Motion monitoring during a course of lung radiotherapy with anchored electromagnetic transponders : Quantification of inter- and intrafraction motion and variability of relative transponder positions

Modeling of artificial intelligence-based respiratory motion prediction in MRI-guided radiotherapy: a review

The advancement of precision radiotherapy techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and particle therapy, highlights the importance of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer, while also posing challenges for respiratory motion management in thoracic and abdominal tumors. MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) stands out as state-of-art real-time respiratory motion management approach owing to the non-ionizing radiation nature and superior soft-tissue contrast characteristic of MR imaging. In clinical practice, MR imaging often operates at a frequency of 4 Hz, resulting in approximately a 300 ms system latency of MRIgRT. This system latency decreases the accuracy of respiratory motion management in MRIgRT. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based respiratory motion prediction has recently emerged as a promising solution to address the system latency issues in MRIgRT, particularly for advanced contour prediction and volumetric prediction. However, implementing AI-based respiratory motion prediction faces several challenges including the collection of training datasets, the selection of prediction methods, and the formulation of complex contour and volumetric prediction problems. This review presents modeling approaches of AI-based respiratory motion prediction in MRIgRT, and provides recommendations for achieving consistent and generalizable results in this field.

A Prospective Study on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Thoracic Radiation Therapy Guided by Bronchoscopically Implanted Electromagnetic Transponders

BACKGROUND

Electromagnetic transponders bronchoscopically implanted near the tumor can be used to monitor deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for thoracic radiation therapy (RT). The feasibility and safety of this approach require further study.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with primary lung cancer or lung metastases. Three transponders were implanted near the tumor, followed by simulation with DIBH, free breathing, and 4D-CT as backup. The initial gating window for treatment was ±5 mm; in a second cohort, the window was incrementally reduced to determine the smallest feasible gating window. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as completion of RT using transponder-guided DIBH. Patients were followed for assessment of transponder- and RT-related toxicity.

RESULTS

We enrolled 48 patients (35 with primary lung cancer and 13 with lung metastases). The median distance of transponders to tumor was 1.6 cm (IQR 0.6-2.8 cm). RT delivery ranged from 3 to 35 fractions. Transponder-guided DIBH was feasible in all but two patients (96% feasible), where it failed because the distance between the transponders and the antenna was >19 cm. Among the remaining 46 patients, 6 were treated prone to keep the transponders within 19 cm of the antenna, and 40 were treated supine. The smallest feasible gating window was identified as ±3 mm. Thirty-nine (85%) patients completed one year of follow-up. Toxicities at least possibly related to transponders or the implantation procedure were grade 2 in six patients (six incidences, cough and hemoptysis), grade 3 in three patients (five incidences, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, and supraventricular tachycardia), and grade 4 pneumonia in one patient (occurring a few days after implantation but recovered fully and completed RT). Toxicities at least possibly related to RT were grade 2 in 18 patients (41 incidences, most commonly cough, fatigue, and pneumonitis) and grade 3 in four patients (seven incidences, most commonly pneumonia), and no patients had grade 4 or higher toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchoscopically implanted electromagnetic transponder-guided DIBH lung RT is feasible and safe, allowing for precise tumor targeting and reduced normal tissue exposure. Transponder-antenna distance was the most common challenge due to a limited antenna range, which could sometimes be circumvented by prone positioning.

Experimental comparison of linear regression and LSTM motion prediction models for MLC-tracking on an MRI-linac

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy with multileaf collimator (MLC)-tracking is a promising technique for intra-fractional motion management, achieving high dose conformality without prolonging treatment times. To improve beam-target alignment, the geometric error due to system latency should be reduced by using temporal prediction.

PURPOSE

To experimentally compare linear regression (LR) and long-short-term memory (LSTM) motion prediction models for MLC-tracking on an MRI-linac using multiple patient-derived traces with different complexities.

METHODS

Experiments were performed on a prototype 1.0 T MRI-linac capable of MLC-tracking. A motion phantom was programmed to move a target in superior-inferior (SI) direction according to eight lung cancer patient respiratory motion traces. Target centroid positions were localized from sagittal 2D cine MRIs acquired at 4 Hz using a template matching algorithm. The centroid positions were input to one of four motion prediction models. We used (1) a LSTM network which had been optimized in a previous study on patient data from another cohort (offline LSTM). We also used (2) the same LSTM model as a starting point for continuous re-optimization of its weights during the experiment based on recent motion (offline+online LSTM). Furthermore, we implemented (3) a continuously updated LR model, which was solely based on recent motion (online LR). Finally, we used (4) the last available target centroid without any changes as a baseline (no-predictor). The predictions of the models were used to shift the MLC aperture in real-time. An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used to visualize the target and MLC aperture during the experiments. Based on the EPID frames, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the target and the MLC aperture positions was used to assess the performance of the different motion predictors. Each combination of motion trace and prediction model was repeated twice to test stability, for a total of 64 experiments.

RESULTS

The end-to-end latency of the system was measured to be (389 ± 15) ms and was successfully mitigated by both LR and LSTM models. The offline+online LSTM was found to outperform the other models for all investigated motion traces. It obtained a median RMSE over all traces of (2.8 ± 1.3) mm, compared to the (3.2 ± 1.9) mm of the offline LSTM, the (3.3 ± 1.4) mm of the online LR and the (4.4 ± 2.4) mm when using the no-predictor. According to statistical tests, differences were significant (p-value <0.05) among all models in a pair-wise comparison, but for the offline LSTM and online LR pair. The offline+online LSTM was found to be more reproducible than the offline LSTM and the online LR with a maximum deviation in RMSE between two measurements of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first experimental comparison of different prediction models for MRI-guided MLC-tracking using several patient-derived respiratory motion traces. We have shown that among the investigated models, continuously re-optimized LSTM networks are the most promising to account for the end-to-end system latency in MRI-guided radiotherapy with MLC-tracking.

Endobronchially Implanted Real-Time Electromagnetic Transponder Beacon-Guided, Respiratory-Gated SABR for Moving Lung Tumors: A Prospective Phase 1/2 Cohort Study

Purpose

Endobronchial electromagnetic transponder beacons (EMT) provide real-time, precise positional data of moving lung tumors. We report results of a phase 1/2, prospective, single-arm cohort study evaluating the treatment planning effects of EMT-guided SABR for moving lung tumors.

Methods and Materials

Eligible patients were adults, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2, with T1-T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer or pulmonary metastasis ≤4 cm with motion amplitude ≥5 mm. Three EMTs were endobronchially implanted using navigational bronchoscopy. Four-dimensional free-breathing computed tomography simulation scans were obtained, and end-exhalation phases were used to define the gating window internal target volume. A 3-mm expansion of gating window internal target volume defined the planning target volume (PTV). EMT-guided, respiratory-gated (RG) SABR was delivered (54 Gy/3 fractions or 48 Gy/4 fractions) using volumetric modulated arc therapy. For each RG-SABR plan, a 10-phase image-guided SABR plan was generated for dosimetric comparison. PTV/organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics were tabulated and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank pair test. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours; version 1.1).

Results

Of 41 patients screened, 17 were enrolled and 2 withdrew from the study. Median age was 73 years, with 7 women. Sixty percent had T1/T2 non-small cell lung cancer and 40% had M1 disease. Median tumor diameter was 1.9 cm with 73% of targets located peripherally. Mean respiratory tumor motion was 1.25 cm (range, 0.53-4.04 cm). Thirteen tumors were treated with EMT-guided SABR and 47% of patients received 48 Gy in 4 fractions while 53% received 54 Gy in 3 fractions. RG-SABR yielded an average PTV reduction of 46.9% (P < .005). Lung V5, V10, V20, and mean lung dose had mean relative reductions of 11.3%, 20.3%, 31.1%, and 20.3%, respectively (P < .005). Dose to OARs was significantly reduced (P < .05) except for spinal cord. At 6 months, mean radiographic tumor volume reduction was 53.5% (P < .005).

Conclusions

EMT-guided RG-SABR significantly reduced PTVs of moving lung tumors compared with image-guided SABR. EMT-guided RG-SABR should be considered for tumors with large respiratory motion amplitudes or those located in close proximity to OARs.

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Correlation of Respiratory Motion of Lung Tumors With Implanted Fiducials and an External Surrogate

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess the suitability of airway-implanted internal fiducial markers and an external surrogate of respiratory motion for motion management during radiation therapy of lung tumors.

Methods and Materials

We analyzed 4-dimensional computed tomography scans acquired during radiation therapy simulation for 28 patients with lung tumors who had anchored fiducial markers bronchoscopically implanted inside small airways in or near the tumor in a prospective trial. We used a linear mixed model to build population-based correlative models of tumor and surrogate motion. The first 24 of the 28 patients were used to build correlative models, and 4 of the 28 consecutive patients were excluded and used as an internal validation cohort. Of the 24 patients from the model building cohort, all were used for the models based on the internal fiducial. The external surrogate was completely visualized in 11 patients from the model building cohort, so only those were used for the models based on the external surrogate. Furthermore, we determined the predicted residual error sum of squares for our correlative models, which may serve as benchmarks for future research.

Results

The motion of the internal fiducials was significantly associated with the tumor motion in the anterior-posterior (P < .0001) and superior-inferior (SI) directions (P < .0001). We also observed a strong correlation of the external surrogate anterior-posterior motion to the tumor dominant SI motion (P < .0001). In the validation cohort, the internal fiducial SI motion was the only reliable predictor of lung tumor motion.

Conclusions

The internal fiducials appear to be more reliable predictors of lung tumor motion than the external surrogate. The suitability of such airway-implanted internal fiducial markers for advanced motion management techniques should be further investigated. Although the external surrogate seems to be less reliable, its wide availability and noninvasive application support its clinical utility, albeit the greater uncertainty will need to be compensated for.

Can bronchoscopically implanted anchored electromagnetic transponders be used to monitor tumor position and lung inflation during deep inspiration breath-hold lung radiotherapy?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of using bronchoscopically implanted anchored electromagnetic transponders (EMTs) as surrogates for 1) tumor position and 2) repeatability of lung inflation during deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) lung radiotherapy.

METHODS

41 patients treated with either hypofractionated (HF) or conventional (CF) lung radiotherapy on an IRB approved prospective protocol using coached DIBH were evaluated for this study. Three anchored EMTs were bronchoscopically implanted into small airways near or within the tumor. DIBH treatment was gated by tracking the EMT positions. Breath-hold cone-beam-CTs (CBCTs) were acquired prior to every HF treatment or weekly for CF patients. Retrospectively, rigid registrations between each CBCT and the breath-hold planning CT were performed to match to 1) spine 2) EMTs and 3) tumor. Absolute differences in registration between EMTs and spine were analyzed to determine surrogacy of EMTs for lung inflation. Differences in registration between EMTs and tumor were analyzed to determine surrogacy of EMTs for tumor position. The stability of the EMTs was evaluated by analyzing the difference between inter-EMT displacements recorded at treatment from that of the plan for the CF patients, as well as the geometric residual (GR) recorded at the time of treatment.

RESULTS

219 CBCTs were analyzed. The average differences between EMT centroid and spine registration among all CBCTs were 0.45±0.42cm, 0.29±0.28cm, and 0.18±0.15cm in superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral directions, respectively. Only 59% of CBCTs had differences in registration <0.5cm for EMT centroid compared to spine, indicating that lung inflation is not reproducible from simulation to treatment. The average differences between EMT centroid and tumor registration among all CBCTs were 0.13±0.13cm, 0.14±0.13cm and 0.12±0.12cm in SI, AP and lateral directions, respectively. 95% of CBCTs resulted in <0.5cm change between EMT centroid and tumor registration, indicating that EMT positions correspond well with tumor position during treatments. Six out of the 7 recorded CF patients had average differences in inter-EMT displacements to be ≤0.26cm and average GR ≤0.22cm, indicating that the EMTs are stable throughout treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchoscopically implanted anchored EMTs are good surrogates for tumor position and are reliable for maintaining tumor position when tracked during DIBH treatment, as long as the tumor size and shape are stable. Large differences in registration between EMTs and spine for many treatments suggest that lung inflation achieved at simulation is often not reproduced. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results

PURPOSE

Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a radiation therapy success story with level 1 evidence demonstrating its efficacy. To provide real-time respiratory motion management for lung SABR, several commercial and preclinical markerless lung target tracking (MLTT) approaches have been developed. However, these approaches have yet to be benchmarked using a common measurement methodology. This knowledge gap motivated the MArkerless lung target Tracking CHallenge (MATCH). The aim was to localize lung targets accurately and precisely in a retrospective in silico study and a prospective experimental study.

METHODS

MATCH was an American Association of Physicists in Medicine sponsored Grand Challenge. Common materials for the in silico and experimental studies were the experiment setup including an anthropomorphic thorax phantom with two targets within the lungs, and a lung SABR planning protocol. The phantom was moved rigidly with patient-measured lung target motion traces, which also acted as ground truth motion. In the retrospective in silico study a volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment was simulated and a dataset consisting of treatment planning data and intra-treatment kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) images for four blinded lung motion traces was provided to the participants. The participants used their MLTT approach to localize the moving target based on the dataset. In the experimental study, the participants received the phantom experiment setup and five patient-measured lung motion traces. The participants used their MLTT approach to localize the moving target during an experimental SABR phantom treatment. The challenge was open to any participant, and participants could complete either one or both parts of the challenge. For both the in silico and experimental studies the MLTT results were analyzed and ranked using the prospectively defined metric of the percentage of the tracked target position being within 2 mm of the ground truth.

RESULTS

A total of 30 institutions registered and 15 result submissions were received, four for the in silico study and 11 for the experimental study. The participating MLTT approaches were: Accuray CyberKnife (2), Accuray Radixact (2), BrainLab Vero, C-RAD, and preclinical MLTT (5) on a conventional linear accelerator (Varian TrueBeam). For the in silico study the percentage of the 3D tracking error within 2 mm ranged from 50% to 92%. For the experimental study, the percentage of the 3D tracking error within 2 mm ranged from 39% to 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

A common methodology for measuring the accuracy of MLTT approaches has been developed and used to benchmark preclinical and commercial approaches retrospectively and prospectively. Several MLTT approaches were able to track the target with sub-millimeter accuracy and precision. The study outcome paves the way for broader clinical implementation of MLTT. MATCH is live, with datasets and analysis software being available online at https://www.aapm.org/GrandChallenge/MATCH/ to support future research.

Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification

The current clinical interface for Varian's intrafraction motion review (IMR) is limited, providing only qualitative data for review at the treatment console. This study provides a method of extracting and interpreting data from combined log files for quantitative evaluation. Combined log files acquired during patient treatment and a parsing code was developed to scan the combined log file looking for unique identifiers pertaining to the data of interest. We were able to extract clinically relevant parameters from the log files including date and time, gantry angle, expected marker position, found marker position, pixel size, and detection result. This study details how to compare IMR data to Calypso investigating dual‐surrogates for intrafraction monitoring during treatment for other researchers to build on these methods. Understanding data recorded during treatment within the combined log files can be helpful in quality improvement of patient care by retrospectively reviewing intrafraction motion.

Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies

Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of modern lung cancer treatment alongside surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of radiation delivery, which has contributed to the evolution of radiation therapy into a guideline-recommended treatment in both early-stage and locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Furthermore, although radiotherapy has long been used for palliation of disease in advanced lung cancer, it is increasingly having a role as a locally ablative treatment in patients with oligometastatic disease.This review provides an overview of recent developments in radiation techniques, particularly for non-radiation oncologists who are involved in the care of lung cancer patients. Technical advances are discussed, and findings of recent clinical trials are highlighted, all of which have led to a changing perception of the role of radiation therapy in multidisciplinary care.

Prospective dual-surrogate validation study of periodic imaging during treatment for accurately monitoring intrafraction motion of prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goal of this prospective study is to validate the use of periodic imaging during treatment with a fiducial marker detection algorithm using radiofrequency transponders for prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment for radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten male patients were enrolled in this study and treated for prostate cancer with implanted electromagnetic monitoring beacons. We evaluated the accuracy and limitations of Intrafraction Motion Review (IMR) by comparing the known locations of the beacons using the electromagnetic monitoring system to the position data reported from IMR images.

RESULTS

A total of 4054 images were taken during treatment. The difference in vector magnitude of the two methods is centered around zero (mean: 0.03 cm, SD: 0.16 cm) and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) is 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98, 1) overall. The Euclidean distance between the two methods was close to zero (median: 0.09 cm, IQR: 0.06, 0.14 cm). The difference in distance between any two markers was centered around zero (mean: 0.01 cm, SD: 0.12 cm) and Lin's CCC is 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) overall.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the algorithm for detected markers within the 2D images is comparable to electromagnetic monitoring for fiducial identification when detected. IMR could provide an alternate solution for patients with contraindications of use of an electromagnetic monitoring system and a cost effective alternative to the acquisition of an additional system for patient monitoring, but does not provide data for pre-treatment set-up verification and real-time 3D positioning during treatment.

Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as a basis for the future assignments of the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The review was group peer-reviewed, and consensus was obtained through multiple working group meetings.

The first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking in an experimental quality assurance procedure on a standard linear accelerator

The ability to track tumour motion without implanted markers on a standard linear accelerator (linac) could enable wide access to real-time adaptive radiotherapy for cancer patients. We previously have retrospectively validated a method for 3D markerless target tracking using intra-fractional kilovoltage (kV) projections acquired on a standard linac. This paper presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and its quality assurance (QA) procedure. The workflow and the algorithm developed to track the 3D target position during volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment delivery were optimised. The linac was operated in clinical QA mode, while kV projections were streamed to a dedicated computer using a frame-grabber software. The markerless target tracking accuracy and precision were measured in a lung phantom experiment under the following conditions: static localisation of seven distinct positions, dynamic localisation of five patient-measured motion traces, and dynamic localisation with treatment interruption. The QA guidelines were developed following the AAPM Task Group 147 report with the requirement that the tracking margin components, the margins required to account for tracking errors, did not exceed 5 mm in any direction. The mean tracking error ranged from 0.0 to 0.9 mm (left-right), -0.6 to  -0.1 mm (superior-inferior) and  -0.7 to 0.1 mm (anterior-posterior) over the three tests. Larger errors were found in cases with large left-right or anterior-posterior and small superior-inferior motion. The tracking margin components did not exceed 5 mm in any direction and ranged from 0.4 to 3.2 mm (left-right), 0.7 to 1.6 mm (superior-inferior) and 0.8 to 1.5 mm (anterior-posterior). This study presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and provides a QA procedure for its safe clinical implementation, potentially enabling real-time adaptive radiotherapy for a large population of lung cancer patients.

Clinical experience with lung-specific electromagnetic transponders for real-time tumor tracking in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

•

7 patients were implanted with lung-specific electromagnetic transponders (EMT).

•

We report no complications from implantation and no migration of the EMT.

•

7 non-small cell lung cancer patients underwent SBRT using EMT real-time tracking.

•

SBRT was delivered in free-breathing (FB) or in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH).

Background and purposes

Motion management is crucial for optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of moving targets. We aimed to describe our clinical experience with real-time tracking of lung-specific electromagnetic transponders (EMTs) for SBRT of early stage non-small cell lung cancer in free-breathing (FB) or deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH).

Material and methods

Seven patients were implanted with EMTs. Simulation for SBRT was performed in FB and in DIBH. We prescribed 60 Gy in 3, 5 or 8 fractions to the tumor and delivered SBRT with volumetric modulated arcs and a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam. Patients’ setup at the linac was performed using EMT positions and cone-beam CT (CBCT) verification. Four patients were treated in DIBH because of a dosimetric benefit. We analysed patient alignment and treatment delivery parameters using DIBH or FB and EMT real-time tracking.

Results

There were no complications from the EMT implantation. Visual inspection of CBCT before and/or after SBRT revealed good alignment of structures and EMTs. The median setup time was 9.8 min (range: 4.6–34.1 min) and the median session time was 14.7 min (range: 7.3–36.5 min). EMT positions in lungs remained stable during overall treatment and allowed real-time tracking both in FB and in DIBH SBRT. The treatment beam was gated when EMT centroid position exceeded tolerance thresholds ensuring correct delivery of radiation to the tumor.

Conclusion

Using EMTs for real-time tracking of tumor motion during lung SBRT proved to be safe, accurate and easy to integrate clinically for treatments in FB or DIBH.

Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT community to 'see what we treat, as we treat' and to act on this information instantaneously has resulted in rapid technological innovation. Specialized treatment machines, such as robotic or gimbal-steered linear accelerators (linac) with in-room imaging suites, have been developed specifically for real-time treatment adaptation. Additional equipment, such as stereoscopic kilovoltage (kV) imaging, ultrasound transducers and electromagnetic transponders, has been developed for intrafraction motion monitoring on conventional linacs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been integrated with cobalt treatment units and more recently with linacs. In addition to hardware innovation, software development has played a substantial role in the development of motion monitoring methods based on respiratory motion surrogates and planar kV or Megavoltage (MV) imaging that is available on standard equipped linacs. In this paper, we review and compare the different intrafraction motion monitoring methods proposed in the literature and demonstrated in real-time on clinical data as well as their possible future developments. We then discuss general considerations on validation and quality assurance for clinical implementation. Besides photon RT, particle therapy is increasingly used to treat moving targets. However, transferring motion monitoring technologies from linacs to particle beam lines presents substantial challenges. Lessons learned from the implementation of real-time intrafraction monitoring for photon RT will be used as a basis to discuss the implementation of these methods for particle RT.

Assessing image artifacts from radiotherapy electromagnetic transponders with metal-artifact reduction imaging

Image artifacts due to 14 gauge radiotherapy electromagnetic (EM) transponders were assessed on conventional spin echo images, and corrected using metal artifact reduction techniques: high bandwidth, view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC). Large areas of signal loss and/or pile-up were produced in an area extending up to 15.3 mm in radius for 14G transponders in standard imaging. Using high bandwidth imaging with VAT, in-plane artifact sizes were reduced by up to 35%. SEMAC did not significantly reduce in-plane or through plane artifact size for axially oriented images, but was effective in reducing through-plane artifacts for sagittal images. Using the experimental data, magnetic field maps were simulated so that the magnetic susceptibility of the transponder could be estimated and slice profiles could be visualized. Due to the large susceptibilities involved, current correction techniques are unable to fully correct artifacts due to EM transponders and significant areas of signal loss and distortion remain. Care should be taken when planning MRI following EM transponder implantation.

Longitudinal assessment of anchored transponder migration following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

Purpose

To assess the long‐term stability of the anchored radiofrequency transponders and compare displacement rates with other commercially available lung fiducial markers. We also sought to describe late toxicity attributable to fiducial implantation or migration.

Materials and methods

The transponder cohort was comprised of 17 patients at our institution who enrolled in a multisite prospective clinical trial and underwent bronchoscopic implantation of three anchored transponders into small (2–2.5 mm) airways. We generated a comparison cohort of 34 patients by selecting patients from our institutional lung SBRT database and matching 2:1 based on the lobe containing tumor and proximity to the bronchial tree. Assessment of migration was performed by rigidly registering the most recent follow‐up CT scan to the simulation scan, and assessing whether the relative geometry of the fiducial markers had changed by more than 5 mm. Toxicity outcomes of interest were hemoptysis and pneumothorax.

Results

The median follow‐up of patients in the transponder cohort was 25.3 months and the median follow‐up in the comparison cohort was 21.7 months. When assessing the most recent CT, all fiducial markers were within 5 mm of their position at CT simulation in 11 (65%) patients in the transponder group as compared to 23 (68%) in the comparison group (P = 0.28). One case of hemoptysis was identified in the transponder cohort, and bronchoscopy confirmed bleeding from recurrent tumor; no cases of hemoptysis were noted in the comparison cohort. No case of pneumothorax was noted in either group.

Conclusion

No significant difference in the rates of fiducial marker retention and migration were noted when comparing patients who had anchored transponders placed into small airways and a 2:1 matched cohort of patients who had other commercially available lung fiducial markers placed. In both groups, no late or chronic toxicity appeared to be related to the implanted fiducial markers.