Intra-operative ultrasound: does it improve the results of percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture?

The Usefulness of Concomitant Ultrasound Guidance With Surgery for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using an Internal Brace

Background This study investigated the usefulness of intraoperative ultrasonography in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) using an internal brace (Achilles Midsubstance SpeedBridge, Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL), a technique that provides strong internal fixation. Methodology Forty-three patients were included and divided into two groups: Group A (n = 22), which received ultrasonography, and Group B (n = 21), which did not. In Group A, ultrasonography was used during suturing with a specialized jig to confirm the suture needle's position at the center of the proximal stump. Postoperative care in both groups involved initiating active dorsiflexion exercises on the day following surgery and permitting weight-bearing without orthosis once 0° dorsiflexion was achieved. The operative time, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings at three months postoperatively, and complications were evaluated. Results Group A had a significantly shorter operative time (41.9 ± 7.5 minutes vs. 52.1 ± 6.5 minutes, P < 0.001) and a lower percentage of high-intensity areas on T2-weighted MRI (1.76% ± 2.68% vs. 8.74% ± 7.02%, P < 0.001) compared to Group B. No significant difference was observed in JSSF scale scores (P = 0.948). Additionally, no cases of re-rupture or wound infection were reported in either group. Conclusions Intraoperative ultrasonography in conjunction with this method may enable precise and reliable suturing, facilitating strong internal fixation and potentially enhancing clinical outcomes.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Modified Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Procedure for Achilles Tendon Repair Without a Jig

Surgical methods for treating Achilles tendon ruptures include open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). MIS offers notable advantages, including reduced rates of infection and wound necrosis; however, it also introduces the risk of sural nerve injury. Intraoperative ultrasonography can mitigate this risk by providing real-time visualization of the sural nerve and Achilles tendon, improving clinical outcomes. This article introduces a novel ultrasound-guided suturing technique for Achilles tendon repair using a percutaneous Achilles repair system (PARS). This technique does not require the use of a jig, which is conventionally used in the standard PARS procedure to ensure accurate and controlled percutaneous suture placement in the Achilles tendon, making it less invasive than conventional methods. Additionally, it allows for more precise intraoperative visualization of the sural nerve using ultrasonography, enabling safer Achilles tendon repair.

Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Surgery and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Diseases

Ultrasound imaging is a vital imaging tool in musculoskeletal medicine, with the number of publications on ultrasound-guided surgery increasing in recent years, especially in minimally invasive procedures of sports, foot and ankle, and hand surgery. However, ultrasound imaging has drawbacks, such as operator dependency and image obscurity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL), a subset of AI, can address these issues. AI/DL can enhance screening practices for hip dysplasia and osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum, improve diagnostic accuracy for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and provide physicians with better prognostic prediction tools for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Building on these advancements, DL methods, including segmentation, detection, and localization of target tissues and medical instruments, also have the potential to allow physicians and surgeons to perform ultrasound-guided procedures more accurately and efficiently. This review summarizes recent advances in ultrasound-guided procedures for musculoskeletal diseases and provides a comprehensive overview of the utilization of AI/DL in ultrasound for musculoskeletal medicine, particularly focusing on ultrasound-guided surgery.

Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a significant injury that can require surgery and can have the risk of re-rupture even after successful treatment. Consequently, to minimize this risk, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the rehabilitation protocol and the impact of different rehabilitation approaches on preventing re-rupture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent team members searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on operative treatment of ATR. We included articles that covered open or minimally invasive surgery for ATR, with a detailed rehabilitation protocol and reports of re-rupture. The study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO and has been reported in the line with PRISMA Guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C85 , Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C86 and assessed using AMSTAR Tool, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C87 .

RESULTS

A total of 43 RCTs were eligible for the meta-analysis, encompassing a combined cohort of 2553 patients. Overall, the postoperative incidence of ATR patients developing re-rupture was 3.15% (95% CI: 2.26-4.17; I2 =44.48%). Early immobilization group patients who had ATR had a 4.07% (95% CI: 1.76-7.27; I2 =51.20%) postoperative incidence of re-rupture; Early immobilization + active range of motion (AROM) group had an incidence of 5.95% (95% CI: 2.91-9.99; I2 =0.00%); Early immobilization + weight-bearing group had an incidence of 3.49% (95% CI: 1.96-5.43; I2 =20.06%); Early weight-bearing + AROM group had an incidence of 3.61% (95% CI: 1.00-7.73; I2 =64.60%); Accelerated rehabilitation (immobilization) group had an incidence of 2.18% (95% CI: 1.11-3.59; I2 =21.56%); Accelerated rehabilitation (non-immobilization) group had a rate of 1.36% (95% CI: 0.12-3.90; I2 =0.00%). Additionally, patients in the immediate AROM group had a postoperative re-rupture incidence of 3.92% (95% CI: 1.76-6.89; I2 =33.24%); Non-immediate AROM group had an incidence of 2.45% (95% CI: 1.25-4.03; I2 =22.09%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests the use of accelerated rehabilitation intervention in early postoperative rehabilitation of the Achilles tendon. However, for early ankle joint mobilization, it is recommended to apply after one to two weeks of immobilization.

All-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch technique shows favourable outcomes for acute Achilles tendon ruptures

PURPOSE

The safety and reliability of endoscopic Achilles tendon rupture repair are still concerning aspects. This study's aim is to evaluate an all-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch (Endo-SARLS) technique.

METHODS

Forty cases with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated with the all-inside Endo-SARLS technique between 2020 and 2021. Under endoscopic control, the proximal tendon stumps were stitched with the running locked method using a semiautomatic flexible suture passer. The threads of the high-strength suture were grasped through the paratenon subspace and then fixed into calcaneal insertion with a knotless anchor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical time and complications were assessed. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) and Heel Rise Height Scale (HRHS) were utilised to evaluate final outcomes.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 25.4 ± 0.4 (range: 24-32) months. Appropriate tendon regeneration was observed on MRI after 12 months. At the final follow-up, the median value of ATRS score was 95 (interquartile range: 94, 98). Furthermore, there is no significant difference between the injured and contralateral side in the average ATRA (18.2 ± 1.8 vs. 18.3 ± 1.9°, ns) and median value of HRHS [14.5 (13.3, 15.5) vs. 14.8 (13.5, 15.6) cm, ns]. No infection and nerve injuries were encountered. Thirty-nine patients reported that they resumed casual sports activity after 6 months. One patient had a slight anchor cut-out, due to an addition injury, which was removed after 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

An all-inside Endo-SARLS technique showed promising clinical results for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. This procedure reduces the risk of sural nerve injuries while establishing a reliable connection between the tendon stumps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A systematic review of the patient reported outcome measures utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving achilles tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving Achilles tendon ruptures. However, the characteristics of these PROMs and current practices has not yet been reported. We hypothesize that there will be heterogeneous PROM usage in this context.

METHODS

A PubMed and Embase systematic review was performed including all dates up to July 27th, 2022, assessing Achilles tendon ruptures in level 1 studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines where applicable. Inclusion criteria were all randomized controlled clinical studies involving Achilles tendon injuries. Studies that: (1) were not level 1 evidence (including editorial, commentary, review, or technique articles), (2) omitted outcome data or PROMs, (3) included injuries aside from Achilles tendon ruptures, (4) involved non-human or cadaveric subjects, (5) were not written in English, and (6) were duplicates were excluded. Demographics and outcome measures were assessed in the studies included for final review.

RESULTS

Out of 18,980 initial results, 46 studies were included for final review. The average number of patients per study was 65.5. Mean follow up was 25 months. The most common study design involved comparing two different rehabilitation interventions (48 %). Twenty different outcome measures were reported including the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) (48 %), followed by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle score Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS-AH) (46 %), the Leppilahti score (20 %), and the RAND-36/Short Form (SF) - 36/SF-12 scores (20 %). An average of 1.4 measures were reported per study.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity exists in PROM usage among level 1 studies involving Achilles tendon ruptures, which prevents meaningful interpretation of these data across multiple studies. We advocate for usage of at least the disease-specific Achilles Tendon Rupture score and a global, quality of life (QOL) survey such as the SF-36/12/RAND-36. Future literature should provide more evidence-based guidelines for PROM usage in this context.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Systematic Review.