Comparison of hemodynamic changes in two veno-venous bypass techniques modified at the portal cannulation site

Complex liver resection under hepatic vascular exclusion and hypothermic perfusion with versus without veno-venous bypass: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

While hypothermic liver perfusion has been shown to improve parenchymal tolerance to complex resections in patients requiring prolonged hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE), the benefit of associated veno-venous bypass (VVB) in this setting remains poorly evaluated.

METHODS

All patients undergoing liver resection requiring HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion for at least 55 min between 2006 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with (VVB+) or without VVB (VVB-).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were analyzed, including 13 VVB+ and 14 VVB-. Median HVE duration was similar in VVB+ and VVB- patients (96 vs. 75 min, respectively). VVB+patients had longer operative time (460 vs. 375 min, p = 0.023) but less blood loss (p = 0.010). Five (19%) patients died postoperatively from liver failure or sepsis, without difference between groups. Postoperative major morbidity rate was similar between VVB+ and VVB- patients (30% vs. 50%, respectively) such as rates of liver failure, haemorrhage, renal insufficiency and sepsis, but VVB- patients experienced more respiratory complications (64% vs. 15%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

During liver resection under HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion, use of VVB allows for reducing blood loss and postoperative respiratory complications. VVB should be recommended in case of liver resection with prolonged HVE.

Complex liver resections for colorectal metastases: are they safe in the low-volume, resource-poor Caribbean setting?

Introduction. Although many authorities suggest that major liver resections should only be carried out in high-volume specialized centres, many patients in the Caribbean do not have access to these health care systems. Presentation of a Case. A 50-year-old woman with a solitary colorectal metastasis invading the inferior vena cava underwent an extended left hepatectomy with caval resection and reconstruction. Several technical maneuvers were utilized that were suited to the resource-poor environment. Conclusion. We suggest that good outcomes can still be attained in the resource-poor, low-volume centres once dedicated and appropriately trained teams are available.

Left trisegmentectomy and combined resection of the inferior vena cava, without reconstruction, for giant cystadenocarcinoma of the liver

A 54-year-old woman with giant liver cystadenocarcinoma underwent left trisegmentectomy with combined resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the right hepatic vein. As a result, only the right inferior hepatic vein was preserved as a drainage vein. Because the perivertebral plexus and the azygos vein were both well developed, neither veno-venous bypass nor IVC reconstruction was performed. The developed collateral veins acted as the venous drainage pathway to maintain a stable systemic circulation. On the seventh postoperative day, portal vein flow dramatically decreased and the patient tended to liver failure. Prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) was administrated via the superior mesenteric artery. The portal flow then gradually increased and liver failure was avoided. Six months after the operation, she was re-admitted due to obstructive jaundice and presented with complete stenosis of the common bile duct (CBD). The jaundice persisted and liver dysfunction progressed. The patient died seven months after the operation. The confluence of the right inferior vein and the IVC could have been deformed, causing outflow blockade. The intrinsic shunt was not good enough to act as the drainage pathway, and IVC reconstruction may have been needed.