Effects of TCFA on stent neointimal coverage at 9 months after EXCEL drug-eluting stent implantation assessed by OCT

Thin-cap fibroatheroma in acute coronary syndrome: Implication for intravascular imaging assessment

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a significant cardiovascular disease threat, has garnered increased focus concerning its etiological mechanisms. Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) are central to ACS pathogenesis, characterized by lipid-rich plaques, profuse foam cells, cholesterol crystals, and fragile fibrous caps predisposed to rupture. While TCFAs may be latent and asymptomatic, their pivotal role in ACS risk is undeniable. High-resolution imaging techniques like Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are instrumental for effective TCFA detection. Therapeutic strategies encompass pharmacological and interventional measures, including antiplatelet agents, statins, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), aiding in plaque stabilization, inflammation reduction, and rupture risk mitigation. Despite the strong correlation between TCFAs and adverse prognoses in ACS patients, early detection and rigorous treatment significantly enhance patient prognosis and diminish cardiovascular events. This review aims to encapsulate recent advancements in TCFA research within ACS, covering formation mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and prognostic implications.

Outcomes of deferred revascularisation following negative fractional flow reserve in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a widely applied invasive physiological assessment, endorsed by major guidelines to aid in the decision to perform or defer revascularisation. While a threshold of  > 0.8 has been applied universally, clinical outcomes may be affected by numerous factors, including the presence of diabetes. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the outcomes of diabetic versus non-diabetic patients in whom revascularisation was deferred based on negative FFR.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic patients in whom revascularisation was deferred based on negative FFR. A search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE, and peer-reviewed studies that reported MACE for diabetic and non-diabetic patients with deferred revascularisation based on FFR  > 0.8 were included. The primary end point was MACE.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 7 studies in which 4275 patients had revascularisation deferred based on FFR > 0.8 (1250 diabetic). Follow up occurred over a mean of 3.2 years. Diabetes was associated with a higher odds of MACE (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.35-2.04, p =  < 0.001), unplanned revascularisation (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.06, p = 0.02), all-cause mortality (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.52, p = 0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.07-4.05, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stable coronary syndromes and deferred revascularisation based on FFR > 0.8, the presence of diabetes portends an increased long-term risk of MACE compared to non-diabetic patients. Trail registration URL:  https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; Unique identifier: CRD42022367312.