Variation in posterior fragment fixation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study

Comparison between anterior-to-posterior screw fixation versus posterolateral approach plate fixation for posterior malleous fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There are two main surgical fixation methods for the posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), the anterior-to-posterior (AP) screws or via the posterolateral (PL) approach utilizing a buttress plate. This review aims to compare the clinical outcome between the AP screw fixation and the PL plate fixation for treating PMFs.

METHODS

We searched all relevant publications about PMFs treated with AP screws or PL plates through electronic databases including the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Embase, the Wiley online library and the Web of Science. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluated clinical outcomes including reduction quality, post-operative function and complications.

RESULTS

Six studies (one single randomized controlled trial and five retrospective cohort studies) were enrolled. 172 patients underwent AP screw fixation and 214 patients underwent PL plate fixation with a total of 386 patients (169 males and 217 females). The PL plating group yielded better AOFAS scores(MD = 6.97, 95 % CI=[4.68, 9.27], P＜0.00001, I2 =0 %) and was more likely to achieve excellent anatomical reduction(OR=5.49, 95 % CI=[1.06, 28.42], P = 0.04, I2 =80 %). No differences were found in the bad reduction quality, incidences of complications (arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the PL plate fixation method has the clinical benefit of achieving anatomical reduction and better AOFAS scores over the AP screw fixation for treating PMFs. No differences were found in the incidences of complications ( arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees. The posterior approach and the direct reduction are recommended for the treatment of the PMFs.

LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE

Ⅱb.

Historic indications for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures- where did they come from and where are we now?

INTRODUCTION

The indications for reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolus component of rotational ankle fractures have been controversial for nearly a century. This study aims to identify the historical basis for surgical intervention and trace trends in management strategies over time.

METHODS

In March 2023, a systematic review of full-text, English-language articles providing indications for surgical fixation of the posterior malleolus component of rotational ankle fractures was performed. Articles underwent title and abstract screening before undergoing full-text review.

RESULTS

Historical indications for surgical fixation were size-dependent, with fractures comprising 25 % to 33 % of the plafond recommended for internal fixation. Modern studies suggest that nonoperative management of posterior malleolus fractures below this threshold results in residual malreduction of the articular surface, syndesmotic instability, and an increased need for independent fixation of the syndesmosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Size-based indications for posterior malleolus fracture fixation are based on Level V evidence from small retrospective case series published nearly one century ago and should be retired. While the size of the posterior malleolus component cannot be ignored, additional factors like fracture morphology and location within the plafond should guide modern surgical indications. Contemporary studies indicate that reduction and fixation of small posterior malleolus fractures (comprising less than 25 % of the articular surface) are associated with improved articular reductions, tibiotalar contact pressures, syndesmotic stability with decreased need for independent fixation of the syndesmosis, and superior postoperative outcomes.