1
|
Kim JY, Tawk B, Knoll M, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Liermann J, Huber PE, Lifferth M, Lang C, Häring P, Gnirs R, Jäkel O, Schlemmer HP, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J, Weykamp F. Clinical Workflow of Cone Beam Computer Tomography-Based Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with Offline Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Modular Adaptive Radiotherapy System (MARS). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1210. [PMID: 38539544 PMCID: PMC10969008 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Ethos (Varian Medical Systems) radiotherapy device combines semi-automated anatomy detection and plan generation for cone beam computer tomography (CBCT)-based daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). However, CBCT offers less soft tissue contrast than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This work aims to present the clinical workflow of CBCT-based oART with shuttle-based offline MR guidance. METHODS From February to November 2023, 31 patients underwent radiotherapy on the Ethos (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) system with machine learning (ML)-supported daily oART. Moreover, patients received weekly MRI in treatment position, which was utilized for daily plan adaptation, via a shuttle-based system. Initial and adapted treatment plans were generated using the Ethos treatment planning system. Patient clinical data, fractional session times (MRI + shuttle transport + positioning, adaptation, QA, RT delivery) and plan selection were assessed for all fractions in all patients. RESULTS In total, 737 oART fractions were applied and 118 MRIs for offline MR guidance were acquired. Primary sites of tumors were prostate (n = 16), lung (n = 7), cervix (n = 5), bladder (n = 1) and endometrium (n = 2). The treatment was completed in all patients. The median MRI acquisition time including shuttle transport and positioning to initiation of the Ethos adaptive session was 53.6 min (IQR 46.5-63.4). The median total treatment time without MRI was 30.7 min (IQR 24.7-39.2). Separately, median adaptation, plan QA and RT times were 24.3 min (IQR 18.6-32.2), 0.4 min (IQR 0.3-1,0) and 5.3 min (IQR 4.5-6.7), respectively. The adapted plan was chosen over the scheduled plan in 97.7% of cases. CONCLUSION This study describes the first workflow to date of a CBCT-based oART combined with a shuttle-based offline approach for MR guidance. The oART duration times reported resemble the range shown by previous publications for first clinical experiences with the Ethos system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E. Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona Lifferth
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lang
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regula Gnirs
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hinault P, Gardin I, Gouel P, Decazes P, Thureau S, Veresezan O, Souchay H, Vera P, Gensanne D. Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13617. [PMID: 35481611 PMCID: PMC9278679 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positioning uncertainties of two PET/CT‐MR imaging setups, C1 and C2. Because the PET/CT data were acquired on the same hybrid device with automatic image registration, experiments were conducted using CT‐MRI data. In C1, a transfer table was used, which allowed the patient to move from one imager to another while maintaining the same position. In C2, the patient stood up and was positioned in the same radiotherapy treatment position on each imager. The two setups provided a set of PET/CT and MR images. The accuracy of the registration software was evaluated on the CT‐MRI data of one patient using known translations and rotations of MRI data. The uncertainties on the two setups were estimated using a phantom and a cohort of 30 patients. The accuracy of the positioning uncertainties was evaluated using descriptive statistics and a t‐test to determine whether the mean shift significantly deviated from zero (p < 0.05) for each setup. The maximum registration errors were less than 0.97 mm and 0.6° for CT‐MRI registration. On the phantom, the mean total uncertainties were less than 2.74 mm and 1.68° for C1 and 1.53 mm and 0.33° for C2. For C1, the t‐test showed that the displacements along the z‐axis did not significantly deviate from zero (p = 0.093). For C2, significant deviations from zero were present for anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior displacements. The mean total uncertainties were less than 4 mm and 0.42° for C1 and less than 1.39 mm and 0.27° for C2 in the patients. Furthermore, the t‐test showed significant deviations from zero for C1 on the anterior‐posterior and roll sides. For C2, there was a significant deviation from zero for the left‐right displacements.This study shows that transfer tables require careful evaluation before use in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Hinault
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,GE Healthcare, Buc, France
| | - Isabelle Gardin
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Pierrick Gouel
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Pierre Decazes
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Sebastien Thureau
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Ovidiu Veresezan
- Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | | | - Pierre Vera
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - David Gensanne
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.,Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moteabbed M, Smeets J, Hong TS, Janssens G, Labarbe R, Wolfgang JA, Bortfeld TR. Toward MR-integrated proton therapy: modeling the potential benefits for liver tumors. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34407528 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac1ef2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-integrated proton therapy (MRiPT) is envisioned to improve treatment quality for many cancer patients. However, given the availability of alternative image-guided strategies, its clinical need is yet to be justified. This study aims to compare the expected clinical outcomes of MRiPT with standard of practice cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided PT, and other MR-guided methods, i.e. offline MR-guided PT and MR-linac, for treatment of liver tumors. Clinical outcomes were assessed by quantifying the dosimetric and biological impact of target margin reduction enabled by each image-guided approach. Planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated using random and systematic setup, delineation and motion uncertainties, which were quantified by analyzing longitudinal MRI data for 10 patients with liver tumors. Proton treatment plans were created using appropriate PTV margins for each image-guided PT method. Photon plans with margins equivalent to MRiPT were generated to represent MR-linac. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) of the uninvolved liver were compared. We found that PTV margin can be reduced by 20% and 40% for offline MR-guided PT and MRiPT, respectively, compared with CBCT-guided PT. Furthermore, clinical target volume expansion could be largely alleviated when delineating on MRI rather than CT. Dosimetric implications included decreased equivalent mean dose of the uninvolved liver, i.e. up to 24.4 Gy and 27.3 Gy for offline MR-guided PT and MRiPT compared to CBCT-guided PT, respectively. Considering Child-Pugh score increase as endpoint, NTCP of the uninvolved liver was significantly decreased for MRiPT compared to CBCT-guided PT (up to 48.4%,p < 0.01), offline MR-guided PT (up to 12.9%,p < 0.01) and MR-linac (up to 30.8%,p < 0.05). Target underdose was possible in the absence of MRI-guidance (D90 reduction up to 4.2 Gy in 20% of cases). In conclusion, MRiPT has the potential to significantly reduce healthy liver toxicities in patients with liver tumors. It is superior to other image-guided techniques currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Moteabbed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Rudi Labarbe
- Ion Beam Applications, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belguim
| | - John A Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Thomas R Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koerber SA, Beuthien-Baumann B. [Modern radiation therapy planning and image-guided radiotherapy using the example of prostate cancer]. Radiologe 2021; 61:28-35. [PMID: 33057736 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00763-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Optimizing radiotherapy demands precise delineation of the target structure, not only before but also during the course of radiotherapy. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS For many years, planning of external radiation treatment planning has been based on computer tomography data. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS With the advent of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional hybrid imaging are increasingly being integrated into radiation treatment planning. The development of the MR-linac can be seen as an innovation. PERFORMANCE The integration of MRI and hybrid imaging (positron emission tomography [PET]/CT, PET/MRI) in the treatment planning process enables more precise treatment planning due to the better morphological and functional information. The integration of MRI data on the MR-linac in daily position control enables adaptation of the irradiation plan to the current conditions. ACHIEVEMENTS Technical innovation such as the MR-linac as well as increasing use of hybrid imaging contribute to the objective of further individualization within (radio)oncology. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Using the example of prostate cancer, the application of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands and hybrid imaging offers great potential for individualized strategic treatment decisions. The MR-linac appears to be particularly suitable for radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Special attention must be paid to the technical aspects of positioning and data acquisition for the purpose of radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Koerber
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wong OL, Yuan JI, Zhou Y, Yu SK, Cheung KY. Longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features: An ACR MRI phantom study on two MRI scanners using a 3D T1W TSE sequence. Med Phys 2021; 48:1239-1249. [PMID: 33370474 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in a three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W) TSE sequence via a well-controlled prospective phantom study. METHODS Thirty consecutive daily datasets of an ACR-MRI phantom were acquired on two 1.5T MRI simulators using a 3D T1W TSE sequence. Images were blindly segmented by two observers. Post-acquisition processing was minimized but an intensity discretization (fixed bin size of 25). One hundred and one radiomics features (shape n = 12; first order n = 16; texture n = 73) were extracted. Longitudinal repeatability of each feature was evaluated by Pearson correlation and coefficient of variance (CV68% ). Interobserver feature value agreement was also quantified using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. A most repeatable radiomics feature set on both scanners was determined by feature coefficient of variance (CV68% <5%), ICC (>0.75), and the ratio of the interobserver difference to the interobserver mean δ<5%. RESULTS No trend of radiomics feature value changed with time. Longitudinal feature repeatability CV68% ranged 0.01-38.60% (mean/median: 12.5%/9.9%), and 0.01-40.47%, (8.49%/7.34%) on the scanners A and B. Shape features exhibited significantly better repeatability than first-order and texture features (all P < 0.01). Significant longitudinal repeatability difference was observed in texture features (P < 0.001) between the two scanners, but not in shape and first-order features (P > 0.30). First-order and texture features had smaller interobserver-dependent variation than acquisition-dependent variation. They also showed good interobserver agreement on both scanners (A:ICC = 0.80 ± 0.23; B:ICC = 0.80 ± 0.22), independent of acquisition repeatability. The repeatable radiomics features in common on both scanners, including 12 shape features, 0 first-order features, and 3 texture features, were determined as the most repeatable MRI radiomics feature set. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics features exhibited heterogeneous longitudinal repeatability, while the shape features were the most repeatable, in this phantom study with a 3D T1W TSE acquisition. The most repeatable radiomics feature set derived in this study should be helpful for the selection of reliable radiomics features in the future clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oi Lei Wong
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - JIng Yuan
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yihang Zhou
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Splinter M, Sachpazidis I, Bostel T, Fechter T, Zamboglou C, Thieke C, Jäkel O, Huber PE, Debus J, Baltas D, Nicolay NH. Dosimetric Impact of the Positional Imaging Frequency for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy - A Voxel-by-Voxel Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:564068. [PMID: 33134166 PMCID: PMC7550661 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate deviations between planned and applied treatment doses for hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy and to quantify dosimetric accuracy in dependence of the image guidance frequency. Methods Daily diagnostic in-room CTs were carried out in 10 patients in treatment position as image guidance for hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy. Fraction doses were mapped to the planning CTs and recalculated, and applied doses were accumulated voxel-wise using deformable registration. Non-daily imaging schedules were simulated by deriving position correction vectors from individual scans and used to rigidly register the following scans until the next repositioning before dose recalculation and accumulation. Planned and applied doses were compared regarding dose-volume indices and TCP and NTCP values in dependence of the imaging and repositioning frequency. Results Daily image-guided repositioning was associated with only negligible deviations of analyzed dose-volume parameters and conformity/homogeneity indices for the prostate, bladder and rectum. Average CTV T did not significantly deviate from the plan values, and rectum NTCPs were highly comparable, while bladder NTCPs were reduced. For non-daily image-guided repositioning, there were significant deviations in the high-dose range from the planned values. Similarly, CTV dose conformity and homogeneity were reduced. While TCPs and rectal NTCPs did not significantly deteriorate for non-daily repositioning, bladder NTCPs appeared falsely diminished in dependence of the imaging frequency. Conclusion Using voxel-by-voxel dose accumulation, we showed for the first time that daily image-guided repositioning resulted in only negligible dosimetric deviations for hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy. Regarding dosimetric aberrations for non-daily imaging, daily imaging is required to adequately deliver treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Splinter
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Thieke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bostel T, Dreher C, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, König F, Bickelhaupt S, Schlemmer HP, Huber PE, Sterzing F, Bäumer P, Debus J, Nicolay NH. Exploring MR regression patterns in rectal cancer during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with daily T2- and diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:171. [PMID: 32653003 PMCID: PMC7353746 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01613-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, only limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data are available concerning tumor regression during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) of rectal cancer patients, which is a prerequisite for adaptive radiotherapy (RT) concepts. This exploratory study prospectively evaluated daily fractional MRI during neoadjuvant treatment to analyze the predictive value of MR biomarkers for treatment response. Methods Locally advanced rectal cancer patients were examined with daily MRI during neoadjuvant RCT. Contouring of the tumor volume was performed for each MRI scan by using T2- and diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI)-sequences. The daily apparent-diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated. Volumetric and functional tumor changes during RCT were analyzed and correlated with the pathological response after surgical resection. Results In total, 171 MRI scans of eight patients were analyzed regarding anatomical and functional dynamics during RCT. Pathological complete response (pCR) could be achieved in four patients, and four patients had a pathological partial response (pPR) following neoadjuvant treatment. T2- and DWI-based volumetry proved to be statistically significant in terms of therapeutic response, and volumetric thresholds at week two and week four during RCT were defined for the prediction of pCR. In contrast, the average tumor ADC values widely overlapped between both response groups during RCT and appeared inadequate to predict treatment response in our patient cohort. Conclusion This prospective exploratory study supports the hypothesis that MRI may be able to predict pCR of rectal cancers early during neoadjuvant RCT. Our data therefore provide a useful template to tailor future MR-guided adaptive treatment concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bostel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - C Dreher
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - F König
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Bickelhaupt
- Division of Medical Imaging and Radiology - Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - H P Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P E Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Sterzing
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Radiation Oncology, Kempten Clinic, Robert-Weixler-Strasse 50, 87439, Kempten, Germany
| | - P Bäumer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,dia.log, Altoetting Center for Radiology, Vinzenz-von-Paul-Strasse 10, 84503, Altoetting, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Handrack J, Bangert M, Möhler C, Bostel T, Greilich S. Towards a generalised development of synthetic CT images and assessment of their dosimetric accuracy. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:180-187. [PMID: 31694437 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1684558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: The interest in generating "synthetic computed tomography (CT) images" from magnetic resonance (MR) images has been increasing over the past years due to advances in MR guidance for radiotherapy. A variety of methods for synthetic CT creation have been developed, from simple bulk density assignment to complex machine learning algorithms.Material and methods: In this study, we present a general method to determine simplistic synthetic CTs and evaluate them according to their dosimetric accuracy. It separates the requirements on the MR image and the associated calculation effort to generate a synthetic CT. To evaluate the significance of the dosimetric accuracy under realistic conditions, clinically common uncertainties including position shifts and Hounsfield lookup table (HLUT) errors were simulated. To illustrate our approach, we first translated CT images from a test set of six pelvic cancer patients to relative electron density (ED) via a clinical HLUT. For each patient, seven simplified ED images (simED) were generated at different levels of complexity, ranging from one to four tissue classes. Then, dose distributions optimised on the reference ED image and the simEDs were compared to each other in terms of gamma pass rates (2 mm/2% criteria) and dose volume metrics.Results: For our test set, best results were obtained for simEDs with four tissue classes representing fat, soft tissue, air, and bone. For this simED, gamma pass rates of 99.95% (range: 99.72-100%) were achieved. The decrease in accuracy from ED simplification was smaller in this case than the influence of the uncertainty scenarios on the reference image, both for gamma pass rates and dose volume metrics.Conclusions: The presented workflow helps to determine the required complexity of synthetic CTs with respect to their dosimetric accuracy. The investigated cases showed potential simplifications, based on which the synthetic CT generation could be faster and more reproducible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Handrack
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Bangert
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Möhler
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Greilich
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
First prospective clinical evaluation of feasibility and patient acceptance of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in Germany. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:691-698. [PMID: 32002567 PMCID: PMC7385000 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01578-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has recently been introduced in our institution. As MRgRT requires high patient compliance compared to conventional techniques and can be associated with prolonged treatment times, feasibility and patient tolerance were prospectively assessed using patient-reported outcome questionnaires (PRO-Q). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three patients were enrolled in a prospective observational study and treated with MRgRT on a low-field hybrid Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerator system (MR-Linac) between April 2018 and April 2019. For assistance in gated breath-hold delivery using cine-MRI, a video feedback system was installed. PRO-Qs consisted of questions on MR-related complaints and also assessed aspects of active patient participation. RESULTS The most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal metastases and liver lesions. The mean treatment time was 34 min with a mean beam-on time of 2:17 min. Gated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was applied in 47% of all patients. Overall, patients scored MRgRT as positive or at least tolerable in the PRO‑Q. Almost two thirds of patients (65%) complained about at least one item of the PRO‑Q (score ≥4), mainly concerning coldness, paresthesia, and uncomfortable positioning. All patients reported high levels of satisfaction with their active role using the video feedback system in breath-hold delivery. CONCLUSION MRgRT was successfully implemented in our clinic and well tolerated by all patients, despite MR-related complaints and complaints about uncomfortable immobilization. Prospective clinical studies are in development for further evaluation of MRgRT and for quantification of the benefit of MR-guided on-table adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Splinter M, Bostel T, Sachpazidis I, Fechter T, Zamboglou C, Jäkel O, Huber PE, Debus J, Baltas D, Nicolay NH. Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations for Post-prostatectomy Radiotherapy to the Prostatic Fossa-Relevance for the Frequency of Position Verification Imaging and Treatment Adaptation. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1191. [PMID: 31788450 PMCID: PMC6856079 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: To analyze divergences between the planned and applied treatment doses for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa on a voxel-by-voxel basis based on interfractional anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: For 10 patients receiving intensity-modulated postoperative radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa, position verification was carried out by daily in-room CT imaging in treatment position (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily CT scans, and treatment doses were accumulated on a voxel-by-voxel basis after deformable image registration. To simulate weekly imaging, derived weekly position correction vectors were used to rigidly register all daily scans of the respective treatment week onto the planning CT before dose accumulation. Detailed dose statistics of the prescribed and applied treatment doses were compared in relation to the frequency of position verification imaging. Derived NTCP and Pinjury values were calculated for the rectum and bladder. Results: Despite a large variability in the pelvic anatomy, daily CT-based patient repositioning resulted in largely negligible deviations of the analyzed dose-volume, conformity, and uniformity parameters from the planned doses for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, and only the bladder exhibited significant increases in the accumulated mean and median doses. Derived NTCP for the applied doses to the rectum and bladder and Pinjury values did not significantly deviate from the treatment plan. In contrast, weekly CT-based repositioning resulted in significant decreases of the PTV coverage and dose conformity as well as large deviations of the applied doses to the rectum and bladder from the planned doses. Consecutively, NTCP for the rectum and Pinjury were found falsely reduced for weekly patient repositioning. Conclusions: Our data indicate for the first time in a voxel-by-voxel analysis that daily imaging is required for reliable adaptive delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa. This work will help guiding adaptive treatment strategies for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Splinter
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schwahofer A, Jäkel O. [Planning target volume : Management of uncertainties, immobilization, image guided and adaptive radiation therapy]. Radiologe 2019; 58:736-745. [PMID: 29946893 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-018-0419-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE As a standard, today's radiation therapy is based on CT images which are used for therapy planning. These images are obtained once before therapy starts and serve as a basis to obtain the position and shape of the target volume. As the patient has to be positioned anew for each fraction, deviations of the tumor position relative to the radiation field but also internal motion of the tumor may occur. These deviations lead to uncertainties, which are taken into account by adding a safety margin around the clinical target volume (CTV) to create the planning target volume (PTV). STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS As a standard today, CT-based treatment planning is used, where images are obtained once prior to therapy. The information on tumor position and shape, which is obtained from these images, is used throughout the whole cycle of radiation therapy without any change. This cycle may last several weeks. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS By repeated imaging of the patient in the treatment position prior to each fraction, the position of the tumor can be assessed and corrected for each fraction. PERFORMANCE A reduction of positioning uncertainty may be used to reduce the safety margin. This leads to a decreased volume of irradiated normal tissue. ACHIEVEMENTS A reduced volume of irradiated normal tissue leads to reduced side effects and provides the opportunity of increased tumor control by dose escalation. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Before the PTV is reduced, a detailed analysis of the uncertainties for the specific imaging method and radiation technique must be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Schwahofer
- Abteilung Medizinische Physik in der Strahlentherapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - O Jäkel
- Abteilung Medizinische Physik in der Strahlentherapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou Y, Wong OL, Cheung KY, Yu SK, Yuan J. A pilot study of highly accelerated 3D MRI in the head and neck position verification for MR-guided radiotherapy. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9:1255-1269. [PMID: 31448211 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.06.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background To evaluate the performance of a highly accelerated 3D MRI on inter-fractional positional measurement for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in the head and neck (HN). Methods Fourteen healthy volunteers received 159 scans on a 1.5 T MR-sim to simulate MRgRT fractions. MRI acquisition included a high-resolution (HQI-MRI, voxel-size =1.05×1.05×1.05 mm3, duration =5 min) and a highly-accelerated low-resolution (true-LQI-MRI, acceleration-factor =9, voxel-size =1.4×1.4×1.4 mm3, duration =86 s) T1w spin-echo sequence (TR/TE =420/7.2 ms). The first session HQI-MRI was used as the reference to mimic planning MRI. Other HQI-MRI was also retrospectively down-sampled in K-space and GRAPPA reconstructed to generate pseudo-LQI-MRI. Inter-sessional positional shift calculated from HQI-MRI, true-LQI-MRI and pseudo-LQI-MRI rigidly registering to the reference were analyzed and compared in the overall HN and the sub-regions of brain, nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx. Results The calculated SD of systematic errors (Σ) from HQI-MRI/pseudo-LQI-MRI/true-LQI-MRI images for overall HN were 1.11/1.14/1.08, 0.28/0.26/0.29, 0.43/0.44/0.60, and 0.77/0.79/0.74 mm for translation in LR, AP, SI and 3D, respectively; The corresponding RMS of random errors (σ) were 0.97/0.98/0.96, 0.28/0.27/0.26, 0.77/0.77/0.72, and 0.85/0.87/0.85 mm. For all sub-regions, brain showed the smallest Σ and σ in 3D. Other sub-regions showed direction-dependent error patterns, but the positioning results were consistent, independent of the datasets used for registration. Conclusions A highly-accelerated 3D-MRI could be used for MR-guided HN radiotherapy without compromising position verification accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihang Zhou
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Hörner-Rieber J, Lagerwaard FJ, Mazzola R, Palacios MA, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Valentini V, Niyazi M. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:92. [PMID: 31167658 PMCID: PMC6551911 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) marks the beginning of a new era. MR is a versatile and suitable imaging modality for radiotherapy, as it enables direct visualization of the tumor and the surrounding organs at risk. Moreover, MRgRT provides real-time imaging to characterize and eventually track anatomical motion. Nevertheless, the successful translation of new technologies into clinical practice remains challenging. To date, the initial availability of next-generation hybrid MR-linac (MRL) systems is still limited and therefore, the focus of the present preview was on the initial applicability in current clinical practice and on future perspectives of this new technology for different treatment sites.MRgRT can be considered a groundbreaking new technology that is capable of creating new perspectives towards an individualized, patient-oriented planning and treatment approach, especially due to the ability to use daily online adaptation strategies. Furthermore, MRL systems overcome the limitations of conventional image-guided radiotherapy, especially in soft tissue, where target and organs at risk need accurate definition. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the additional time needed to re-optimize dose distributions online, the reliability of the gating and tracking procedures and the interpretation of functional MR imaging markers and their potential changes during the course of treatment. Due to its continuous technological improvement and rapid clinical large-scale application in several anatomical settings, further studies may confirm the potential disruptive role of MRgRT in the evolving oncological environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - F. Alongi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - L. Boldrini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F. Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M. A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. P. Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. P. J. Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V. Valentini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - M. Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhou Y, Yuan J, Wong OL, Fung WWK, Cheng KF, Cheung KY, Yu SK. Assessment of positional reproducibility in the head and neck on a 1.5-T MR simulator for an offline MR-guided radiotherapy solution. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2018; 8:925-935. [PMID: 30505721 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.10.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Recently, a shuttle-based offline magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) approach was proposed. This study aims to evaluate the positional reproducibility in the immobilized head and neck using a 1.5-T MR-simulator (MR-sim) on healthy volunteers. Methods A total of 159 scans of 14 healthy volunteers were conducted on a 1.5-T MR-sim with thermoplastic mask immobilization. MR images with isotropic 1.053 mm3 voxel size were rigidly registered to the first scan based on fiducial, anatomical and gross positions. Mean and standard deviation of positional displacements in translation and rotation were assessed. Systematic error and random errors of positioning in the head and neck on the MR-sim were determined in the translation of, and in the rotation of roll, pitch and yaw. Results The systematic error (Σ) of translation in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction was 0.57, 0.22 and 0.26 mm for fiducial displacement, 0.28, 0.10 and 0.52 mm for anatomical displacement, and 0.53, 0.22 and 0.49 mm for gross displacement, respectively. The random error (σ) in corresponding translation direction was 2.07, 0.54 and 1.32 mm for fiducial displacement, 1.34, 0.73 and 2.04 mm for anatomical displacement, and 2.24, 0.86 and 2.61 mm for gross displacement. The systematic error and random error of rotation were generally smaller than 1°. Conclusions Our results suggested that high gross positional reproducibility (<1 mm translational and <1° rotational systematic error) could be achieved on an MR-sim for the proposed offline MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihang Zhou
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Winky Wing Ki Fung
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ka Fai Cheng
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hunt A, Hansen VN, Oelfke U, Nill S, Hafeez S. Adaptive Radiotherapy Enabled by MRI Guidance. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:711-719. [PMID: 30201276 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategies systematically monitor variations in target and neighbouring structures to inform treatment-plan modification during radiotherapy. This is necessary because a single plan designed before treatment is insufficient to capture the actual dose delivered to the target and adjacent critical structures during the course of radiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue image contrast over current standard X-ray-based technologies without additional radiation exposure. With integrated MRI and radiotherapy platforms permitting motion monitoring during treatment delivery, it is possible that adaption can be informed by real-time anatomical imaging. This allows greater treatment accuracy in terms of dose delivered to target with smaller, individualised treatment margins. The use of functional MRI sequences would permit ART to be informed by imaging biomarkers, so allowing both personalised geometric and biological adaption. In this review, we discuss ART solutions enabled by MRI guidance and its potential gains for our patients across tumour types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hunt
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V N Hansen
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - U Oelfke
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Nill
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tamihardja J, Zenk M, Flentje M. MRI-guided localization of the dominant intraprostatic lesion and dose analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:145-152. [PMID: 30209535 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1364-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary radiation therapy is a curative treatment option for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection of the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy treatment planning, the comparison with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies and the examination of the dose distribution in relation to the DIL location. MATERIALS AND METHODS In all, 54 patients with treatment planning MRI for primary radiotherapy of prostate cancer from 03/2015 to 03/2017 at the Universitätsklinikum Würzburg were identified. The localization of the DIL was based on MRI with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. After registration of the MR image sets within Pinnacle3 (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI, USA), the dose distribution was analyzed. The location of the DIL was compared to the pathology reports in a side-based manner. RESULTS The DIL mean dose (Dmean) was 77.51 ± 0.77 Gy and in 50/51 cases within the tolerance range or exceeded the prescribed dose. There was a significant difference in Dmean between ventral (n = 21) and dorsal (n = 30) DIL (77.87 ± 0.67 vs. 77.26 ± 0.77 Gy; p = 0.005). MRI-guided localization showed an accuracy and sensitivity of up to 78.8% and 82.1% for inclusion of secondary lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION Up to 82.1% of histologically verified intraprostatic lesions were identified in the context of MRI-guided radiotherapy treatment planning. As expected, dorsal DIL tend to be minimally underdosed in comparison to ventral DIL. Adequate dose coverage was achieved in over 98% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Maria Zenk
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Emmerich J, Laun FB, Pfaffenberger A, Schilling R, Denoix M, Maier F, Sterzing F, Bostel T, Straub S. Technical Note: On the size of susceptibility-induced MR image distortions in prostate and cervix in the context of MR-guided radiation therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:1586-1593. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Emmerich
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Frederik B. Laun
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Institute of Radiology; University Hospital Erlangen; Erlangen Germany
| | - Asja Pfaffenberger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | | | - Michael Denoix
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Florian Maier
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
- National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
- National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Sina Straub
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|