Surgical intervention for blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: indications and time intervals

Impact of Pelvic Fracture on Patients with Blunt Bowel Mesenteric Injury: Is Immediate Laparotomy Warranted?

The management of blunt abdominopelvic trauma with combined hemoperitoneum and pelvic fractures is challenging for trauma surgeons. Although angioembolization can achieve hemostasis in most visceral organ injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt abdominal trauma, it cannot effectively control hemorrhage in patients with blunt bowel mesenteric injury (BBMI). This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with hemodynamically unstable patients with BBMI and to test the hypothesis that pelvic fracture is an independent risk factor for patients with unstable BBMI and concomitant pelvic fracture to guide the therapeutic sequence for difficult-to-manage patients. This retrospective study reviewed the data of hospitalized patients with trauma between 2009 and 2021 and included 158 adult patients with surgically proven BBMI. The patients were divided on the basis of the presence of a shock episode before emergency laparotomy. The shock group included 44.3% of all patients in the study (n = 70). Clinical injury severity and prognosis for patients in the shock group were poorer than those for patients in the non-shock group, and more invasive treatments and transfusions were performed for patients in the shock group than for those in the non-shock group. Pelvic fractures were more frequently associated with the shock group than with the non-shock group (21.4% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the presence of intracerebral hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 10.87, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.70-69.75) and rib fracture (OR = 5.94, 95% CIs = 1.06-33.45) was identified as an independent predictor of shock, whereas the effect of pelvic fracture did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 2.94, 95% CIs = 0.66-13.13) after adjusting for confounding factors. For patients with BBMI, outcomes need to be improved during early diagnosis, and treatments should be expeditiously performed on the basis of the rapid identification of unstable hemodynamic status. Our results support the recommendation of emergency laparotomy in unstable patients with concomitant pelvic fractures, followed by damage control TAE if needed.

Successful minimally invasive management using transcatheter arterial embolization in a hemodynamically stable elderly patient with mesenteric vascular injury in a hybrid emergency room system cin Korea: a case report

Mesenteric injury occurs rarely in cases associated with blunt abdominal trauma. Despite its low incidence, mesenteric injury can lead to fatal outcomes such as hypovolemic shock due to hemoperitoneum or sepsis due to intestinal ischemia, or perforation-related peritonitis. For mesenteric injuries, especially those involving massive bleeding, intestinal ischemia, and perforation, the standard treatment is surgery. However, in the case of operative management, it should be borne in mind that there is a possibility of complications and mortality during and after surgery. The usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is well known in solid organs but is controversial for mesenteric injury. We present a 75-year-old man with mesenteric injury due to blunt abdominal trauma. Initial abdominal computed tomography showed no hemoperitoneum, but a mesenteric contusion and pseudoaneurysm with a diameter of 17 mm were observed near the origin of the superior mesenteric artery. Since there were no findings requiring emergency surgery such as free air or intestinal ischemia, it was decided to perform nonoperative management with TAE using microcoils in hybrid emergency room system. TAE was performed successfully, and there were no complications such as bleeding, bowel ischemia, or delayed bowel perforation. He was discharged on the 23rd day after admission with percutaneous catheter drainage for drainage of mesenteric hematoma. The authors believe that treatment with TAE for highly selected elderly patients with mesenteric injuries has the positive aspect of minimally invasive management, considering the burden of general anesthesia and the various avoidable intraoperative and postoperative complications.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Surgical Blunt Bowel and/or Mesenteric Injuries among Motorcyclists and Car Occupants

(1) Background: Surgical blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injuries (BBMIs) are rare but challenging for trauma surgeons. Surgical BBMI is associated with specific injury mechanisms, such as direct compression by the handlebar in motorcycle accidents or rapid acceleration and deceleration of the impact forces associated with seatbelt injuries in motor vehicle collisions. However, the discussions on the implications of BBMI and the mechanisms of road traffic accidents remain scarce. This retrospective study assessed the clinical and injury characteristics of surgically proven BBMI among motorcyclists and car occupants based on trauma-registered data obtained from a level I trauma center in Taiwan. (2) Methods: Medical data of 72 motorcyclists and 38 car occupants who had surgical BBMI between January 2009 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, injuries, and outcomes in both groups were compared and analyzed. (3) Results: Motorcyclists with surgical BBMI had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (median [Q1–Q3], 18 (9–27) vs. 16 (9–18), p = 0.044) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (15 (11–15) vs. 15 (15–15), p = 0.034]) than car occupants. Motorcyclists with surgical BBMI had a higher incidence of pelvic fractures (18.1% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.032) and upper limb fractures (23.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.042) and a significantly higher rate of chest tube insertion than car occupants (29.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.027). However, there were no significant differences in the outcomes of morbidity and mortality between motorcyclists and car occupants with surgical BBMI. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated there were no significant differences in outcomes between motorcyclists and car occupants with surgical BBMI. However, motorcyclists with surgical BBMI were injured more severely, along with injuries to the head/neck and extremities, than car occupants.

[Reliability of the FFP classification in pelvic fractures]

BACKGROUND

Pelvic fractures are typical for frail geriatric patients. They are characterized by increasing pain and loss of mobility. As geriatric pelvic fractures differ from the typical high velocity injuries, Rommens and Hofmann recommended a new classification for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in 2013. In addition to the location of the fracture they also assessed the degree of dislocation.

OBJECTIVE

Compared to known fracture classifications of the pelvis, the FFP classification appears complex. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the interobserver reliability of the FFP classification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The members of the Section of Geriatric Traumatology (DGOU) were presented with 10 DICOM data sets with fractures of the pelvis for classification. As a reference the classification of P.M. Rommens, the author of the FFP, was established.

RESULTS

In this study 24 consultants (47%) and 27 (53%) residents took part. Also, six radiologists were invited to participate. A total of 493 assessments were made. In 184 (37%) cases there was agreement with the reference, in 183 (37%) computed tomography images the fractures were classified lower, in 26 (26%) higher than the reference. This initially resulted in a Cohens κ coefficient of 0.36. This corresponds to a sufficient agreement (fair) according to Garbuz. With the reduction of the classification to four main groups, the Cohens κ coefficient increased to a satisfactory value.

CONCLUSION

The reasons for the partly low agreement could be the participants' lack of experience and an inaccurate description of the classification levels. In the end, however, the FFP classification is the only one that meaningfully represents pelvic fractures of geriatric and frail patients. By simplifying to the four main groups, a better interobserver reliability is achieved. For a successful treatment, however, attention to the individual patient and the "fracture personality" is essential.

Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients

PURPOSE

We propose a functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in geriatric patients; patients with such fractures normally undergo 10 days of conservative therapy with full-weight bearing within pain limits. Conservative therapy for FFP is continued for patients who can stand with assistance, and surgical stabilization is recommended for patients with difficulty in auxiliary standing at 10 day postadmission. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of functional treatment between geriatric patients with FFP type I/II and those with FFP type III/IV, as described by Rommens et al. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 84 geriatric patients who underwent functional treatment for FFP. Based on the results of the first examination, the patients were allocated to the following FFP types: type I/II (n = 53) and type III/IV (n = 31). Change in functional mobility scale described by Graham et al. from before injury to the final follow-up were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the functional mobility scale (0.25 ± 0.70 vs. 0.23 ± 0.56, p = 0.889) between FFP type I/II and FFP type III/IV.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of the functional treatment for FFP for the geriatric patients did not differ significantly between the radiographic classifications. Functional treatment could, therefore, be a treatment option for almost all radiographic types of FFP, especially for geriatric patients. Further investigations are warranted.

Mobility and mortality of 340 patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis

PURPOSE

To investigate prognosis of patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP) treated in a single trauma unit in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 340 consecutive patients with FFP (40 men, 300 women; average age, 82.5 years) treated in our facility from April 2012 to April 2019. Fractures were categorized according to the Rommens classification. Patients' mechanism of injury, existence of hip implant, standing and walking abilities (using the Majeed score), and 1-year mortality rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

According to the Rommens classification, there were 84 type Ia, 2 type Ib, 24 type IIa, 78 type IIb, 51 type IIc, 40 type IIIa, 1 type IIIb, 4 type IIIc, 1 type IVa, 51 type IVb, and 3 type IVc fractures. Sixteen patients (4.7%) received surgical treatments. Twenty-eight patients (8.2%) had no memory of a traumatic event, and 61 (18%) had implants from a previous hip surgery. A total of 176 patients (52%) were followed up for ≥ 1 year, and 70 (39.8%) and 67 (38.1%) patients had recovery of standing and walking abilities, similar to those before the injury. The operative group (7/9 = 77.8%) had a higher proportion of patients who regained their standing and walking abilities at the 1-year follow-up than the conservative group. The 1-year mortality rate of the patients who could be followed for ≥ 1 year was 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

According to our data, 4.7% of patients were indicated for surgery, and only < 40% of patients were able to regain their pre-injury standing and walking abilities at 1 year after the injury. FFP may greatly affect an elderly's activities of daily living and may lead to prognosis similar to patients with proximal hip fractures. To regain the walking ability of patients with FFP, more aggressive indication of surgical treatment may be considered depending on the patient's background. Further examinations are necessary to determine the surgical indications and treatment protocol for FFP.