 and .004, respectively). Total analgesic consumption (ketoprofen and tramadol) was significantly lower in the PNB within the first (P values = .018 and .010) and second postoperative days (P values = .041 and .011), respectively. Return to normal daily activity was significantly (P< .0001) shorter in the PNB group compared with the GA group (3.6 days vs 12.2 days). A total of 71.4% of the patients in the PNB group were satisfied compared with 27.8% in the GA group (P< .0001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the PNB group (82.1% vs 34.5%, P< .0001).

CONCLUSION

This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that nerve stimulator-guided PNB could be used as an alternative to GA for AP repair of stages I and II prolapse because it is associated with less postoperative pain and analgesic consumption, in addition to shorter duration of recovery.

[Hemorrhoidal surgery: new trends for day-case surgery]

Despite recommendations and encouragements, day-case hemorrhoidal surgery is incompletely developed. The incidence of postoperative pain, urinary retention and the risk of bleeding vary according to the surgical procedure but they are considered as the main impediments to ambulatory management. Consequently, besides the use of good clinical practice concerning ambulatory surgery, hemorrhoidal surgery requires an effective control of postoperative pain based on the use of pudendal block, an adaptation of the anesthetic technique and a careful postoperative follow-up.

The effectiveness of pudendal nerve block versus caudal block anesthesia for hypospadias in children

BACKGROUND

Caudal block (CB) has some disadvantages, one of which is its short duration of action after a single injection. For hypospadias repair, pudendal nerve block (PNB) might be a suitable alternative since it has been successfully used for analgesia for circumcision. We evaluated PNB compared with CB as measured by total analgesic consumption 24 hours postoperatively.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded study, patients were randomized into 2 groups, either receiving CB or nerve stimulator-guided PNB. In the PNB group, patients were injected with 0.3 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. In the CB group, patients were injected with 1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. Analgesic consumption was assessed during the first 24 hours postoperatively. The "objective pain scale" developed by Hannalah and Broadman was used to assess postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Eighty patients participated in the study, 40 in each group. The mean age in the PNB group was 3.1 (1.1) years and in the CB group was 3.2 (1.1) years. The mean weights in the PNB and CB groups were 15.3 (2.8) kg and 15.3 (2.2) kg, respectively. The percentage of patients who received analgesics during the first 24 hours were significantly higher in the CB (70%) compared with the PNB group (20%, P < 0.0001). The average amount of analgesics consumed per patient within 24 hours postoperatively was higher in the CB group (paracetamol P < 0.0001, Tramal P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received PNB had reduced analgesic consumption and pain within the first 24 hours postoperatively compared with CB.

Nerve-stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block by pararectal approach

AIM

Various techniques have been described for performing a pudendal nerve block (PNB) and have associated problems such as multiple needle injections, the need for special equipment and consumption of time. This study aimed to describe a nerve-stimulator-guided PNB using a pararectal approach and to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of that procedure.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective study of 53 patients who underwent a PNB from December 2009 to July 2010. With the index finger of the left hand inserted into anus, we guided the nerve stimulator needle along the second finger tip on the ischial spine to the site where the maximal contraction of the external anal sphincter could be felt. Once the position of the needle tip had been confirmed, the desired drug was injected. Of the 53 patients, a cohort of eight underwent manometry before and after the pudendal block.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients underwent the nerve-stimulator-guided procedure: 13 patients for pudendal neuralgia and the other 40 patients for anorectal disease. The mean maximal resting and squeezing pressures before the block were 55 and 161 mmHg, respectively, compared with 35 and 67 mmHg after the block. The PNB took just minutes to perform, was well tolerated by the patients, and resulted in neither severe complications nor repeated attempts.

CONCLUSION

Nerve-stimulator-guided PNB using a pararectal approach proved to be easy and safe, with acceptable patient tolerance. In addition, it can be used for a variety of anorectal procedures where relaxation of anal tone is required.

Ischiorectal block with bupivacaine for post hemorrhoidectomy pain

Background

Hemorrhoid is one of the most common surgical diseases occurring in the anorectal region. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ischiorectal fossa block on alleviating post hemorrhoidectomy pain.

Methods

In this study, 90 patients suffering from hemorrhoids were evaluated. They were randomly divided into 3 groups. The first group had no block, the second group an ischiorectal block with placebo (normal saline), and the third group a preemptive ischiorectal block with bupivacaine. Postoperative variables such as pain intensity, pethidine consumption, nausea, and vomiting were compared between the groups.

Results

The postoperative pain score in group 1 was 8.5 ± 1.3 and 8.1 ± 0.9 (P = NS) in group 2. The post operative analgesic demand was 3.1 ± 1.5 and 3.3 ± 1.8 hours in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = NS). The post operative pain score and analgesic demand were 4.2 ± 2.1 and 9.3 ± 2.7 hours, respectively, in group 3 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Preemptive ischiorectal block reduces the posthemorrhoidectomy pain and opioid demand.

Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is associated with intense postoperative pain, but optimal evidence-based pain therapy has not been described. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the management of pain after haemorrhoidal surgery.

METHODS

Randomized studies published in the English language from 1966 to June 2006, assessing analgesic and anaesthetic interventions in adult haemorrhoidal surgery, and reporting pain scores, were retrieved from the Embase and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

Of the 207 randomized studies identified, 106 met the inclusion criteria, with mixed methodological quality. Of these, 41 studies evaluating surgical and alternative interventions were excluded. Quantitative analyses were not performed, as there were limited numbers of trials with a sufficiently homogeneous design.

CONCLUSION

Local anaesthetic infiltration, either as a sole technique or as an adjunct to general or regional anaesthesia, and combinations of analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and opiates) are recommended. If appropriate, a stapled operation may be preferable.

Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up

PURPOSE

We evaluate the safety and efficacy of a spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus a local anesthesia of pudendal block with ropivacaine combined with intravenous sedation in the hemorrhoidectomy procedure and also we compared the short- and long-term efficacy of conventional diathermy versus Ligasure diathermy hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients of grade III or IV hemorrhoids were randomized to conventional diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal (n = 19) or local anesthesia (n = 18) and Ligasure diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal (n = 17) or local anesthesia (n = 20). Time of follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Patients operated under local anesthesia had less pain (p < 0.01), less analgesic requirements (p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01), and less postoperative complications (p < 0.05). A shorter operating time (p < 0.001) and less complications at 4 months postoperatively (p < 0.05) was observed in the Ligasure group, but differences at 12 months were not found.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia with pudendal block with ropivacaine and sedation reduced postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and postoperative complications, and can be performed as day-case procedure. Ligasure diathermy hemorrhoidectomy reduced operating time and was equally effective than conventional diathermy in long-term symptom control.

Bilateral guided cervical block for Zenker diverticulum excision in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis

Patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have difficulties in tracheal intubation. An 87-year-old man with severe AS was scheduled for Zenker diverticulum (ZD) excision. It was decided to proceed with combined bilateral cervical plexus blockade using a nerve stimulator. The surgery lasted about 3 h, with stable hemodynamics, ECG, and oxygen saturation. The use of a nerve stimulator-guided cervical block minimizes the risk of severe respiratory and/or airway compromise secondary to phrenic nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, because it can elicit diaphragmatic muscle response, which helps to avoid the administration of local anesthetic directly to the area of the phrenic nerve, and guides correct needle placement. In conclusion, the nerve stimulatorguided bilateral cervical block in our ZD patient with AS was shown to be a safe and successful alternative anesthetic option.

[Acute renal failure related to urinary retention following haemorrhoidectomy performed under general anaesthesia and bilateral pudendal nerve block: a case report]

Anorectal surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Pudendal nerve blocks, formerly performed by surgeons, provides effective postoperative analgesia and allow a quicker recovery, which is quite important in the current concept of fast-track postoperative care. However, even for benign surgery with a safe anaesthetic technique, serious adverse events may occur. We report a case of acute renal failure related to urinary retention. Hidden by a prior history of urination difficulties, recognition of symptoms, following haemorrhoidectomy performed with bilateral pudendal block, was late. After complete recovery, electrophysiologic investigations found hypotonic, hypocontractile bladder.Therefore, before performing haemorrhoidectomy with regional anaesthesia, prior history of urination difficulties should be searched. The risk of urinary retention due to surgery and anaesthesia may be increased, as observed in this original case report.

Pudendal block with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief

PURPOSE

Postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy is very intense, and the pain at the first postoperative defecation is very intense. Based on our pilot initial results that reflected reduced postoperative pain, we conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to investigate whether the analgesia produced by bilateral pudendal nerve block using a nerve-stimulator could provide better postoperative pain relief compared with the routine technique in use in the Department of Anesthesia.

METHODS

After Ethical Committee approval and informed consent, 100 patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized into control (C) and study (P) groups with 50 patients each. Bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.25 percent bupivacaine was performed with nerve-stimulator. Evaluated parameters were pain severity, duration of analgesia, demand analgesia, and possible technique-related complications. Data were evaluated 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery completion. The first defecation and patient satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

Successful pudendal nerves stimulation was achieved in all patients in the study group. The pudendal nerve block group was found to have better postoperative pain relief, reduced need for analgesics, and patient satisfaction. Mean analgesic duration was 23.8 +/- 4.8 hours vs. 3.6 +/- 1 hours. All patients in the pudendal nerve block had spontaneous micturition vs. 48 patients in the control group. The pudendal analgesia was considered excellent by 44 patients and satisfactory by 6 male patients. The six male patients complained because of penile anesthesia. No anesthetic-related local or systemic complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this controlled study, bilateral pudendal nerve block oriented by nerve stimulator provided excellent analgesia with low need for opioids, without local or systemic complications, and without urinary retention.

Combination of Topical EMLA With Local Injection of Lidocaine: Superior Pain Relief After Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a combination of topical anesthetic (EMLA) and local injection with lidocaine is better than lidocaine alone for pain relief after Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized into 2 groups: (1) control group (CG, n=30) received neomycin ointment (5 g), and (2) EMLA group (EG, n=30) received EMLA (5 g), both agents applied topically after surgery. Before the surgical incision was made, lidocaine (10 mL of a 1% solution) was locally injected into all 60 patients. After surgery, analgesics were provided when necessary. The visual analog scale score was recorded at 4 time points: (1) upon arrival in the postanesthesia room, (2) 2 hours after arriving in the postanesthesia room, (3) between 9 and 10 PM on the first postoperative evening, and (4) on the first postoperative morning. The frequency of meperidine requests, 1-time catheterizations for urinary retention, and patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management, were also recorded.

RESULTS

The median visual analog scale scores and cumulative dosages of meperidine were significantly lower in the EG than the CG (P<0.05). Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control was also significantly higher in the EG than the CG (P<0.01). No systemic complications occurred.

DISCUSSION

EMLA is considered a breakthrough in cutaneous analgesia, capable of reducing pain in many cutaneous procedures. Because Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy has been performed for years with ongoing concerns over postoperative pain, we felt that using EMLA could lower postoperative pain intensity and the number of requests for additional medication.

[The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids]

Surgery is the most effective treatment in patients with symptomatic grade III-IV hemorrhoids who have not responded to outpatient treatment, when there is associated abnormalities (anal fissure, anal fistula, skin tags) and in thrombosed hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidectomy is currently the "gold standard" treatment. Randomized controlled trials comparing open with closed hemorrhoidectomy show no significant differences in pain scores. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy produces less postoperative pain than hemorrhoidectomy but is less effective in terms of symptom control. No treatment is superior to others in reducing postoperative pain except the use of drugs and anesthetic techniques. In patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids and thrombosed hemorrhoids, treatment may initially consist of an urgent hemorrhoidectomy with the same results as those obtained with elective surgery.

Repetitive Occipital Nerve Blockade for Cervicogenic Headache: Expanded Case Report of 47 Adults

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repetitive occipital nerve blocks using a nerve stimulator in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.

METHODS

This prospective noncomparative clinical interventional case-series study included 47 patients suffering from cervicogenic headache using a repetitive guided occipital nerve blockade.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (87%) required more than one injection to achieve six-month pain-relief period. For every three years of headache history, the outcomes demonstrated that a patient needed one additional injection to the basic injection.

CONCLUSION

The repeated nerve stimulator-guided occipital nerve blockade is a treatment mode that may relieve cervicogenic headache with no recurrence for at least six months in addition to alleviation of associated symptoms.

Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve blockversus general anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy

PURPOSE

A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to test the hypothesis that patients receiving a nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block for hemorrhoidectomy would experience more effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia and shorter hospital stay compared to patients receiving general anesthesia.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. Following Ethics Committee approval and informed consent, 80 patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to two groups of 40 patients each: general anesthesia alone, or nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block. Postoperative pain, the primary outcome variable of the study, was assessed by visual analogue scale scores at predetermined intervals during the postoperative period. Analgesic consumption, time to return to normal activities, patients' and surgeons' satisfaction, and duration of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

The guided pudendal nerve block group failed in three patients, requiring their conversion to general anesthesia. Otherwise, patients in the pudendal nerve block group experienced better postoperative pain relief at rest (P < 0.0001), on walking, sitting, and defecation (P < 0.001), reduced need for opioids (11/35 vs 32/37; P < 0.0001), a more rapid return to normal activities (7.2 vs 13.8 days; P < 0.0001) and also a shorter hospital stay (25/35 vs 3/37 outpatient cases; P < 0.0001) compared to the general anesthesia group. Pudendal nerve block was also associated with overall higher patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia (30/35 vs 9/37; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shortened hospital stay, and earlier return to normal activity compared to general anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy.

Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems

Treating common benign anal diseases has evolved towards more outpatient procedures with better outcome. However, minimizing post-procedure morbidities such as pain and the avoidance incontinence remain the most significant concerns. We introduce some controversies and highlight the developments in current surgical practice for the treatment of common anal problems.