Autoantigens in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Toward a cure for type 1 diabetes mellitus: diabetes-suppressive dendritic cells and beyond

Insulin has been the gold standard therapy for diabetes since its discovery and commercial availability. It remains the only pharmacologic therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D), an autoimmune disease in which autoreactive T cells specifically kill the insulin-producing beta cells. Nevertheless, not even molecularly produced insulin administered four or five times per day can provide a physiologic regulation able to prevent the complications that account for the morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients. Also, insulin does not eliminate the T1D hallmark: beta-cell-specific autoimmunity. In other words, insulin is not a 'cure'. A successful cure must meet the following criteria: (i) it must either replace or maintain the functional integrity of the natural, insulin-producing tissue, the endocrine islets of Langerhans' and, more specifically, the insulin-producing beta cells; (ii) it must, at least, control the autoimmunity or eliminate it altogether; and (iii) it must be easy to apply to a large number of patients. Criterion 1 has been partially realized by allogeneic islet transplantation. Criterion 2 has been partially realized using monoclonal antibodies specific for T-cell surface proteins. Criterion 3 has yet to be realized, given that most of the novel therapies are currently quasi-patient-specific. Herein, we outline the current status of non-insulin-based therapies for T1D, with a focus on cell-based immunomodulation which we propose can achieve all three criteria illustrated above.

Comparison of the islet cell antibody pattern of monoclonal glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies recognizing linear and conformational epitopes

In order to compare the reactivity of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies recognizing linear and conformational epitopes as islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies (ICA), monoclonal antibodies were generated. An ELISA displacement test using two biotinylated monoclonals recognizing a linear (M61/7E11) or a conformational GAD65 epitope (M65/6B12) was performed to identify epitope regions recognized by monoclonal GAD antibodies. The GAD binding by monoclonal GAD antibodies was tested by immunofluorescence on fixed and unfixed pancreatic sections of human, rat, and mouse, and by Dot-blot experiments. 16/23 (69.6%) of the monoclonals were specifically reactive with GAD65 and 7/23 (30.4%) were reactive with both GAD isoforms. 8/16 (50%) of monoclonal GAD65 antibodies recognized a linear GAD epitope located at the N-terminus (pattern 1). 5/16 (31.3%) displaced M65/6B12, indicating the recognition of a conformational GAD epitope (pattern 2). Monoclonals belonging to patterns 1 and 2 showed strong ICA binding. 3/16 (18.8%) of monoclonals specific for GAD65 with weak or no immunostaining of pancreatic islets (pattern 3) did not inhibit the binding of both biotinylated antibodies in the displacement test, indicating other epitope specificities. In conclusion, GAD antibodies recognizing both conformational and linear epitopes of the GAD65 molecule are involved in ICA binding with strong reactivity. Furthermore, results obtained with monoclonals of pattern 3 suggest the occurrence of GAD65 epitopes partly inaccessible on cryosections, which may result in an ICA-negative test of GAD65 autoantibody positive sera.