Gastric pH and volume after oral fluids in the postpartum patient

Effect of Pregnancy on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Female Patients Who Underwent Nondelivery Surgery: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Pregnant women usually have several risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and physiologic changes that make them susceptible to PONV development. We investigated the risk of PONV and postoperative vomiting (PV) in pregnant women in nondelivery surgery compared to nonpregnant women. This study included female adult patients who underwent nondelivery surgery at five hospitals between January 2011 and March 2021. To identify the association between pregnancy and PONV, logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for covariates. A total of 60,656 (nonpregnant women = 57,363 and pregnant women = 3293) complete patient outcomes and perioperative data were eligible for analysis. Although there was no significant association between pregnancy and PONV, the risk of PV in the pregnant women was 3.9-fold higher (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 3.06-4.97) than in the nonpregnant women. In addition, increased pregnancy duration increased the risk of PV (odds ratio (95% CI), 1.05 (1.01-1.09)) and preoperative nausea, and vomiting increased the risk of PONV (odds ratio (95% CI), 2.68 (1.30-5.54)) and PV (odds ratio (95% CI), 4.52 (2.36-8.69)). Pregnancy increased the risk of PV in female patients who underwent nondelivery surgery, and pregnancy duration and preoperative nausea and vomiting also were associated with PONV or PV.

Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1)

This Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline for perioperative care in cesarean delivery will provide best practice, evidenced-based, recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases with, primarily, a maternal focus. The focused pathway process for scheduled and unscheduled cesarean delivery for this ERAS Cesarean Delivery Guideline will consider from the time from decision to operate (starting with the 30-60 minutes before skin incision) to hospital discharge. The literature search (1966-2017) used Embase and PubMed to search medical subject headings that included "Cesarean Section," "Cesarean Section," "Cesarean Section Delivery" and all pre- and intraoperative ERAS items. Study selection allowed titles and abstracts to be screened by individual reviewers to identify potentially relevant articles. Metaanalyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled studies, nonrandomized controlled studies, reviews, and case series were considered for each individual topic. Quality assessment and data analyses that evaluated the quality of evidence and recommendations were evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, as used and described in previous ERAS Guidelines. The ERAS Cesarean Delivery Guideline/Pathway has created a maternal focused pathway (for scheduled and unscheduled surgery starting from 30-60 minutes before skin incision to maternal discharge) with ERAS cesarean delivery consensus recommendations preoperative elements (anesthetic medications, fasting, carbohydrate supplementation, prophylactic antibiotics/skin preparation, ), intraoperative elements (anesthetic management, maternal hypothermia prevention, surgical technique, hysterotomy creation and closure, management of peritoneum, subcutaneous space, and skin closure), perioperative fluid management, and postoperative elements (chewing gum, management of nausea and vomiting, analgesia, timing of food intake, glucose management, antithrombotic prophylaxis, timing of ambulation, urinary management, and timing of maternal and neonate discharge). Limited topics for optimized care and for antenatal education and counselling and the immediate neonatal needs at delivery are discussed. Strong recommendations for element use were given for preoperative (antenatal education and counselling, use of antacids and histamine, H2 receptor antagonists, 2-hour fasting and small meal within 6 hours surgery, antimicrobial prophylaxis and skin preparation/chlorhexidine-alcohol), intraoperative (regional anesthesia, prevention of maternal hypothermia [forced warm air, warmed intravenous fluids, room temperature]), perioperative (fluid management for euvolemia and neonatal immediate care needs that include delayed cord clamping), and postoperative (fluid management to prevent nausea and vomiting, antiemetic use, analgesia with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs/paracetamol, regular diet within 2 hours, tight capillary glucose control, pneumatic compression stocking for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, immediate removal of urinary catheter). Recommendations against the element use were made for preoperative (maternal sedation, bowel preparation), intraoperative (neonatal oral suctioning or increased inspired oxygen), and postoperative (heparin should not be used routinely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis). Because these ERAS cesarean delivery pathway recommendations (elements/processes) are studied, implemented, audited, evaluated, and optimized by the maternity care teams, this will create an opportunity for the focused and optimized areas of care research with further enhanced care and recommendation.

Postpartum tubal ligation: A retrospective review of anesthetic management at a single institution and a practice survey of academic institutions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to evaluate institutional anesthetic techniques utilized for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). Secondarily, academic institutions were surveyed on their clinical practice for PPTL.

DESIGN

An institutional-specific retrospective review of patients with ICD-9 procedure codes for PPTL over a 2-year period was conducted. Obstetric anesthesia fellowship directors were surveyed on anesthetic management of PPTL.

SETTING

Labor and delivery unit. Internet survey.

PATIENTS

202 PPTL procedures were reviewed. 47 institutions were surveyed; 26 responses were received.

MEASUREMENTS

Timing of PPTL, anesthetic management, postoperative pain and length of stay.

MAIN RESULTS

There was an epidural catheter reactivation failure rate of 26% (18/69 epidural catheter reactivation attempts). Time from epidural catheter insertion to PPTL was a significant factor associated with failure: median [IQR; range] time for successful versus failed epidural catheter reactivation was 17h [10-25; 3-55] and 28h [14-33; 5-42], respectively (P=0.028). Epidural catheter reactivation failure led to significantly longer times to provide surgical anesthesia than successful epidural catheter reactivation or primary spinal technique: median [IQR] 41min [33-54] versus 15min [12-21] and 19min [15-24], respectively (P<0.0001). Fifty-eight percent (15/26) of respondents routinely leave the labor epidural catheter in-situ if PPTL is planned. Sixty-five percent (17/26) and 7% (2/26) would not attempt to reactivate the epidural catheter for PPTL if >8h and >24h post-delivery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural catheter reactivation failure increases with longer intervals between catheter placement and PPTL. Failed epidural catheter reactivation increases anesthetic and operating room times. Our results and the significant variability in practice from our survey suggest recommendations on the timing and anesthetic management are needed to reduce unfulfilled PPTL procedures.

Residual Gastric Volume After Bowel Preparation With Polyethylene Glycol for Elective Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study

GOAL

To examine the residual gastric volume (RGV) in colonoscopy after bowel preparations with 3-L polyethylene glycol (PEG).

BACKGROUND

Obstacles to high-volume bowel preparation by anesthesia providers resulting from concerns over aspiration risk are common during colonoscopy.

STUDY

Prospective measurements of RGV were performed in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and morning colonoscopy with split-dose PEG preparation, patients undergoing EGD and afternoon colonoscopy with same-day PEG preparation, and patients undergoing EGD alone under moderate conscious sedation. Colonoscopy patients were allowed to ingest clear liquids until 2 hours before the procedure. Patients undergoing EGD alone were instructed to eat/drink nothing after midnight.

RESULTS

There were 860 evaluated patients, including 330 in the split-dose preparation group, 100 in the same-day preparation group, and 430 in the EGD-only group. Baseline demographics and disease/medication factors were similar. The mean RGV in patients receiving the same-day preparation (35.4 mL or 0.56 mL/kg) was significantly higher than that in patients receiving the split-dose preparation (28.5 mL or 0.45 mL/kg) and in patients undergoing EGD alone (22.8 mL or 0.36 mL/kg) (P=0.023 and P<0.0001, respectively). Within the bowel-preparation groups, patients with fasting times of 2 to 3 hours had similar RGV compared with patients who had fasting times >3 hours. The shape of the distribution and the range of RGV among the 3 study groups were similar. No aspiration occurred in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG bowel preparations increase RGV mildly, but seem to have no clinical significance. These results support the current fasting guidelines for colonoscopy.

The evidence base behind modern fasting guidelines

Fasting before general anaesthesia aims to reduce the volume and acidity of stomach contents, thus decreasing the risk of regurgitation/aspiration. The objectives of the Cochrane report which are summarised in this paper, were to systematically review the effect of different preoperative fasting regimes (duration, type and volume of intake) on perioperative complications and patient wellbeing. Few trials reported the incidence of aspiration/regurgitation or related morbidity but relied on indirect measures of patient safety ie. intraoperative gastric volume and pH. There was no evidence to suggest intake of fluids up to 2 hr preoperatively has an impact on patients gastric volumes or pH. Intake of fluids up to 90 min preoperatively had no impact on gastric contents but this was based on small numbers. In addition, permitting patients to drink water preoperatively resulted in significantly lower gastric volumes. Clinicians should evaluate this evidence for themselves and when necessary, adjust existing fasting policies.

Fasting from midnight – the history behind the dogma

The purpose of this chapter is to review historical fasting guidelines and how the dogma of fasting from midnight arose and came to be challenged by randomized clinical trials of preoperative clear liquids versus overnight fast. Medical and anaesthesia textbooks and journals from the 19th and 20th centuries were consulted, and the results of clinical trials and the reaction to them are reviewed. The dogma appeared to result from extrapolation of pulmonary aspiration risk in 'full-stomach' emergency cases to healthy elective cases. This was reinforced when 25 mL in the stomach, present in half of all healthy fasting patients, was used as a surrogate marker for high risk of aspiration. Subsequent large-scale studies showed the risk to be minimal. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated the safety of clear oral liquids until 2 hr preoperatively in healthy patients undergoing elective surgery. Reaction was cautious but led to eventual acceptance of evidence-based fasting guidelines.

A prospective observational study of the use of the ProsealTM laryngeal mask airway for postpartum tubal ligation

BACKGROUND

Though controversial, the risk of pulmonary aspiration during general anaesthesia in the immediate postpartum period appears low. The efficacy of the Proseal laryngeal mask airway was studied prospectively in a group of patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation.

METHODS

The Proseal laryngeal mask airway was employed for airway management in 90 fasted patients undergoing tubal ligation via minilaparotomy at least 8 h after normal vaginal delivery (mean 36.5, range 8-96 h). Gastric volume and pH were measured, using aspiration through a gastric tube.

RESULT

Proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion was successful in all patients, requiring one attempt in 75 patients (83%). The median (range) leak pressure was 35 (23-40) cmH2O. Twenty-two patients (25%) had a leak pressure of 40 cmH2O or greater. Gastric tube placement was successful in all patients, described as easy in 79 (87%), and difficult in 11 (13%). The mean initial volume of gastric aspirate was 10.7 (0-64) mL and the final volume 15.6 (0-71) mL. The mean pH of the gastric aspirate was 2.6 (1.2-6.6). There were no incidents of suspected fluid regurgitation or aspiration, but two patients required intubation during surgery. Ten patients (11.1%) complained of sore throat in the recovery room, nine of which were described as mild. All patients reported being satisfied with their anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

The Proseal laryngeal mask airway provides an effective airway for general anaesthesia in fasted patients undergoing tubal ligation from 8 h after normal vaginal delivery. While the safety of an unprotected airway in this population remains uncertain, this study suggested a low risk of regurgitation, especially in the first 24 h post partum.

Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications

BACKGROUND

Fasting before general anaesthesia aims to reduce the volume and acidity of stomach contents during surgery, thus reducing the risk of regurgitation/aspiration. Recent guidelines have recommended a shift in fasting policy from the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' approach to more relaxed policies which permit a period of restricted fluid intake up to a few hours before surgery. The evidence underpinning these guidelines however, was scattered across a range of journals, in a variety of languages, used a variety of outcome measures and methodologies to evaluate fasting regimens that differed in duration and the type and volume of intake permitted during a restricted fasting period. Practice has been slow to change.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effect of different preoperative fasting regimens (duration, type and volume of permitted intake) on perioperative complications and patient wellbeing (including aspiration, regurgitation and related morbidity, thirst, hunger, pain, nausea, vomiting, anxiety) in different adult populations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases, conference proceedings and reference lists from relevant articles were searched for studies of preoperative fasting in August 2003 and experts in the area were consulted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials which compared the effect on postoperative complications of different preoperative fasting regimens on adults were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Details of the eligible studies were independently extracted by two reviewers and where relevant information was unavailable from the text attempts were made to contact the authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty eight randomised controlled comparisons (made within 22 trials) were identified. Most were based on 'healthy' adult participants who were not considered to be at increased risk of regurgitation or aspiration during anaesthesia. Few trials reported the incidence of aspiration/regurgitation or related morbidity but relied on indirect measures of patient safety i.e. intra-operative gastric volume and pH. There was no evidence that the volume or pH of participants' gastric contents differed significantly depending on whether the groups were permitted a shortened preoperative fluid fast or continued a standard fast. Fluids evaluated included water, coffee, fruit juice, clear fluids and other drinks (e.g. isotonic drink, carbohydrate drink). Participants given a drink of water preoperatively were found to have a significantly lower volume of gastric contents than the groups that followed a standard fasting regimen. This difference was modest and clinically insignificant. There was no indication that the volume of fluid permitted during the preoperative period (i.e. low or high) resulted in a difference in outcomes from those participants that followed a standard fast. Few trials specifically investigated the preoperative fasting regimen for patient populations considered to be at increased risk during anaesthesia of regurgitation/aspiration and related morbidity.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence to suggest a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. Permitting patients to drink water preoperatively resulted in significantly lower gastric volumes. Clinicians should be encouraged to appraise this evidence for themselves and when necessary adjust any remaining standard fasting policies (nil-by-mouth from midnight) for patients that are not considered 'at-risk' during anaesthesia.

Ultrasound examination of the stomach contents of women in the postpartum period

This study used ultrasound imaging to compare stomach contents and gastric emptying of women in the postpartum period with those of nonpregnant women. In the first part of the study, the presence or absence of solid food particles was compared between patients presenting for postpartum tubal ligation (n = 28) and those presenting for gynecological surgery (n = 24). In the second part of the study, gastric emptying of solid food in a group of women in the postpartum period (n = 20) was compared with that of a group of nonpregnant volunteers (n = 21). After a standardized meal, the subjects were not allowed any food for 4 h, and the stomach contents were examined by ultrasound. Results of the first part of the study showed that 11 of the 28 patients presenting for postpartum tubal ligation compared with none of the gynecologic patients had solid food particles in the stomach prior to surgery. In the second part of the study, 19 of 20 women in the postpartum group still had food particles in the stomach 4 h after the meal as compared with only 4 of 21 in the non-pregnant group. Both differences were statistically significant. Our results indicate that gastric contents of women in the postpartum period may include food particles and that there is delayed gastric emptying of solid food in the postpartum period.

The effect of pre-operative oral fluids on morbidity following anaesthesia for minor surgery

Postoperative morbidity and serum osmolality were studied in 46 patients who were encouraged to drink water until 3 h pre-operatively and 49 receiving the normal fasting regimen prior to minor surgery. There was significantly less thirst in the postoperative period in those patients allowed to drink and subjectively better recovery than after previous anaesthesia. There was no morbidity from ingestion of up to 11 of water 2.5 h pre-operatively. Although there was only a moderate improvement in postoperative recovery we feel that allowing patients to drink water pre-operatively improves patient comfort, especially since patients may have to fast for much longer than guidelines recommend, simply because of the traditional organisation of operating lists.