Aprotinin or tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a propensity analysis

Perioperative intravenous iron preserves iron stores and may hasten the recovery from post-operative anaemia after knee replacement surgery

In unilateral total knee replacement (TKR), perioperative blood loss, low transfusion thresholds and short hospital stay result in patients being discharged with low haemoglobin (Hb). We assessed the effects of perioperative administration of intravenous iron, with or without erythropoietin, plus a restrictive transfusion threshold (Hb < 80 g L(-1)) both on transfusion rate and recovery from post-operative anaemia. TRK patients received iron sucrose (2 x 200 mg per 48 h, iv) (Group IVI, n = 129). Patients with admission Hb < 130 g L(-1), also received erythropoietin (1 x 40 000 IU, sc) (Group EPO, n = 19). Perioperative clinical and laboratory data were obtained. Mean Hb loss was 36 g L(-1), but only seven patients were transfused (5%). Pre-operatively, 66 (45%) patients did not have enough stored iron to compensate Hb loss. At post-operative day 30, only 15% were anaemic, 70% of Hb loss and 92% of pre-operative Hb were recovered and ferritin increased by 73 microg L(-1) (P < 0.01), although erythropoietic response was higher in patients receiving erythropoietin (P < 0.05). No adverse effects of iron sucrose or erythropoietin were witnessed. This protocol seems to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion rate and may hasten the recovery from post-operative anaemia in TKR patients, without depleting iron stores. Further studies are needed to ascertain which patients may benefit of extended intravenous iron and/or erythropoietin administration.

Intravenous iron and recombinant erythropoietin for the treatment of postoperative anemia

PURPOSE

To determine if early recovery from severe post-operative anemia is accelerated by iv iron therapy alone or in combination with recombinant erythropoietin (EPO).

METHODS

In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized study, consenting adult patients without preoperative anemia whose hemoglobin concentration (Hb) was 70 to 90 g x L(-1) on the first day after cardiac or orthopedic surgery (POD 1) were assigned to one of three groups: control, iv iron alone (200 mg of iron sucrose on POD 1, 2, and 3) or in combination with EPO (600 U x kg(-1) on POD 1 and 3). The primary outcome was increase in Hb (adjusted for red blood cell transfusions) from POD 1 to 7. Analysis was by intention-to-treat in patients for whom the primary outcome was available. Group effect was analyzed by the ANOVA test, and between-group differences were specified with a Duncan multiple-range test.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was available in 31 of 38 randomized patients. The average POD 1 Hb was 84 +/- 4 g x L(-1). There were no between-group differences in outcomes except for higher reticulocyte counts on POD-7 in the combination group. The average adjusted one-week increases in Hb were 7 +/- 8 g x L(-1) in the control group (n = 10), 9 +/- 9 g x L(-1) in the iv iron group (n = 11), and 10 +/- 14 g x L(-1) in the combination group (n = 10). The average adjusted six-week increases in Hb were 37 +/- 14 g x L(-1) in the control group, 40 +/- 7 g x L(-1) in the iv iron group, and 45 +/- 12 g x L(-1) in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative treatment with iv iron alone or in combination with EPO does not appear to accelerate early recovery from postoperative anemia.

Perioperative intravenous iron, with or without erythropoietin, plus restrictive transfusion protocol reduce the need for allogeneic blood after knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) results in a substantial blood loss and 30 to 50 percent of patients receive allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). Therefore, the effectiveness of a restrictive transfusion trigger (hemoglobin [Hb] level < 8 g/dL) plus stimulation of erythropoiesis was evaluated, with or without blood salvage, for reducing ABT in TKR patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A series of 139 consecutive of primary TKR patients received perioperative iron sucrose (2 x 200 mg/48 hr, intravenously [IV]), plus preoperative erythropoietin (EPO; 1 x 40.000 UI, sc) if preoperative Hb level was less than 130 g per L (Group A). This protocol was applied to another series of 173 consecutive TKR patients who also received postoperative unwashed shed blood (USB) if preoperative Hb level was less than 130 g per L (Group B). Perioperative clinical and laboratory data were gathered.

RESULTS

No adverse effects of iron sucrose, EPO, or USB administration were witnessed, and only 13 patients received ABT overall (4%). No major differences in perioperative blood counts or iron metabolism variables were observed between groups, but stimulation of erythropoiesis seemed to be more pronounced in those patients receiving EPO (p < 0.05). There were no differences in postoperative complications between groups, but length of hospital stay for patients with a preoperative Hb level of less than 130 g per L was shorter in Group B (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This blood saving protocol seems to be effective for reducing ABT in TKR patients. Which patients are more likely to benefit from either perioperative iron administration or selective addition of postoperative blood salvage to pharmacologic treatment, however, needs to be further evaluated.