[Ligament bracing--augmented primary suture repair in multiligamentous knee injuries]

[Treatment of acute knee dislocations]

A knee dislocation is a serious injury involving at least two of the four major ligamentous stabilizers of the knee. This injury results in multidirectional knee instability. In dislocation of the knee the popliteal artery and the peroneal nerve can also be damaged. Dislocations with vascular involvement are potentially threatening injuries of the lower extremities. The diagnosis of knee dislocation can be difficult due to a high rate of spontaneous reduction at the initial examination. Knee dislocations are rare and mainly occur in young men. They are mostly caused by high-energy trauma; however, they can also be caused by low-energy injuries. Obesity increases the risk of knee dislocations. The classification of a knee dislocation is based on the anatomical structures involved and the direction of dislocation. The acute treatment includes reduction and stabilization measures. Associated injuries, such as vascular, nerve, extensor mechanism and cartilage injuries as well as fractures and meniscal injuries can influence the treatment approach and the outcome. The definitive surgical treatment depends on the severity of the injury and can include ligament reconstruction or repair with bracing. The aftercare should be individually adapted with the aim to restore knee joint stability and function. Complications such as arthrofibrosis, peroneal nerve palsy, compartment syndrome, postoperative infection and recurrent instability can occur. In the long term, patients have an increased risk for the development of symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Anatomic repair and ligament bracing as an alternative treatment option for acute combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial or posterolateral corner-results of a multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

Combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial/-lateral corner (PMC/PLC) usually require surgical management. Literature shows controversy regarding the standards of treatment. Suture-augmented repair leads to excellent results in acute knee dislocations but has not been investigated clinically in combined PCL injuries. The purpose of this multicentre study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of this technique in acute combined PCL injuries.

MATERIALS & METHODS

N = 33 patients with acute combined PCL injuries involving the PMC/PLC were treated by one-stage suture repair with ligament bracing of the PCL and suture repair of the accompanying PMC/PLC injuries with/without ligament bracing or primary augmentation by semitendinosus autograft. Outcome was assessed by IKDC questionnaire, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale and KOOS. Additional PCL stress-radiography was performed.

RESULTS

N = 31 patients with combined PCL injuries (female: male = 7:24; age 39.1 ± 13.8 years) with a follow-up of 16.8 ± 9.6 months were finally evaluated. 18 had PMC injuries, 13 PLC injuries. 32.2% presented with accompanying meniscal tears (70% medial meniscus). 19.4% showed cartilage injuries grade III-IV. Complications included one infection and four knee stiffnesses. Three had symptomatic postoperative instability, all affiliated to the PLC group. The IKDC was 69.8 ± 16.5, Lysholm score 85 ± 14.4 and KOOS 89.7 ± 8.1. Median loss of activity (Tegner) was 0.89 ± 1.31. Comparing PMC and PLC, all scores showed a tendency towards more favourable outcomes in the PMC group (n.s.). Stress-radiography showed an overall side-to-side difference of 3.7 ± 3.8 mm. Subgroup evaluation showed statistically significant better results (p = 0.035) of PMC (2.5 ± 1.5 mm) versus PLC (5.8 ± 5.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage suture repair with ligament bracing is a viable technique for acute combined PCL injuries and predominantly leads to good and excellent clinical outcomes. Patients with PLC injuries show a tendency towards inferior outcomes and higher instability rates compared to PMC injuries. These results may help in therapy planning and counselling patients with these rare injury pattern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

[Multiligament instabilities of the knee in sports injuries : An update of the Hamburg concept]

BACKGROUND

Knee dislocation (KD) is a rare but severe injury of the knee joint, with a high rate of concomitant neurovascular injuries. The severity of the ligamentous injury, which is classified according to the Schenck classification, the mechanism of injury, concomitant injuries and individual factors determine the treatment strategy in KD.

TREATMENT STRATEGY

Furthermore, a clear differentiation between high-velocity (HV) and low-velocity (LV) injuries is necessary. Generally, surgical treatment within 7-10 days should be aspired. Herein, the one-stage hybrid treatment using augmented ligament sutures (ligament bracing) in combination with primary ligament reconstruction (posterolateral and ACL) leads to very good functional results in the mid-term. Ultra-low-velocity (ULV) dislocations and those with concomitant peroneal lesions require a modified approach, due to a limited prognosis. During rehabilitation, the individual progress must be closely monitored and follow an early functional approach. In approximately 20% of all cases, early arthroscopic arthrolysis shows a high success rate.

ACL reconstruction provides superior stability than ACL repair in patients with Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations: first results of a 12 month follow-up study

PURPOSE

Acute knee dislocation is a rare but devastating multi-ligamentous knee injury with only limited evidence-based surgical technique recommendations. The aim of this study was a comparison of two different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) restoration techniques as part of an early total surgical care concept: (1) repair of ACL with additional internal bracing (ACLIB) compared to; (2) ACL reconstruction with autograft (ACLR).

METHODS

Retrospective, clinical-study of patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation (according to Schenck classification), in which the ACL was treated with ACLIB or ACLR within 12 days. The PCL was sutured and internally braced in all cases. Medial and lateral complex injuries were repaired and additionally laterally augmented by an Arciero reconstruction. After a minimum 12 months follow-up different patient-reported outcome measurements (IKDC, Lysholm, VAS, Tegner Score) and instrumental stability assessment by Rolimeter -test and stress radiographs (Telos™) were analyzed. Groups were compared by t test with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 20 patients (5 IIIM, 5 IIIL and 10 IV) were included in this study with an average follow-up of 13.7 ± 2.6 months. There were significant differences in instrumental stability testing (side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation: ACLIB 2.7 ± 1.5 mm vs. ACLR 1.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.0339) and stress radiography (SSD ACL: ACLIB 3.4 ± 2.2 mm vs. ACLR 0.4 ± 2.7; p = 0.0249) between groups. ACLIB group showed greater ROM in terms of flexion (SSD Flexion: ACLIB 7.8 ± 9.9° vs. ACLR 16 ± 7.0°; p = 0.0466; Total Flexion overall 125.5 ± 11.8°). No clinically relevant differences in patient-reported outcome scores (Lysholm Score: ACLIB 82 ± 16.4 vs. ACLR 85 ± 10.4; IKDC subjective score: ACLIB 70.4 ± 17 vs. ACLR 76.6 ± 8.3) were determined.

CONCLUSION

ACLR provides superior translational stability than ACLIB in terms of instrumental testing and stress radiography. Both techniques were equivalent with respect to PROMS and led to good and excellent clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, III.

[Augmented primary sutures "internal bracing" following ligamentous elbow dislocation]

OBJECTIVE

Aim of surgical treatment is the primary stabilization of the unstable elbow following a ligamentous elbow dislocation.

INDICATIONS

Ligamentous elbow dislocations are typically accompanied by injuries to the surrounding musculature and collateral ligaments of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is indicated in case of failure of nonoperative therapy, i.e., when a dislocation can only be prevented in immobilization > 90° and pronation of the elbow or an active muscular centering of the elbow fails after 5-7 days.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Contraindications for a solely "internal bracing" augmented primary suture are generally in the case of accompanying bony injuries in elbow dislocations, extensive soft-tissue injuries, and septic arthritis of the elbow.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The augmented primary suture of the elbow is performed using both a lateral (Kocher or Kaplan) and medial (FCU split) approach to the elbow. After reduction of the elbow, the collateral ligaments are first augmented with high-strength polyethylene suture and fixed in the distal humerus together with another high-strength polyethylene augmentation suture. The extensors and flexors are then fixed to the medial and lateral epicondyle, respectively, using suture anchors.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The aim of the postoperative management is early functional exercise of the elbow. The elbow is placed in an elbow brace to avoid varus and valgus load.

RESULTS

Between August 2018 and January 2020, a total of 12 patients were treated with an augmented primary suture following unstable ligamentous elbow dislocation. After a mean follow-up of 14 ± 12.7 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.5 points with a mean functional arc of 115°. None of the patients reported a recurrent dislocation or persistent instability of the elbow.

Arthrofibrosis is a common but poorly defined complication in multiligament knee injuries: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to systematically review multiligament knee injury (MLKI) outcome studies to determine definitions of arthrofibrosis (AF) and provide information about incidence, management as well as potential risk factors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed (PubMed and Cochrane library) following the PRISMA guidelines of operatively treated MLKI (Schenck II-IV) studies reporting the incidence of AF. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Injury pattern, timing of surgery, surgical technique, treatment of AF, rehabilitation programs and PROMS were inquired. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Coleman methodological score.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with a total of 709 patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 4.8 years were included and followed 47.2 ± 32.0 months. The majority of studies (22/25) used imprecise and subjective definitions of AF. A total of 86 patients were treated for AF, resulting in an overall prevalence of 12.1% (range 2.8-57.1). Higher-grade injuries (Schenck III-IV), acute treatment and ROM (range of motion) limiting rehabilitation programs were potential risk factors for AF. The time from index surgery to manipulation anesthesia (MUA) and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) averaged at 14.3 ± 8.8 and 27.7 ± 12.8 weeks. Prior to MUA and LOA, the ROM was 51.7° ± 23.5 and 80.2° ± 17.0, resulting in a total ROM gain after intervention of 65.0° ± 19.7 and 48.0° ± 10.6, respectively; with no reports of any complication within the follow-up. The overall methodological quality of the studies was poor as measured by the Coleman score with average 56.3 ± 12.5 (range 31-84) points.

CONCLUSIONS

AF is a common but poorly defined complication particularly in high-grade MLKI. Early postoperative and intensified physiotherapy is important to reduce the risk of AF. MUA and LOA are very effective treatment options and result in good clinical outcome. Prospective studies with bigger study population are needed to optimize treatment algorithms of further patients after MLKI. The protocol of this systematic review has been prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021229187, January 4th, 2021).

Treatment of Knee Dislocation With Primary Repair and Suture Augmentation: A Viable Solution

Background:

Different surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of knee dislocation (KD). Nonoperative approaches are frequently combined with surgical reconstruction using auto- or allograft.

Purpose:

To evaluate the midterm results of primary surgical repair and suture augmentation to treat KD.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 22 patients (5 women, 17 men; mean age, 45 ± 15 years) with KD were evaluated at a mean of 49 ± 16 months after surgical treatment that included primary repair and suture augmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging, stress radiographs, and outcome scores were obtained at the follow-up. Clinical examination including hop tests and force measurements for flexion and extension was performed.

Results:

The mean difference in pre- to postinjury Tegner scores was –2 ± 1. The outcome scores showed mean values of 84 ± 15 (Lysholm), 73 ± 15 (International Knee Documentation Committee) and 65 ± 25 (Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury scale). Compared with the uninjured knee, the range of motion of the injured knee was reduced by 21° ± 12°. Twelve patients felt fit enough to perform hop tests and showed a mean deficit of 7% ± 17%° compared with the uninjured leg. The mean force deficit was 19% ± 18% for extension and 8% ± 16% for flexion. Stress radiographs revealed an 11 ± 7–mm higher anteroposterior translation on the injured side. Four patients had secondary ligament reconstructions due to persistent instability and 7 underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis due to stiffness. A significant increase of osteoarthritis was found for the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral compartments (P = .007, .004, and .006, respectively).

Conclusion:

Primary repair and suture augmentation of KD led to satisfactory clinical midterm results despite persistent radiological instability and a significant increase in osteoarthritis. This technique allows the return to activities of daily living without subjective instability in most nonathletic patients. Secondary ligament reconstructions should be performed if relevant instability persists to decrease the risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage damage.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique.

METHODS

All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% - 14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.

[Combined PCL ligament bracing and ACL reconstruction in acute knee dislocation (Schenck IV) - The Hamburg Approach : Video article]

OBJECTIVE

Stepwise reconstruction of knee stability and physiological kinematics in acute knee dislocation.

INDICATIONS

The operative technique is demonstrated in a case of multiligamentous injury of the knee with involvement of both cruciate ligaments and additional medial and lateral peripheral injuries (type IV according to Schenck classification).

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Critical soft tissue conditions, infections, old age, obesity, lack of compliance.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Time-limited arthroscopy in order to primarily identify and treat posterior horn/root injuries of the meniscus and concomitant intra-articular injuries. Anatomical placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) drill wires for later ACL tunnel drilling is arthroscopically guided. Subsequent conversion to an anteromedial arthrotomy and ligament bracing of the posterior cruciate ligament. The ACL is reconstructed using the ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon. Medial and lateral peripheral injures are anatomically reconstructed followed by a posterolateral augmentation in a technique described by Arciero.

FOLLOW-UP

Limited weight bearing for 6 weeks and stepwise increase of flexion using a standard knee brace and close clinical monitoring.

EVIDENCE

Ligament bracing of both cruciate ligaments is an established treatment technique in acute knee dislocations and has been proven to achieve good to excellent clinical results. In an ongoing clinical study primary ACL reconstruction as a modified treatment approach indicated superior stability in a 12-month follow-up in patients with acute knee dislocations.

Anatomical repair and ligament bracing of Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations leads to acceptable subjective and kinematic outcomes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of anatomical repair and ligament bracing for Schenck III and IV knee dislocation (KD).

METHODS

The results of 27 patients (15 and 12 cases of Schenck III and IV KD, respectively) after a mean follow-up of 18.1 ± 12.1 months (range 6-45 months) were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients suffered high-kinetic-energy accidents, whereas five patients suffered ultralow-velocity (ULV) trauma due to obesity. The outcome measures were the Lysholm score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) score. A kinematic 3D gait analysis with five walking trials was performed to compare the patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

The mean KSS, HSS score, Lysholm score, and KOOS were 77.4 ± 14.4, 84.6 ± 11.2, 81.5 ± 10.4, and 67.3 ± 16.8, respectively. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The mean range of motion deficiency compared to the healthy side was 24.4 ± 18.5°. Ten patients had first-degree residual laxity of the anterior cruciate ligament; 12 and 2 patients had first- and second-degree residual laxity of the collateral ligament, respectively. Five patients underwent additional arthroscopic arthrolysis due to arthrofibrosis at an average of 6.2 ± 1.9 months (range 4-9 months) after the initial surgery. The 3D gait analysis showed no major differences in joint stability or movement between the patients and healthy controls. Only the ULV trauma patients had significantly lower outcome scores and showed larger kinematic deviations in joint movement during the gait analysis.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical repair with ligament bracing is a suitable surgical procedure in the treatment of KD and provides evidence in clinical practice with the benefit of early, definitive repair and preservation of the native ligaments. Patients reach acceptable subjective and objective functional outcomes, including mainly normalized gait patterns during short-term follow-up, with only minor changes in kinematics and spatial-temporal characteristics. Obese patients who suffered ULV trauma showed significantly inferior outcomes with larger deviations in joint kinematics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Promising clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after internal bracing of acute posterior cruciate ligament lesions in multiple injured knees

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesions in multiple injured knees that were surgically treated with internal bracing.

METHODS

Acute complete PCL lesions in multiple injured knees with subsequent internal-bracing treatment within 21 days between 2014 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. At final follow-up, patients were assessed with Tegner, Lysholm, and IKDC scores. PCL stability and healing were verified with KT-2000, stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients [mean age 37.4 (± 17.8; SD) years] were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 19.9 (± 7.7; SD) months. Thirteen patients suffered complete lesions of the PCL with concomitant ligamentous injuries (Schenck I: six cases, Schenck III M: five cases, Schenck IV N: one case, Schenck V: one case). Median Tegner, mean Lysholm and mean IKDC scores at follow-up were 4 (2-7; interquartile range), 69.1 (± 16.6; SD) and 68.9 (± 18.1; SD) respectively. Posterior translation averaged 5.8 (± 2.2; SD) mm with the KT 2000 and stress radiography showed a mean posterior tibial translation of 5.5 (± 4.1; SD) mm in the side to side comparison. MRI showed adequate PCL healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal bracing as treatment for acute PCL ruptures in multiple injured knees showed adequate restoration of posterior tibial translation in a single-centre study including 14 cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair

Injury to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is most commonly seen in the setting of a multiligamentous injured knee, and isolated PCL tears are rare. PCL injuries are generally treated either conservatively or by PCL reconstruction using a graft. If a proximal or distal tear is present, the injured ligament can also be treated by primary repair, in which the ligament is reattached to the tibial or femoral insertion. This has the (theoretical) advantages of preserving the native tissue, maintaining proprioception, and can be performed in a less invasive way when compared with reconstruction surgery. In this review, the appropriate patient selection, surgical indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of primary repair of proximal and distal PCL tears will be discussed. Primary repair may be an alternative treatment for PCL reconstruction if appropriate patient selection is applied.

Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option-results of a multicentre study

PURPOSE

The literature shows no consensus regarding the best method and timing for the treatment of acute knee dislocations. Studies indicate that a one-stage procedure performed in the early stages of injury can lead to superior results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after performing early surgical repair with additional suture augmentation (ligament bracing) of all torn ligaments in acute knee dislocations.

METHODS

In this prospective multicentre study, 73 patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation were treated with one-stage ligament bracing within 10 days. Twenty-six patients sustained a type III medial dislocation, thirty-nine patients sustained a type III lateral dislocation, and eight patients presented a type IV dislocation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Within the follow-up evaluation, various scores were collected (International Knee Documentation Committee IKDC Score, Tegner Score and Lysholm Score). Additional stress radiography was performed (Telos™) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine knee dislocations (Schenck III and IV) with a follow-up at a mean of 14 ± 1.6 months were evaluated. The average IKDC score was 75.5 ± 14.5, the average Lysholm score was 81.0 ± 15.5, and the median loss of activity in the Tegner score was 1 (range 0-3) point. Stress radiographs showed side-to-side differences at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.3 mm for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of 2.9 ± 2.1 mm for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The operative revision rate (early and late) was 17.4%. In the early stage, one wound infection and one case of transient common peroneal nerve (CPN) paresis were successfully revised. In the later stage, four patients with knee stiffness and six cases with symptomatic knee instability needed reoperation. Patients without ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations or CPN showed good or excellent results in 87.5% according to the Lysholm score.

CONCLUSION

In cases of acute knee dislocation, primary ACL and PCL transosseous sutures with additional suture augmentation predominantly lead to good and excellent clinical results. Obese patients sustaining ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations and patients following injury to the CPN show inferior outcomes. In patients without ULV and CPN intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 10.1%. The obtained results and revision rates show that early primary suture repair is a promising option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective multicentre study, II.

Repair and Augmentation with Internal Brace in the Multiligament Injured Knee

The internal brace is a ligament repair bridging concept using braided ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene suture tape and knotless bone anchors to reinforce ligament strength to allow early mobilization during early-phase healing. This concept can be used in the management of anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, anterolateral ligament, medial collateral ligament, posteromedial corner, and posterolateral corner injuries. Ligament reinforcement is a concept in which a graft is reinforced and can be used in all aspects of knee ligament reconstruction. There has been a recent resurgence in ligament repair and recent evidence suggests equivalent outcome results.

High complication rate following dynamic intraligamentary stabilization for primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

New strategies for dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) in the primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are currently under debate. It has been proposed that these might serve as alternative techniques to conventional ACL reconstruction procedures using tendon autografts. The aims of the present investigation were to evaluate the functional results and critically assess the complication rate following primary ACL repair with DIS and to review existing reports of favourable clinical results with the method in relation to knee joint stability and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients received dynamic intraligamentary stabilization a mean of 14 days after ACL rupture. Fifty-seven patients (96.6%, male:female = 37:20; mean age 27.6 years) were available for follow-up examinations including the Tegner activity level, anteroposterior stability in comparison with the uninjured knee, subjective satisfaction, and range of knee motion. Complications after 3 and 12 months were also analyzed. Associated lesions requiring surgical measures were found in 30 patients.

RESULTS

A statistically significant decrease in Tegner activity levels was detected between the preoperative status (median 7) and the 12-month follow-up (median 5). The overall complication rate was 57.9%, including rerupture or non-healing (n = 10, 17.5%), repeat arthroscopy (n = 13, 22.8%) as a result of meniscus tears (n = 2, 15.4%), cyclops syndrome (n = 4, 30.8%) or restricted range of motion (n = 7, 53.8%), arthrofibrosis (n = 3, 5.3%), and implant interference (n = 7, 12.3%). Anteroposterior KT-1000 stability of 3 mm or below was achieved in 29 (50.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIS procedure does not appear to be appropriate for providing predictable results in a young and active cohort of patients following ACL rupture, as it has an unacceptably high complication rate and leads to residual anteroposterior knee joint laxity of 3 mm or more in 28 (49.1%) of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (prospective case series).

[Acute injury of the posterior cruciate ligament with femoral avulsion : Arthroscopic ligament repair and bracing]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of arthroscopic bracing of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is to restore anatomic and biomechanic function in acute PCL tears. Therefore, primary augmentation of the PCL by using a stable suturing system is used.

INDICATIONS

Acute tears of the PCL, femoral avulsions, isolated or combined in cases of multiligament injuries (knee dislocations of Schenk types II-IV).

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Chronic instabilities of the PCL, infection of the knee joint.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Arthroscopic preparation of the femoral PCL footprint. Suturing of the PCL stump with non-resorbable sutures. Placement of the femoral and tibial tunnel with a specific arthroscopic PCL guide. Femoral fixation of the bracing system and the PCL augmenting sutures extracortical via a button or intraarticular with a suture anchor. Tibial fixation via a button has to be performed in a minimum of 80° of flexion and under permanent anterior drawer tension.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Brace in full extension with posterior support 24 h/day, range of motion (ROM) restricted up to 90° of flexion and limited weight bearing with 20 kg for the first 6 weeks postoperatively. After 6 weeks, weight bearing and ROM can be increased and a solid frame brace with posterior support is recommended for the next 6 weeks.

Changes in gait pattern and early functional results after ACL repair are comparable to those of ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) has been introduced as a new technique to repair the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to restore knee joint kinematics after an acute ACL tear. Aim of the present study was to compare the early post-operative activity, restoration of gait pattern and functional results after DIS in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for acute ACL tears. It was hypothesized that functional results, post-operative activity and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those after ACLR.

METHODS

Sixty patients with acute ACL tears were included in this study and underwent either DIS or ACLR with an anatomic semitendinosus autograft in a randomized manner. Patients were equipped with an accelerometric step counter for the first 6 weeks after surgery in order to monitor their early post-operative activity. 3D gait analysis was performed at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic parameters were extracted and averaged for each subject. Functional results were recorded at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery using the Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score and Lysholm score.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent DIS showed an increased early post-operative activity with significant differences at week 2 and 3 (p = 0.0241 and 0.0220). No significant differences between groups were found for knee kinematic and kinetic parameters or the functional scores at any time of the follow-up. Furthermore, the difference in anterior tibial translation was not significantly different between the two groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Early functional results and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those of primary ACLR. Therefore, ACL repair may be an alternative to ACLR in this cohort of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Syndesmotic InternalBraceTM for anatomic distal tibiofibular ligament augmentation

Reconstruction of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there is no generally accepted treatment guidelines. Thus, there still remain considerable controversies regarding diagnosis, classification and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Syndesmotic malreduction is the most common indication for early re-operation after ankle fracture surgery, and widening of the ankle mortise by only 1 mm decreases the contact area of the tibiotalar joint by 42%. Outcome of ankle fractures with syndesmosis injury is worse than without, even after surgical syndesmotic stabilization. This may be due to a high incidence of syndesmotic malreduction revealed by increasing postoperative computed tomography controls. Therefore, even open visualization of the syndesmosis during the reduction maneuver has been recommended. Thus, the most important clinical predictor of outcome is consistently reported as accuracy of anatomic reduction of the injured syndesmosis. In this context the TightRope^® system is reported to have advantages compared to classical syndesmotic screws. However, rotational instability of the distal fibula cannot be safely limited by use of 1 or even 2 TightRopes^®. Therefore, we developed a new syndesmotic InternalBrace^TM technique for improved anatomic distal tibiofibular ligament augmentation to protect healing of the injured native ligaments. The InternalBrace^TM technique was developed by Gordon Mackay from Scotland in 2012 using SwiveLocks^® for knotless aperture fixation of a FiberTape^® at the anatomic footprints of the augmented ligaments, and augmentation of the anterior talofibular ligament, the deltoid ligament, the spring ligament and the medial collateral ligaments of the knee have been published so far. According to the individual injury pattern, patients can either be treated by the new syndesmotic InternalBrace^TM technique alone as a single anterior stabilization, or in combination with one posteriorly directed TightRope^® as a double stabilization, or in combination with one TightRope^® and a posterolateral malleolar screw fixation as a triple stabilization. Moreover, the syndesmotic InternalBrace^TM technique is suitable for anatomic refixation of displaced bony avulsion fragments too small for screw fixation and for indirect reduction of small posterolateral tibial avulsion fragments by anatomic reduction of the anterior syndesmosis with an InternalBrace^TM after osteosynthesis of the distal fibula. In this paper, comprehensively illustrated clinical examples show that anatomic reconstruction with rotational stabilization of the syndesmosis can be realized by use of our new syndesmotic InternalBrace^TM technique. A clinical trial for evaluation of the functional outcomes has been started at our hospital.

Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament: Physiology, rupture and reconstruction techniques

The influences and mechanisms of the physiology, rupture and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on kinematics and clinical outcomes have been investigated in many biomechanical and clinical studies over the last several decades. The knee is a complex joint with shifting contact points, pressures and axes that are affected when a ligament is injured. The ACL, as one of the intra-articular ligaments, has a strong influence on the resulting kinematics. Often, other meniscal or ligamentous injuries accompany ACL ruptures and further deteriorate the resulting kinematics and clinical outcomes. Knowing the surgical options, anatomic relations and current evidence to restore ACL function and considering the influence of concomitant injuries on resulting kinematics to restore full function can together help to achieve an optimal outcome.