Interatrial septum versus right atrial appendage pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation

Dual-chamber versus single chamber pacemakers, a systemic review and meta-analysis on sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block patients

Aims

The atrioventricular block (AVB) is a conduction system problem that results from the impairment in the transmission of an impulse from the atria to the ventricle, the disease has many etiologies. This article aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual and single-chamber pacemakers in patients with SSS and AVB.

Methods

An electronic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed from 2000 till August 15th, 2022. Retrieved articles were exported to Endnote Reference Library Software, where duplicate studies were removed from the list, and only articles meeting the eligibility criteria of this study were selected. RevMan 5.4 and STATA 16 software were used for the analysis. The modified Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias and New-castle Ottawa scale were used for quality assessment of RCTs and observational studies respectively.

Results

This study is composed of 8953 patients with sick-sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. A total of thirteen outcomes are included in this meta-analysis, out of which atrial fibrillation significantly favored dual chamber [OR = 1.29; 95 % CI = 1.05-1.59; P = 0.01 I2 = 29 %] and overall complications [OR = 0.48; 95 % CI = 0.29-0.77; p = 0.03 I2 = 0 %] and pneumothorax [OR = 0.31; 95 % CI = 0.10-0.93; p = 0.04, I2 = 0 %] were satisfied by single-chamber pacing.

Conclusion

This study concluded that neither single-chamber nor dual-chamber pacemakers are superior to each other, but they are unique in their own ways as the results of this study manifest remarkable reduction in atrial fibrillation rates and pneumothorax using dual-chamber and single-chamber pacemakers respectively.

Alternative atrial pacing site to improve cardiac function: focus on Bachmann's bundle pacing

Pacing from the right atrial appendage (RAA) prolongs the P wave duration and can induce interatrial and especially left-sided atrio-ventricular dyssynchrony. Pacing from Bachmann's bundle closely reproduces normal physiology and has the potential to avoid the electromechanical dysfunction associated with conventional RAA pacing. Interatrial conduction delay is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and death. In addition to a reduction in atrial fibrillation, Bachmann's bundle pacing has emerging applications as a hemodynamic pacing modality. This review outlines the pathophysiology of atrial conduction disturbances and their potential remedies and provides the reader with a practical guide to implementing Bachmann's bundle pacing with an emphasis on the recapitulation of normal electrical and mechanical function.

Combined effects of high atrial septal pacing and reactive atrial antitachycardia pacing for reducing atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether atrial fibrillation (AF) burden varies by pacing site in patients with reactive atrial antitachycardia pacing (rATP). We aimed to compare AF burden in patients with high atrial septal pacing (HASp) via delivery catheter and right atrial appendage pacing (RAAp) in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 109 patients with a history of paroxysmal AF and SSS who had received dual-chamber pacemaker implantation between January 2017 and December 2019, of whom 39 and 70 patients had HASp and RAAp, respectively. rATP was initiated after a 1-month post-implantation run-in period.

RESULTS

Patients with HASp had a significantly shorter P-wave duration during atrial pacing than those with RAAp (99.3 ± 10.4 vs. 116.0 ± 14.3 ms, p < .001). During the 3-year follow-up period, the incidence of an AF lasting longer than 1 or 7 days was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; p = .016; HR, 0.24; p = .004) than in those with RAAp. The median time of AF/AT per day in the follow-up periods was significantly shorter in the HASp group than in the RAAp group (10 vs. 18 min/day, p = .018). Atrial lead division did not occur in the HASp group during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

HASp via delivery catheter is as safe as RAAp, and HASp combined with rATP is effective for reducing AF burden in patients with SSS and paroxysmal AF.

EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

With the global increase in device implantations, there is a growing need to train physicians to implant pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although there are international recommendations for device indications and programming, there is no consensus to date regarding implantation technique. This document is founded on a systematic literature search and review, and on consensus from an international task force. It aims to fill the gap by setting standards for device implantation.

Association of furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide use with risk of atrial fibrillation post pacemaker implantation among elderly patients

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) induced by artificial pacing is directly related to atrial remodeling. Previous basic research has shown that furosemide aggravates pathologic myocardial remodeling while hydrochlorothiazide alleviates it. However, whether furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide plays a role in developing AF after pacemaker implantation remains unknown. The study aims to investigate the association between oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide and the risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation.

Methods

After a review of electronic medical records, elderly patients with pacemaker implantation and without a known baseline history of AF were included and information on their use of daily oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide was extracted. New incident AF cases were confirmed via the records of outpatient visits. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the association between daily oral furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide and risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation, after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

Among a total of 551 patients aged more than 65 years, 157 AF cases were identified after pacemaker implantation during a maximum follow up of 3.0±1.6 years. Of these, 242 had used furosemide and 97 had used hydrochlorothiazide therapy. Patients taking daily oral furosemide had a relatively higher risk of AF after pacemaker implantation [hazard ratio (HR): 1.507, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.036–2.192; P=0.032] after being adjusted for related disease and prescribed medications, while oral taking of hydrochlorothiazide was shown to be a non-effective factor (HR: 0.666, 95% CI: 0.413–1.074), which had no statistical significance.

Conclusions

Daily oral furosemide might increase the risk of developing AF after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients, while hydrochlorothiazide has no detrimental effect.