1
|
Merten R, Strnad V, Karius A, Lotter M, Kreppner S, Schweizer C, Fietkau R, Schubert P. Definitive treatment for primary urethral cancer: A single institution's experience with organ-preserving brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2025; 24:62-67. [PMID: 39384520 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical urethectomy ± cystectomy has long represented the standard of care for rare primary urethral cancer (PUC). With our analysis, we want to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy (BT) of urethra for organ preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed treatment procedures and results of 3 patients with PUC, which have been treated in our department between 2011 and 2020 with brachytherapy. One male patient underwent brachytherapy with chemoradiotherapy after transurethral resection (TUR). Brachytherapy has been performed as high-dose-rate (HDR) boost with a cumulative dose of 8 Gy (9.3 Gy EQD2-α/β = 10 Gy). The 2 further female patients have been treated with sole pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy with a total dose of 49.9 Gy (50.3 Gy EQD2-α/β = 10 Gy) and 62.2 Gy (64.6 Gy EQD2-α/β = 10 Gy). RESULTS Median follow-up was 103 months (41-153). No local recurrence occurred and all patients are still alive. For the male patient we documented Grade 3 cystitis. As late side effects the pre-existing Grade 2 incontinence worsened to Grade 3. Among female patients one developed Grade 3 vaginal synechiae. There was no Grade ≥4 toxicity. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy in PUC is a feasible and promising option with high local control rate and tolerable toxicity. It provides a good alternative to surgery for organ preservation in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Merten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - V Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Karius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Kreppner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C Schweizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - P Schubert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Alliance WERA (CCC WERA), Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gough J, Hall W, Good J, Nash A, Aitken K. Technical Radiotherapy Advances – The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation in the Delivery of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:301-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
3
|
Wong OL, Poon DM, Kam MK, Lo GG, Fung WW, Man SY, Xue C, Yu SK, Cheung KY, Yuan J. 3D‐T2W‐TSE radiotherapy treatment planning MRI using compressed sensing acceleration for prostate cancer: Image quality and delineation value. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e369-e377. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Oi Lei Wong
- Research Department Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Darren M.C. Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Miachael K.M. Kam
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Gladys G. Lo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Winky W.K. Fung
- Department of Radiotherapy Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Shei Yee Man
- Department of Radiotherapy Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Cindy Xue
- Research Department Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics Department Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics Department Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Jing Yuan
- Research Department Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Böckelmann F, Putz F, Kallis K, Lettmaier S, Fietkau R, Bert C. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:647-656. [PMID: 32157345 PMCID: PMC7305089 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01596-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric influence of daily interfractional (inter) setup errors and intrafractional (intra) target motion on the planning target volume (PTV) and the possibility of an offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) method to correct larger patient positioning uncertainties in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods A CTV (clinical target volume)-to-PTV margin ranging from 15 mm in LR (left-right) and SI (superior-inferior) and 5–10 mm in AP (anterior-posterior) direction was applied to all patients. The dosimetric influence of this margin was retrospectively calculated by analysing systematic and random components of inter and intra errors of 31 consecutive intermediate- and high-risk localized PCa patients using daily cone beam computed tomography and kV/kV (kilo-Voltage) imaging. For each patient inter variation was assessed by observing the first 4 treatment days, which led to an offline ART-based treatment plan in case of larger variations. Results: Systematic inter uncertainties were larger (1.12 in LR, 2.28 in SI and 1.48 mm in AP) than intra systematic errors (0.44 in LR, 0.69 in SI and 0.80 mm in AP). Same findings for the random error in SI direction with 3.19 (inter) and 2.30 mm (intra), whereas in LR and AP results were alike with 1.89 (inter) and 1.91 mm (intra) and 2.10 (inter) and 2.27 mm (intra), respectively. The calculated margin revealed dimensions of 4–5 mm in LR, 8–9 mm in SI and 6–7 mm in AP direction. Treatment plans which had to be adapted showed smaller variations with 1.12 (LR) and 1.72 mm (SI) for Σ and 4.17 (LR) and 3.75 mm (SI) for σ compared to initial plans with 1.77 and 2.62 mm for Σ and 4.46 and 5.39 mm for σ in LR and SI, respectively. Conclusion The currently clinically used margin of 15 mm in LR and SI and 5–10 mm in AP direction includes inter and intra uncertainties. The results show that offline ART is feasible which becomes a necessity with further reductions in PTV margins. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01596-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Böckelmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beer L, Polanec SH, Baltzer PAT, Schatzl G, Georg D, Schestak C, Dutschke A, Herrmann H, Mazal P, Brendel AK, Shariat SF, Ringl H, Helbich TH, Apfaltrer P. 4D perfusion CT of prostate cancer for image-guided radiotherapy planning: A proof of concept study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225673. [PMID: 31856177 PMCID: PMC6922381 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advanced forms of prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy with either external beam therapy or brachytherapy delivery techniques aim for a focal boost and thus require accurate lesion localization and lesion segmentation for subsequent treatment planning. This study prospectively evaluated dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) for the detection of prostate cancer lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) using qualitative and quantitative image analysis compared to multiparametric magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. Methods With local ethics committee approval, 14 patients (mean age, 67 years; range, 57–78 years; PSA, mean 8.1 ng/ml; range, 3.5–26.0) underwent DCE-CT, as well as mpMRI of the prostate, including standard T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE-MRI sequences followed by transrectal in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Maximum intensity projections (MIP) and DCE-CT perfusion parameters (CTP) were compared between healthy and malignant tissue. Two radiologists independently rated image quality and the tumor lesion delineation quality of PCa using a five-point ordinal scale. MIP and CTP were compared using visual grading characteristics (VGC) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC)/area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Results The PCa detection rate ranged between 57 to 79% for the two readers for DCE-CT and was 92% for DCE-MRI. DCE-CT perfusion parameters in PCa tissue in the PZ were significantly different compared to regular prostate tissue and benign lesions. Image quality and lesion visibility were comparable between DCE-CT and DCE-MRI (VGC: AUC 0.612 and 0.651, p>0.05). Conclusion Our preliminary results suggest that it is feasible to use DCE-CT for identification and visualization, and subsequent segmentation for focal radiotherapy approaches to PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Beer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephan H. Polanec
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal A. T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Schatzl
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Schestak
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anja Dutschke
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Herrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Mazal
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Helmut Ringl
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas H. Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Apfaltrer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|