[The effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia on the pathophysiology of the eventration syndrome]

Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging-based diagnosis of severe mesenteric traction syndrome: Hemodynamics and prostacyclin - A prospective cohort study

BRIEF ABSTRACT

Today, the diagnosis and grading of mesenteric traction syndrome relies on a subjective assessment of facial flushing. However, this method has several limitations. In this study, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and a predefined cut-off value are assessed and validated for the objective identification of severe mesenteric traction syndrome.

BACKGROUND

Severe mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. The diagnosis is based on an assessment of the developed facial flushing. Today this is performed subjectively, as no objective method exists. One possible objective method is Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI), which has been used to show significantly higher facial skin blood flow in patients developing severe MTS. Using these data, a cut-off value has been identified. This study aimed to validate our predefined LSCI cut-off value for identifying severe MTS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed on patients planned for open esophagectomy or pancreatic surgery from March 2021 to April 2022. All patients underwent continuous measurement of forehead skin blood flow using LSCI during the first hour of surgery. Using the predefined cut-off value, the severity of MTS was graded. In addition, blood samples for prostacyclin (PGI₂) analysis and hemodynamics were collected at predefined time points to validate the cut-off value.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. Using our predefined LSCI cut-off value, 21 (35 %) patients were identified as developing severe MTS. These patients were found to have higher concentrations of 6-Keto-PGF_aα (p = 0.002), lower SVR (p < 0.001), lower MAP (p = 0.004), and higher CO (p < 0.001) 15 min into surgery, as compared with patients not developing severe MTS.

CONCLUSION

This study validated our LSCI cut-off value for the objective identification of severe MTS patients as this group developed increased concentrations of PGI₂ and more pronounced hemodynamic alterations compared with patients not developing severe MTS.

Mesenteric traction syndrome - Incidence, impact, and treatment: A systematic scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is commonly seen during major abdominal surgery and is characterised by facial flushing, hypotension, and tachycardia 15 min into surgery. MTS also impacts the postoperative course, as severe MTS has been associated with increased postoperative morbidity. However, despite MTS being common and severe MTS causing increased postoperative morbidity, the gaps in the literature are not clearly defined. We aimed to examine the diagnostic criteria, incidence, intraoperative and postoperative impact, and potential preventative measures of MTS while highlighting potential gaps in the literature.

METHODS

We followed the Prisma guidelines and performed a systematic literature search. We included only human studies examining MTS. All hits were screened for title and abstract, followed by a full-text review by at least two authors for determining eligibility for inclusion. Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies, comprising 1102 patients were included in the review. The combined incidence of MTS during open abdominal surgery was found to be 76%, with 35% developing severe MTS. It was found that the development of MTS was associated with marked haemodynamic changes. It was also found that several different subjective diagnostic criteria exist and that severe MTS was associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Furthermore, several preventative measures for protecting against MTS have been examined, but only on the incidence of MTS and not on the postoperative course.

CONCLUSION

MTS occurs in 76% of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and is associated with deleterious haemodynamic effects, which are more pronounced in patients developing severe MTS. Severe MTS is also associated with a worse postoperative outcome. However, gaps are still present in the current literature on MTS.

Laser speckle contrast imaging for quantitative assessment of facial flushing during mesenteric traction syndrome in upper gastrointestinal surgery

The mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is associated with prostacyclin (PGI₂) facilitated systemic vasodilatation during surgery and is identified by facial flushing. We hypothesized that severe facial flushing would be related to the highest concentrations of plasma PGI₂ and accordingly to the highest levels of skin blood flow measured by laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were consecutively included. Within the first hour of the procedure, facial flushing was scored according to a standardized scale, and skin blood flow (LSPU) was continuously measured on the forehead and the cheeks by LSCI. Arterial blood samples for 6-keto-PGF_1α (stable metabolite of PGI₂) and hemodynamic variables were obtained at defined time points. Overall, 66 patients were included. After 15 min of surgery, patients with severe flushing demonstrated the highest plasma 6-keto-PGF_1α concentration and the most significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance. Accordingly, the skin blood flow on the forehead (238 [201-372] to 562 LSPU [433-729]) and the cheeks (341 [239-355] to 624 LSPU [468-917]) increased and were significantly higher than for patients with moderate or no flushing (both, P = 0.04). A cut-off value for skin blood flow could be defined for both the cheeks and the forehead for patients with severe flushing vs. no flushing (425/456 LSPU, sensitivity 75/76% and specificity 80/85%). MTS is linked to an increase in facial skin blood flow during upper gastrointestinal surgery. By applying LSCI, it is possible to quantitatively register facial blood flow, and thereby provide an objective tool for intraoperative verification of MTS.

Severe Intraoperative Shock Related to Mesenteric Traction Syndrome

Mesenteric traction syndrome is defined as arterial hypotension, facial flushing, and tachycardia related to mesenteric traction. We describe a case of mesenteric traction syndrome refractory to catecholamine and vasopressin infusions. The patient, who had Crohn disease, developed severe distributive shock after mesenteric traction while undergoing resection of an intestinal inflammatory mass, accompanied by facial flushing and unaltered readings for pulse oximetry, capnography, and bispectral index monitoring. The absence of tachycardia in this case was attributed to long-term use of timolol. Arterial pressure returned to baseline level after approximately 30 minutes, and the postoperative period was uneventful.

Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia offers greater pain relief compared to systemic opioid-based medications, but its effect on morbidity and mortality is unclear. This review was originally published in 2006 and was updated in 2012 and again in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative epidural analgesia in comparison with postoperative systemic opioid-based analgesia for adults undergoing elective abdominal aortic surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

In the updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and five trial registers in November 2014, together with reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative systemic opioid-based analgesia for adults who underwent elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information and data when required. We assessed the level of evidence according to the scale provided by the GRADE working group.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials published from 1987 to 2009 with 1498 participants in this updated review. Participants had a mean age between 60.5 and 71.3 years. The percentage of women in the included studies varied from 0% to 28.1%. Adding an epidural to general anaesthesia for people undergoing abdominal aortic repair reduced myocardial infarction (risk ratio (RR) 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.97); I(2) statistic = 0%; number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 28 (95% CI 19 to 1423), visual or verbal analogical scale (VAS) scores up to three days after the surgery (mean difference (MD) -1.78 (95% CI -2.32 to -1.25); I(2) statistic = 0% for VAS scores on movement at postoperative day one), time to tracheal extubation (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.42 (95% CI -0.70 to -0.15); I(2) statistic = 83%; equivalent to a mean reduction of 36 hours), postoperative respiratory failure (RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.85); I(2) statistic = 0%; NNTB 8 (95% CI 6 to 16)), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.65); I(2) statistic = 0%; NNTB 32 (95% CI 27 to 74)) and time spent in the intensive care unit (SMD -0.23 (95% CI -0.41 to -0.06); I(2) statistic = 0%; equivalent to a mean reduction of six hours). We did not demonstrate a reduction in the mortality rate up to 30 days (RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.86); I(2) statistic = 0%). The level of evidence was low for mortality and time before tracheal extubation; moderate for myocardial infarction, respiratory failure and intensive care unit length of stay; and high for gastrointestinal bleeding and VAS scores.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Epidural analgesia provided better pain management, reduced myocardial infarction, time to tracheal extubation, postoperative respiratory failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intensive care unit length of stay compared with systemic opioid-based drugs. For mortality, we did not find a difference at 30 days.

Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia offers greater pain relief compared to systemic opioid-based medications, but its effect on morbidity and mortality is unclear. This review was originally published in 2006 and was updated in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative epidural analgesia in comparison with postoperative systemic opioid-based pain relief for adult patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 11) via Ovid; Ovid MEDLINE (from inception to week 1 November 2010); and EMBASE (from inception to week 1, November 2010). The original search was performed in 2004. We assessed non-English language reports and contacted researchers in the field. We did not seek unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative systemic opioid-based analgesia for adult patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information and data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials that involved 1297 patients (633 patients received epidural analgesia and 664 received systemic opioid analgesia) in this review. This included one trial we found in our updated search and one trial from our original review that had been awaiting translation. The epidural analgesia group showed significantly lower visual analogue scale scores for pain on movement (up to postoperative day three) regardless of the site of the epidural catheter and epidural formulation. The postoperative duration of tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter, by about 48%, in the epidural analgesia group. The overall event rates of myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure (defined as an extended need for mechanical ventilation), gastrointestinal complications, and renal complications were significantly lower in the epidural analgesia group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Epidural analgesia provides better pain relief (especially during movement) in the period up to three postoperative days. It reduces the duration of postoperative tracheal intubation by roughly half. The occurrence of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, myocardial infarction, gastric complications and renal complications was reduced by epidural analgesia. However, current evidence does not confirm the beneficial effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative mortality and other types of complications.

Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia offers greater pain relief compared to systemic opioid-based medications, but its effect on morbidity and mortality is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative epidural analgesia in comparison with postoperative systemic opioid-based pain relief for adult patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via OVID (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004); OVID MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004); and EMBASE (1980 to June 2004). We assessed non-English language reports and contacted researchers in the field. We did not seek unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative systemic opioid-based analgesia for adult patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information and data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 1224 patients met our inclusion criteria; 597 patients received epidural analgesia and 627 received systemic opioid analgesia. The epidural analgesia group showed significantly lower visual analogue scale for pain on movement (up to postoperative day three), regardless of the site of epidural catheter and epidural formulation. Postoperative duration of tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter by about 20% in the epidural analgesia group. The overall incidence of cardiovascular complication; myocardial infarction; acute respiratory failure (defined as an extended need for mechanical ventilation); gastrointestinal complication; and renal insufficiency was significantly lower in the epidural analgesia group, especially in trials that used thoracic epidural analgesia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Epidural analgesia provides better pain relief (especially during movement) for up to three postoperative days. It reduces the duration of postoperative tracheal intubation by roughly 20%. The occurrence of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, overall cardiac complication, myocardial infarction, gastric complication and renal complication was also reduced by epidural analgesia, especially thoracic. However, current evidence does not confirm the beneficial effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative mortality and other types of complications.

Prostaglandin I2 release following mesenteric traction during abdominal surgery is mediated by cyclooxygenase-1

Our study aimed to determine the role of cyclooxygenase-2 in the release of prostaglandin-(PG)-I2 following mesenteric traction during abdominal surgery. In a prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 40 patients electively scheduled for non-laparoscopic abdominal surgery, were pretreated with the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor parecoxib (n=20) or placebo (n=20). Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, oxygenation ratio and plasma concentrations of the stable PGI2-metabolite 6-keto-PGF1alpha were compared between groups before injection of parecoxib (-40 min), immediately before mesenteric traction (0 min), and 5, 10, and 30 min thereafter. In addition, plasma concentrations of valdecoxib, the active metabolite of the prodrug parecoxib, were determined. Plasma concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1alpha and heart rate increased in both groups after mesenteric traction. There were no significant differences between groups at individual times in heart rate, arterial blood pressure and plasma concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1alpha. Oxygenation ratio decreased after 10 and 30 min following mesenteric traction in the parecoxib group with a significant difference between treatment groups at 10 and 30 min. Plasma concentrations of valdecoxib revealed therapeutic values. Our data indicate that PGI2 release following mesenteric traction is mediated by cyclooxygenase-1.

Vasopressor hormone response following mesenteric traction during major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

We investigated the vasopressor hormone response following mesenteric traction (MT) with hypotension due to prostacyclin (PGI2) release in patients undergoing abdominal surgery with a combined general and epidural anesthesia.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study we administered 400 mg ibuprofen (i.v.) in 42 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. General anesthesia was combined with epidural anesthesia (T4-L1). Before as well as 5, 15, 30, 45, and 90 min after MT we recorded plasma osmolality, hemodynamics and measured 6-keto-PGF1 alpha (stabile metabolite of PGI2), TXB2 (stabile metabolite of thromboxane A2) active renin, and arginine vasopressin (AVP) plasma concentrations by radioimmunoassay. Catecholamine levels were assessed by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection.

RESULTS

Following MT, arterial hypotension occurred along with a substantial PGI2 release. This was completely abolished by ibuprofen administration. Although plasma levels of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha (1133 (708) vs. 60 (3) ng/L, median (median absolute deviation), P = 0.0001, placebo vs. ibuprofen) remained significantly elevated, blood pressure was restored within 30 min after MT in the placebo group. At the same point in time plasma concentrations of TXB2 (164 (87) vs. 58 (1) ng/L, P = 0.0001), epinephrine (46 (33) vs. 14 (6) ng/L, P = 0.001), AVP (41 +/- (18) vs. 12 (7) ng/L, P = 0.0004), and active renin (27 (12) vs. 12 (4) ng/L, P = 0.001) were significantly higher in placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Under combined general and epidural anesthesia arterial hypotension following MT due to endogenous PGI2 release is associated with enhanced release of AVP, active renin, epinephrine and thromboxane A2, presumably contributing to hemodynamic stability within 30 min after MT.