[Anaesthesiology as a compulsory subject in the new German medical school curriculum. Evaluation of a curricular model at the University Hospital Aachen]

[Undergraduate teaching of anaesthesiology : a nationwide survey in Germany]

BACKGROUND

In 2003 anaesthesiology was implemented as a compulsory speciality of undergraduate teaching in Germany due to the revised regulations of medical education. Besides the preexisting subject of emergency medicine an obligatory course in anaesthesiology was introduced. Thus anaesthesiology has gained considerable importance in all medical faculties. To gain insight into the current status of undergraduate medical education in the university departments of anaesthesiology a nationwide survey at all university departments in Germany was initiated.

METHODS

In cooperation with the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) a standardized questionnaire was developed and sent to 36 departments of anaesthesiology of all German medical faculties. Questions concerned the structure of the respective curriculum, learning goals, teaching, assessment and evaluation methods as well as facultative courses.

RESULTS

Of the 36 university departments of anaesthesiology, 35 returned the questionnaire. In 66% undergraduate education in anaesthesiology is part of the fourth or fifth year of medical training. In 91% of the faculties lectures were accompanied by teaching in small student groups. A simulator-based training is integrated either in anaesthesiology and/or in emergency medicine in 91% of the departments of anaesthesiology. In 69% of the departments contents of anaesthesia, critical care medicine, emergency medicine and pain management are an integral part of undergraduate teaching in anaesthesiology. The primary learning goals are directed towards general anaesthesia and there is less focus on topics of preoperative or postoperative care, such as preoperative risk evaluation, postoperative pain management and regional anaesthesia. Besides a multiple choice test (91%) oral (63%) and/or practical examinations (71%) are used as assessment tools. In 71% of the medical faculties the respective departments of anaesthesiology are leading and organising skills laboratories. In student evaluations anaesthesiology achieved best ranking in 66% of the medical faculties compared to other specialties. The possibility to take an elective course in anaesthesiology exists in 74% of the faculties. Half of these faculties organize this elective as a longitudinal course for one complete semester, the other half as a full time course over mostly 1 or 2 weeks. At present E-learning plays a minor role.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides detailed information about the current status of undergraduate teaching of the university departments of anaesthesiology in Germany. The study shows a remarkable consistency of structure, contents and methods of education in anaesthesiology throughout all university departments of anaesthesiology. This information is the basis for triggering synergistic effects, for improving educational standards in anaesthesiology and for introducing a platform for developing modern learning media, e.g. through the scientific society DGAI.

[Teaching non-technical skills for critical incidents: Crisis resource management training for medical students]

BACKGROUND

Physicians have to demonstrate non-technical skills, such as communication and team leading skills, while coping with critical incidents. These skills are not taught during medical education. A crisis resource management (CRM) training was established for 4th to 6th year medical students using a full-scale simulator mannikin (Emergency Care Simulator, ECS, METI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The learning objectives of the course were defined according to the key points of Gaba's CRM concept. The training consisted of theoretical and practical parts (3 simulation scenarios with debriefing). Students' self-assessment before and after the training provided the data for evaluation of the training outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 65 students took part in the training. The course was well received in terms of overall course quality, debriefings and didactic presentation, the mean overall mark being 1.4 (1: best, 6: worst). After the course students felt significantly more confident when facing incidents in clinical practice. The main learning objectives were achieved.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of applying the widely used ECS full-scale simulator in interdisciplinary teaching has been demonstrated. The training exposes students to crisis resource management issues and motivates them to develop non-technical skills.

[Intensive care medicine as a component of the compulsory medical curriculum. Evaluation of a pilot curriculum at the University Hospital Aachen]

BACKGROUND

In order to provide early achievement of practical experience during medical education, the medical faculty of the university Aachen has developed a new medical school curriculum which was offered in 2003 for the first time. In this curriculum anaesthesiology became a compulsory subject with practical training both in the operation theatre and in emergency medicine. Accordingly, a practical course in the field of intensive care medicine has also been designed with respect to the planned schedule and personnel resources. This course was evaluated by both students and teaching staff in a written, anonymous form as a quality control.

METHODS

A dedicated course was developed for medical students of the 8th and 9th semesters. In this course comprised of 6 students and lasting 1 week, practical training is provided by intensive care physicians and accompanied by theoretical lessons focusing on the definition, diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis of sepsis, essentials of mechanical ventilation and patient presentation at the bedside during daily rounds. On the last day of training students were required to present patients by themselves thereby recapitulating the acquired knowledge. In the summer semester 2007 this intensive care training course was offered for the first time. All participating 83 students and 23 physicians involved in teaching evaluated the course with marks from 1 to 6 according to the standard German school grading system using an online questionnaire.

RESULTS

Students rated the course with 1.6+/-0.7 (mean +/- SD) for comprehensibility, with 1.6+/-0.7 for structural design, and with 1.7+/-0.7 for agreement between teachers. They graded their personal learning success with 1.7+/-0.7. With a cumulative mark of 1.7+/-0.6, the course was ranked as 1 of the top 3 courses of the medical faculty from the very beginning. The majority of the teaching staff (80%) appreciated the focus on few selected teaching subjects. However, comprehensibility, structural design, agreement between teachers and personal learning success were graded one mark worse than by the students.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results, efficiency and acceptance of intensive care training courses were high. Major criteria for the high grading were a limited number of participants, the focus on few subjects, and a clear structural design. However, according to several personal notes from the students, simulation-based sessions and written teaching material might further improve success of this course.

[Teaching emergency medicine at the University Medical Center Freiburg: establishment of an integrative concept]

Efforts to improve the quality of undergraduate medical education are commonly hampered by limited human and financial resources. This deficiency may be offset by the development of well structured and innovative teaching concepts, which optimize available assets. The newly conceived modular course "Emergency Medicine" at the University Medical Center Freiburg was conducted for the first time in the winter semester 2006/2007. The core of the course is a 3-day practical training period. It provides the possibility to teach a maximum number of medical students with only four lecturers using patient simulators, interactive case scenarios (simulation software MicroSim), and case scenarios with standardized patients. Evaluation of the course revealed standardized patients to be the best of all teaching methods with an overall average grade of 1.1 (patient simulators 1.2, computer simulation 1.4). Of the students, 88% stated that the practical training encouraged their interest in the speciality emergency medicine. The excellent student evaluation results show that the new course "Emergency Medicine" for medical students constitutes a successful balance between the constraint of resource limitation and the goal of excellent medical education.