Results of revision intramedullary nailing with and without auxillary plate in aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric nonunion

[Nonunions after intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures]

INTRODUCTION

The overall frequency of proximal femoral fractures means that we are repeatedly confronted with failed healing and implant failure, despite a relatively low nonunion rate especially in intertrochanteric fractures (< 5%). The aim of this paper is to present our approach to treating these nonunions of the proximal femur and discuss the treatment results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2023, patients with nonunion of the proximal femur were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Age, gender, time to revision, the Weber-Cech classification of pseudarthrosis and radiographic imaging before and after revision were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 58 years (range 25-88 years). The overall healing rate was 88% with a mean consolidation time of 8 months (range 2-29 months). The main osteosynthesis procedures were plate osteosynthesis (n = 45, of which 44 were blade plates), and nail replacement (n = 12). Other procedures included augmentative plate osteosyntheses (n = 4), isolated cancellous bone graft (n = 2), nail dynamization (n = 2), and the use of a dynamic hip screw (n = 1).

DISCUSSION

The analysis of our treatment data as well as the current literature, revealed a trend towards intramedullary revision procedures. Implants that can be used to correct the CCD angle, such as the blade plate, remain a predictable option to achieve correction, especially in nonunions with an increased degree of varus. Particularly in the subtrochanteric region, fractures can also be treated in a targeted manner by a combination of mechanical and biological methods with a reamed nail change to a larger caliber implant.

Lateral cortical notching facilitates dynamization of proximal femoral nailing - A finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dynamization of proximal femoral nailing by removal of distal interlocking is one of the recommended treatment options for nonunions of femur fractures. However, in certain inter-/subtrochanteric fractures, gliding of the nail along the femoral shaft is blocked by lateral femoral cortical support of the lag screw. For these cases, Biber et al. proposed lateral cortical notching (LCN), in which the supporting lateral bone is removed. This study investigates the biomechanical effect of LCN on gliding of proximal femoral nailing and stress distribution at the bone/implant interface.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this finite element analysis a three-dimensional model of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nailing without distal interlocking was simulated using the FebioStudio software suite. To simulate LCN, the lag screw hole was lengthened to 15.34 mm at the lateral cortex. Displacement of the nail along the femoral shaft axis and von Mises stress distribution were compared between LCN model and standard implantation model.

RESULTS

Displacement of the nail along the femoral shaft axis was higher in the LCN model than in the standard implantation model (0.48 mm vs. 0.07 mm). Highest von Mises stresses of 176-178 MPa at the implant and of 52-81 MPa at the proximal femur were detected. Maximum von Mises stresses of the implant were comparable at all sides, except for a reduced von Mises stress at the lateral inferior side in the LCN model (80 vs. 102 MPa). At the inferior lateral screw hole and the anterior/posterior lateral screw hole maximum von Mises stress was reduced in the LCN model (2 vs. 49 MPa and 52 vs. 81 MPa), whereas the maximum von Mises stress at the inferior medial screw hole was higher in the LCN model than in the standard implantation model (53 vs. 27 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral cortical notching facilitates gliding of a distally dynamized proximal femoral nail along the femoral shaft axis in intertrochanteric fractures. Additionally, the lack of lateral cortical bone support at the lag screw reduces von Mises stress at the bone/implant interface and thus could lower the risk for implant breakage and peri‑implant fractures.

Pertrochanteric Nonunion: When and Why to Consider a Medullary Implant

SUMMARY

Pertrochanteric nonunion management is a technically challenging problem. When repair is undertaken rather than conversion arthroplasty, successful treatment revolves around accurate deformity correction, preservation of vascularity, and stable durable fixation. The decision to use an extramedullary or intramedullary implant should be influenced by nonunion-specific characteristics and patient-related conditions. Failure to understand these nuances when selecting an implant strategy often results in treatment failure. The primary purpose of this article was to discuss these variables and delineate when an intramedullary implant should be considered for treatment of a pertrochanteric nonunion. The secondary purpose was to describe the author's preferred surgical technique for implant-driven deformity correction and compression when choosing an intramedullary nail.

The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion

INTRODUCTION

Owing to its distinct biomechanical properties, nonunion is common (7-20%) after intramedullary (IM) nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Unlike diaphyseal nonunion, it is difficult to provide sufficient stability by exchanging nailing alone in subtrochanteric nonunion. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion initially treated with an IM nail and subsequently managed with minimally invasive augmentative plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients were enrolled retrospectively. The mechanisms of initial injury were traffic accidents in 8, falls from a height in seven, and slipping in two patients. Two patients with atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures without a specific trauma history were further included. All patients underwent IM nailing as the index operation. Nonunion surgery was performed an average of 45.2 weeks after the initial surgery. In cases of hardware damage and/or atrophic nonunion, exchange nailing and bone grafting were performed in addition to augmentative plating, as necessary. Conversely, augmentative plating alone was performed in cases of hypertrophic nonunion without any failure of the preexisting IM nail or malalignment. A narrow locking compression plate was fixed after contouring according to the shape of the proximal femur. The mean follow-up period was 36.1 months.

RESULTS

Bony union was achieved in 18/19 patients (94.7%), at an average of 19.8 weeks after nonunion surgery. In the case that did not heal even after exchange nailing, additional plating and bone grafting, further autogenous bone grafting was required after 11 months, which healed uneventfully. There were 2 cases of soft tissue irritation over the plate, but no major complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional plate augmentation over a retained IM nail yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of the bony union in subtrochanteric nonunion. Given its expected biomechanical superiority and relatively easy surgical technique, it may be a reasonable option for the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion.