[Perioperative anesthesia management of extended partial liver resection. Pathophysiology of hepatic diseases and functional signs of hepatic failure]

Relationship between hepatic venous anatomy and hepatic venous blood loss during hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Predicting increased blood loss based on anatomical intervascular relationships is essential in major hepatectomy.

METHODS

We assessed 63 consecutive patients undergoing anatomical hepatectomy exposing the hepatic vein (HV) trunk at two institutes. Correlations between anatomical alterations of the hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC), HV, hepatic IVC, or right atrium (RA) and the blood loss per standard weight (BLSW) or blood transfusion (n = 18) were analyzed. The results of IVC partial clamping (PC) were additionally examined.

RESULTS

The BLSW in type V-up anatomical morphology was significantly higher than that in straight type (p < 0.05). The parameters associated with an increased BLSW (> 13.5 mL/kg) were tumor size (> 4 cm), prothrombin activity (< 87%), CVP (> 7 mmHg), area of suprahepatic IVC (< 360 mm²), IVC-RA gap (> 28 mm), longitudinal angle of IVC (< 160°), and axial angle of the MHV (< 55°). A multivariate analysis revealed that a high IVC-RA gap was a significant independent risk factor (odds ratio; 4.32, p < 0.05). Among 25 patients undergoing IVC-PC, only three showed a remarkable decrease in hepatic venous bleeding. No other statistically significant differences in the surgical records were observed in most cases.

CONCLUSION

The IVC-RA gap might be a promising novel predictive parameter reflecting increased blood loss leading to blood transfusion in anatomical hepatectomy.

Epidural Anesthesia in Liver Surgery-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of epidural anesthesia (EA) on patients who underwent liver resection.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

This single-center study was conducted at an academic medical center.

METHODS

A subset of 110 1:1 propensity score-matched patients who underwent liver resection with and without EA were analyzed. Outcome measures were pain intensity ≥5 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) at rest and during movement on postoperative days 1-5, analyzed with logistic mixed-effects models, and postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, length of hospital stay (LOS), and one-year survival. One-year survival in the matched cohorts was compared using a frailty model.

RESULTS

EA patients were less likely to experience NRS ≥5 at rest (odds ratio = 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01 to 0.28, P < 0.001). These findings were independent of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, baseline NRS, and surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic). The number and severity of postoperative complications and LOS were comparable between groups (P = 0.258, P > 0.999, and P = 0.467, respectively). Reduced mortality rates were seen in the EA group one year after surgery (9.1% vs 30.9%, hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.90, P = 0.031). No EA-related adverse events occurred. Earlier recovery of bowel function was seen in EA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EA had better postoperative pain control and required fewer systemic opioids. Postoperative complications and LOS did not differ, although one-year survival was significantly improved in patients with EA. EA applied in liver surgery was effective and safe.

Perioperative management of liver surgery-review on pathophysiology of liver disease and liver failure

An increasing number of patients present for liver surgery. Given the complex pathophysiological changes in chronic liver disease (CLD), it is pivotal to understand the fundamentals of chronic and acute liver failure. This review will give an overview on related organ dysfunction as well as recommendations for perioperative management and treatment of liver failure-related symptoms.

Risk factors for coagulopathy after liver resection

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver resection.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients who underwent liver resection at a university hospital between April 2010 and May 2011 were evaluated within seven days after surgery.

PATIENTS

One hundred forty-seven patients were assessed for eligibility. Thirty needed to be excluded because of incomplete data (23) or a preexisting coagulopathy (7).

MEASUREMENTS

Coagulopathy was defined as 1 or more of the following events: international normalized ratio ≥1.4, platelet count <80,000/μL, and partial thromboplastin time >38 seconds. Related to the time course and coagulation profile thresholds, 3 different groups could be distinguished: no coagulopathy, temporary coagulopathy, and persistent coagulopathy.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (65.8%) had no coagulopathy, whereas 33 (28.2%) developed temporary coagulopathy and 7 (6%) developed persistent coagulopathy until day 7. Preoperative international normalized ratio (P = .001), postoperative peak lactate levels (P = .012), and resected liver weight (P = .005) were identified as independent predictors. Preoperative liver transaminases and transfusion volumes of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly higher in patients with persistent coagulopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural anesthesia is feasible in patients scheduled for liver resection. Caution should be observed for patients with extended resection (≥3 segments) and increased postoperative lactate. In patients with preexisting liver disease, epidural catheters should be avoided.

[Intraoperative surgical and anesthesiological problems and the consequences for surgery]

Although the procedures for severe intraoperative complications have largely been defined, in everyday life less dramatic but equally important problems and issues arise which are controversially debated between treating surgeons and the anesthesiologists. Preoperative anemia, transfusion therapy, fluid management, patient positioning, hypothermia and neuromuscular blockade are the focus of the occasionally conflicting interests of anesthesiologists and surgeons. Good reciprocal communication and mutual understanding are a requirement for proactive management of complications. The overall objective is the reduction of intraoperative risks thereby reducing morbidity and mortality. This can be achieved through modern fluid management, blood conserving techniques and maintenance of normothermia. Surgeons further require an optimal view during minimally invasive surgery even by complex patient positioning and adequate neuromuscular blockade.