Growth hormone response to thyrotropin releasing hormone and placebo in a group of insulin dependent diabetic patients

Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human

During the last decade, the GH axis has become the compelling focus of remarkably active and broad-ranging basic and clinical research. Molecular and genetic models, the discovery of human GHRH and its receptor, the cloning of the GHRP receptor, and the clinical availability of recombinant GH and IGF-I have allowed surprisingly rapid advances in our knowledge of the neuroregulation of the GH-IGF-I axis in many pathophysiological contexts. The complexity of the GHRH/somatostatin-GH-IGF-I axis thus commends itself to more formalized modeling (154, 155), since the multivalent feedback-control activities are difficult to assimilate fully on an intuitive scale. Understanding the dynamic neuroendocrine mechanisms that direct the pulsatile secretion of this fundamental growth-promoting and metabolic hormone remains a critical goal, the realization of which is challenged by the exponentially accumulating matrix of experimental and clinical data in this arena. To the above end, we review here the pathophysiology of the GHRH somatostatin-GH-IGF-I feedback axis consisting of corresponding key neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic effectors, and their cloned receptors and signaling pathways. We propose that this system is best viewed as a multivalent feedback network that is exquisitely sensitive to an array of neuroregulators and environmental stressors and genetic restraints. Feedback and feedforward mechanisms acting within the intact somatotropic axis mediate homeostatic control throughout the human lifetime and are disrupted in disease. Novel effectors of the GH axis, such as GHRPs, also offer promise as investigative probes and possible therapeutic agents. Further understanding of the mechanisms of GH neuroregulation will likely allow development of progressively more specific molecular and clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions in which GH secretion is regulated abnormally. Thus, we predict that unexpected and enriching insights in the domain of the neuroendocrine pathophysiology of the GH axis are likely be achieved in the succeeding decades of basic and clinical research.

Hypothalamic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion in type I diabetic men: effect of the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and hexarelin, a novel GHRP-6 analog

Insulin dependent (type I) diabetic patients show abnormal growth hormone (GH) secretion. Hexarelin is an analog of GHRP-6 which releases GH in part via somatostatin inhibition. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of hexarelin and GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, on GH secretion in 10 type I diabetic and 7 normal men. All the subjects were administered: 1) human GHRH (1-29) NH2 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 2) hexarelin 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 3) hexarelin 100 micrograms + hGHRH 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min. In type I diabetic patients significantly greater GH responses to GHRH and hexarelin have been observed with normal subjects. Hexarelin caused a significantly (p < 0.05) greater GH response as compared to GHRH in both diabetic and control subjects. After the administration of hexarelin+GHRH, a significant increase in both GH absolute and peak levels as compared to hexarelin or GHRH alone was found in all the subjects. However, the GH responses to the combined stimuli were not significantly different in diabetics as compared to normals; moreover, the interaction of GHRH and hexarelin was synergistic in controls and additive in diabetics. We hypothesize that a reduction in the hypothalamic somatostatin inhibitory tone combined with increased pituitary GH production may be responsible for the pattern of the GH responses to hexarelin and GHRH observed in our type I diabetic patients.

Effect of glucocorticoids on the paradoxical growth hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in patients with acromegaly

It has been hypothesized that in acromegalic patients, as well as in normal subjects, acute increases in serum cortisol levels may cause an enhancement of hypothalamic somatostatin secretion, which in turn may be responsible for the glucocorticoid-mediated growth hormone (GH) inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate short-term effects of an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of hydrocortisone on the GH response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in acromegaly. We studied six adult patients with active acromegaly. The group was composed of four women and two men with a mean age of 55.8 +/- 6.4 years (range, 27 to 68) and a mean body mass index of 26.7 +/- 1 kg/m2 (range, 23.3 to 30). All patients underwent the following treatments: (1) hydrocortisone alone: a bolus i.v. injection of hydrocortisone succinate 100 mg in 2 mL saline at time -60 minutes, followed by a 120-minute i.v. infusion of hydrocortisone succinate 250 mg in 250 mL saline from -60 to 60 minutes; (2) TRH+hydrocortisone: a bolus i.v. injection of TRH 200 micrograms 60 minutes after initiation of a 2-hour hydrocortisone infusion; (3) TRH alone: a bolus i.v. injection of TRH at time 0, 60 minutes after initiation of a 2-hour saline infusion. In all six patients, TRH induced large GH increases (absolute peak GH level, 58.1 +/- 23.2 micrograms/L; maximum % GH change with respect to baseline, 1,397.8% +/- 807.8%; range, 205% +/- 5,219%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Variability in the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone alone or combined with pyridostigmine in type 1 diabetic patients

In man the GH response to GHRH is variable within and between subjects. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the variability of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the existence of either inter- or intraindividual variability in the GH response to GHRH in type 1 diabetic patients. Moreover, we investigated the effect of PD on such variability in the same patients. Seven (4 females-3 males) nonobese type 1 diabetic patients underwent two experiments performed in consecutive days according to a single-blind protocol: 1) 120 mg oral PD 60 min before iv injection of human (h) GHRH-(1-29) NH2, 100 micrograms in 2 ml of sterile water; 2) oral placebo 60 min before iv injection of 100 micrograms hGHRH. The two experiments were then repeated, following the same procedure, one and two weeks after the start of the study. The GH peaks after GHRH were variable within different subjects but also in the same subject on different occasions. However, the mean GH peak levels after GHRH in the three tests were not significantly different (14.2 +/- 3.5, 15.3 +/- 3, 16.5 +/- 6.4 micrograms/L, respectively), the coefficient of variation for each test was 65%, 51.8%, 102.4%, respectively (mean 73.1 +/- 15.1%). The GH response to GHRH was always significantly enhanced by PD administration: the mean GH peak levels in the three tests were 31.9 +/- 7.1, 44.8 +/- 10.4, 49.9 +/- 13.1 micrograms/L, respectively, without significant differences between tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)