Quality of life ten and more years after restorative proctocolectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli

Prophylactic colectomy and rectal preservation in FAP: systematic endoscopic follow-up and adenoma destruction changes natural history of polyposis

Background and study aims  Prophylactic surgery of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) includes total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) to proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA). Surgical guidelines rely on studies without systematic endoscopic follow-up and treatment. Our aim was to report our experience based on a different approach: therapeutic follow-up, comparing in this setting IRA and IAA in terms of oncological safety and quality of life. Patients and methods  Between January 1965 and November 2015, all patients who underwent prophylactic surgery for FAP with therapeutic endoscopic follow-up in Lyon University hospital: systematic endoscopic treatment of adenomas, were retrospectively and prospectively (since 2011) included. Results  A total of 296 patients were analyzed: 92 had proctocolectomy with IAA (31.1 %), 197 total colectomy with IRA (66.5 %), and seven abdominoperineal resections (2.4 %). Median follow-up was 17.1 years (range, 0-38.1). Incidence of secondary cancer (IR vs. IAA) was 6.1 % vs. 1.1 % ( P  = 0.06; 95 %CI 0.001-0.36). The 15-year cancer-free and overall survival (IR vs. IAA) were 99.5 % vs 100 % ( P  = 0.09) and 98.9 % vs. 98.8 % ( P  = 0.82), respectively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 44 patients: 29 (14.7 %) in the IRA and 15 (16.3 %) in the IAA group ( P  = 0.72). The mean number of stools per day in the respective groups were 4.4 (2.5) vs. 5.5 (2.6) ( P  = 0.001). Fecal incontinence occurred in 14 patients (7.1 %) in the IRA vs. 16 (17.4 %) in the IAA group ( P  = 0.03). Conclusions  A combination of therapeutic endoscopic treatment and extended rectal preservation appears to be a safe alternative to ileoanal J-pouch anastomosis.

Long-term clinical outcomes and follow-up status in Japanese patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after radical surgery: a descriptive, retrospective cohort study from a single institute

PURPOSE

Data on long-term outcomes of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are unclear in Japan because a nationwide registry system is lacking. We assessed overall survival, incidence of neoplasms, fecal incontinence, and postoperative follow-up status of patients with FAP treated surgically in our hospital.

METHODS

In total, 154 patients with FAP who underwent radical surgery from 1981 to 2017 in our department were available for the questionnaire. Sixty-five patients, 36 of whom were followed at our hospital, were assessed using clinical records and the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 187 months (interquartile range, 93.5-296 months). The median age at surgery was 36 years (range, 12-69 years). The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year overall survival rate was 100%, 98%, 95%, and 89%, respectively. All five deaths were caused by diseases other than colorectal cancer. FAP-related neoplasms comprised 23 colorectal cancers, five duodenal cancers, three gastric cancers, five thyroid cancers, two ileal pouch cancers, and nine desmoid tumors. The incidence of desmoid tumors was significantly associated with the operation date. The duration from radical surgery to neoplasm onset significantly differed by neoplasm type. Forty-five of 54 patients (excluding those who died or underwent ileostomy) developed fecal incontinence (median Wexner score of 8). Surgical procedures involving hand-sewn sutures with rectal mucosal stripping were significantly associated with fecal incontinence and the Wexner score. Fifty-eight of the 60 surviving patients underwent follow-up examinations.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival was favorable. Fecal incontinence depended on the surgical procedures. Most patients continued to receive follow-up examinations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No. 3112 by Institutional Review Board of Hyogo College of Medicine.

Optimizing the timing of colorectal surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in clinical practice

Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by the development of hundreds of colorectal adenomas in the second decade of life, and prophylactic colectomy is usually performed around age of 20. A common question is the appropriate timing of surgery and which endoscopic findings indicate surgery. Methods: All FAP patients known at Leiden University Medical Centre from 1985 onwards were included. The patients were then subdivided into those diagnosed before or after 2000. Patient information included age at diagnosis, colonic phenotype, age at surgery, pathological findings and the outcome of follow-up colonoscopies in whom surgery was postponed. Results: The 72 FAP patients identified consisted of 33 patients diagnosed before (group A) and 39 after (group B) 2000. The median age at diagnosis for patients with classical FAP was 18 in groups A and B. All patients diagnosed before 2000 underwent colorectal surgery versus 68% of those diagnosed >2000. The median age at surgery for classical FAP patients was 19 and 24 years in groups A and B, respectively. In patients with intact colon, the number of adenomas gradually increased over many years. Although most adenomas remained <5 mm, the proportion of 5-15 mm adenomas slowly increased. Only one patient developed a high-grade adenoma. None of the patients developed CRC. Conclusions: Surgery today in FAP is performed less often and at a more advanced age. Our experience also suggests that surgery can be safely postponed in selected patients. The most important endoscopic indication for surgery is substantial number of large adenomas of >5-10 mm.

Progress in surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease with a high tendency to develop colorectal cancer. The timing and choice of preventive surgical interventions should be based on the number, size and severity of adenomas, combined with a variety of considerations, in order to effectively prevent cancer and make patients easy to accept. Total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure, which could minimize the residual rectal mucosa and reduce the risk of adenoma recurrence, has become the first choice for patients with FAP. Besides, laparoscopic IPAA has obvious advantages such as cosmetic appearance, quick recovery, little adhesion and high pregnancy rate. Patients with FAP should be managed by experienced surgeons working in specialized medical centers in order to get the most reasonable treatment at the best time and achieve long-term effective outcomes.

Functional outcome after pouch-anal reconstruction with primary and secondary mucosectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)

INTRODUCTION

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction is the surgical standard for the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The pouch-anal anastomosis may be performed handsewn after primary mucosectomy or by double stapling. Better functional results favour the latter; however, higher rates of remaining rectal mucosa with adenomas often necessitate secondary mucosectomy. Data on functional outcome after secondary mucosectomy is scarce. The aim of the study was to analyse whether patients who undergo secondary mucosectomy maintain their functional benefits compared to patients with primary mucosectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients after secondary mucosectomy and 31 patients after primary mucosectomy were compared with respect to their functional outcome, using the MSKCC score, the Wexner score and ano-rectal physiology testing.

RESULTS

The MSKCC global score and the Wexner score showed a non-significant trend towards slightly better results after secondary mucosectomy (63.1 vs. 56.6, p = 0.0188 and 9.5 vs. 11, p = 0.3780). Patients after secondary mucosectomy also showed a tendency towards less bowel movements per 24 h (7 (range 4-11) vs. 8.5 (range 3-20), p = 0.1518). Resting pressures were slightly higher after secondary (44 vs. 39.6 mmHg, p = 0.4545) and squeeze pressures slightly higher after primary mucosectomy (87.6 vs. 81.2 mmHg, p = 0.6126). However, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study cannot ultimately resolve the controversy concerning handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Our results suggest a trend towards better functional results after stapled anastomosis with secondary mucosectomy.

Risk Factors Associated With Pouch Adenomas in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal reconstruction is the standard prophylactic surgical procedure for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. However, several groups have reported the development of adenomas and even carcinomas within the ileal pouch. The predisposing factor was the time interval after pouch surgery in some studies, but it was the severity of the initial colonic disease and duodenal adenomatosis in others.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to further clarify the prevalence of pouch adenomas, clinical risk factors, and a possible phenotype-genotype relation in a large population of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, as well as to analyze pouch adenoma-free survival.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a specialized outpatient clinic at the University of Heidelberg.

PATIENTS

A total of 192 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were included, and all of the available endoscopy reports after pouch surgery were screened for pouch adenomas. Additional clinical information was retrieved from the Heidelberg Polyposis Register.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

This present study revealed 3 main independent risk factors for the development of pouch adenomas: age <18 years at the time of IPAA, male sex, and the presence of gastric adenomas. Secondary outcome measures were adenoma progression and overall pouch adenoma-free survival.

RESULTS

Pouch adenomas were detected in 46.9% of patients. Median follow-up was 12.8 years (interquartile range, 9.0-17.0 y) for patients with pouch adenomas and 7.3 years (interquartile range, 2.5-12.2 y) for those without them. Patients underwent pouch surgery at a median age of 27.5 years (range, 10.2-58.5 y), and pouch adenomas occurred a median of 8.5 years (range, 0.9-25.1 y) after surgery. Also detected were gastric adenomas in 37.2%, duodenal adenomas in 80.3%, and desmoid tumors in 24.5% of patients. Estimation of pouch adenoma-free survival revealed that, after 20 years, only ≈22% of patients would be free of pouch adenomas. Male sex, age ≦18 years at the time of pouch surgery, and gastric adenomas were found to be independent risk factors for the development of pouch adenomas in a multivariate Cox regression analysis (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0059, and p = 0.0020). No predisposing germline mutation for pouch adenoma development was detected.

LIMITATIONS

Detailed information on the initial preoperative findings was not fully available, and the study was only carried out as a single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

A severe upper intestinal phenotype, male sex, and age <18 years at the time of IPAA all increase the risk for development of pouch adenomas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A675.

A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Faecal incontinence is a common complication of ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and seems to worsen with time. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence of the use of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for patients with faecal incontinence after IPAA. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Cochrane databases for all relevant articles. All studies, which reported the outcome of SNS in patients with faecal incontinence after IPAA, were reviewed. Three papers were identified, including a case report, cohort study and retrospective study. The total number of patients was 12. The follow-up duration included 3 months, 6 months and 24 months. After peripheral nerve evaluation, definitive implantation was performed in 10 (83.3%) patients. All three studies reported positive outcomes, with CCF scores and incontinence episodes improving significantly. Preliminary results suggest good outcome after permanent SNS implant. Studies with larger sample sizes, well-defined patient characteristics and standardized outcome measures are required to fully investigate the effect of SNS in IPAA patients.

Quality-of-life implications of risk-reducing cancer surgery

Background

Modern advances in genetic sequencing techniques have allowed for increased availability of genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. Consequently, more people are being identified as mutation carriers and becoming aware of their increased risk of malignancy. Testing is commonplace for many inheritable cancer syndromes, and with that comes the knowledge of being a gene carrier for some patients. With increased risk of malignancy, many guidelines recommend that gene carriers partake in risk reduction strategies, including risk-reducing surgery for some syndromes. This review explores the quality-of-life consequences of genetic testing and risk-reducing surgery.

Methods

A narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed, focusing on the health-related quality-of-life implications of surgery for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.

Results

Risk-reducing surgery almost uniformly decreases cancer anxiety and affects patients' quality of life.

Conclusion

Although the overwhelming quality-of-life implications of surgery are neutral to positive, risk-reducing surgery is irreversible and can be associated with short- and long-term side-effects.

Surgical considerations in FAP-related pouch surgery: Could we do better?

The ileoanal pouch has become the standard restorative procedure of choice for patients with the classical phenotype in FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis) and also for ulcerative colitis (UC). Whilst we tend to encounter descriptive analyses comparing functional outcome, fertility and quality of life (QOL) between series in literature, there may be an urgent need to discuss the subtle technical modifications that may be pivotal for improving long-term QOL in FAP patients. Our aim is to review the current literature and discuss the aspects of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis that may require specific reevaluation for FAP. Surgical strategies aimed at minimizing post-interventional desmoid growth is one of the most important aspects. For this study, the following topics of interest were selected: Timing of surgery, IRA or ileoanal pouch for classical FAP, laparoscopic or conventional surgery, TME or mesenteric dissection, preservation of the ileocolic vessels, handsewn or double-staple anastomosis, shape and size of pouch, protective ileostomy, Last and definitely not least: how to manage desmoid plaques or desmoids at the time of prophylactic surgery. For the depicted technicalities of the procedure, a review of recent literature was performed and evaluated. For the topics selected, only sparse reference in literature was identified that was focused on the specific condition situation of FAP. Almost all pouch literature focusses on the procedural aspects, and FAP patients are always a very minor number. Therefore it becomes obvious that the specific entity is not adequately taken into account. This is a serious bias for identification of important steps in the procedure that may be beneficial for patients with either of the diseases. The results of this study demonstrate that several technical differences for construction of ileoanal pouches in FAP patients deserve more attention and prospective evaluation-perhaps even randomized trials. The role, importance and potential benefit or deterioration of outcome in most of the discussed technicalities remains unclear to date. Significant differences between the underlying diseases (UC and FAP) have not been taken into consideration, such as specifically the management of precursor desmoid lesions at the time of prophylactic surgery as well as prevention of desmoid tumors. Several of the aspects discussed in this paper should be prospectively evaluated in larger and exclusive series of FAP patients.

Prophylactic surgery in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)--a single surgeon's short- and long-term experience with hand-assisted proctocolectomy and smaller J-pouches

PURPOSE

Prophylactic proctocolectomy with an ileoanal neo-reservoir is the established procedure in non-attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Traditionally, the ileal J-pouch is created by doubling 15 cm of the terminal ileum. Pouch inlet problems are not infrequently encountered in longer pouches. On this rationale, this series reports on the functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) following standardized construction of a shorter J-pouch with a limb of 8-9 cm length.

METHODS

All patients of a single-surgeon series with FAP who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic proctocolectomy and small ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the primary procedure between 10/2005 and 04/2010 and responded to the questionnaire were included and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients (78 %) out of the consecutive series who underwent operation in this period were included in the study. After a mean follow-up of 38 months, 40/46 patients (87 %) did not report any incontinence and 3 patients (6.5 %) complained about occasional nocturnal incontinence (3 failed to answer this question). The mean stool frequency per 24 h was 6.25. No significant difference was encountered between the QoL outcome of our patients versus the German normative population. Comparable results were achieved in a study analyzing the long-term results in FAP patients with a 15-cm pouch.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller, 8-9 cm J-pouches show excellent functional results both in short- and in long-term results. The hand-assisted procedure was safe and no conversions were required. QoL is equal to a normative population, as it is in a series of patients with larger J-pouches.

Long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in 191 patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

A long-lasting good functional outcome of the pelvic pouch and a subsequent satisfying quality of life (QoL) are mandatory. Long-term functional outcome and QoL in a single-center cohort were assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all patients with an IPAA for UC, operated between 1990 and 2010 in our department. Pouch function was assessed using the Öresland Score (OS) and the 'Pouch Functional Score' (PFS). QoL was assessed using a Visual Analogue Score (VAS).

RESULTS

250 patients (42% females) with a median age at surgery of 38 years (interquartile range (IQR): 29-48 years) underwent restorative proctocolectomy. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR: 6-17 years). Response rate was 81% (n=191). Overall pouch function was satisfactory with a median OS of 6/15 (IQR: 4-8) and a median PFS of 6/30 (IQR: 3-11). 24-hour bowel movement is limited to 8 times in 68% of patients (n=129), while 55 patients (29%) had less than 6 bowel movements. 12 patients (6.5%) were regularly incontinent for stools, while 154 patients (82%) reported a good fecal continence. Fecal incontinence during nighttime was more common (n=72, 39%). Pouch function had little impact on social activity (4/10; IQR: 2-6) and on professional activity (3/10; IQR: 1-6). 172 patients (90%) reported to experience an overall better health condition since their operation. The OS and the PFS correlated well (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.83). Overall pouch function was stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Majority of patients report a good pouch function on the long-term with limited impact on QoL.