1
|
Hayek OE, Rais-Bahrami S, McDonald A, Galgano SJ. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Salvage for Lymph Node Recurrent Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET Imaging. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:471-476. [PMID: 37395949 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01174-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our understanding of patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after primary treatment of localized disease has significantly evolved since the development of positron emission tomography (PET) agents targeting prostate cancer. Previously, most biochemical recurrences were not associated with imaging correlates when restaging with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or bone scintigraphy and, hence, were typically assumed to represent occult metastases. A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after previous local therapy prompting a PET scan showing uptake limited to regional lymph nodes is an increasingly common clinical scenario as advanced prostate cancer imaging becomes more widely utilized. The optimal management strategy for patients who have lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is both unclear and evolving, particularly in terms of local and regionally directed therapies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilizes ablative radiation doses with steep gradients to achieve local tumor control while sparing nearby normal tissues. SBRT is an attractive therapeutic modality due to its efficacy, favorable toxicity profile, and flexibility to administer elective doses to areas of potential occult involvement. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe how SBRT is being implemented in the era of PSMA PET for the management of solely lymph node recurrent prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS SBRT has been shown to effectively control individual lymph node tumor deposits within the pelvis and retroperitoneum for prostate cancer and is well-tolerated with a favorable toxicity profile. However, a major limitation thus far has been the lack of prospective trials supporting the use of SBRT for oligometastatic nodal recurrent prostate cancer. As further trials are conducted, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of recurrent prostate cancer will be better established. Although PET-guided SBRT appears feasible and potentially beneficial, there is still considerable uncertainty about the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in patients with nodal recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer. PSMA PET has undoubtedly advanced imaging of recurrent prostate cancer, revealing anatomic correlates for disease recurrence that previously went undetected. At the same time, SBRT continues to be explored in prostate cancer with feasibility, a favorable risk profile, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes. However, much of the existing literature comes from the pre-PSMA PET era and integration of this novel imaging approach has led to greater focus on new and ongoing clinical trials to rigorously evaluate this approach and compare to other established treatment modalities utilized for oligometastatic, nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar E Hayek
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
| | - Andrew McDonald
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen JJ, Weg E, Liao JJ. Prostate and metastasis-directed focal therapy in prostate cancer: hype or hope? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:163-176. [PMID: 36718727 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The paradigm of focal therapy's role in metastatic patients is being challenged by evolving attitudes and emerging data. At the current time, specifically regarding prostate cancer, does the evidence indicate this is more hype or hope? AREAS COVERED We searched the literature via PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies from 2014 to the present addressing focal therapy with non-palliative intent in metastatic prostate cancer patients, emphasizing prospective trials when available. We sought to address all common clinical scenarios: de novo synchronous diagnosis, oligorecurrence, oligoprogression, and mCRPC disease. EXPERT OPINION Current evidence is strongest, and in our opinion practice-changing, for prostate-directed RT in de novo metastatic patients with low metastatic burden. Metastasis-directed therapy with SBRT is consistently shown to have low rates of toxicity, and promising rates of ADT-free survival and progression-free survival. These can be utilized on a patient-by-patient basis with these endpoints in mind, but do not yet show sufficient benefit to be standard of care. This is a rich area of ongoing research, and many trials should publish in the coming years to shed light on many unanswered questions, including the role of cytoreductive prostatectomy, systemic therapy combined with MDT, and the integration of modern PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zamagni A, Bonetti M, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Galietta E, Strigari L, Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Cammelli S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic radiotherapy of nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:845-863. [PMID: 35980556 PMCID: PMC9637632 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastases-directed therapies can delay the initiation or switch of systemic treatments and allow local control (LC) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with lymph nodes (LN) oligometastases. We performed a systematic review on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS were selected. Data on ADT-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were also collected from the selected studies. Fifteen studies were eligible (414 patients), 14 of them were retrospective analyses. A high heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient selection and treatment. In one study SBRT was delivered as a single 20 Gy fraction, while in the others the median total dose ranged between 24 and 40 Gy delivered in 3-6 fractions. LC and PFS were reported in 15 and 12 papers, respectively. LC was reported as a crude percentage in 13 studies, with 100% rate in seven and 63.2-98.0% in six reports. Five studies reported actuarial LC (2-year LC: 70.0-100%). PFS was reported as a crude rate in 11 studies (range 27.3-68.8%). Actuarial 2-year PFS was reported in four studies (range 30.0-50.0%). SBRT tolerability was excellent, with only two patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and two patients with grade 3 late toxicity. SBRT for LN oligorecurrences from PCa in safe and provides optimal LC. However, the long-term effect on PFS and OS is still unclear as well as which patients are the best candidate for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Zamagni
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mattia Bonetti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Erika Galietta
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nicosia L, Trapani G, Rigo M, Giaj-Levra N, Mazzola R, Pastorello E, Ricchetti F, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Fiorini M, Alongi F. 1.5 T MR-Guided Daily Adapted SBRT on Lymph Node Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226658. [PMID: 36431135 PMCID: PMC9697920 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac in patients affected by lymph node oligometastases from PCa. Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study conducted in a single institution (protocol n°: MRI/LINAC n. 23748). Patients with oligometastatic lymph nodes from PCa treated with daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac were included in the study. There was a minimum required follow-up of 3 months after SBRT. The primary end-point was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary end-points were: nodal progression-free survival (NPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 118 lymph node oligometastases from PCa were treated with daily adaptive 1.5 T MR-guided SBRT in 63 oligometastatic patients. Of the patients, 63.5% were oligorecurrent and 36.5% were oligoprogressive. The two-year LPFS was 90.7%. The median NPFS was 22.3 months and the 2-year NPFS was 46.5%. Receiving hormone therapy before SBRT was correlated with a lower NPFS at the multivariate analysis (1 y NPFS 87.1% versus 42.8%; p = 0.002-HR 0.199, 95% CI 0.073-0.549). Furthermore, the oligorecurrent state during ADT was correlated with a lower NPFS than was the oligoprogressive state. The median PFS was 10.3 months and the 2-year PFS was 32.4%. Patients treated with hormone therapy before SBRT had a significantly lower 1-year PFS the others (28% versus 70.4%; p = 0.01-HR 0.259, 95% CI 0.117-0.574). No acute and late toxicities occurred during treatment. Conclusions: The present study is the largest prospective study of 1.5 T lymph node SBRT on MR-linac in patients with PCa. Lymph node SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac provides high local control rates with an excellent toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-045-6014800; Fax: +39-045-60148071
| | - Giovanna Trapani
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Matilde Fiorini
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- Clinical Research Unity, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 199:536-543. [PMID: 35953611 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01993-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a local radio-oncological treatment for patients with prostate cancer that metastasized to either the lymph nodes or distant regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included 133 patients with prostate cancer that displayed either distant metastases (DM) or lymph node metastases alone (NM) and were treated between 2004 and 2019. All patients underwent computed tomography and a bone scan or 18F- or prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography. Patients received local external beam radiation therapy to the prostate to achieve local control (60-81.4 Gy to the prostate, and 45-50.4 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes), with either the 3D conformal (4-field box) or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. A urologist prescribed additional therapy. RESULTS We included 51 patients with DM and 82 patients with NM. The mean follow-up was 42 months for all patients. The groups were similar in T stage, initial prostate-specific antigen, histology, androgen deprivation therapy, age, treatment techniques, and prescribed doses, but different in lymph node inclusion and follow-up times. In the NM and DM groups, the 5‑year biochemical recurrence-free rates were 52% and 24%, respectively (p < 0.0001); the 5‑year disease-specific survival rates were 92% and 61%, respectively (p = 0.001); and the 5‑year OS rates were 77% and 48%, respectively (p = 0.01). The groups had similar acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary side effects, except that late genitourinary side effects occurred significantly more frequently in the NM group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS DM was associated with significantly worse outcomes than NM. The long-term survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer was low.
Collapse
|
6
|
Tamihardja J, Zehner L, Hartrampf P, Lisowski D, Kneitz S, Cirsi S, Razinskas G, Flentje M, Polat B. Salvage Nodal Radiotherapy as Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Detected by Positron Emission Tomography Shows Favorable Outcome in Long-Term Follow-Up. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153766. [PMID: 35954430 PMCID: PMC9367596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients, who suffer from oligorecurrent prostate cancer with limited nodal involvement, may be offered positron emission tomography (PET)-directed salvage nodal radiotherapy to delay disease progression. This current analysis aimed to access salvage radiotherapy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer with simultaneous integrated boost to PET-involved lymph nodes as metastasis-directed therapy. A long-term oncological outcome was favorable after salvage nodal radiotherapy and severe toxicity rates were low. Androgen deprivation therapy plays a major role in recurrent prostate cancer management and demonstrates a positive influence on the rate of biochemical progression in patients receiving salvage nodal radiotherapy. The present long-term analysis may help clinicians identify patients who would benefit from salvage nodal radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, as a multimodal treatment strategy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Abstract Background: The study aimed to access the long-term outcome of salvage nodal radiotherapy (SNRT) in oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 95 consecutive patients received SNRT for pelvic and/or extrapelvic nodal recurrence after prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) or choline PET from 2010 to 2021. SNRT was applied as external beam radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to a median total dose of 62.9 Gy (EQD21.5Gy) to the recurrent lymph node metastases. The outcome was analyzed by cumulative incidence functions with death as the competing risk. Fine–Gray regression analyses were performed to estimate the relative hazards of the outcome parameters. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation utilized Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). The results are as follows: the median follow-up was 47.1 months. The five-year biochemical progression rate (95% CI) was 50.1% (35.7–62.9%). Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was adminstered in 60.0% of the patients. The five-year biochemical progression rate was 75.0% (42.0–90.9%) without ADT versus 35.3% (19.6–51.4%) with ADT (p = 0.003). The cumulative five-year late grade 3 GU toxicity rate was 2.1%. No late grade 3 GI toxicity occured. Conclusions: Metastasis-directed therapy through SNRT for PET-staged oligorecurrent prostate cancer demonstrated a favorable long-term oncologic outcome. Omittance of ADT led to an increased biochemical progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Leonie Zehner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Philipp Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Dominik Lisowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Susanne Kneitz
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Sinan Cirsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Local Control after Locally Ablative, Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Oligometastases Identified by Gallium-68-PSMA-Positron Emission Tomography in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients (OLI-P). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092073. [PMID: 35565207 PMCID: PMC9100669 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this clinical trial, 63 patients with a total of 89 prostate cancer metastases identified on PSMA-PET were included, none of them undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. We showed that local ablative radiotherapy controls >90% of the metastases, but progression at other sites is common after two years. Local ablative radiotherapy may be an option to at least temporarily avoid systemic therapy in selected patients. Abstract Progression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values after curative treatment of prostate cancer patients is common. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-) PET imaging can identify patients with metachronous oligometastatic disease even at low PSA levels. Metastases-directed local ablative radiotherapy (aRT) has been shown to be a safe treatment option. In this prospective clinical trial, we evaluated local control and the pattern of tumor progression. Between 2014 and 2018, 63 patients received aRT of 89 metastases (MET) (68 lymph node (LN-)MET and 21 bony (OSS-)MET) with one of two radiation treatment schedules: 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions in 34 MET or 30 Gy in 10 Gy fractions in 55 MET. The mean gross tumor volume and planning target volume were 2.2 and 14.9 mL, respectively. The median follow-up time was 40.7 months. Local progression occurred in seven MET, resulting in a local control rate of 93.5% after three years. Neither treatment schedule, target volume, nor type of lesion was associated with local progression. Regional progression in the proximity to the LN-MET was observed in 19 of 47 patients with at least one LN-MET (actuarial 59.3% free of regional progression after 3 years). In 33 patients (52%), a distant progression was reported. The median time to first tumor-related clinical event was 16.6 months, and 22.2% of patients had no tumor-related clinical event after three years. A total of 14 patients (22%) had another aRT. In conclusion, local ablative radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-PET staged oligometastatic prostate cancer may achieve local control, but regional or distant progression is common. Further studies are warranted, e.g., to define the optimal target volume coverage in LN-MET and OSS-MET.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Konnerth D, Marschner S, Schmidt Hegemann NS, Belka C, Li M. Radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer-a pattern of care survey among members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:727-734. [PMID: 35364690 PMCID: PMC9300519 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01925-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Due to improved imaging, oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is diagnosed more frequently. Growing evidence shows that patients with a limited number of metastases benefit from primary-directed radiotherapy (PDT) as well as from metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT). This survey investigates the current treatment practice for OMPC among German-speaking radiation oncologists. Methods Members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie [DEGRO]) were surveyed regarding their current treatment practice via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by email. The survey included six general items and 14 specific items regarding treatment characteristics. Questionnaires with at least 50% of questions completed were considered for further analysis. Results A total of 204 responses were received (15% response rate), 167 were considered for further analysis. Most respondents stated to be specialized in treating prostate cancer patients and to treat 10–30 patients with OMPC per annum; 97% considered PSMA-PET/CT necessary to define oligometastatic disease. Opinions differed regarding the use of systemic therapies: 63% of the respondents aimed to defer systemic therapy using radiotherapy in OMPC, whereas 37% considered systemic therapy necessary. In the setting of synchronous OMPC, 97% recommended PDT with or without a combination of MDT and/or systemic therapy. For metachronous nodal or bone oligometastatic recurrence, 98 and 99%, respectively, would opt for MDT. The majority would combine MDT with systemic therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. Respondents recommended normofractionation, hypofractionation, and SBRT for lymph node metastases in 49, 27, and 24%, respectively. No consensus existed regarding the field size for MDT of lymph node metastases. Most respondents preferred > 5 fractions for treatment of bone metastases. Conclusion Local radiotherapy for PDT and MDT is routinely used among respondents of this survey, representing 12% of all German-speaking radiation oncologists. The timing of systemic therapy, fractionation schedules, and field sizes are handled differently and remain an area of active investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dinah Konnerth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Frascino V, Alitto AR, Fionda B, Boldrini L, Romano A, Casà C, Catucci F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021. Urologia 2022; 89:5-15. [PMID: 34496707 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211042335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Francolini G, Bellini C, Di Cataldo V, Detti B, Bruni A, Alicino G, Triggiani L, La Mattina S, D'Angelillo RM, Demofonti C, Mazzola R, Cuccia F, Alongi F, Aquilano M, Allegra AG, Ciccone LP, Burchini L, Salvestrini V, Morelli I, Frosini G, Desideri I, Livi L. Pattern of Recurrence After Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Nodal Pelvic Relapse. A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:57-62. [PMID: 34598843 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Currently, when nodal pelvic oligorecurrent disease is detected, no standard treatment option is recommended. One possible salvage option is nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here we analysed recurrence patterns after nodal SBRT in patients affected by pelvic oligometastatic relapse after radical prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data on 93 patients consecutively treated in five different institutions for pelvic oligorecurrent disease were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and imaging showing three or fewer metachronous lymphoadenopathies under aortic bifurcation. Patients underwent SBRT on all sites of disease. Concomitant ADT was allowed. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range 11-41), 57 patients had post-SBRT radiological evidence of relapse, for a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months (95% confidence interval 9-24). Concomitant ADT was administered in 20 patients (21.5%). Overall, eight (8.6%), 21 (22.6%) and 28 (30.1%) patients had prostate bed only, pelvic nodal or distant relapse, respectively. The median ADT-free survival was not reached. Concomitant ADT, International Society for Urologic Pathology pattern at diagnosis < or ≥3, time to relapse ≤ or >12 months, prostate-specific antigen at recurrence < or ≥1.10 ng/ml and prostate-specific membrane antigen staging were not significantly associated with DFS. After relapse, 42 patients (45.2%) received a second SBRT course. CONCLUSION Nodal SBRT yielded encouraging DFS and ADT-free survival in this population. Only a minority of patients developed prostate bed recurrence, suggesting that local treatment may be safely avoided. A consistent percentage of patients could be managed with a second SBRT course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Francolini
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - C Bellini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - B Detti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
| | - A Bruni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Modena Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - G Alicino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Modena Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - L Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - S La Mattina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - R M D'Angelillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - C Demofonti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - R Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - F Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - M Aquilano
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A G Allegra
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L P Ciccone
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L Burchini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - V Salvestrini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - I Morelli
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G Frosini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - I Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|