Single-access laparoscopic colectomy with a novel multiport device in sigmoid colectomy for colon cancer

Long-term Oncological Results After Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: Sigmoidectomy is performed in most cases for benign pathologies and mainly in cases of diverticulitis. Few studies in the literature report oncological results after sigmoidectomy for adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to report the long-term oncological outcomes after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) for adenocarcinoma. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From January 2003 to February 2021, 173 patients underwent elective LS for adenocarcinoma. Twenty-four patients with a diagnosis of preoperative distant metastases were excluded (13.9%). Results: Seven postoperative complications were observed (7.1%). Of these, 2 (2%) anastomotic leakages were treated surgically by the Hartmann procedure (Clavien-Dindo grade III-b). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes with the specimen was 14.2 ± 7.1. At a median follow-up of 115 months (interquartile range 133.8), 2 (2%) and 9 patients (9.2%) had developed recurrence and metastases, respectively. During follow-up, 6 patients (6.1%) with metastases died due to disease progression and 6 other patients (6.1%) died due to causes other than cancer related. At the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, the overall survival rates were 90.5% ± 3.4% and 83.8% ± 4.5%, respectively, while the disease-free survival rates were 87.1% ± 4.1% and 83.5% ± 4.7%, respectively. Conclusion: LS is a safe and feasible technique both in terms of the number of harvested lymph nodes and oncological results. The possibility of sparing the colon without mobilizing the splenic flexure and dividing the left colic artery could reduce intra- and postoperative complications. Further studies with larger samples of patients are required to confirm these data.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy With Boari Flap Construction for Advanced Colon Cancer With Ureteric Invasion: A Case Report

Urinary tract resection is the only procedure that can cure colorectal cancer that directly invades the ureter. In these cases, open surgery is commonly used. Here, we describe our experience of a case of sigmoidectomy following Boari flap construction with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for advanced colon cancer with ureteric invasion. A 68-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with left flank pain. Left hydroureteronephrosis was detected on ultrasonography. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the sigmoid colon and hydroureteronephrosis due to swelling of a mesenteric lymph node. Computed tomography detected no signs of distant metastasis. Colonoscopy revealed an ulcerated, bleeding, and stricturing lesion in the sigmoid colon, which was identified as an adenocarcinoma with a moderate degree of differentiation at histological examination. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the Trendelenburg semi-right lateral position. An umbilical incision was made for the insertion of a single multichannel port for SILS. Sigmoidectomy and Boari flap reconstruction were performed. There were no perioperative complications. The total operating time was 572 minutes (including Boari flap procedure of 174 minutes), and estimated blood loss was 200 mL. Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with Boari flap construction is technically feasible with sigmoid cancer and ureteral invasion.

Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a case report

With regard to laparoscopic and robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for primary rectal malignancies, limited data have been published in the literature. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SLS) has been successfully introduced for treating colorectal cancer. Here we describe our experience of APR with SLS plus one port (SLS + 1) for treating advanced rectal cancer. A 65-year-old man underwent the procedure, which involved a 35-mm incision in the left side of the umbilicus for the insertion of a single multichannel port as well as the insertion of a 5-mm port into the right lower quadrant. The sigmoid colon and rectum were mobilized from the pelvic floor using a medial and lateral approach. After the rectum with the mesorectum was completely mobilized according to the total mesorectal excision, the sigmoid colon was intracorporeally transected. The specimen was removed through the perineal wound. Terminal colostomy was fashioned at the left lower trocar site. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was bilaterally performed. There were no perioperative complications. The total operating time was 592 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 180 mL. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of SLS + 1 APR with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for treating rectal cancer. We conclude that SLS + 1 APR is a technically promising alternative method for treating selected patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients

The safety of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SLS) in elderly patients with colorectal cancer has not been established. The aim of the current study was to compare the outcomes of SLS and multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS) and to assess the feasibility of SLS in colorectal cancer patients aged ≥70 years. A retrospective case-control study of colon cancer patients undergoing elective surgical intervention between 2011 and 2014 was conducted. A total of 129 patients with colon cancer underwent surgery and were included in the analysis. Data regarding patient demographics, surgical variables, oncological outcomes and short-term outcomes were evaluated for statistical significance to compare MLS (n=79) and SLS (n=50) in colon cancer patients. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics. No case required re-admission within 30 days post surgery. The mean surgery times were similar for the MLS and SLS groups when cases with left and right hemicolectomies were combined (207.7 and 215.9 min, respectively; P=0.47). In addition, overall perioperative outcomes, including blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, size of the surgical margin and complications, were similar between these groups. Thus, we suggest that SLS can be performed safely in elderly patients with colon cancer.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Reduction in operative trauma along with an improvement in endoscopic access has undoubtedly occupied surgical minds for at least the past 3 decades. It is not at all surprising that minimally invasive colon surgery has come a long way since the first laparoscopic appendectomy by Semm in 1981. It is common knowledge that the recent developments in video and robotic technologies have significantly furthered advancements in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery. This has led to the overall acceptance of the treatment of benign colorectal pathology via the endoscopic route. Malignant disease, however, is still primarily treated by conventional approaches.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This review article is based on a literature search pertaining to advances in minimally invasive colorectal surgery for the treatment of malignant pathology, as well as on personal experience in the field over the same period of time. Our search was limited to level I and II clinical papers only, according to the evidence-based medicine guidelines. We attempted to present our unbiased view on the subject relying only on the evidence available.

CONCLUSION

Focusing on advances in colorectal minimally invasive surgery, it has to be stated that there are still a number of unanswered questions regarding the surgical management of malignant diseases with this approach. These questions do not only relate to the area of boundaries set for the use of minimally invasive techniques in this field but also to the exact modality best suited to the treatment of every particular case whilst maintaining state-of-the-art oncological principles.

Resident training in single-incision laparoscopic colectomy

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SLC) is touted as an improved approach to minimally invasive surgery, although no data currently exist regarding the acquisition of this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate resident performance and outcomes in patients undergoing SLC performed by residents vs. staff colorectal surgeons. A retrospective case-control study was conducted, including 220 patients who underwent elective surgical intervention with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC, n=141) or SLC (n=79) for colon cancer over a 24-month period at Yao Municipal Hospital (Yao, Japan). Data on patient demographics, operative data, oncological outcomes and short-term outcomes were evaluated for statistical significance. To investigate issues regarding the surgical procedures, the entire operation was recorded on video for all patients and was divided into 6 procedures, with each procedure measured in seconds. Senior-level residents were able to safely perform MLC under appropriate experienced supervision. For SLC, 1 case required conversion to an open procedure. No case required additional trocar placement. The mean operative times were similar for the staff and resident groups for total colon cancer (192.5 and 217.5 min, respectively; P=0.88), whereas the operative times of the staff group for right-sided colon cancer were significantly longer, and the operative times of the resident group for left-sided colon cancer were significantly longer. In addition, the overall perioperative outcomes, including blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, length of the surgical margin and complications, were similar between the two groups. When video recordings were evaluated by dividing the surgical process for the right colon into 4 procedures and that for the left colon into 6 procedures, the results demonstrated that the residents required more time to close the mesenteric margin for the left colon compared with the staff performing the same procedure (3,470.1±1,258.5 vs. 5,218.6±2,341.2 sec; P=0.01). Therefore, senior-level residents were able to safely perform SLC under appropriate experienced supervision. For the left colon, the main challenge for the residents appeared to be the closure of the mesenteric margin. Our data support that it is possible to train senior residents to complete a SLC safely and with the same efficacy as staff surgeons.

Single-Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Total Pelvic Exenteration After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Primary Rectal Cancer: A Case Report

Limited data on laparoscopic and robotic total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for gynecologic, urologic, and rectal malignancies have been published in the literature. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been successfully introduced for colon cancer. Here, we describe our experience of TPE with SILS + 1 port (SILS+1) for advanced rectal cancer. A 64-year-old man was referred to our hospital with anemia. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a rectal tumor that was contiguous with the seminal vesicle and bladder. Rectoscopy revealed an ulcerated, bleeding, and stricturing lesion in the rectum, which was defined as an adenocarcinoma with a moderate degree of differentiation on histologic examination. The patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy using capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. After 3 courses of chemotherapy, a rectovesical fistula was suspected from examination of CT images. CT demonstrated intramural gas in the urinary bladder, which suggested a diagnosis of emphysematous cystitis. Thus, we constructed a transverse loop colostomy. Two months after the last administration of chemotherapy, we performed SILS+1 TPE. The procedure involved a 35-mm incision in the right side of the umbilicus for the insertion of a single multichannel port, and insertion of a 12-mm port into the right lower quadrant. Total operating time was 751 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 1100 mL (including urine). SILS+1 TPE is a technically promising alternative method for the treatment of selected patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Single incision glove port laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection

INTRODUCTION

The advantages of single port surgery remain controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single incision glove port colon resections using a diathermy hook, reusable ports and standard laparoscopic straight instrumentation.

METHODS

Between June 2012 and February 2014, 70 consecutive patients (30 women) underwent a colonic resection using a wound retractor and glove port. Forty patients underwent a right hemicolectomy through the umbilicus and thirty underwent attempted single port resection via an incision in the right rectus sheath (14 high anterior resection, 13 low anterior resection, 3 abdominoperineal resection).

RESULTS

Sixty-two procedures (89%) were completed without conversion to open or multiport techniques. Four procedures had to be converted and additional ports were needed in four other patients. The postoperative mortality rate was 0%. Complications occurred in six patients (9%). Two cases were R1 while the remainder were R0 with a median nodal harvest of 20 (range: 9-48). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range: 3-25 days) (right hemicolectomy: 5 days (range: 3-12 days), left sided resection: 6 days (range: 4-25 days). At a median follow-up of 14 months, no port site hernias were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Single incision glove port surgery is an appropriate technique for different colorectal cancer resections and has the advantage of being less expensive than surgery with commercial single incision ports.

Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: State of art

A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery. During the last years, a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma, yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity. New techniques, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) have been developed in order to reach the goal of “scarless” surgery. Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures, such as colectomies, SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus, perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens or intestinal anastomosis. The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. However, SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach. A reduced capacity for triangulation, the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues. The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement, especially for oncologic cases.

Single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery is technically feasible

Introduction. Single-access laparoscopic surgery (SALS) has been successfully introduced for colectomy surgery; however, for mid to low rectum procedures such as total mesorectal excision, it can be technically complicated. In this study, we introduced a single-access technique for rectum cancer operations without the use of other instruments. Aims. To show the short-term results of single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery in terms of pathologic results and immediate complications. Settings and Design. Prospective study. Materials and Methods. We selected middle rectum to anal canal cancer patients to undergo single-access laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer. All patients had total mesorectal excisions. An umbilical incision was made for the insertion of a single multichannel port, and a mesocolic window was created to identify the inferior mesenteric artery and vein. Total mesorectal excision was performed. There were no perioperative complications. The mean operative time was 269 minutes; the median hospital stay was 7 days; the mean wound size was 5.5 cm; the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15; and all patients had intact mesorectal capsules. Statistical Analysis Used. Mean, minimum–maximum. Conclusion. Single-access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is feasible while oncologic principles and patient safety are maintained.

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Despite significant improvements in medical management of inflammatory bowel disease, many of these patients still require surgery at some point in the course of their disease. Their young age and poor general conditions, worsened by the aggressive medical treatments, make minimally invasive approaches particularly enticing to this patient population. However, the typical inflammatory changes that characterize these diseases have hindered wide diffusion of laparoscopy in this setting, currently mostly pursued in high-volume referral centers, despite accumulating evidences in the literature supporting the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The largest body of evidence currently available for terminal ileal Crohn’s disease shows improved short term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery, with prolonged operative times. For Crohn’s colitis, high quality evidence supporting laparoscopic surgery is lacking. Encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with the adoption of laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. A consensus about patients’ selection and the need for staging has not been reached yet. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, a wave of enthusiasm is pushing towards less invasive strategies, to further minimize surgical trauma, with single incision laparoscopic surgery being the most realistic future development.

Single-access laparoscopic colectomy utilizing gravity in the lateral decubitus position

BACKGROUND

Only a limited number of instruments can be used in single-access laparoscopic colectomy, and triangulation must be forfeited to avoid instrument collision. We investigated whether this problem could be overcome by performing laparoscopic colectomy by the use of the lateral decubitus position, making full use of gravity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether single-access laparoscopic colectomy could be achieved while maintaining patients in the lateral decubitus position.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study.

SETTING

This single-center study was conducted in a hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten consecutive patients (4 men and 6 women) with stage II or III colon cancer were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Each patient was placed in the lateral decubitus position. Single-port access to the abdomen was provided by a 3.0-cm incision at the umbilicus. The roots of the supplying or draining vessels were isolated and divided for lymphadenectomy. Next, the colon was dissected from a lateral approach, without the help of the assistant. The specimen was extracted from the single-access incision. Extracorporeal or intracorporeal anastomosis was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the feasibility of single-access laparoscopic colectomy in the lateral decubitus position.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative complications and no need for conversions to conventional laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, or the supine position. The median total surgical time was 154 minutes (interquartile range, 135-220 minutes). Surgical blood loss was slight (<20 mL) in all patients. No postoperative complications occurred. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-7 days).

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that single-access laparoscopic colectomy in the lateral decubitus position is safe and feasible.

Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown multiport laparoscopic surgery to be safe compared with open surgery in elective colonic disease. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) represents the latest advance in laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the safety and complication profile of colonic SILS.

METHODS

The search was performed in October 2011 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Search terms were 'colorectal', 'colon', 'colectomy', 'rectal' and single incision/port/trocar/site/scar. Only pure single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery for benign and malignant colonic disease was included. Primary outcomes were the early postoperative complication profiles of colonic SILS. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation, lymph node yields, conversion rate and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Colonic SILS data were compared with data from a Cochrane review on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery and four main RCTs on laparoscopic colonic surgery. Median operating times and time to first bowel motion for colonic SILS were comparable with those for laparoscopic colonic surgery. The median lymph node retrieval for malignant disease achieved with SILS was acceptable. Evidence for a reduction in postoperative pain with SILS was conflicting. There was no significant reduction in length of hospital stay with SILS. Most patients selected for colonic SILS had a low body mass index, non-bulky tumours and were operated on by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. There was significant heterogeneity in study group characteristics, indications for surgery, research methodology, operative techniques and follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

Colonic SILS should be restricted to highly selected patients; operations should be performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, with critical appraisal of clinical outcomes.

Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures

AIM

Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal surgery is of growing importance. The experience of colorectal resection through single-incision laparoscopic surgery was assessed, including the patient outcomes.

METHOD

A meta-analysis was performed of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic with multiport laparoscopy. Endpoints included conversion to laparotomy, operation time, postoperative morbidity, length of skin incision and length of hospital stay. The MEDLINE database was searched and only comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were retrieved from full-text manuscripts. Meta-analysis was performed according to the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects.

RESULTS

From October 2008 to December 2011, 1026 colorectal resections including 921 colonic and 105 rectal procedures using single-incision laparoscopic surgery were reported in 64 studies. Meta-analysis of the 15 comparative studies, including a total of 1075 procedures (494 single-incision and 581 multiport laparoscopies), showed no difference in conversion to open laparotomy [odds ratio (OR) 0.58 (0.24, 1.38); P=0.22], morbidity [OR 0.84 (0.61, 1.15); P=0.27] or operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.27 (-6.50, 5.95); P=0.93], but a significantly shorter total skin incision [WMD -0.52 (-0.79, -0.25); P<0.001] and a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay [WMD -0.75 (-1.30, -0.20); P=0.008] after single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with a multiport laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

Although only 15 nonrandomized comparative studies of varying methodology have been reported, this systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 1000 colorectal procedures suggest that single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and safe.

Pearls and pitfalls in SILS colectomy

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy has developed into a viable option for the treatment of benign and malignant colorectal diseases with the innovation of new access devices, instrumentation, and surgical techniques. Although cosmesis has been highly touted as the most apparent advantage of the approach, the single-incision platform also affords the potential for enhanced recovery, early hospital discharge, and reduction in postoperative wound complications. Despite increasing evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy, wide-ranging adaptation has been tempered in part as a result of the technical demands of the approach. We aim to describe our surgical pearls for overcoming various pitfalls and technical challenges experienced during single-incision laparoscopic colectomy to facilitate successful application of this technique.

Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review for the years 1983 to March 2011 to retrieve all relevant articles.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 378 patients undergoing SILC were reviewed. All studies except 2 used a commercially available single-port device. Range of body mass index was 20.9 to 30.0 kg/m². Ranges of operative times and estimated blood losses were 83 to 225 minutes and 0 to 115 mL, respectively. Of 378 cases, a total of 6 cases (1.6%) were converted to open, 6 (1.6%) to hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALC), and 14 (4.0%) to conventional (multiport) laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) (overall conversion rate, 6.9%). An additional laparoscopic port was used in 4.9% (12/247) cases. Range of harvested lymph nodes number for malignant cases was 13.5 to 27 and surgical margins were negative in all cases. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 0.5% (2/378) and 12.9% (45/349), respectively. The length of hospital stay (LOS) varied across reports (1.9-9.8 days). Among 4 case-matched studies, 2 showed shorter LOS after SILC than after HALC (2.7 vs 3.3 days) or after MLC/HALC (3.4 vs 4.6/4.9 days). Furthermore, one of these studies reported that maximum pain score on postoperative days 1 and 2 was significantly lower in SILS than in MLC and HALC.

CONCLUSIONS

In early series of highly selected patients, SILC appears to be feasible and safe when performed by surgeons who are highly skilled in laparoscopy. Despite technical difficulties, there may be potential benefits associated with SILC over MLC/HALC but it is yet to be proven objectively.

Single-scar laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal attachable and detachable instruments

BACKGROUND

In single-access laparoscopic colectomy, the number of instruments that can be inserted through the single-access site is limited by instrument collision. To compensate, triangulation is necessary, but the operative field becomes inadequate. To overcome this problem, intracorporeal attachable and detachable instruments can broaden the field of visceral tissue by retracting from at least 2 points.

OBJECTIVE

We tested this new procedure for colon cancer surgery.

DESIGN

This is a prospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single-center hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten consecutive patients (3 male and 7 female) with stage II or III colon cancer underwent the procedure.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received a 3.0-cm incision at the umbilicus or right iliac fossa. At least 2 clips and a suspending bar were inserted through a 12-mm port in a multiport access device. The clips grasped the mesocolon at different points and were retracted with either an extracorporeal magnet or fine-loop retractors; this broadened the operative field in the mesocolon by at least 2 points. The mesocolon was dissected with a medial to lateral approach. The suspended bar was tied to 2 fine-loop retractors and manipulated to enlarge the operative field in the mesocolon. The roots of the vascular pedicles were isolated and divided during lymph node dissection. After extracting the specimen, an anastomosis was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intra- and postoperative complications due to inadequate access were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative complications and no need for conversions to open surgery or second access ports. The median total surgical time was 182 minutes (range, 122-245). Surgical blood loss was slight (range, 1-20 mL) in all patients. No postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative hospital stay was 5 to 7 days.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was small.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that intracorporeal attachable and detachable instruments were safe and feasible for this procedure.

Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy

AIM

With the introduction of single-port surgery, expected advantages are improved cosmesis, decrease of pain and shorter length of stay. The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes of single-port colectomy with those of conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

METHOD

All consecutive patients undergoing single-port colectomy between January and June 2010 were identified from a prospective database. They were matched for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score and type of resection with patients who had conventional laparoscopic colectomy. All perioperative data, analgesic requirement, pain scores and inflammatory response were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients [five men, nine women; median age (interquartile range) 56 (30-73) years, body mass index (interquartile range) 22 (20-24) kg/m2] underwent single-port colectomy and were matched with patients who had conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Median operating times, estimated blood loss, pain scores, analgesic requirement, inflammatory response and length of hospital stay were similar. Median increase in incision length was significantly higher in the single-port group (P=0.004), but maximal incision length for specimen extraction was comparable. There were no anastomotic leaks, wound infections or 30-day readmissions.

CONCLUSION

In a case-matched setting with a small sample size, single-port laparoscopic colectomy has comparable outcomes to conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience

Introduction. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a virtually "scarless" technique. A retrospective analysis is performed to evaluate an initial experience of this surgical approach. Materials and Methods. From January 2010 to October 2011, SILS was considered as a minimally invasive approach to abdominal disease. The access was made by a standard wound protector and a size 6 glove. A series of little accesses were made on the tips of the glove-fingers to induce pneumoperitoneum and to create a working channel for the laparoscopic instruments. An analysis of costs of this technique was made too. Results. SILS was successfully completed with low cost in 34 patients: 20 appendectomy, 12 cholecystectomy, and 2 right colectomy were performed with a median operative time of 35, 45, and 67.5 minutes, respectively. In no patient any conversion to standard laparoscopy or to open surgery was needed. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. In right hemicolectomy, the oncological parameters were respected. Conclusions. In this paper the glove-port technique showed multiple advantages. The SILS is a feasible approach for some pathologies in selected patients. The glove-port is a simple, low-cost, reproducible, and sure method to perform SILS in a high-experienced laparoscopic surgical centre.

Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease

AIM

Instrument crowding is encountered in single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Our aim was to compare the results of SILS with those of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for malignant colorectal disease.

METHODS

The records of 27 patients who received SILS for the treatment of malignant disease using a home-made multiple-port system were compared with those of 68 patients who received CLS performed in a standard manner using four to five trocar sites.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, disease stage, tumour location or tumour size between the SILS and CLS groups. The most common surgery was high anterior resection in both groups (SILS, 63.0%vs CLS, 58.8%). There were no significant differences between the groups in types of surgery performed, length of bowel resected, resection margin, blood loss, duration of surgery or postoperative complications. Postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in the SILS group than in the CLS group (3.07 ± 1.14 vs 2.41 ± 0.63, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SILS is as effective as CLS, and is not associated with increased duration of surgery, blood loss or complications.

Single-port laparoscopic diverting sigmoid colostomy

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic surgery has been described for various colorectal conditions. Here, we report the first 4 single-port laparoscopic sigmoid colostomies for fecal diversion.

METHODS

A 1.5-cm-round incision was made on the skin at a previously marked colostomy site. A wound retractor was inserted and an access platform with four 5-mm trocars was attached to the wound retractor. The sigmoid colon was mobilized using electrocautery, laparoscopic scissors, or an advanced bipolar device. A standard Brooke colostomy was created through the initial skin incision.

RESULTS

Four elective single-port laparoscopic diverting colostomies were performed. Indications included obstructing colon and rectal cancers and intractable Crohn's proctitis. The average operative time was 73 minutes (range, 53-105), and blood loss was minimal (<50 mL). There were no intraoperative complications. Three of 4 patients received oral analgesia, and one patient received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia postoperatively. The average time to passage of flatus was 1 day. Diet was advanced either on the day of surgery or on postoperative day 1. The length of hospital stay ranged from 0 to 15 days.

CONCLUSION

Single-port laparoscopic sigmoid colostomy is an effective technique that allows full intra-abdominal visualization and colonic mobilization while eliminating the need for additional skin incisions other than the colostomy site itself.

Total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis. Surgical treatment in evolution

INTRODUCTION

Total abdominal colectomy is the procedure of choice for debilitated patients with acute, medical refractory ulcerative colitis in our practice. A laparoscopic approach has been previously shown to be safe and effective, and has become our preferred strategy. This study illustrates the laparoscopic evolution towards a truly minimally invasive approach comparing three phases of a single colorectal surgeon experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In May 2010 single incision laparoscopy was introduced in our practice and has become our preferred approach. Ten consecutive ulcerative colitis patients were case matched and compared with 10 previous laparoscopic-assisted (Feb 2003-Jan 2007) and 10 hand-assisted (Feb 2006-Apr 2010) total abdominal colectomies. Patient, disease and surgery-related factors were analyzed and short-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Given the study design, there were no differences in demographics, smoking history, disease duration and severity, nutritional and inflammatory parameters, and indication for surgery between groups. Single incision patients were more likely to have received immunosuppressive therapy within 30 days of the surgery (p = 0.016). In the single incision group we noticed significantly shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and faster resumption of solid diet (p = 0.019) compared to the other groups. Other short-term outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Single incision laparoscopy offers a safe alternative to other laparoscopic approaches. Despite the higher technical complexity, the duration of surgery is shorter with faster resumption of oral intake. Studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up will be required to confirm the benefits of this approach.

Single-incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

A three-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for the particularly debilitated patient with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer several advantages over the open approach in this setting. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive strategy representing a truly scarless procedure for the first surgical step, namely, the total abdominal colectomy (TAC).

METHODS

Nine consecutive patients with medically refractory UC underwent a single-incision laparoscopic TAC between May and October 2010. All patients were on aggressive medical therapy with corticosteroids or immunosuppressors and were selected for this approach on the basis of their body habitus and the absence of relevant comorbidities. The whole operation was performed through a single access to the abdominal cavity, placed at the ostomy site marked preoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 142 ± 23 min, with an estimate blood loss of 108 ± 125 ml. No intraoperative complications or conversions to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery occurred. In all cases the postoperative course was uneventful. The return of bowel function was observed on postoperative day 1.7 ± 0.7, and patients could tolerate a solid diet on postoperative day 3 ± 0.5. The mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 ± 1.3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, a single-incision laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis has been shown to be safe and feasible. Initial results suggest that this technique can lead to improvements in short-term outcomes in selected patients.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging modality that has proven to be safe and feasible for colon resection in multiple case reports and series. Nonetheless, comparative analyses with established techniques are limited in the published literature. We evaluated the efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for the treatment of sigmoid disease through a matched-case comparison with conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CLC).

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid resection for benign or malignant disease between July 2009 and September 2010 were matched to patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty SILC and CLC cases each were paired based on gender (p < 1.0), age (p < 0.47), pathology (p < 1.0), and surgical procedure (p < 1.0). Ten patients (50%) in the SILC group and eight patients (40%) in the CLC group had a history of prior abdominal surgery (p < 0.53). There were no conversions to open surgery; however, one SILC procedure (5%) required conversion to CLC (p < 0.31). There was no significant difference in mean operating time between groups (p < 0.80). Mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower for SILC compared to CLC (p < 0.007). Mean lymph node extraction was comparable between groups in the subset of patients with malignant disease (p < 0.68). Two postoperative complications were encountered in each group. The mean length of hospital stay for SILC and CLC was 3.2 ± 1.0 and 3.8 ± 2.1 days, respectively (p < 0.25). There were no readmissions or reoperative interventions in either group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional laparoscopic technique, single-incision laparoscopic surgery results in similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The technique avoids use of multiple trocar sites and may safely be performed in patients with a history of previous abdominal surgery while maintaining a short length of hospital stay and low complication rate.

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: outcomes of an emerging minimally invasive technique

PURPOSE

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is an emerging procedure in the field of minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this procedure.

METHODS

Between July 2009 and April 2010, SILC was performed for 35 patients presenting with pathology of the colon. Surgical procedures included right hemicolectomy, sigmoid resection, and total colectomy. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty two of the 35 patients (91.4%) underwent successful completion of SILC while 3 patients required laparoscopic modifications. The mean incision length was 3.4 cm with a range of 2-6 cm. The mean total operative time (OT) for right, left, and total colectomies was 158.8 ± 31.8 min, 127.0 ± 37.1 min, and 216.3 ± 72.6 min, respectively. Overall, the OT was not significantly different between patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (147.9 ± 47.9 min) compared to those with a BMI <25 kg/m(2) (123.1 ± 40.9 min). In the subset of patients with malignant disease, the mean lymph node extraction was 23.5 ± 12.0 and all margins were negative. There were no intraoperative complications, and the overall mean length of hospital stay was 2.9 ± 1.0 days (range 2-6 days). The postoperative morbidity rate was 11.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for benign and malignant diseases of the colon. This modality can be successfully applied for various colorectal procedures without conversion to open surgery, resulting in a short length of hospital stay and a minimal short-term complication rate.

Single-access laparoscopic low anterior resection with vertical suspension of the rectum

PURPOSE

Single-access laparoscopic surgery was first introduced for colectomy and later adapted for anterior resection. During single-access laparoscopic pelvic procedures, such as total mesorectal excision, it is often difficult to obtain an adequate operative field. By suspending the rectum vertically, we were able to execute a total mesorectal excision with single-access laparoscopy. We describe here the use of this new procedure to treat rectal cancer.

METHODS

The selected 7 patients (1 male and 6 female) with stage II or III rectal cancer underwent the procedure. Single-port access to the abdomen was provided by a 3.0-cm incision at the right iliac fossa. The descending mesocolon was dissected by use of a medial approach, and a columnar magnet was placed on the surface of the abdominal wall to restore triangulation. The inferior mesenteric artery was skeletonized and the superior rectal artery divided during lymph node dissection. The total mesorectal excision extended to the pelvic floor and the rectum was vertically retracted with a suspending bar in collaboration with an extracorporeal magnet tool. The rectum was then transected below the reflection of the peritoneum. Intracorporeal anastomosis was performed with the double-stapling technique. Two pelvic drains were inserted through the single incision and the anus, respectively, for all patients. A defunctioning ileostomy was not created in any patient.

RESULTS

Median total surgical time was 205 minutes (range, 175-245 min). Intraoperative blood loss was minimal in all patients (range, 1-20 mL). None of the cases required conversion to open surgery or addition of a second port. The only preoperative or postoperative complication occurred in one patient with clinical anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

Low anterior single-access laparoscopic resection seems safe and feasible when the rectum is suspended like a swing to ensure an adequate operative field.

Step-wise integration of single-port laparoscopic surgery into routine colorectal surgical practice by use of a surgical glove port

INTRODUCTION

The cost associated with single-port laparoscopic access devices may limit utilisation of single-port laparoscopic surgery by colorectal surgeons. This paper describes a simple and cheap access modality that has facilitated the widespread adoption of single-port technology in our practice both as a stand-alone procedure and as a useful adjunct to traditional multiport techniques.

METHODS

A surgical glove port is constructed by applying a standard glove onto the rim of the wound protector/retractor used during laparoscopic resectional colorectal surgery. To illustrate its usefulness, we present our total experience to date and highlight a selection of patients presenting for a range of elective colorectal surgery procedures.

RESULTS

The surgical glove port allowed successful completion of 25 single-port laparoscopic procedures (including laparoscopic adhesiolysis, ileo-rectal anastomosis, right hemicolectomy, total colectomy and low anterior resection) and has been used as an adjunct in over 80 additional multiport procedures (including refashioning of a colorectal anastomosis made after specimen extraction during a standard multiport laparoscopic anterior resection).

CONCLUSIONS

This simple, efficient device can allow use of single-port laparoscopy in a broader spectrum of patients either in isolation or in combination with multiport surgery than may be otherwise possible for economic reasons. By separating issues of cost from utility, the usefulness of the technical advance inherent within single-port laparoscopy for colorectal surgery can be better appreciated. We endorse the creative innovation inherent in this approach as surgical practice continues to evolve for ever greater patient benefit.

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a novel approach through a Pfannenstiel incision

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is evolving as a safe and feasible approach for the management of various diseases of the colon and rectum. The modality affords completion of "scarless" surgery through a transumbilical incision; however, this approach is associated with several limitations when performing colorectal procedures involving the pelvis. Collinear alignment of the camera and instruments through a single umbilical incision results in restricted visualization, inadequate dissection and mobilization, and the potential for inadvertent injury. We have developed an innovative approach utilizing a Pfannenstiel incision for single-incision access to the pelvis.

METHODS

Single-incision laparoscopic colon resection was performed using a single-access device placed through a mini-Pfannenstiel incision.

RESULTS

Three consecutive patients underwent single-incision laparoscopic anterior rectosigmoid resection for recurrent diverticulitis through a 4-cm Pfannenstiel incision. The procedures were performed at 150, 180, and 195 min with an estimated blood loss of 50, 150, and 75 mL, respectively. The resected specimen lengths were 10.5, 20.2, and 15.0 cm, respectively. There were no conversions to multi-port laparoscopic or open surgery. The length of hospital stay was 4 days for patients 1 and 2, and 3 days for patient 3. There were no major complications or readmissions during postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Single-incision laparoscopic anterior rectosigmoid resection for diverticulitis can be performed successfully through a Pfannenstiel incision. This approach facilitates direct visualization and access for rectal and pelvic dissection while maintaining adequate exposure to the left colon and splenic flexure during the procedure.

New developments in colorectal surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New developments in colorectal surgery have been driven primarily by technical innovations, which in turn are responsible for changes in practice. This review examines recent publications that describe and have contributed to these changes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified and reviewed recent publications in the areas of fecal incontinence, constipation, single incision and robotic surgical techniques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neoplasms, surgical care improvement, use of mechanical bowel preparation, and magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

SUMMARY

New technologies and practice innovations will enhance patient outcomes and quality of life. Multiinstitutional studies, randomized when practical, will be necessary to further define the safety and efficacy of these new surgical techniques and to further define best practices in colon and rectal surgery.

Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: Current state of the art

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive single-site (MISS) surgery has recently been applied to colorectal surgery. We aimed to assess the current state of the art and the adequacy of preliminary oncological results.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. Keywords used were "Single Port" or "Single-Incision" or "LaparoEndoscopic Single Site" or "SILS™" and "Colon" or "Colorectal" and "Surgery".

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles on colorectal MISS surgery have been published from July 2008 to July 2010, presenting data on 149 patients. One study reported analgesic requirement. The final incision length ranged from 2.5 to 8 cm. Only two studies reported fascial incision length. There were two port site hernias in a series of 13 patients (15.38%). Two "fully laparoscopic" MISS procedures with preparation and achievement of the anastomosis completely intracorporeally are reported. Future site of ileostomy was used as the sole access for the procedures in three studies. Lymph node harvesting, resection margins and length of specimen were sufficient in oncological cases.

CONCLUSIONS

MISS colorectal surgery is a challenging procedure that seems to be safe and feasible, but the existing clinical evidence is limited. In selected cases, and especially when an ileostomy is planned, colorectal surgery may be an ideal indication for MISS surgery leading to a no-scar surgery. Despite preliminary oncological results showing the feasibility of MISS surgery, we want to stress the need to standardize the technique and carefully evaluate its application in oncosurgery under ethical committee control.

Resection of stage 0/I colon cancer via a circumferential periumbilical skin incision: relevance to single-incision laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

We have been performing curative resection of colon cancer via a minilaparotomy without utilizing any laparoscopic instruments as an alternative to laparoscopic-assisted approach. Based on our experiences and improved surgical techniques, we have devised a new method for performing resection of stage 0/I colon cancer via a circumferential periumbilical skin incision that is associated with better cosmesis than standard minilaparotomy.

METHODS

The short- and long-term results of curative colectomy via a circumferential periumbilical skin incision without utilizing any laparoscopic instruments performed in selected patients with stage 0/I colon cancer between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 8 men and 2 women with a median age of 66.5 years (range 61-77 years). Their median body mass index was 22.4 kg/m(2) (range 21.1-27.7 kg/m(2)). Pathological stage according the TNM classification was stage 0 in 4 patients and stage I in 6 patients. Median operative time was 160.5 min (range 135-203 min), and median blood loss was 60 ml (range 5-330 ml). Postoperative complications consisted of seroma in two patients and small bowel obstruction in one patient. After a median follow-up period of 5.7 years, there were no recurrences or wound complications.

CONCLUSION

Curative colectomy via a circumferential periumbilical skin incision seems oncologically safe, yields satisfactory cosmetic results, and may provide an alternative to single-incision laparoscopic surgery in selected patients with colon cancer.

Single-access laparoscopic left and right hemicolectomy combined with extracorporeal magnetic retraction

PURPOSE

In single-access laparoscopic colectomy, the number of forceps inserted through the umbilical incision is limited. To compensate for the single-access site, triangulation must be lost or instrument collision must be sustained. Extracorporeal magnetic retraction can overcome this problem. This report describes the use of this new procedure for colon cancer resection.

METHODS

All patients had advanced cancer of the descending or the ascending colon. Single access to the abdomen was achieved with a 3.0- to 4.0-cm umbilical incision. Short vascular forceps and 2 rolls of gauze were inserted into the incision and a columnar magnet was placed on the surface of the abdominal wall. A specially made port access device was attached at the incision. The vascular forceps grasping the tissue were retracted by moving the magnet, enabling triangulation in cooperation with a second forceps. The mesocolon was dissected using a medial to lateral approach. The roots of the vascular pedicles were isolated and divided from the superior or the inferior mesenteric artery during lymph node dissection. Extracorporeal anastomosis was performed.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative complications, no need to convert to open surgery, and no need to add a second port. The median total surgical time was 255 (range, 220-315) minutes. Surgical blood loss was slight (range, 1-20 mL) in all patients. No postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative hospital stay was 7 days for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure can be safely and feasibly performed using extracorporeal magnetic retraction.