Clinical use of a simulation-multileaf collimator

The Role of A Conventional Simulator in Multileaf-Plan Simulation: A Proposal

Modern computer networks provide satisfying levels of data recording and verification between the treatment planning system (TPS) and the accelerators, while the main weakness of the preparation chain remains the simulation. When a conventional simulator is employed, it may adversely affect the three-dimensional treatment planning system (3DPS) process because of the difficulty to document the leaf positions on the simulator location films and on the patient's skin. With a conventional simulator, hard copies of the DRRs of each field and CT scans at isocenter level are needed.

In an attempt to transfer more information displayed from a BEV perspective from the 3DPS to simulator radiographs, this study aimed to reduce the quality loss by using a 2D conventional simulator in a 3DPS process.

We realized an acetate photocopy of TPS data for each field, from a BEV perspective, containing: DRR, wire frames of the PTV, organs at risk and MLC aperture. The photocopies, with an appropriate magnification factor to obtain a correct projective value (ratio 1:1) at isocenter level, are carefully placed on the radiographic images on the same hard copy which allows us to better understand possible setup errors and obliges us to correct these.

The method provides reliable documentation, facilitates treatment verification, and fulfils the criteria for MLC simulation. It is accurate, simple, and very inexpensive.

A simple and reliable method to simulate multileaf-plans

To combine conformity of the irradiation with time effectiveness during treatment, the use of multileaf collimators has become more and more common. However, the simulation of the leaf positions is rather difficult compared with metal blocks. We developed a new method, utilizing an acrylic template in which the contour produced by the leaves is machined in the form of a 1 mm groove by a computerized numerically controlled milling machine. This template is then inserted into a mount attached to the simulator. The main advantages are the errorfree, direct communication from the therapy planning system to the milling machine via a network, the possibility to transfer the contour to the skin, and the documentation on the simulation film. The use of templates is reliable and, e.g. the costs of the materials are lower than for block simulation.