Efficacy and Safety Outcomes for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Infusion of Tirofiban After Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting

Direct mechanical thrombectomy vs. intravenous alteplase plus mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation tandem occlusions

Background and purpose

Tandem occlusion is a significant risk factor for poor outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis. The necessity of bridging therapy [intravenous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT)] for patients with tandem occlusion remains controversial. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of direct MT vs. bridging therapy in patients with tandem occlusions in the anterior circulation.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients with anterior circulation tandem occlusions treated with either direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT-alone group) or intravenous alteplase thrombolysis followed by MT (bridging group) between January 2019 and March 2022. The primary outcome was prespecified as a favorable outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2] at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion, overall mortality at 90 days, and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aSICH).

Results

A total of 110 patients were enrolled, with 49 in the MT-alone group and 61 in the bridging group. A favorable outcome (mRS score of 0-2) at 90 days was achieved in 25 patients (51.0%) in the MT-alone group and in 34 patients (55.7%) in the bridging group, showing no significant difference between the groups, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.17 (95% CI, 0.47-2.90; P = 0.743). The incidence of aSICH was higher in the bridging group than in the MT-alone group [31.1% vs. 14.3%; aOR, 2.86 (95% CI, 1.04-7.88); P = 0.042]. Rates of successful reperfusion, overall mortality at 90 days, and SICH were similar between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that a lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (P = 0.005), intraprocedural tirofiban administration (P = 0.012), and internal carotid artery stent implantation (P = 0.040) were associated with a favorable outcome at 90 days.

Conclusion

This study found no evidence that prior intravenous thrombolysis affects clinical or imaging outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusions after endovascular thrombectomy. Bridging therapy may be associated with an increased rate of aSICH. Intraprocedural tirofiban administration, stent implantation, and a lower baseline NIHSS score were associated with favorable outcomes.

Current trends in antiplatelet strategies for emergent carotid stenting in acute tandem occlusions: a web-based, nationwide survey in the Italian neurovascular community

BACKGROUND

Although a benefit from mechanical thrombectomy has been proven, the best treatment strategy for tandem occlusions (TOs) remains unclear. We conducted a survey that aimed to investigate the trends of pharmacological strategy in the setting of emergent carotid stenting for TOs in the Italian neuro-endovascular community.

METHODS

We administered a 13-multiple choice-questions survey to the Chiefs of the centers participating to the Italian Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke (IRETAS), focused on the technical aspects and on the management of the antiplatelet therapy for emergent carotid tenting in TOs. An internal coherence control was performed by the coordinating investigator.

RESULTS

We obtained responses from 56/66 centers (84.8%). The main results of the survey showed that most of the center treat TOs using a retrograde approach, deploying a closed-cell stent. A single antiplatelet therapy is preferred at the moment of the deployment of the stent.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey showed that the current practice regarding the acute management of TOs, in particular the antiplatelet therapy, remains heterogeneous in the Italian neurovascular community. Specific evidences are urgently needed in order to achieve a consensus on the acute management of TOs.

Association of perioperative P2Y12 inhibitor administration with outcomes for tandem occlusion: RESCUE AT-LVO sub-study

Background

We aimed to clarify the association between intraoperative P2Y12 inhibitor administration during EVT and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior circulation TO stroke.

Methods

Among consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) enrolled in the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolic and Atherothrombotic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion Registry from 2016 to 2019, those with anterior circulation TOs who underwent EVT were analyzed. These patients were categorized into the following groups: those who received P2Y12 inhibitors during the perioperative period and those who did not receive P2Y12 inhibitors. The outcomes included good functional outcomes, as indicated by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) was compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association of outcomes with perioperative P2Y12 inhibitor administration. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the group that did not receive P2Y12 inhibitors as the reference. The perioperative period included the period in which antithrombotic therapy was administered immediately before EVT and during the operative period.

Results

We enrolled 242 patients with AIS with anterior circulation TOs (42 females [17.4%]; median age, 76 [interquartile range, 69-81] years). Patients who received P2Y12 inhibitors during the perioperative period (n = 131) showed a higher frequency of carotid artery stenting than those who did not receive perioperative P2Y12 inhibitors (n = 111; 86.3% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, patients who received perioperative P2Y12 inhibitors during the perioperative period had a higher incidence of good functional outcomes than those who did not receive perioperative P2Y12 inhibitors (42.0% vs. 32.4%; adjusted OR: 6.65, 95% CI: 1.88-23.53), with no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of SICH (5.3% vs. 8.1%; OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.09-2.09).

Conclusion

Perioperative administration of P2Y12 inhibitors may be associated with a higher frequency of good functional outcomes in patients undergoing EVT for AIS with anterior circulation TOs. However, since several confounding factors are involved in this sub-analysis of EVT for anterior circulation TOs, further studies are warranted.

Platelet-Function-Monitoring-Guided Therapy After Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting

Background/Objectives: Antiplatelet therapy after emergent carotid stenting (eCAS) represents a challenge in balancing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) and in-stent thrombosis (IST). Post-procedural platelet function monitoring may guide antiplatelet therapy and could potentially improve outcomes due to fewer post-procedural complications. Methods: Consecutive eCAS patients (2019-2021) were included in a single-center retrospective observational study. Patients treated with eCAS received peri-procedural eptifibatide followed by dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The effect of platelet ADP inhibition by clopidogrel was monitored using the Multiplate® Analyzer (Roche). Clopidogrel non-responders were changed to ticagrelor treatment. The primary outcome was defined as a favorable outcome at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 versus 3-6. Safety outcomes included ICH, IST, and mortality. Data were analyzed and compared in clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients using Fischer's exact test and multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 105 patients had eCAS, and 28 patients (27%) were clopidogrel non-responders and were changed to treatment with ticagrelor. The favorable outcome was more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients, 23 (82%), than in clopidogrel-treated patients, 44 (57%), p = 0.036. Numerically, ICH, IST, and mortality were more frequent in clopidogrel-treated patients, but none of the differences were statistically significant. In multivariate analyses, ticagrelor treatment was significantly associated with the favorable outcome, OR = 3.89 (95% CI: 1.09-13.86), p = 0.036. Conclusions: One in four eCAS patients were clopidogrel non-responders. This study suggests that personalized antiplatelet treatment therapy was safe, and that changing treatment to ticagrelor in clopidogrel non-responders was associated with better outcomes in eCAS patients.